APPLICATION OF THE PEREKREST METHOD FOR DIFFERENTIATING OPERATOR SPECIALISTS DEPENDING ON THE RELIABILITY OF THEIR ACTIVITIES

I. I Ziva; A. E Selivanov; S. A Avdushenko

doi:10.17816/rmmar43354

Russian Military Medical Academy Reports ›› 2020, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1-2S) :69 -71. DOI: 10.17816/rmmar43354

Articles

research-article

APPLICATION OF THE PEREKREST METHOD FOR DIFFERENTIATING OPERATOR SPECIALISTS DEPENDING ON THE RELIABILITY OF THEIR ACTIVITIES

Author information +

History +

PDF

Abstract

The current stage of development of society is characterized by the fact that the pace and rhythm of life is extremely high, and therefore the flows of incoming information, and they are voluminous and require quick and accurate analysis by a person, high-quality decision making in the shortest possible time. One of the urgent problems of the physiology of labor is the problem of evaluating the performance of operator-specific specialists. For a specialist in the operator profile, the reliability of activities and the presence of an adequate strategy for behavior in an “emergency” situation are of particular importance. The purpose of the study: to test the “Cross” method for differentiating specialist operators depending on the reliability of their operator activities and determining their strategy for behavior in an “emergency” situation. As a result of the study, it was revealed that the Perekrest technique allows differentiating specialists depending on the reliability of operator activity. The introduction of the “program malfunction” situation into the “cross” test procedure allows identifying individuals with constructive strategies for behavior in an “emergency” situation.

Keywords

safe / situation / medical specialist / reliability / environment / emergency situation

Cite this article

Download citation ▾

I. I Ziva, A. E Selivanov, S. A Avdushenko. APPLICATION OF THE PEREKREST METHOD FOR DIFFERENTIATING OPERATOR SPECIALISTS DEPENDING ON THE RELIABILITY OF THEIR ACTIVITIES. Russian Military Medical Academy Reports, 2020, 39(1-2S): 69-71 DOI:10.17816/rmmar43354

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户忘记密码

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within

[1]	1. Авдюшенко, С.А. Апробация методики «Перекрест» для оценки надежности и стратегии поведения в нештатной ситуации специалистов операторского профиля / И.И. Зива, А.Е. Селиванов, С.А. Авдюшенко, И.Т. Андреев // Известия Российской Военно-медицинской академии. - 2019. - №3. - С.187-190.

[2]	2. Ахутин, В.М. Инженерная физиология и моделирование систем организма / В.М. Ахутин, В.П. Нефедов, М.П. Сахаров. - Новосибирск: Наука, 1987.

[3]	3. Панов, Д.Ю. Инженерная психология / Д.Ю. Панов, В.П. Зинченко. - М.: Прогресс, 1964.

[4]	4. Бедельбаев, А.А. Адаптивные процедуры принятия решений в многокритериальных задачах / А.А. Бедельбаев, Ю.А. Дубов, Б.Л. Шмульян // Автоматика и телемеханика. - 1976. - №1. - С.136-145.

[5]	5. Зива, И.И. Эффективная эксплуатация судовых эргатических систем с переменной структурой и техническими отказами: автореф. дис. … канд. техн. наук: 05.22.19 / И.И. Зива. - Мурманск: Мурманский государственный технический университет, 2015. - 23 с.

[6]	6. Григорев, А.И. Физиология человека / А.И. Григорев, В.Д. Сонькин. - М.: Наука, 2019. - С.25-32.