State of oncology care in Russia: pancreatic cancer (C25). Diagnosis, prevalence, quality of patient registration, and annual mortality. Part 1. (clinical-population study)

Vakhtang M. Merabishvili , Sergey S. Bagnenko , Pavel V. Balakhnin , Ekaterina A. Busko , Alexander V. Pavlovsky , Vladislav E. Moiseenko , Vladimir V. Perelygin

Pharmacy Formulas ›› 2024, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (3) : 18 -35.

PDF
Pharmacy Formulas ›› 2024, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (3) : 18 -35. DOI: 10.17816/phf636928
Biomedical Sciences
research-article

State of oncology care in Russia: pancreatic cancer (C25). Diagnosis, prevalence, quality of patient registration, and annual mortality. Part 1. (clinical-population study)

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The study focuses on pancreatic cancer (C25), a malignant neoplasm arising from the ductal epithelium or glandular tissue of the pancreas, which accounts for 3% of the overall cancer incidence in Russia. The rates of incidence and mortality are rising, with the number of newly registered patients in Russia being lower than the number of recorded deaths, although the one-year mortality rate among patients is decreasing. The direct cause of pancreatic cancer (C25) remains unknown. Risk factors for developing this condition include genetics, smoking, alcohol abuse, a sedentary lifestyle, excessive meat consumption, and a lack of plant-based foods in the diet. Diseases associated with a high risk of this pathology include long-standing chronic pancreatitis, newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes in individuals aged 50-70, and cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. The aim of the study is to examine the patterns of incidence and mortality, the quality of patient registration, the characteristics of tumor localization, and the histological structure of pancreatic cancer (C25). The study will also track the nature of annual mortality among patients and explore the possibilities, methods, and techniques of modern diagnosis and treatment for these patients. The research confirmed the significant burden of pancreatic cancer (C25), primarily due to the late detection of this disease. The study provided sufficient material to analyze age-related risk factors, as well as the patterns of incidence and mortality in the population. It also examined and presented mortality rates among patients, including during the first year of observation.

Keywords

pancreatic cancer / morbidity / mortality / quality of accounting / diagnosis / malignant neoplasms / cancer treatment methods / oncological care

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Vakhtang M. Merabishvili, Sergey S. Bagnenko, Pavel V. Balakhnin, Ekaterina A. Busko, Alexander V. Pavlovsky, Vladislav E. Moiseenko, Vladimir V. Perelygin. State of oncology care in Russia: pancreatic cancer (C25). Diagnosis, prevalence, quality of patient registration, and annual mortality. Part 1. (clinical-population study). Pharmacy Formulas, 2024, 6(3): 18-35 DOI:10.17816/phf636928

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2022 (morbidity and mortality) / Kaprin A. D., Starinsky V. V., Shakhzadova A. O., Lisichnikova I. V. // Moscow: P. A. Hertsen MNIOI. – 2023. – 275 p. (In Russ).

[2]

Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2022 году (заболеваемость и смертность) / Под ред. А. Д. Каприна, В. В. Старинского, А. О. Шахзадовой, И. В. Лисичниковой. – М.: МНИОИ им. П. А. Герцена – филиал ФГБУ «НМИЦ радиологии» Минздрава России, 2023. ИЛЛ. – 275 с.

[3]

Shangina O. V. Descriptive, analytical and molecular epidemiology of pancreatic cancer / O. V. Shangina, D. M. Maksimovich, D. G. Zaridze // Siberian journal of oncology. – 2022. – Vol. 21, No. 3. – P. 90–103. – doi: 10.21294/1814-4861-2022-21-3-90-103. (In Russ).

[4]

Шаньгина О. В. Описательная, аналитическая и молекулярная эпидемиология рака поджелудочной железы / О. В. Шаньгина, Д. М. Максимович, Д. Г. Заридзе // Сибирский онкологический журнал. – 2022. – Т. 21, № 3. – С. 90–103. – doi: 10.21294/1814-4861-2022-21-3-90-103.

[5]

National Cancer Institute SEER Stat Fact Sheets: Pancreas Cancer [Internet] [cited 2007 Feb 21]. URL: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/pancreas.html

[6]

National Cancer Institute SEER Stat Fact Sheets: Pancreas Cancer [Internet] [cited 2007 Feb 21]. URL: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/pancreas.html.

[7]

GBD 2017 Pancreatic Cancer Collaborators. The global, regional, and national burden of pancreatic cancer and its attributable risk factors in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019; 4(12):934–947. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30347-4.

[8]

GBD 2017 Pancreatic Cancer Collaborators. The global, regional, and national burden of pancreatic cancer and its attributable risk factors in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019; 4(12): 934–947. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30347-4.

[9]

Capasso M., Franceschi M., Rodriguez-Castro K.I., Crafa P., Cambiè G., Miraglia C., Barchi A., Nouvenne A., Leandro G., Meschi T., De’ Angelis G.L., Di Mario F. Epidemiology and risk factors of pancreatic cancer. Acta Biomed. 2018; 89(9):141–146. doi: 10.23750/abm. v89i9-S.7923

[10]

Capasso M., Franceschi M., Rodriguez-Castro K. I., Crafa P., Cambiè G., Miraglia C., Barchi A., Nouvenne A., Leandro G., Meschi T., De’ Angelis G. L., Di Mario F. Epidemiology and risk factors of pancreatic cancer. Acta Biomed. 2018; 89(9):141–146. doi: 10.23750/abm.v89i9-S.7923.

[11]

Prokhorov A. V. Opukholi podzheludochnoi zhelezy: ucheb.-metod. posobie / A.V. Prokhorov, M.N. Shepet’ko, V.E. Papok; Belorus. gos. med. un-t, Kaf. onkologii. – Minsk: BGMU, 2013. – 32 p. (In Russ).

[12]

Прохоров А. В. Опухоли поджелудочной железы: учеб.-метод. пособие / А. В. Прохоров, М. Н. Шепетько, В. Е. Папок; Белорус. гос. мед. ун-т, Каф. онкологии. – Минск: БГМУ, 2013. – 32 с.

[13]

Siegel R. L., Miller K. D., Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020; 70(1): 7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590.

[14]

Siegel R. L., Miller K. D., Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020; 70(1):7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590.

[15]

Cancer Incidence in Five Continents. Volume XII. Registry Summary tables. https://ci5.iarc.fr/ci5-xii/tables/summary

[16]

Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2015 (morbidity and mortality) / Kaprin A. D., Sprinsky V. V., Petrova G. V. // Moscow: P. A. Hertsen MNIOI. – 2017. – 250 p. (In Russ).

[17]

Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2015 году (заболеваемость и смертность) / Под ред. А. Д. Каприна, В. В. Спринского, Г. В. Петровой. – М.: МНИОИ им. П. А. Герцена – филиал ФГБУ «НМИЦ радиологии» Минздрава России, 2017. – 250 с.

[18]

Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2010 (morbidity and mortality) / Chissov V. I., Starinsky V. V., Petrova G. V. // Moscow: P.A. Hertsen MNIOI. – 2012. – 260 p. (In Russ).

[19]

Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2010 году (заболеваемость и смертность) / Под ред. В. И. Чиссова, В. В. Старинского, Г. В. Петровой – М.: МНИОИ им. П. А. Герцена, 2012. – 260 с.

[20]

Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2019 (morbidity and mortality) / Kaprin A. D., Starinsky V. V., Shakhzadova A. O. // Moscow: P. A. Hertsen MNIOI. – 2020. – 214 p. (In Russ).

[21]

Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2019 году (заболеваемость и смертность) / Под ред. А. Д. Каприна, В. В. Старинского, А. О. Шахзадовой. – М.: МНИОИ им. П. А. Герцена – филиал ФГБУ «НМИЦ радиологии» Минздрава России, 2020. – 214 c.

[22]

Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2020 (morbidity and mortality) / Kaprin A. D., Starinsky V. V, Shakhzadova A. O. // Moscow: P. A. Hertsen MNIOI. – 2021. – 252 p. (In Russ).

[23]

Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2020 году (заболеваемость и смертность) / Под ред. А. Д. Каприна, В. В. Старинского, А. О. Шахзадовой. – М.: МНИОИ им. П. А. Герцена – филиал ФГБУ «НМИЦ радиологии» Минздрава России, 2021. – 252 с.

[24]

Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2021 (morbidity and mortality) / Kaprin A. D., Starinsky V. V., A. O. Shakhzadova // Moscow: P. A. Hertsen MNIOI. – 2022. – 252 p. (In Russ).

[25]

Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2021 году (заболеваемость и смертность) / Под ред. А. Д. Каприна, В. В. Старинского, А. О. Шахзадовой. – М.: МНИОИ им. П. А. Герцена – филиал ФГБУ «НМИЦ радиологии» Минздрава России, 2022. – 252 с.

[26]

Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2000 (morbidity and mortality) / Chissov V.I., Starinsky V.V. // Moscow: P. A. Hertsen MNIOI. 2002:264. (In Russ).

[27]

Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2000 году (заболеваемость и смертность) / Под ред. В. И. Чиссова, В. В. Старинского. – М.: МНИОИ им. П. А. Герцена, 2002. – 264 с.

[28]

Merabishvili V. M. Analytical indicators. accounting reliability index / V. M. Merabishvili // Issues of oncology. – 2018. – Vol. 64, No. 3. – P. 445–452. (In Russ).

[29]

Мерабишвили В. М. Аналитические показатели. индекс достоверности учета / В. М. Мерабишвили // Вопросы онкологии. – 2018. – Т. 64, № 3. – С. 445–452.

[30]

Merabishvili V. M. The index of reliability of accounting is the most important criterion for an objective assessment of the activities of the oncology service for all localizations of malignant neoplasms, regardless of the mortality rate of patients / V. M. Merabishvili // Issues of oncology. – 2019. – Vol. 65, No. 4. – P. 510–515. (In Russ).

[31]

Мерабишвили В. М. Индекс достоверности учета-важнейший критерий объективной оценки деятельности онкологической службы для всех локализаций ЗНО, независимо от уровня летальности больных / В. М. Мерабишвили // Вопросы онкологии. – 2019. – Т. 65, № 4. – С. 510–515.

[32]

Merabishvili V. M. Analytical indicators. Annual mortality of patients with malignant neoplasms in each year of observation / V. M. Merabishvili // Issues of Oncology. – 2021. – Vol. 67, No. 1. – P. 44–50. – doi: 10.37469/0507-3758-2021-67-1-44-50. (In Russ).

[33]

Мерабишвили В. М. Аналитические показатели. Погодичная летальность больных злокачественными новообразованиями на каждом году наблюдения / В. М. Мерабишвили // Вопросы онкологии. – 2021. – Т. 67, № 1. – С. 44–50. – doi: 10.37469/0507-3758-2021-67-1-44-50.

[34]

Merabishvili V. M. Mediko-statisticheskii terminologicheskii slovar’: metodicheskoe posobie dlya vrachei, ordinatorov, aspirantov i nauchnykh sotrudnikov. Izdanie vtoroe, dopolnennoe terminami, illyustratsiyami i avtorskimi kommentariyami. – M., Vol. 8. Izdatel’skie tekhnologii, 2021. – 120 p. (In Russ).

[35]

Мерабишвили В. М. Медико-статистический терминологический словарь: методическое пособие для врачей, ординаторов, аспирантов и научных сотрудников. Издание второе, дополненное терминами, иллюстрациями и авторскими комментариями. – М., Т 8. Издательские технологии, 2021. – 120 с.

[36]

Yamashita Y., Shimokawa T., Ashida R., Dietrich C. F., D’Onofrio M., Hirooka Y., Kudo M., Mori H., Sofuni A., Kitano M. Value of Low-Mechanical-Index Contrast-Enhanced Transabdominal Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer: A Meta-analysis. ltrasound Med Biol. 2021;47(12): 3315–3322. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.08.005.

[37]

Yamashita Y., Shimokawa T., Ashida R., Dietrich C. F., D’Onofrio M., Hirooka Y., Kudo M., Mori H., Sofuni A., Kitano M. Value of Low-Mechanical-Index Contrast-Enhanced Transabdominal Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer: A Meta-analysis. ltrasound Med Biol. 2021; 47(12): 3315–3322. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.08.005.

[38]

Mikhetko A. A. Endoscopic endosonography with fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of pancreatic tumors / A. A. Mikhetko, A. S. Artemyeva, O. V. Ivko [et al.] // Issues of oncology. – 2021. – Vol. 67, No. 3. – P. 397–404. – doi: 10.37469/0507-3758-2021-67-3-397-404. (In Russ).

[39]

Михетько А. А. Эндоскопическая эндосонография с тонкоигольной аспирационной биопсией в диагностике опухолей поджелудочной железы / А. А. Михетько, А. С. Артемьева, О. В. Ивко [и др.] // Вопросы онкологии. – 2021. – Т. 67, № 3. – С. 397–404. – doi: 10.37469/0507-3758-2021-67-3-397-404.

[40]

Shin C. M., Villa E. The efficiency of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) combined with EUS elastography for pancreatic cancer diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasonography. 2023;42(1): 20–30. doi: 10.14366/usg.22103.

[41]

Hassan G. M., Laporte L., Paquin S. C., Menard C., Sahai A. V., Mâsse B., Trottier H. Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration versus Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Biopsy for Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(12):2951. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12122951.

[42]

Hassan G. M., Laporte L., Paquin S. C., Menard C., Sahai A. V., Mâsse B., Trottier H. Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration versus Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Biopsy for Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(12): 2951. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12122951.

[43]

Paramythiotis D., Karlafti E., Tsavdaris D., Arvanitakis K., Protopapas A. A., Germanidis G., Kougias L., Hatzidakis A., Savopoulos C., Michalopoulos A. Comparative Assessment of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biopsies vs. Percutaneous Biopsies of Pancreatic Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance. J Clin Med. 2024;13(11):3108. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113108.

[44]

Paramythiotis D., Karlafti E., Tsavdaris D., Arvanitakis K., Protopapas A. A., Germanidis G., Kougias L., Hatzidakis A., Savopoulos C., Michalopoulos A. Comparative Assessment of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biopsies vs. Percutaneous Biopsies of Pancreatic Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance. J Clin Med. 2024; 13(11):3108. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113108.

[45]

Kudryavtseva A. V. CT and MRI in the assessment of resectable and conditionally resectable pancreatic tumors / A. V. Kudryavtseva, S. S. Bagnenko, I. I. Dzidzava [et al.] // Annals of Surgical Hepatology. – 2021. – Vol. 26, No. 1. – P. 34–47. – doi: 10.16931/1995-5464.2021134-47. (In Russ).

[46]

Кудрявцева А. В. КТ и МРТ в оценке резектабельных и условно резектабельных опухолей поджелудочной железы / А. В. Кудрявцева, С. С. Багненко, И. И. Дзидзава [и др.] // Анналы хирургической гепатологии. – 2021. – Т. 26, № 1. – С. 34–47. – doi: 10.16931/1995-5464.2021134-47.

[47]

Nesterov D. V. Dynamic computed tomography in patients with pancreatic cancer. Evaluation of perfusion in the tumor and in the parenchyma of the gland outside it / D. V. Nesterov, E. V. Rosenhaus // Medical visualization. – 2014. – No. 2. – P. 68–74. (In Russ).

[48]

Нестеров Д. В. Динамическая компьютерная томография у больных раком поджелудочной железы. Оценка перфузии в опухоли и в паренхиме железы вне ее / Д. В. Нестеров, Е. В. Розенгауз // Медицинская визуализация. – 2014. – № 2. – С. 68–74

[49]

Badgery H. E., Muhlen-Schulte T., Zalcberg J. R., D’souza B., Gerstenmaier J. F., Pickett C., Samra J., Croagh D., Pancreatic Cancer Image Biobank Authorship Group. Determination of “borderline resectable” pancreatic cancer – A global assessment of 30 shades of grey. HPB (Oxford). 2023; 25(11):1393–1401. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.07.883.

[50]

Badgery H. E., Muhlen-Schulte T., Zalcberg J. R., D’souza B., Gerstenmaier J. F., Pickett C., Samra J., Croagh D., Pancreatic Cancer Image Biobank Authorship Group. Determination of «borderline resectable» pancreatic cancer – A global assessment of 30 shades of grey. HPB (Oxford). 2023; 25(11):1393–1401. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.07.883.

[51]

Yan X., Lv K., Xiao M., Tan L., Gui Y., Zhang J., Chen X., Jia W., Li J. The diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus contrast-enhanced computed tomography for pancreatic carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl Cancer Res. 2022;11(10): 3645–3656. doi: 10.21037/tcr-22-601.

[52]

Yan X., Lv K., Xiao M., Tan L., Gui Y., Zhang J., Chen X., Jia W., Li J. The diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus contrast-enhanced computed tomography for pancreatic carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl Cancer Res. 2022; 11(10): 3645–3656. doi: 10.21037/tcr-22-601.

[53]

Rahman M. I. O., Chan B. P. H., Far P. M., Mbuagbaw L., Thabane L., Yaghoobi M. Endoscopic ultrasound versus computed tomography in determining the resectability of pancreatic cancer: A diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis. 2020;26(3):113–119. doi: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_39_20.

[54]

Rahman M. I. O., Chan B. P. H., Far P. M., Mbuagbaw L., Thabane L., Yaghoobi M. Endoscopic ultrasound versus computed tomography in determining the resectability of pancreatic cancer: A diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis. 2020; 26(3):113–119. doi: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_39_20.

[55]

Alabousi M., McInnes M. D., Salameh J-P., Satkunasingham J., Kagoma Y. K., Ruo L., Meyers B. M., Aziz T., Pol C. B. MRI vs. CT for the Detection of Liver Metastases in Patients With Pancreatic Carcinoma: A Comparative Diagnostic Test Accuracy Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021;53(1):38–48. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27056.

[56]

Alabousi M., McInnes M. D., Salameh J-P., Satkunasingham J., Kagoma Y. K., Ruo L., Meyers B. M., Aziz T., Pol C. B. MRI vs. CT for the Detection of Liver Metastases in Patients With Pancreatic Carcinoma: A Comparative Diagnostic Test Accuracy Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021; 53(1):38–48. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27056.

[57]

Ikuta Y., Takamori H., Ikeda O., Tanaka H., Sakamoto Y., Hashimoto D., Ozaki N., Nakahara O., Furuhashi S., Abe S., Beppu T., Shimada S., Yamashita Y., Baba H. Detection of liver metastases secondary to pancreatic cancer: utility of combined helical computed tomography during arterial portography with biphasic computed tomography-assisted hepatic arteriography. J Gastroenterol. 2010;45(12): 1241–1246. doi: 10.1007/s00535-010-0285-6.

[58]

Ikuta Y., Takamori H., Ikeda O., Tanaka H., Sakamoto Y., Hashimoto D., Ozaki N., Nakahara O., Furuhashi S., Abe S., Beppu T., Shimada S., Yamashita Y., Baba H. Detection of liver metastases secondary to pancreatic cancer: utility of combined helical computed tomography during arterial portography with biphasic computed tomography-assisted hepatic arteriography. J Gastroenterol. 2010; 45(12): 1241–6. doi: 10.1007/s00535-010-0285-6.

[59]

Balakhnin P. V. The nature and perfusion dynamics of peritumoral ring contrast enhancement of small (5–9 mm) and very small (<5 mm) hypovascular liver metastases: Analysis of dynamic CT arteriohepaticography data / P. V. Balakhnin, A. S. Shmelev, E. G. Shachinov [et al.] // Practical oncology. – 2017. – Vol. 18, No. S1. – P. 58–78. (In Russ).

[60]

Балахнин П. В. Природа и перфузионная динамика перитуморального кольцевого контрастирования мелких (5–9 мм) и очень мелких (<5 мм) гиповаскулярных метастазов в печени: Анализ данных динамической КТ-артериогепатикографии / П. В. Балахнин, А. С. Шмелев, Е. Г. Шачинов [и др.] // Практическая онкология. – 2017. – Т. 18, № S 1. – С. 58–78.

[61]

Trufanov G. E. Radiation diagnostics of pancreatic diseases: normal radiation anatomy of the pancreas, description of radiation semiotics of diseases and injuries of the pancreas, tactics of radiation examination, issues of etiology, pathogenesis, morphology and clinical manifestations of diseases / G. E. Trufanov, S. D. Rud, S. S. Bagnenko; G. E. Trufanov, S. D. Rud, S. S. Bagnenko. – 2nd ed., corrected. – St. Petersburg: ELBI-SPb, 2011. – 287 p. – (Briefs of a radiation diagnostician). – ISBN 978-5-93979-235-6. (In Russ).

[62]

Труфанов Г. Е. Лучевая диагностика заболеваний поджелудочной железы: нормальная лучевая анатомия поджелудочной железы, описание лучевой семиотики заболеваний и повреждений поджелудочной железы, тактика лучевого исследования, вопросы этиологии, патогенеза, морфологии и клинические проявления заболеваний / Г. Е. Труфанов, С. Д. Рудь, С. С. Багненко; Г. Е. Труфанов, С. Д. Рудь, С. С. Багненко. – Изд. 2-е, испр. – Санкт-Петербург: ЭЛБИ-СПб, 2011. – 287 с. – (Конспект лучевого диагноста). – ISBN 978-5-93979-235-6.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Eco-Vector

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

284

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/