Diseases and abnormalities of the nipple-areolar complex: a case report series

Abstract

The nipple–areolar complex is a specific anatomical and histological structure. Normal structure and pathological process variabilities and the complexity of diagnostic imaging cause difficulties for radiologists and physicians. Breast magnetic resonance imaging is highly sensitive for structural features and nipple-areolar complex cancer detection. Magnetic resonance imaging is a useful diagnostic tool when mammography and ultrasound findings are inconclusive. It allows visualization of the retroareolar region, suitable for the diagnosis of papillomas, adenomas, Paget’s disease, ductal carcinoma in situ, and invasive ductal carcinoma.

This is a case report on identifying the pathology and anomalies of the nipple-areolar complex, which may benefit radiologists, gynecologists, and residents.

Keywords

case report / breast disease / nipple-areolar complex / mammography

References

[1] Stone K, Wheeler A. A Review of anatomy, physiology, and benign pathology of the nipple. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(10):3236–3240. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4760-4

[2] Stone K., Wheeler A. A review of anatomy, physiology, and benign pathology of the nipple // Ann Surg Oncol. 2015. Vol. 22, N 10. P. 3236–3240. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4760-4

[3] Reisenbichler E, Hanley KZ. Seminars in diagnostic pathology developmental disorders and malformations of the breast. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2019;36(1):11–15. doi: 10.1053/j.semdp.2018.11.007

[4] Reisenbichler E., Hanley K.Z. Seminars in diagnostic pathology developmental disorders and malformations of the breast // Semin Diagn Pathol. 2019. Vol. 36, N 1. P. 11–15. doi: 10.1053/j.semdp.2018.11.007

[5] Liao CY, Wu YT, Wu WP, et al. Role of breast magnetic resonance imaging in predicting malignant invasion of the nipple-areolar complex: Potential predictors and reliability between inter-observers. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(28):e7170. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007170

[6] Liao C.Y., Wu Y.T., Wu W.P., et al. Role of breast magnetic resonance imaging in predicting malignant invasion of the nipple-areolar complex: Potential predictors and reliability between inter-observers // Medicine (Baltimore). 2017. Vol. 96, N 28. P. e7170. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007170

[7] Milon A, Wahab CA, Kermarrec E, et al. Breast MRI: Is faster better? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020;214(2):282–95. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21924

[8] Milon A., Wahab C.A., Kermarrec E., et al. Breast MRI: Is faster better? // AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020. Vol. 214, N 2. P. 282–295. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21924

[9] Acrpractice parameterfor the performance of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast. AcoR; 2018. Available from: https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Practice-Parameters/MR-Contrast-Breast.pdf. Accessed: 15.01.2023.

[10] Acrpractice parameterfor the performance of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast. ACoR, 2018. Режим доступа: https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Practice-Parameters/MR-Contrast-Breast.pdf. Дата обращения: 15.01.2023.

[11] Lee SJ, Trikha S, Moy L, et al. ACR appropriateness criteria evaluation of nipple discharge. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(5s):S138–53. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.01.030

[12] Lee S.J., Trikha S., Moy L., et al. ACR appropriateness criteria evaluation of nipple discharge // J Am Coll Radiol. 2017. Vol. 14, N 5s. P. 138–153. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.01.030

[13] Ferris-James DM, Iuanow E, Mehta TS, et al. Imaging approaches to diagnosis and management of common ductal abnormalities. Radiographics. 2012;32(4):1009–1030. doi: 10.1148/rg.324115150

[14] Ferris-James D.M., Iuanow E., Mehta T.S., et al. Imaging approaches to diagnosis and management of common ductal abnormalities // Radiographics. 2012. Vol. 32, N 4. P. 1009–1030. doi: 10.1148/rg.324115150

[15] Del Riego J, Pitarch M, Codina C, et al. Multimodality approach to the nipple-areolar complex: A pictorial review and diagnostic algorithm. Insights Imaging. 2020 5;11(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13244-020-00896-1

[16] Del Riego J., Pitarch M., Codina C., et al. Multimodality approach to the nipple-areolar complex: A pictorial review and diagnostic algorithm // Insights Imaging. 2020. Vol. 11, N 4. P. 89. doi: 10.1186/s13244-020-00896-1

[17] Yoon JH, Yoon H, Kim EK, et al. Ultrasonographic evaluation of women with pathologic nipple discharge. Ultrasonography. 2017;36(4):310–320. doi: 10.14366/usg.17013

[18] Yoon J.H., Yoon H., Kim E.K., et al. Ultrasonographic evaluation of women with pathologic nipple discharge // Ultrasonography. 2017. Vol. 36, N 4. P. 310–320. doi: 10.14366/usg.17013

[19] Horvat JV, Keating DM, Rodrigues-Duarte H, et al. Calcifications at digital breast tomosynthesis: Imaging features and biopsy techniques. Radiographics. 2019;39(2):307–318. doi: 10.1148/rg.2019180124

[20] Huppe A.I., Overman K.L., Gatewood J.B., et al. Mammography positioning standards in the digital era: Is the status quo acceptable? // AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017. Vol. 209, N 6. P. 1419–1425. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.17522

[21] Huppe AI, Overman KL, Gatewood JB, et al. Mammography positioning standards in the digital era: Is the status quo acceptable? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209(6):1419–1425. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.17522

[22] Horvat J.V., Keating D.M., Rodrigues-Duarte H., et al. Calcifications at digital breast tomosynthesis: imaging features and biopsy techniques // Radiographics. 2019. Vol. 39, N 2. P. 307–318. doi: 10.1148/rg.2019180124

[23] Gao Y, Brachtel EF, Hernandez O, Heller SL. An analysis of nipple enhancement at breast MRI with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2019;39(1):10–27. doi: 10.1148/rg.2019180039

[24] Gao Y., Brachtel E.F., Hernandez O., Heller S.L. An analysis of nipple enhancement at breast MRI with radiologic-pathologic correlation // Radiographics. 2019. Vol. 39, N 1. P. 10–27. doi: 10.1148/rg.2019180039

[25] Lim HS, Jeong SJ, Lee JS, et al. Paget disease of the breast: Mammographic, US, and MR Imaging findings with pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2011;31(7):1973–1987. doi: 10.1148/rg.317115070

[26] Lim H.S., Jeong S.J., Lee J.S., et al. Paget disease of the breast: Mammographic, US, and MR Imaging findings with pathologic correlation // Radiographics. 2011. Vol. 31, N 7. P. 1973–1987. doi: 10.1148/rg.317115070

[27] Geffroy D, Doutriaux-Dumoulins I. Clinical abnormalities of the nipple-areola complex: The role of imaging. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2015;96(10):1033–1044. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2015.07.001

[28] Geffroy D., Doutriaux-Dumoulins I. Clinical abnormalities of the nipple-areola complex: The role of imaging // Diagn Interv Imaging. 2015. Vol. 96, N 10. P. 1033–1044. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2015.07.001

[29] Moon JY, Chang YW, Lee EH, Seo DY. Malignant invasion of the nipple-areolar complex of the breast: Usefulness of breast MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201(2):448–455. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9186

[30] Moon J.Y., Chang Y.W., Lee E.H., Seo D.Y. Malignant invasion of the nipple-areolar complex of the breast: Usefulness of breast MRI // AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013. Vol. 201, N 2. P. 448–455. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9186

[31] Maksimov DA, Sergeev AN, Morozov AM, et al. About modern types of surgical treatment for breast cancer (literature review). Journal of new medical technologies, eEdition. 2021;(1):7–13. (In Russ). doi: 10.24412/2075-4094-2021-1-1-1

[32] Максимов Д.А., Сергеев А.Н., Морозов А.М., и др. О современных видах хирургического лечения рака молочной железы (обзор литературы) // Вестник новых медицинских технологий. Электронное издание. 2021. № 1. С. 7–13. doi: 10.24412/2075-4094-2021-1-1-1

[33] Zikiryakhodzhaev AD, Volchenko NN, Saribekyan EK, Rasskazova EA. Lesion of the nipple-areola complex in patients with breast cancer. Problems in oncology. 2017;63(4):593–597. (In Russ).

[34] Зикиряходжаев А.Д., Волченко Н.Н., Сарибекян Э.К., Рассказова Е.А. Поражение сосково-ареолярного комплекса при раке молочной железы // Вопросы онкологии. 2017. Т. 63, № 4. С. 593–597.

[35] Levchuk AL, Khodyrev SA, Shabaev RM. Current state of breast reconstructive surgery. Bulletin of Pirogov National Medical & Surgical Center. 2021;16(2):122–127. (In Russ). doi: 10.25881/20728255-2021-16-2-122

[36] Левчук А.Л., Ходырев С.А., Шабаев Р.М. Современное состояние реконструктивно-восстановительной хирургии молочных желёз // Вестник Национального медико-хирургического центра им. Н.И. Пирогова. 2021. Т. 16, № 2. С. 122–127. doi: 10.25881/20728255-2021-16-2-122

[37] Berger N, Luparia A, Di Leo G, et al. Diagnostic performance of MRI versus galactography in women with pathologic nipple discharge: A systematic review and meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209(2):465–471. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16682

[38] Berger N., Luparia A., Di Leo G., et al. Diagnostic performance of MRI versus galactography in women with pathologic nipple discharge: A systematic review and meta-analysis // AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017. Vol. 209, N 2. P. 465–471. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16682

[39] Sripathi S, Ayachit A, Kadavigere R, et al. Spectrum of imaging findings in Paget’s disease of the breast: A pictorial review. Insights Imaging. 2015;6(4):419–429. doi: 10.1007/s13244-015-0415-z

[40] Sripathi S., Ayachit A., Kadavigere R., et al. Spectrum of imaging findings in Paget’ s disease of the breast: A pictorial review // Insights Imaging. 2015. Vol. 6, N 4. P. 419–429. doi: 10.1007/s13244-015-0415-z

[41] Da Costa D, Taddese A, Cure ML, et al. Common and unusual diseases of the nipple-areolar complex. Radiographics. 2007;27(Suppl. 1):S65–S77. doi: 10.1148/rg.27si075512

[42] Da Costa D., Taddese A., Cure M.L., et al. Common and unusual diseases of the nipple-areolar complex // Radiographics. 2007. Vol. 27, Suppl. 1. P. S65–S77. doi: 10.1148/rg.27si075512

[43] Alhayo ST, Edirimanne S. Clinically challenging case of nipple adenoma. Breast J. 2018;24(6):1084–1085. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13089

[44] Alhayo S.T., Edirimanne S. Clinically challenging case of nipple adenoma // Breast J. 2018. Vol. 24, N 6. P. 1084–1085. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13089

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Eco-Vector