EEG alpha band characteristics in patients with a depressive episode within recurrent and bipolar depression

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The search for biological markers for the differential diagnosis of recurrent depression and bipolar depression is an important undertaking in modern psychiatry. Electroencephalography (EEG) is one of the promising tools in addressing this challenge.

AIM: To identify differences in the quantitative characteristics of the electroencephalographic alpha band activity in patients with a depressive episode within the framework of recurrent depression and bipolar depression.

METHODS: Two groups of patients (all women) were formed: one consisting of subjects with recurrent depressive disorder and one with subjects experiencing a current mild/moderate episode (30 patients), and subjects with bipolar affective disorder or a current episode of mild or moderate depression (30 patients). The groups did not receive pharmacotherapy and did not differ in their socio-demographic parameters or total score on the Hamilton depression scale. A baseline electroencephalogram was recorded, and the quantitative characteristics of the alpha band activity were analyzed, including the absolute spectral power, interhemispheric coherence, and EEG activation.

RESULTS: The patients with recurrent depressive disorder demonstrated statistically significantly lower values of the average absolute spectral power of the alpha band (z=2.481; p=0.042), as well as less alpha attenuation from eyes closed to eyes open (z=2.573; p=0.035), as compared with the patients with bipolar affective disorder.

CONCLUSION: The presented quantitative characteristics of alpha activity are confirmation that patients with affective disorders of different origins also display distinctive electrophysiological features which can become promising biomarkers and could help separate bipolar depression from the recurrent type.

Keywords

electroencephalogram / alpha rhythm / recurrent depression / bipolar depression / biomarkers

References

[1] Tyuvina NA, Korobkova IG. Comparative clinical characteristics of depression in bipolar affective disorders types I and II. Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2016;8(1):22-28. doi: 10.14412/2074-2711-2016-1-22-28. Russian.

[2] Mitchell PB, Frankland A, Hadzi-Pavlovic D, Roberts G, Corry J, Wright A, Loo CK, Breakspear M. Comparison of depressive episodes in bipolar disorder and in major depressive disorder within bipolar disorder pedigrees. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 2011;199(4):303-309. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.088823.

[3] Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. [Bipolar affective disorder]. Clinical Guidelines; 2021, 161 p. Russian.

[4] Avedisova AS, Marachev MP. Clinical typology of atypical depression in bipolar and unipolar affective disorders. Zhurnal Nevrologii i Psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova. 2012;112(3):18-23. Russian.

[5] Martynikhin IA. The use of ICD-10 for diagnosing mental disorders in Russia, according to national statistics and a survey of psychiatrists’ experience. Consortium Psychiatricum. 2021;2(2):35-44. doi: 10.17816/CP69.

[6] Shamrey VK, Kurasov ES, Zobin YS, Tsygan NV. Possibilities of using laboratory biomarkers for the objective diagnosis of depressive disorders. Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2021;13(2):34-39. doi: 10.14412/2074-2711-2021-2-34-39. Russian.

[7] Tamatam A, Khanum F, Bawa AS. Genetic biomarkers of depression. Indian Journal of Human Genetics. 2012;18(1):20-33. doi: 10.4103/0971-6866.96639.

[8] Zhao S, Bao Z, Zhao X, Xu M, Li MD, Yang Z. Identification of Diagnostic Markers for Major Depressive Disorder Using Machine Learning Methods. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2021;15:645998. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.645998.

[9] Wang H, Zhang M, Xie Q, Yu J, Qi Y, Yue Q. Identification of diagnostic markers for major depressive disorder by cross-validation of data from whole blood samples. PeerJ. 2019;7:e7171. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7171.

[10] Mnatsakanian EV, Kryukov VV, Antipova OS, Krasnov VN. Emotional Modulation of visual brain responses during classical conditioning in patients with recurrent vs. bipolar depression. Doctor.ru. 2019;6(161):47-52. doi: 10.31550/1727-2378-2019-161-6-47-52. Russian.

[11] Lapin IA, Mitrofanov AA. Use of mathematical analysis of EEG records for the purpose of differential diagnosis of uni- and bipolar depression (on example of discriminant analysis of power spectrum, coherence and hemispheric asymmetry parameters). Russian Society of Psychiatrists. 2017;27(2):69-74. Russian.

[12] Kesebir S, Yosmaoğlu A. QEEG in affective disorder: about to be a biomarker, endophenotype and predictor of treatment response. Heliyon. 2018;4(8):e00741. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00741.

[13] Galkin SA, Ryazantseva UV, Simutkin GG, Ivanova SA, Bokhan NA. Possible neurophysiological markers for the differential diagnosis of bipolar and unipolar affective disorders. Siberian Herald of Psychiatry and Addiction Psychiatry. 2021;113(4):14–21. doi: 10.26617/1810-3111-2021-4(113)-14-21. Russian.

[14] Galkin SA, Bokhan NA. The differential diagnosis of unipolar and bipolar depression based on EEG signals. Zhurnal Nevrologii i Psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova. 2022;122(11):51-56. doi: 10.17116/jnevro202212211151. Russian.

[15] Margarette Sanchez M, Borden L, Alam N, Noroozi A, Ravan M, Flor-Henry P, Hasey G. A Machine learning algorithm to discriminating between bipolar and major depressive disorders based on resting EEG data. Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). 2022;2022:2635-2638. doi: 10.1109/EMBC48229.2022.9871453.

[16] Ravan M, Noroozi A, Sanchez MM, Borden L, Alam N, Flor-Henry P, Hasey G. Discriminating between bipolar and major depressive disorder using a machine learning approach and resting-state EEG data. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2023;146:30-39. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2022.11.014.

[17] Galkin SA, Peshkovskaya AG, Simutkin GG, Vasilieva SN, Roshchina OV, Ivanova SA, Bokhan NA. Impairments to the functions of spatial working memory in mild depression and their neurophysiological correlates. Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology. 2020;50(7):825-829. doi: 10.1007/s11055-020-00973-4.

[18] Bazanova OM. Electroencephalogram Alpha Activity: Modern Interpretations. Uspekhi fiziologicheskih nauk. 2009;40(3):32-53. Russian.

[19] Schurmann M, Basar E. Alpha oscillations shed new light on relation between EEG and single neurons. Neuroscience Research. 1999;33(2):79-80. doi: 10.1016/s0168-0102(98)00116-3.

[20] Galkin SA, Vasilyeva SN, Simutkin GG, Bokhan NA. Quantitative characteristics of the alpha-rhythm of the electroencephalogram in depressive disorders. Neurology Bulletin. 2021;LIII(3):19-25. doi: 10.17816/nb77773.

[21] Luders HO, Noachtar S. Atlas and Classification of Electroencephalography. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2000.

[22] Doletskiy AN, Dokuchaev DA, Lata AA. Opinion transformation in mechanism of generation and physiological interpretation of the EEG alpha rhythm. Volgograd Journal of Medical Research. 2019;(1):14-19. Russian.

[23] Kirschfeld K. The physical basis of alpha waves in the electroencephalogram and the origin of the “Berger effect”. Biological Cybernetics. 2005;92(3):177-85. doi: 10.1007/s00422-005-0547-1.

[24] Cukic M, Stokic M, Radenkovic S, Ljubisavljevic M, Simic S, Savic D. Nonlinear analysis of EEG complexity in episode and remission phase of recurrent depression. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research. 2020;29(2):e1816. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1816.

[25] Xiao R, Shida-Tokeshi J, Vanderbilt DL, Smith BA. Electroencephalography power and coherence changes with age and motor skill development across the first half year of life. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0190276. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190276.

[26] Murias M, Webb SJ, Greenson J, Dawson G. Resting state cortical connectivity reflected in EEG coherence in individuals with autism. Biological Psychiatry. 2007;62(3):270-273. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.11.012.

Funding

Russian Science FoundationРоссийский научный фонд(22–15–00084)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Bokhan N.A., Galkin S.A., Vasilyeva S.N.