Comments on the article “Dialogical structure of the brain and the ternary system of the mind: the neurosemiotics of Yuri Lotman”

References

[1] Sanna M. Dialogical Structure of the Brain and the Ternary System of the Mind: The Neurosemiotics of Yuri Lotman. Consortium PSYCHIATRICUM. 2025;6(1):CP15606. doi: 10.17816/CP15606

[2] Kostina AV. [Main features of postnonclassical science and philosophy. Materials for the courses “Philosophy”, “Theory and Methodology of Culture”]. Uchenyj sovet. 2019;(12):52–59. Russian.

[3] Luria AR. [Higher cortical functions of man]. Saint-Petersburg: Piter; 2020. p. 528–601. Russian.

[4] Lotman YM. [Articles on semiotics and topology of culture]. In: Yu. Lotman YM. Izbrannye stat’i: v 3 tomah. Tallinn: Alexandra; 1992. Vol. I. Russian.

[5] Lotman M. Umwelt and semiosphere. Sign Systems Studies. 2002;30(1):33–40. doi: 10.12697/SSS.2002.30.1.03

[6] Lotman YM. From the editors. To the problem of spatial semiotics // Works on sign systems. Tartu, 1986. Vyp. 720. С. 3. Russian.

[7] Anokhin KV. The Cognitome: Seeking the Fundamental Neuroscience of a Theory of Consciousness. Neurosci Behav Physi. 2021; 51:915–937. doi: 10.1007/s11055-021-01149-4

[8] Anokhin KV. [Cognitome: hypernetwork model of the brain]. In: Trofimov AG, editor. Nejroinformatika-2015: XVII Vserossijskaja nauchno-tehnicheskaja konferencija s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem: sbornik nauchnyh trudov: [v 3 ch.]. Moscow: MIFI; 2015. p. 14–15. Russian.

[9] Chalmers DJ. The conscious mind: in search of a fun damental theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996. 432 p.

[10] Chalmers DJ. The character of consciousness. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010. 596 p.

[11] Shvyrkov VB. [Introduction to Objective Psychology. Neural bases of psyche: selected works]. Moscow: Institut psihologii Rossijskoj akademii nauk; 2006. 592 p. Russian.

[12] Handy ТC, Gazzaniga MS, Ivry RB. Cortical and subcortical contributions to the representation of temporal information. Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(11):1461–1473. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(03)00093-9

[13] Eckstein K, Friederici AD. It’s early: event-related potential evidence for initial interaction of syntax and prosody in speech comprehension. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006;18(10):1696–1711. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.10.1696

[14] Friederici AD, von Cramon DY, Kotz SA. Role of the corpus callosum in speech comprehension: interfacing syntax and prosody. Neuron. 2007;53(1):135–145. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.11.020

[15] Vigneau, M., Beaucousin, V., Herve, P. Y., et al. (2006). Metaanalyzing left hemisphere language areas: Phonology, semantics, and sentence processing. Neuroimage, 30(4), 1414–1432.

[16] Anikina VG. [Ideas of M.K. Mamardashvili and cultural and dialogical understanding of reflexion]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Serija 14, Psihologija. 2015;(4):114–122. Russian.

[17] Mamardashvili MK. [How I understand philosophy]. Moscow: Progress; 1990. 241 p. Russian.

[18] Mamardashvili MK. [Lectures on ancient philosophy]. Saint-Petersburg: Azbuka; 2018. 300 p. Russian.

[19] Vygotsky LS. [Thinking and speech]. In: Vygotsky LS. Sobranie sochinenij: v 6-ti tomah. Moscow: Pedagogika; 1982. Vol. 2. p. 5–361. Russian.

[20] Zaidel E, Kasher A, Soroker N, [et al.] Hemispheric contributions to pragmatics. Brain Cogn. 2000;43(1–3):438–443.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Andriushchenko A.V.