Hand function assessment: tests for adult patients with central nervous system disorders

Abstract

Upper limb dysfunction is a very common and severe problem in patients with central nervous system disorders. The restoration of arm and hand functions is one of the priority goals of medical rehabilitation in these patients. The development of new and effective rehabilitation technologies, implementation of a patient-centered approach, and objective assessment of rehabilitation outcomes require validated tools. This review aimed to introduce specialists to those tools that evaluate the rehabilitation outcomes based on the patient’s performance in standardized tasks (tests). Functional abilities of the upper extremities should be assessed based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. The general concepts of these tests are discussed. Standard requirements for measurement tools (validity, reliability, and sensitivity) ensure the reliability of test results. The tests that focused on the hand and arm function are briefly described. Only tests that have good psychometric characteristics and are suitable for the monitoring of rehabilitation outcomes for patients with stroke, multiple sclerosis, and spinal cord injury are also presented in the review. In conclusion, the choice of a specific test is based on the purpose and objectives of the study (clinical practice or scientific research), motor deficit peculiarities, and rehabilitation unit resources. However, new and validated tools that focus on the assessment of hand function abilities in patients with central nervous system disorders are needed.

Keywords

assessment / tests / rehabilitation / upper limb / arm / hand / function / stroke / multiple sclerosis / spinal cord injury

References

[1] Marek K, Redlicka J, Miller E, Zubrycki I. Objectivizing measures of post-stroke hand rehabilitation through multi-disciplinary scales. J Clin Med. 2023;12(23):7497. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237497

[2] Marek K., Redlicka J., Miller E., Zubrycki I. Objectivizing measures of post-stroke hand rehabilitation through multi-disciplinary scales // J Clin Med. 2023. Vol. 12, N 23. P. 7497. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237497

[3] Xu Q, Li C, Pan Y, et al. Impact of smart force feedback rehabilitation robot training on upper limb motor function in the subacute stage of stroke. NeuroRehab. 2020;47(2):209–215. doi: 10.3233/NRE-203130

[4] Xu Q., Li C., Pan Y., et al. Impact of smart force feedback rehabilitation robot training on upper limb motor function in the subacute stage of stroke // NeuroRehab. 2020. Vol. 47, N 2. P. 209–215. doi: 10.3233/NRE-203130

[5] Huang WH, Dou ZL, Jin HM, et al. The effectiveness of music therapy on hand function in patients with stroke: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Front Neurol. 2021;12:641023. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.641023

[6] Huang W.H., Dou Z.L., Jin H.M., et al. The effectiveness of music therapy on hand function in patients with stroke: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials // Front Neurol. 2021. Vol. 12. P. 641023. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.641023

[7] Luijten MA, Eekhout I, D’Hooghe M, et al. Development of the Arm Function in Multiple Sclerosis Questionnaire-Short Form (AMSQ-SF): A static 10-item version. Mult Scler. 2018;24(14): 1892−1901. doi: 10.1177/1352458518808197

[8] Luijten M.A., Eekhout I., D’Hooghe M., et al. Development of the Arm Function in Multiple Sclerosis Questionnaire-Short Form (AMSQ-SF): A static 10-item version // Mult Scler. 2018. Vol. 24, N 14. P. 1892−1901. doi: 10.1177/1352458518808197

[9] Kalkers NF, Galan I, Kerbrat A, et al. Differential item functioning of the Arm function in Multiple Sclerosis Questionnaire (AMSQ) by language, a study in six countries. Mult Scler. 2021;27(1):90−96. doi: 10.1177/1352458519895450

[10] Kalkers N.F., Galan I., Kerbrat A., et al. Differential item functioning of the Arm function in Multiple Sclerosis Questionnaire (AMSQ) by language, a study in six countries // Mult Scler. 2021. Vol. 27, N 1. P. 90−96. doi: 10.1177/1352458519895450

[11] Kapadia N, Zivanovic V, Verrier M, Popovic MR. Toronto rehabilitation institute-hand function test: assessment of gross motor function in individuals with spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehab. 2012;18(2):167−86. doi: 10.1310/sci1802-167

[12] Kapadia N., Zivanovic V., Verrier M., Popovic M.R. Toronto rehabilitation institute-hand function test: Assessment of gross motor function in individuals with spinal cord injury // Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehab. 2012. Vol. 18, N 2. P. 167−186. doi: 10.1310/sci1802-167

[13] Cantero-Tellez R, Naughton N, Algar L, Valdes K. Outcome measurement of hand function following mirror therapy for stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review. J Hand Ther. 2019;32(2): 277–291.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2018.01.009

[14] Cantero-Tellez R., Naughton N., Algar L., Valdes K. Outcome measurement of hand function following mirror therapy for stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review // J Hand Ther. 2019. Vol. 32, N 2. P. 277–291.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2018.01.009

[15] Santisteban L, Teremetz M, Bleton JP, et al. Upper limb outcome measures used in stroke rehabilitation studies: A systematic literature review. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(5):e0154792. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154792

[16] Santisteban L., Teremetz M., Bleton J.P., et al. Upper limb outcome measures used in stroke rehabilitation studies: A systematic literature review // PLoS ONE. 2016. Vol. 11, N 5. P. e0154792. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154792

[17] Churruca K, Pomare C, Ellis LA, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): A review of generic and condition-specific measures and a discussion of trends and issues. Health Expect. 2021;24(4):1015−1024. doi: 10.1111/hex.13254

[18] Churruca K., Pomare C., Ellis L.A., et al. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): A review of generic and condition-specific measures and a discussion of trends and issues // Health Expect. 2021. Vol. 24, N 4. P. 1015−1024. doi: 10.1111/hex.13254

[19] International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Available from: https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/international-classification-of-functioning-disability-and-health. Accessed: 15.01.2024.

[20] International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Режим доступа: https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/international-classification-of-functioning-disability-and-health. Дата обращения: 15.01.2024.

[21] Sabari JS, Woodbury M, Velozo CA. Rasch analysis of a new hierarchical scoring system for evaluating hand function on the motor assessment scale for stroke. Stroke Res Treat. 2014;2014:730298. doi: 10.1155/2014/730298

[22] Sabari J.S., Woodbury M., Velozo C.A. Rasch analysis of a new hierarchical scoring system for evaluating hand function on the motor assessment scale for stroke // Stroke Res Treat. 2014. Vol. 2014. P. 730298. doi: 10.1155/2014/730298

[23] Bushnell C, Bettger JP, Cockroft KM, et al. Chronic stroke outcome measures for motor function intervention trials: Expert panel recommendations. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015;8 (6, Suppl S3):S163–S169. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002098

[24] Bushnell C., Bettger J.P., Cockroft K.M., et al. Chronic stroke outcome measures for motor function intervention trials: Expert panel recommendations // Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015. Vol. 8, N 6, Suppl. S3. P. S163–S169. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002098

[25] Van Gils A, Meyer S, Van Dijk M, et al. The adult assisting hand assessment stroke: Psychometric properties of an observation-based bimanual upper limb performance measurement. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2018;99(12):2513–2522. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.04.025

[26] Van Gils A., Meyer S., Van Dijk M., et al. The adult assisting hand assessment stroke: Psychometric properties of an observation-based bimanual upper limb performance measurement // Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2018. Vol. 99, N 12. P. 2513–2522. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.04.025

[27] Ven-Stevens L, Graff M, Selles R, et al. Instruments for assessment of impairments and activity limitations in patients with hand conditions: A European Delphi study. J Rehab Med. 2015;47(10):948−956. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2015

[28] Ven-Stevens L., Graff M., Selles R., et al. Instruments for assessment of impairments and activity limitations in patients with hand conditions: A European Delphi study // J Rehab Med. 2015. Vol. 47, N 10. P. 948−956. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2015

[29] Wang S, Hsu CJ, Trent L, et al. Evaluation of performance-based outcome measures for the upper limb: A comprehensive narrative review. PM R. 2018;10(9):951−962.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.02.008

[30] Wang S., Hsu C.J., Trent L., et al. Evaluation of performance-based outcome measures for the upper limb: A comprehensive narrative review // PM R. 2018. Vol. 10, N 9. P. 951−962.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.02.008

[31] Kimmerle M, Mainwaring L, Borenstein M. The functional repertoire of the hand and its application to assessment. Am J Occup Ther. 2003;57(5):489–498. doi: 10.5014/ajot.57.5.489

[32] Kimmerle M., Mainwaring L., Borenstein M. The functional repertoire of the hand and its application to assessment // Am J Occup Therapy. 2003. Vol. 57, N 5. P. 489–498. doi: 10.5014/ajot.57.5.489

[33] Hughes AM, Boucas SB, Burridge JH, et al. Evaluation of upper extremity neurorehabilitation using technology: a European Delphi consensus study within the EU COST Action Network on Robotics for Neurorehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2016;13(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12984-016-0192-z

[34] Hughes A.M., Boucas S.B., Burridge J.H., et al. Evaluation of upper extremity neurorehabilitation using technology: A European Delphi consensus study within the EU COST Action Network on Robotics for Neurorehabilitation // J Neuroeng Rehab. 2016. Vol. 13, N 1. P. 86. doi: 10.1186/s12984-016-0192-z

[35] Burridge J, Alt Murphy M, Buurke J, et al. A systematic review of international clinical guidelines for rehabilitation of people with neurological conditions: What recommendations are made for upper limb assessment? Front Neurol. 2019;10:567. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00567

[36] Burridge J., Alt Murphy M., Buurke J., et al. A systematic review of international clinical guidelines for rehabilitation of people with neurological conditions: What recommendations are made for upper limb assessment? // Front Neurol. 2019. Vol. 10. P. 567. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00567

[37] Moreno-Morente G, Hurtado-Pomares M, Terol Cantero MC. Bibliometric analysis of research on the use of the Nine Hole Peg Test. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(16):10080. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610080

[38] Moreno-Morente G., Hurtado-Pomares M., Terol Cantero M.C. Bibliometric analysis of research on the use of the Nine Hole Peg Test // Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. Vol. 19, N 16. P. 10080. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610080

[39] Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Kashman N, et al. Adult norms for the Nine Hole Peg Test of finger dexterity. OTJR: Occup Particip Health. 1985;5:24–38. doi: 10.1177/153944928500500102

[40] Mathiowetz V., Weber K., Kashman N., et al. Adult norms for the Nine Hole Peg Test of finger dexterity // OTJR: Occup Particip Health. 1985. Vol. 5. P. 24–38. doi: 10.1177/153944928500500102

[41] Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, Weber K. Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther. 1985;39(6):389−390. doi: 10.5014/ajot.39.6.386

[42] Mathiowetz V., Volland G., Kashman N., Weber K. Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity // Am J Occup Therapy. 1985. Vol. 39, N 6. P. 389−390. doi: 10.5014/ajot.39.6.386

[43] Lawson I. Purdue pegboard test. Occup Med. 2019;69:376–377. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqz044933

[44] Lawson I. Purdue pegboard test // Occup Med. 2019. Vol. 69. P. 376–377. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqz044933

[45] Heldner MR, Vanbellingen T, Bohlhalter S, et al. A valid test for manual dexterity in multiple sclerosis. Phys Ther. 2014;94(11):1644−1651. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130252

[46] Heldner M.R., Vanbellingen T., Bohlhalter S., et al. A valid test for manual dexterity in multiple sclerosis // Phys Ther. 2014. Vol. 94, N 11. P. 1644−1651. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130252

[47] Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, et al. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient: A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehab Med. 1975;7(1):15−17.

[48] Fugl-Meyer A.R., Jaasko L., Leyman I., et al. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient: A method for evaluation of physical performance // Scand J Rehab Med. 1975. Vol. 7, N 1. P. 15−17.

[49] Lyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res. 1981;4(4):483−492. doi: 10.1097/00004356-198112000-00001

[50] Lyle R.C. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research // Int J Rehab Res. 1981. Vol. 4, N 4. P. 483−492. doi: 10.1097/00004356-198112000-00001

[51] Barreca SR, Gowland CK, Stratford PW, et al. Development of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory: Theoretical constructs, item generation, and selection. Topics Stroke Rehab. 2004;11(4):31−42. doi: 10.1310/JU8P-UVK6-68VW-CF3W

[52] Barreca S.R., Gowland C.K., Stratford P.W., et al. Development of the chedoke arm and hand activity inventory: Theoretical constructs, item generation, and selection // Topics Stroke Rehab. 2004. Vol. 11, N 4. P. 31−42. doi: 10.1310/JU8P-UVK6-68VW-CF3W

[53] Carr JH, Shepherd RB, Nordholm L, Lynne D. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Physical Therapy. 1985;65(2):175−180. doi: 10.1093/ptj/65.2.175

[54] Carr J.H., Shepherd R.B., Nordholm L., Lynne D. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients // Physical Therapy. 1985. Vol. 65, N 2. P. 175−180. doi: 10.1093/ptj/65.2.175

[55] Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, et al. Assessing wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32(7):1635−1639. doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.7.1635

[56] Wolf S.L., Catlin P.A., Ellis M., et al. Assessing wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke // Stroke. 2001. Vol. 32, N 7. P. 1635−1639. doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.7.1635

[57] Kim H, Shin JH. Assessment of upper extremity function in people with stroke based on the framework of the ICF: A narrative Review. Brain Neurorehab. 2022;15(2):e16. doi: 10.12786/bn.2022.15.e16

[58] Kim H., Shin J.H. Assessment of upper extremity function in people with stroke based on the framework of the ICF: A narrative review // Brain Neurorehab. 2022. Vol. 15, N 2. P. e16. doi: 10.12786/bn.2022.15.e16

[59] Alt Murphy M, Bjorkdahl A, Forsberg-Warleby G, Persson CU. Implementation of evidence-based assessment of upper extremity in stroke rehabilitation: From evidence to clinical practice. J Rehab Med. 2021;53(1):jrm00148. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2790

[60] Alt Murphy M., Bjorkdahl A., Forsberg-Warleby G., Persson C.U. Implementation of evidence-based assessment of upper extremity in stroke rehabilitation: From evidence to clinical practice // J Rehab Med. 2021. Vol. 53, N 1. P. jrm00148. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2790

[61] Woytowicz EJ, Rietschel JC, Goodman RN, et al. Determining levels of upper extremity movement impairment by applying a cluster analysis to the Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2017;98(3): 456–462. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.06.023

[62] Woytowicz E.J., Rietschel J.C., Goodman R.N., et al. Determining levels of upper extremity movement impairment by applying a cluster analysis to the Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity in chronic stroke // Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2017. Vol. 98, N 3. P. 456–462. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.06.023

[63] Platz T, Pinkowski C, Frederike van W, et al. Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: A multicenter study. Clin Rehab. 2005;19(4):404−411. doi: 10.1191/0269215505cr832oa

[64] Platz T., Pinkowski C., Frederike van W., et al. Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: A multicenter study // Clin Rehab. 2005. Vol. 19, N 4. P. 404−411. doi: 10.1191/0269215505cr832oa

[65] Chen P, Liu TW, Tse MM, et al. The predictive role of hand section of Fugl-Meyer assessment and motor activity log in action research arm test in people with stroke. Front Neurol. 2022;13:926130. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.926130

[66] Chen P., Liu T.W., Tse M.M., et al. The predictive role of hand section of Fugl-Meyer assessment and motor activity log in action research arm test in people with stroke // Front Neurol. 2022. Vol. 13. P. 926130. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.926130

[67] Oliveira CS, Almeida CS, Freias LC, et al. Use of the Box and Block Test for the evaluation of manual dexterity in individuals with central nervous system disorders: A systematic review. Man Ther Posturology Rehab J. 2016;14:1–17. doi: 10.17784/mtprehabjournal.2016.14.436

[68] Oliveira C.S., Almeida C.S., Freias L.C., et al. Use of the Box and Block Test for the evaluation of manual dexterity in individuals with central nervous system disorders: A systematic review // Man Ther Posturology Rehab J. 2016. Vol. 14. P. 1–17. doi: 10.17784/mtprehabjournal.2016.14.436

[69] Kapadia N, Jovanovic L, Musselman K, et al. Preliminary evaluation of the reliability and validity of the 3D printed Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-Hand Function Test in individuals with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2021;44(Suppl 1):S225−S233. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2021.1961055

[70] Kapadia N., Jovanovic L., Musselman K., et al. Preliminary evaluation of the reliability and validity of the 3D printed Toronto rehabilitation institute-hand function test in individuals with spinal cord injury // J Spinal Cord Med. 2021. Vol. 44, Suppl. 1. P. S225−S233. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2021.1961055

[71] Persson HC, Alt Murphy M, Danielsson A, et al. A cohort study investigating a simple, early assessment to predict upper extremity function after stroke--a part of the SALGOT study. BMC Neurol. 2015;15:92. doi: 10.1186/s12883-015-0349-6

[72] Persson H.C., Alt Murphy M., Danielsson A., et al. A cohort study investigating a simple, early assessment to predict upper extremity function after stroke--a part of the SALGOT study // BMC Neurol. 2015. Vol. 15. P. 92. doi: 10.1186/s12883-015-0349-6

[73] Krumlinde-Sundholm L, Lindkvist B, Plantin J, Hoare B. Development of the assisting hand assessment for adults following stroke: A Rasch-built bimanual performance measure. Disability Rehab. 2019;41(4):472−480. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1396365

[74] Krumlinde-Sundholm L., Lindkvist B., Plantin J., Hoare B. Development of the assisting hand assessment for adults following stroke: A Rasch-built bimanual performance measure // Disability Rehab. 2019. Vol. 41, N 4. P. 472−480. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1396365

[75] Plantin J, Verneau M, Godbolt AK, et al. Recovery and prediction of bimanual hand use after stroke. Neurology. 2021;97(7):e706−e719. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012366

[76] Plantin J., Verneau M., Godbolt A.K., et al. Recovery and prediction of bimanual hand use after stroke // Neurology. 2021. Vol. 97, N 7. P. e706−e719. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012366

[77] Barreca SR, Stratford PW, Masters LM, et al. Validation of three shortened versions of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory. Physiotherapy Canada. 2006;58(2):148−156. doi: 10.3138/ptc.58.2.148

[78] Barreca S.R., Stratford P.W., Masters L.M., et al. Validation of three shortened versions of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory // Physiotherapy Canada. 2006. Vol. 58, N 2, P. 148−156. doi: 10.3138/ptc.58.2.148

[79] Alt Murphy M, Resteghini C, Feys P, Lamers I. An overview of systematic reviews on upper extremity outcome measures after stroke. BMC Neurol. 2015;15:29. doi: 10.1186/s12883-015-0292-6

[80] Alt Murphy M., Resteghini C., Feys P., Lamers I. An overview of systematic reviews on upper extremity outcome measures after stroke // BMC Neurol. 2015. Vol. 15. P. 29. doi: 10.1186/s12883-015-0292-6

[81] Pohl J, Held JP, Verheyden G, et al. Corrigendum: Consensus-based core set of outcome measures for clinical motor rehabilitation after stroke--a delphi study. Front Neurol. 2021;12:697935. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.697935

[82] Pohl J., Held J.P., Verheyden G., et al. Corrigendum: Consensus-based core set of outcome measures for clinical motor rehabilitation after stroke--a delphi study // Front Neurol. 2021. Vol. 12. P. 697935. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.697935

[83] Nijland RH, van Wegen EE, Harmeling-van der Wel BC, et al. Presence of finger extension and shoulder abduction within 72 hours after stroke predicts functional recovery: Early prediction of functional outcome after stroke: the EPOS cohort study. Stroke. 2010;41(4):745−750. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.572065

[84] Nijland R.H., van Wegen E.E., Harmeling-van der Wel B.C., et al. Presence of finger extension and shoulder abduction within 72 hours after stroke predicts functional recovery. Early prediction of functional outcome after stroke: The EPOS cohort study // Stroke. 2010. Vol. 41, N 4. P. 745−750. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.572065

[85] Inojosa H, Schriefer D, Ziemssen T. Clinical outcome measures in multiple sclerosis: A review. Autoimmun Rev. 2020;19(5):102512.

[86] Inojosa H., Schriefer D., Ziemssen T. Clinical outcome measures in multiple sclerosis: A review // Autoimmun Rev. 2020. Vol. 19, N 5. P. 102512.

[87] Kurtzke JF. Rating neurological impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology. 1983;33(11):1444−1452. doi: 10.1212/wnl.33.11.1444

[88] Kurtzke J.F. Rating neurological impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS) // Neurology. 1983. Vol. 33, N 11. P. 1444−1452. doi: 10.1212/wnl.33.11.1444

[89] Molenaar PC, Strijbis EM, van Munster CE, et al. Cross-sectional and longitudinal correlations between the Arm Function in Multiple Sclerosis Questionnaire (AMSQ) and other outcome measures in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022;61:103725. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103725

[90] Molenaar P.C., Strijbis E.M., van Munster C.E., et al. Cross-sectional and longitudinal correlations between the Arm Function in Multiple Sclerosis Questionnaire (AMSQ) and other outcome measures in multiple sclerosis // Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022. Vol. 61. P. 103725. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103725

[91] Feys P, Lamers I, Francis G, et al. Multiple sclerosis outcome assessments consortium. The Nine-Hole Peg Test as a manual dexterity performance measure for multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2017;23(5):711−720. doi: 10.1177/1352458517690824

[92] Feys P., Lamers I., Francis G., et al. Multiple sclerosis outcome assessments consortium. The Nine-Hole Peg Test as a manual dexterity performance measure for multiple sclerosis // Mult Scler. 2017. Vol. 23, N 5. P. 711−720. doi: 10.1177/1352458517690824

[93] Cutter G, Baier M, Rudick R, Cookfair D. Development of a multiple sclerosis functional composite as a clinical trial outcome measure. Brain. 1999;122(Pt 5):871−882. doi: 10.1093/brain/122.5.871

[94] Cutter G., Baier M., Rudick R., Cookfair D. Development of a multiple sclerosis functional composite as a clinical trial outcome measure // Brain. 1999. Vol. 122, Pt. 5. P. 871−882. doi: 10.1093/brain/122.5.871

[95] Solaro C, Cattaneo D, Brichetto G, et al. Clinical correlates of 9-hole peg test in a large population of people with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019;30:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2019.01.043

[96] Solaro C., Cattaneo D., Brichetto G., et al. Clinical correlates of 9-hole peg test in a large population of people with multiple sclerosis // Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019. Vol. 30. P. 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2019.01.043

[97] Jones LA, Bryden A, Wheeler TL, et al. Considerations and recommendations for selection and utilization of upper extremity clinical outcome assessments in human spinal cord injury trials. Spinal Cord. 2018;56(5):414–425. doi: 10.1038/s41393-017-0015-5

[98] Jones L.A., Bryden A., Wheeler T.L., et al. Considerations and recommendations for selection and utilization of upper extremity clinical outcome assessments in human spinal cord injury trials // Spinal Cord. 2018. Vol. 56, N 5. P. 414–425. doi: 10.1038/s41393-017-0015-5

[99] Coates SK, Harvey LA, Dunlop SA, Allison GT. The AuSpinal: A test of hand function for people with tetraplegia. Spinal Cord. 2011;49(2):219−229. doi: 10.1038/sc.2010.86

[100] Coates S.K., Harvey L.A., Dunlop S.A., Allison G.T. The AuSpinal: A test of hand function for people with tetraplegia // Spinal Cord. 2011. Vol. 49, N 2. P. 219−229. doi: 10.1038/sc.2010.86

[101] Lili L, Sunnerhagen KS, Rekand T, et al. Independence and upper extremity functioning after spinal cord injury: A cross-sectional study. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):3148. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29986-y

[102] Lili L., Sunnerhagen K.S., Rekand T., et al. Independence and upper extremity functioning after spinal cord injury: A cross-sectional study // Sci Rep. 2023. Vol. 13, N 1. P. 3148. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29986-y

[103] Wuolle KS, Van Doren CL, Thrope GB, et al. Development of a quantitative hand grasp and release test for patients with tetraplegia using a hand neuroprosthesis. J Hand Surg. 1994;19(2):209−218. doi: 10.1016/0363-5023(94)90008-6

[104] Wuolle K.S., Van Doren C.L., Thrope G.B., et al. Development of a quantitative hand grasp and release test for patients with tetraplegia using a hand neuroprosthesis // J Hand Surg. 1994. Vol. 19, N 2. P. 209−218. doi: 10.1016/0363-5023(94)90008-6

[105] Caroll D. A quantitative test of upper extremity function. J Chronic Dis. 1965;18:479–482. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(65)90030-5

[106] Caroll D. A quantitative test of upper extremity function // J Chronic Dis. 1965. Vol. 18. P. 479–482. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(65)90030-5

[107] Kalsi-Ryan S, Curt A, Fehlings MG, Verrier MC. Assessment of the hand in tetraplegia using the graded redefined assessment of strength, sensibility and prehension (GRASSP): Impairment versus function. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehab. 2009;14(4):34−46.

[108] Kalsi-Ryan S., Curt A., Fehlings M.G., Verrier M.C. Assessment of the hand in tetraplegia using the graded redefined assessment of strength, sensibility and prehension (GRASSP): Impairment versus function // Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehab. 2009. Vol. 14, N 4. P. 34−46.

[109] Sollerman C, Ejeskär A. Sollerman Hand Function Test: A standardised method and its use in tetraplegic patients. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1995:29(2):167−176. doi: 10.3109/02844319509034334

[110] Sollerman C., Ejeskär A. Sollerman Hand Function Test: A standardised method and its use in tetraplegic patients // Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1995. Vol. 29, N 2. P. 167−176. doi: 10.3109/02844319509034334

[111] Popovic MR, Thrasher TA, Adams ME. Functional electrical therapy: Retraining grasping in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2006;44(3):143–151. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101822

[112] Popovic M.R., Thrasher T.A., Adams M.E. Functional electrical therapy: Retraining grasping in spinal cord injury // Spinal Cord. 2006. Vol. 44, N 3. P. 143–151. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101822

[113] Marino RJ, Kern SB, Leiby B, et al. Reliability and validity of the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) in subjects with chronic spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2015;38(4):498−504. doi: 10.1179/2045772314Y.0000000272

[114] Marino R.J., Kern S.B., Leiby B., et al. Reliability and validity of the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) in subjects with chronic spinal cord injury // J Spinal Cord Med. 2015. Vol. 38, N 4. P. 498−504. doi: 10.1179/2045772314Y.0000000272

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Eco-Vector