Standardization of rehabilitation medical cards for adult patients with musculoskeletal and peripheral nervous systems dysfunction
Galina E. Ivanova , Andrey Y. Suvorov , Aleksander V. Novikov , Anna N. Belova , Olga V. Vorobyova , Mikhail B. Tsykunov , Tatyana V. Builova , Alexey A. Shmonin , Maria N. Maltseva
Physical and rehabilitation medicine, medical rehabilitation ›› 2023, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (3) : 179 -188.
Standardization of rehabilitation medical cards for adult patients with musculoskeletal and peripheral nervous systems dysfunction
Currently, each rehabilitation institution solves the problem of registration of rehabilitation medical records empirically, based on the existing realities of a particular institution.
The study examined the development of a medical history template for the in- and outpatient medical rehabilitation of patients with peripheral nervous system (PNS) and musculoskeletal system (MSA) dysfunction.
The medical history template corresponded to the currently approved forms 003/y (“Medical record for inpatient care”) and 025/y (“Medical record for outpatient care”) but supplemented with chapters, allowing entry of information in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation Order for medical rehabilitation of adults (No. 788n dated July 31, 2020). Additional chapters, forms, and appendices designed to include specific information about the rehabilitation process included the physical and rehabilitation medicine doctor examination list, multidisciplinary rehabilitation team members, examination lists, rehabilitation routing scale blank, list of MDRC discussions, individual patient management forms, standard rehabilitation discharge form, and list of rehabilitation quality criteria for adult patients with MSA/PNS dysfunction. Validated scales and test forms were also included.
The unification of rehabilitation medical records for patients with MSA/PNS impairment makes it easier for the staff of the rehabilitation departments and centers to file medical records in accordance with the current legislation.
medical rehabilitation / medical records / musculoskeletal system / peripheral nervous system / standardization
| [1] |
Zasypkin MY, Ponomareva IV. Methodological recommendations for maintaining medical records in medical organizations. Samara: Reaviz Medical University; 2019. 27 р. (In Russ). |
| [2] |
Засыпкин М.Ю., Пономарева И.В. Методические рекомендации по ведению медицинской документации в медицинских организациях. Самара: Медицинский университет «Реавиз», 2019. 27 с. |
| [3] |
Karpova AL, Mostovoy AV. Maintaining primary medical records in neonatology departments. Neonatology News Opinions Training. 2014;(2):64–80. (In Russ). |
| [4] |
Карпова А.Л., Мостовой А.В. Ведение первичной медицинской документации в отделениях неонатологического профиля // Неонатология: новости, мнения, обучение. 2014. № 2. С. 64–80. |
| [5] |
Bickenbach J, Cieza A, Rauch A, Stucki G. ICF Core Sets: Manual for Clinical Practice: Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2012. 150 р. |
| [6] |
Bickenbach J., Cieza A., Rauch A., Stucki G. ICF Core Sets: Manual for Clinical Practice: Göttingen: Hogrefe, 2012. 150 р. |
| [7] |
Matev I, Bankov S. Rehabilitation in arm injuries. Bulgaria: Med Physical Education; 1981. 257 р. (In Russ). |
| [8] |
Матев И., Банков С. Реабилитация при повреждениях руки. Болгария: Медицина и физкультура, 1981. 257 с. |
| [9] |
Marks VO. Orthopedic diagnostics. Minsk: Science Technology; 1978. 271 р. (In Russ). |
| [10] |
Маркс В.О. Ортопедическая диагностика. Минск: Наука и техника, 1978. 271 с. |
| [11] |
Berg KO, Wood-Dauphinee SL, Williams JI, Maki B. Measuring balance in the elderly: Validation of an instrument. Can J Public Health. 1992;83(2):7–11. |
| [12] |
Berg K.O., Wood-Dauphinee S.L., Williams J.I., Maki B. Measuring balance in the elderly: Validation of an instrument // Can J Public Health. 1992. Vol. 83, N 2. P. 7–11. |
| [13] |
Stevenson TJ. Detecting change in patients with stroke using the Berg Balance Scale. Aust J Physiother. 2001;47(1):29–38. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60296-8 |
| [14] |
Stevenson T.J. Detecting change in patients with stroke using the Berg Balance Scale // Aust J Physiother. 2001. Vol. 47, N 1. P. 29–38. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60296-8 |
| [15] |
Vernon H, Mior J. The neck disability index: A study of reliability and validity. J Manipul Phys Therapy. 1991;14(7):409–415. |
| [16] |
Vernon H., Mior J. The neck disability index: A study of reliability and validity // J Manipul Phys Therapy. 1991. Vol. 14, N 7. P. 409–415. |
| [17] |
Bakhtadze MA, Vernon H, Zakharova OB, et al. The neck disability index: Russian language version (NDI-RU): A study of validity and reliability. Spine. 2015;14:1115–1121. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000880 |
| [18] |
Bakhtadze M.A., Vernon H., Zakharova O.B., et al. The neck disability index: Russian language version (NDI-RU): A study of validity and reliability // Spine. 2015. Vol. 14. P. 1115–1121. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000880 |
| [19] |
Clinical Recommendations “Degenerative diseases of the spine (approved by the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 2021)”. (In Russ). Available from: https://base.garant.ru/403622338/. Accessed: 15.08.2023. |
| [20] |
Клинические рекомендации «Дегенеративные заболевания позвоночника (утверждены Министерством здравоохранения РФ, 2021)». Режим доступа: https://base.garant.ru/403622338/. Дата обращения: 15.08.2023. |
| [21] |
Steinhaus ME, Iyer S, Lovecchio F, et al. Which NDI domains best predict change in physical function in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery? Spine. 2019;19(10):1698–1705. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.06.006 |
| [22] |
Steinhaus M.E., Iyer S., Lovecchio F., et al. Which NDI domains best predict change in physical function in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery? // Spine. 2019. Vol. 19, N 10. P. 1698–1705. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.06.006 |
| [23] |
Fairbank JC. Why are there different versions of the oswestry disability index? J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;20(1):83–86. doi: 10.3171/2013.9.Spine13344 |
| [24] |
Fairbank J.C. Why are there different versions of the Oswestry disability index? // J Neurosurg Spine. 2014. Vol. 20, N 1. P. 83–86. doi: 10.3171/2013.9.Spine13344 |
| [25] |
Bakhtadze MA, Kuzminov KO, Bolotov DA. Oswestry disability index: A study of releability and validity of the Russian version. Manual Therapy. 2016;64(4):24–33. (In Russ). |
| [26] |
Бахтадзе М.А., Болотов Д.А., Кузьминов К.О. Индекс ограничения жизнедеятельности из-за боли в нижней части спины (опросник Освестри): оценка надежности и валидности русской версии // Мануальная терапия. 2016. Т. 64, № 4. С. 24–33. |
| [27] |
Roland М, Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part 1: Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine. 1983;8(2):141–144. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198303000-00004 |
| [28] |
Roland М., Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part 1: Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain // Spine. 1983. Vol. 8, N 2. P. 141–144. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198303000-00004 |
| [29] |
Stratford PW, Binkley JM. Measurement properties of the RM-18: A modified version of the Roland-Morris disability scale. Spine. 1997;22(20):2416–2421. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199710150-00018 |
| [30] |
Stratford P.W., Binkley J.M. Measurement properties of the RM-18: A modified version of the Roland-Morris disability scale // Spine. 1997. Vol. 22, N 20. P. 2416–2421. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199710150-00018 |
| [31] |
Byvaltsev VA, Belykh EG, Alekseeva NV, Sorokovikov VA. Application of scales and questionnaires in the examination of patients with degenerative lesions of the lumbar spine: Methodological recommendations. Irkutsk: Scientific Center Reconstructive Reconstructive Surgery; 2013. 32 р. (In Russ). |
| [32] |
Бывальцев В.А., Белых Е.Г., Алексеева Н.В., Сороковиков В.А. Применение шкал и анкет в обследовании пациентов с дегенеративным поражением поясничного отдела позвоночника: методические рекомендации. Иркутск: Научный центр реконструктивной и восстановительной хирургии, 2013. 32 с. |
| [33] |
Bakhtadze MA, Lusnikova IV, Kanaev SP, Rastrigin SN. Lower back pain: Which scales and questionnaires to choose? Russ J Pain. 2020;18(1):22–28. (In Russ). doi: 10.17116/pain20201801122 |
| [34] |
Бахтадзе М.А., Лусникова И.В., Канаев С.П., Расстригин С.Н. Боль в нижней части спины: какие шкалы и опросники выбрать? // Российский журнал боли. 2020. Т. 18, № 1. С. 22–28. doi: 10.17116/pain20201801122 |
| [35] |
Lequesne M. Indices of severity and disease activity for osteoarthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1991;20(6 Suppl 2):48–54. doi: 10.1016/0049-0172(91)90027-w |
| [36] |
Lequesne M. Indices of severity and disease activity for osteoarthritis // Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1991. Vol. 20, N 6, Suppl. 2. P. 48–54. doi: 10.1016/0049-0172(91)90027-w |
| [37] |
Methodological Recommendations for the Pilot Project “Development of the Medical Rehabilitation System in the Russian Federation”. Practical Application of Rating Scales in Medical Rehabilitation. Moscow: Union of Rehabilitation Specialists of Russia; 2015–2016: 91 р. (In Russ). |
| [38] |
Методические рекомендации для пилотного проекта «Развитие системы медицинской реабилитации в Российской Федерации». Практическое применение оценочных шкал в медицинской реабилитации. Москва: Союз реабилитологов России, 2015–2016. 91 с. |
| [39] |
Yagjyan GV, Abrahamyan DO, Grigoryan BE, Azatyan AT. Russian version of the DASH questionnaire: A tool to study the outcomes of upper limb lesions. Ann Plastic Reconstruct Aesthetic Sur. 2005;(1):52–58. (In Russ). |
| [40] |
Ягджян Г.В., Абраамян Д.О., Григорян Б.Э., Азатян А.Т. Русская версия опросника DASH: инструмент исследования исходов лечения поражений верхней конечности // Анналы пластической, реконструктивной и эстетической хирургии. 2005. № 1. С. 52–58. |
| [41] |
Braitmayer K, Dereskewitz C, Oberhauser C, et al. Examination of the applicability of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire to patients with hand injuries and diseases using Rasch analysis. Patient. 2017;10(3):367–376. doi: 10.1007/s40271-016-0212-x |
| [42] |
Braitmayer K., Dereskewitz C., Oberhauser C., et al. Examination of the applicability of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire to patients with hand injuries and diseases using Rasch analysis // Patient. 2017. Vol. 10, N 3. P. 367–376. doi: 10.1007/s40271-016-0212-x |
| [43] |
Clinical recommendations “Open wrist and hand wound (approved by the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 2021)”. (In Russ). Available from: https://base.garant.ru/403024386/. Accessed: 15.08.2023. |
| [44] |
Клинические рекомендации «Открытая рана запястья и кисти (утверждены Министерством здравоохранения РФ, 2021)». Режим доступа: https://base.garant.ru/403024386/. Дата обращения: 15.08.2023. |
Eco-Vector
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |