Systematic review and meta-analysis: Main points

Abstract

The growth of the scientific medical community publication activity has led to the emergence of large volumes of disparate, often contradictory information of varying degrees of methodological quality. In such circumstances, a single tool for processing the results of numerous clinical trials was only a matter of time, reflecting the needs of practitioners. Such a tool within the framework of the principles of evidence-based medicine was the conduct of systematic reviews, in some cases supplemented by meta-analyses. The Cochrane is now the leading scientific organization that sets the tone for all research of this kind, providing most of the research of this design every year. Without taking into account the possible negative consequences of such a monopoly, it should be noted that this organization offers a detailed algorithm for writing systematic reviews, which is in the public domain along with the necessary software. This highly transparent methodology makes writing systematic reviews a task within the reach of any professional, regardless of supervision by the Cochrane, whose guiding resource is limited. This work is based on the methodological recommendations of the Cochrane and focuses on the main stages of writing systematic reviews.

Keywords

systematic review / meta-analysis / evidence-based medicine

References

[1] Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.3 (updated February 2022). Cochrane; 2022.

[2] Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.3 (updated February 2022). Ed. by J.P.T. Higgins, J. Thomas, J. Chandler J. et al. Cochrane, 2022.

[3] Jahan N, Naveed S, Zeshan M, Tahir MA. How to conduct a systematic review: A narrative literature review. Cureus. 2016;8(11):e864. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.864

[4] Jahan N., Naveed S., Zeshan M., Tahir M.A. How to conduct a systematic review: A narrative literature review // Cureus. 2016. Vol. 8, No. 11. P. e864. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.864

[5] Wright RW, Brand RA, Dunn W, Spindler KP. How to write a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;455:23–29. DOI: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31802c9098

[6] Wright R.W., Brand R.A., Dunn W., Spindler K.P. How to write a systematic review // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2007. Vol. 455. P. 23–29. DOI: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31802c9098

[7] Shah HM, Chung KC. Archie Cochrane and his vision for evidence-based medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(3):982–988. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b03928

[8] Shah H.M., Chung K.C. Archie Cochrane and his vision for evidence-based medicine // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2009. Vol. 124, No. 3. P. 982–988. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b03928

[9] Gopalakrishnan S, Ganeshkumar P. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: Understanding the best evidence in primary healthcare. J Family Med Prim Care. 2013;2(1):9–14. DOI: 10.4103/2249-4863.109934

[10] Gopalakrishnan S., Ganeshkumar P. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: Understanding the best evidence in primary healthcare // J. Family Med. Prim. Care. 2013. Vol. 2, No. 1. P. 9–14. DOI: 10.4103/2249-4863.109934

[11] Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4(1):1. DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1

[12] Moher D., Shamseer L., Clarke M. et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement // Syst. Rev. 2015. Vol. 4, No. 1. P. 1. DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1

[13] Cooke A, Smith D, Booth A. Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qual Health Res. 2012;22(10):1435–1443. DOI: 10.1177/1049732312452938

[14] Cooke A., Smith D., Booth A. Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis // Qual. Health Res. 2012. Vol. 22, No. 10. P. 1435–1443. DOI: 10.1177/1049732312452938

[15] Henderson LK, Craig JC, Willis NS, et al. How to write a Cochrane systematic review. Nephrology (Carlton). 2010;15(6):617–624. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2010.01380.x

[16] Henderson L.K., Craig J.C., Willis N.S. et al. How to write a Cochrane systematic review // Nephrology (Carlton). 2010. Vol. 15, No. 6. P. 617–624. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2010.01380.x

[17] Pannucci CJ, Wilkins EG. Identifying and avoiding bias in research. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(2):619–625. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181de24bc

[18] Pannucci C.J., Wilkins E.G. Identifying and avoiding bias in research // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2010. Vol. 126, No. 2. P. 619–625. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181de24bc

[19] Savović J, Jones HE, Altman DG, et al. Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized, controlled trials. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(6):429–438. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-6-201209180-00537

[20] Savović J., Jones H.E., Altman D.G. et al. Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized, controlled trials // Ann. Intern. Med. 2012. Vol. 157, No. 6. P. 429–438. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-6-201209180-00537

[21] Murad MH, Montori VM, Ioannidis JP, et al. How to read a systematic review and meta-analysis and apply the results to patient care: users’ guides to the medical literature. JAMA. 2014;312(2):171–179. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.5559

[22] Murad M.H., Montori V.M., Ioannidis J.P. et al. How to read a systematic review and meta-analysis and apply the results to patient care: users’ guides to the medical literature // JAMA. 2014. Vol. 312, No. 2. P. 171–179. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.5559

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Sigua B.V., Kotkov P.A., Kurkov A.A., Zemlyanoy V.P.