A double-edged weapon or commission forensic examination in civil trial on medical cases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A commission forensic medical examination is crucial for examining medical cases, and its conclusion is of fundamental importance to the court. However, experts often do not use their rights to the fullest extent, limiting themselves to the study of medical documentation. Such an approach negatively affects the quality of concrete conclusions, which is associated with legal risk in criminal and civil proceedings.

CASE PRESENTATION: This review is devoted to a case report on moral damage compensation recovery from the hospital to the relatives of patient A., who died during medical care. A commission forensic medical examination could not establish death causation, citing inadequate medical documentation. The commission made no attempts to gather additional information on the case. The victims sued the two hospitals for a total of 2,500,000 rubles. The court of first instance dismissed the lawsuit, finding the defendants’ guilt unproven. The appellate court reversed this decision and indicated that the defendants must themselves prove their innocence; however, neither the available documentation nor the expert opinion was allowed to do this. The court ordered the defendants to pay 1,600,000 rubles.

CONCLUSION: A commission forensic medical examination opinion must serve as evidence in the case. However, the court can interpret a formal approach to its performance against the defendants, sometimes even in cases where the medical care was potentially accurate and under accepted standards and recommendations.

Keywords

medical malpractice / compensation for moral damages

References

[1] Mustafina LR, Khamitova GM. The constitutional right to healthcare and medical care for students in schools: chosen aspects. J Educational Social Res. 2019;9(4):53–57. doi: 10.2478/jesr-2019-0054

[2] Mustafina L.R., Khamitova G.M. The constitutional right to healthcare and medical care for students in schools: chosen aspects // J Educational Social Res. 2019. Vol. 9, N 4. P. 53–57. doi: 10.2478/jesr-2019-0054

[3] Semina TV, Klevno VA, Gusev AY, Veselkina OV. Criminal responsibility of a doctor in modern Russia: monograph. Ed. by T.V. Semina. Moscow: Prospect; 2020. 351 р. (In Russ).

[4] Семина Т.В., Клевно В.А., Гусев А.Ю., Веселкина О.В. Уголовная ответственность врача в современной России: монография / Под общ. ред. Т.В. Семиной. Москва: Проспект, 2020. 351 c.

[5] Spiridonov VA. Forensic medical examinations in criminal cases against medical personnel: history and modernity. Kazan: Astori A; 2020. 126 р. (In Russ).

[6] Спиридонов В.А. Судебные медицинские экспертизы по уголовным делам в отношении медицинского персонала: история и современность. Казань: Астор и Я, 2020. 126 с.

[7] Barinov EH. Forensic medical examination in civil proceedings in medical cases: monograph. 2nd ed., revised and updated. Moscow: Yurayt; 2019. 181 р. (In Russ).

[8] Баринов Е.Х. Судебно-медицинская экспертиза в гражданском судопроизводстве по медицинским делам: монография. 2-е изд., перераб. и доп. Москва: Юрайт, 2019. 181 с.

[9] Shmarov LA. Causal relationship between action (inaction) and adverse outcome. Actual Problems Med Biology. 2018;(2):66–69. (In Russ). doi: 10.24411/2587-4926-2018-10022

[10] Шмаров Л.А. Причинно-следственная связь между действием (бездействием) и неблагоприятным исходом // Актуальные проблемы медицины и биологии. 2018. № 2. С. 66–69. doi: 10.24411/2587-4926-2018-10022

[11] Galyukova MI. Features of interrogation of witnesses in civil cases related to compensation for moral damage due to poor-quality medical care. Russ Judge. 2019;(9):3–8. (In Russ).

[12] Галюкова М.И. Особенности допроса свидетелей по гражданским делам, связанным с компенсацией морального вреда вследствие некачественного оказания медицинской помощи // Российский судья. 2019. № 9. С. 3–8.

[13] Barinov EH, Romodanovsky PO. Problems of forensic medical examinations conducted in the framework of civil proceedings. Med Right. 2011;(6):25–30. (In Russ).

[14] Баринов Е.Х., Ромодановский П.О. Проблемы судебно-медицинских экспертиз, проводимых в рамках гражданского процесса // Медицинское право. 2011. № 6. С. 25–30.

[15] Barinov EH, Tikhomirov AV. Forensic medical examination in solving issues related to “medical disputes”. Med Expertise Law. 2010;(6):5–7. (In Russ).

[16] Баринов Е.Х., Тихомиров А.В. Судебно-медицинская экспертиза при решении вопросов, связанных с «медицинскими спорами» // Медицинская экспертиза и право. 2010. № 6. С. 5–7.

[17] Barinov EH, Romodanovsky PO. The state of forensic medical examinations in civil cases related to “medical” disputes. Forensic Med Examination. 2013;56(6):37–40. (In Russ).

[18] Баринов Е.Х., Ромодановский П.О. Состояние судебно-медицинских экспертиз по гражданским делам, связанным с «медицинскими спорами» // Судебно-медицинская экспертиза. 2013. Т. 56, № 6. С. 37–40.

[19] Kalinin RE. Analysis of the testimony of medical workers during the examination of “medical” cases. Forensic Med. 2019;5(C1):110–111. (In Russ).

[20] Калинин Р.Э. Анализ показаний медицинских работников при проведении экспертиз по «врачебным» делам // Судебная медицина. 2019. Т. 5, № S1. C. 110–111.

[21] Barinov EH, Kalinin RE, Romodanovsky PO. Forensic medical examination based on the materials of a “medical” case in the absence of primary medical documentation (case from practice). Bulletin Forensic Med. 2018;(1):40–44. (In Russ).

[22] Баринов Е.Х., Калинин Р.Э., Ромодановский П.О. Судебно-медицинская экспертиза по материалам «врачебного» дела при отсутствии первичной медицинской документации (случай из практики) // Вестник судебной медицины. 2018. № 1. С. 40–44.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Anisimov A.A., Gilmetdinova E.S., Nurmieva E.R., Khamitova G.M., Spiridonov V.A.