Sex determination by pelvic osteometry using discriminant analysis

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One of the current challenges of forensic medicine is the sex identification of skeletal remains. Sex determination from isolated bones is considered a particularly difficult task. Consequently, increased attention has been paid to investigating the possibility of sex identification from an isolated pelvis.

AIM: To develop a method for morphological sex determination by pelvis osteometry using multiple discriminant analysis and evaluating its accuracy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The objects of the study were the pelvic skeletons (n=84) of individuals of both sexes aged 18 to 86 years from the collection of the Department of Human Anatomy of the V.I. Razumovsky Saratov State Medical University, as well as 11 male (19–76 years) and 14 female (18–80 years) pelvises from the collection of the Department of Human Anatomy, Operative Surgery and Topographic Anatomy of the St. Luke Lugansk State Medical University. Measurements were made by V.P. Alekseev’s method using a large spreading caliper, a sliding caliper, and a measuring tape. Classification models were built by stepwise discriminant analysis.

RESULTS: A model with a set of variables is obtained, which allows determining the sex of skeletal remains with consideration of osteometric data. The identification accuracy of the model was 90.4%. When tested on the verification group, an accuracy of 84% was obtained. The following data used in the mathematical model showed statistically significant differences: pelvis height, ischium height, and the largest diameter of the acetabulum (p <0.01).

CONCLUSION: The study allowed creating a mathematical model that can be used for sex determination of skeletal remains taking into account seven osteometric parameters of the pelvis; the theoretical and practical accuracy of the model was 90.4% and 84%, respectively.

Keywords

pelvis / sex determination / discriminant analysis

References

[1] Yankovski VE, Fominykh SA, Pivovarov AV, Belyaev IA. On the possibility of sex definition based on sections square of radial bones' distal metaepiphysis. The Siberian Medical Journal. 2009;24(3-1):61–63. EDN: KZIGLJ

[2] Semyonov VV. Revisiting the definition of the gender identity of the skeletal bones. Forensic Examination of Belarus. 2016;2(3):51–56. EDN: YLPTJV

[3] Chertovskikh AA. Procedure for sex determination of human scapula. Russian Journal of Forensic Medicine. 2020;6(1):33–35. doi: 10.19048/2411-8729-2020-6-1-33-35 EDN: XIJHRQ

[4] Dixit SG, Kakar S, Agarwal S, Choudhry R. Sexing of human hip bones of Indian origin by discriminant function analysis. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. 2007;14(7):429–435. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2007.03.009

[5] Anuthama K, Shankar S, Ilayaraja V, et al. Determining dental sex dimorphism in South Indians using discriminant function analysis. Forensic Science International. 2011;212(1-3):86–89. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.05.018

[6] Afrianty I, Nasien D, Kadir MRA, Haron H. Determination of gender from pelvic bones and patella in forensic anthropology: a comparison of classification techniques. In: Proceedings of 2013 1st International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Modelling and Simulation; Kota Kinabalu, 2013 Dec 3–5. Kota Kinabalu: IEEE; 2013. P. 3–7. doi: 10.1109/AIMS.2013.9

[7] Alekseev VP. Osteometry. Methods of anthropological research. Moscow: Nauka; 1966. (In Russ.)

[8] Garmus AK. Forensic criteria for identification of a person based on a skeletal pelvis [dissertation]. Leningrad; 1990. (In Russ.)

[9] Phenice TW. A newly developed visual method of sexing the os pubis. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 1969;30(2):297–301. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330300214

[10] Buikstra JE, Ubelaker DN, editors. Standards for data collection from human skeletal remains: proceedings of a seminar at the field museum of natural history. Fayetteville: Arkansas archeological survey; 1994.

[11] Bass WM. Human osteology: a laboratory and field manual. 5th edition. Columbia: Missouri archaeological society; 2005.

[12] Gaivoronsky IV, Fandeeva OM, Nikolenko VN, et al. Somatic sex determination of an adult by bone remains (rewiev). Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research. 201915(3):683–690. EDN: GVVLMQ

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Eco-Vector