Comment to the Article „Classifications of Acetabular Defects: Do They Provide an Objective Evidence for Complexity of Revision Hip Joint Arthroplasty? (Critical Literature Review and Own Cases)“

Abstract

.

References

[1] 1.Baauw M., Van Hooff M.L., Spruit M. Current construct options for revision of large acetabular defects: A systematic review. JBJS Rev. 2016;4(11). Pii: 10.2106/ JBJS.RVW.15.00n9. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.15.00119.

[2] 2.Makinen T.J., Abolghasemian M,. Watts E., Fichman S.G., Kuzyk P., Safir O.A. et al. Management of massive acetabular bone defects in revision arthroplasty of the hip using a reconstruction cage and porous metal augment. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B(5):607-613. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B5.BJJ-2014-0264.R3.

[3] 3.Gehrke T., Bangert Y., Schwantes B., Gebauer M., Kendoff D. Acetabular revision in THA using tantalum augments combined with impaction bone grafting. Hip Int 2013;23(4):359-365. DOI: 10.5301/hipint.5000044.

[4] 4.Jenkins D.R., Odland A.N., Sierra R.J., Hanssen A.D., Lewallen D.G. Minimum five-year outcomes with porous tantalum acetabular cup and augment construct in complex revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(10):e49. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00125.

[5] 5.Rogers B.A., Whittingham-Jones P.M., Mitchell P.A., Safir O.A., Bircher M.D., Gross A.E. The reconstruction of periprosthetic pelvic discontinuity. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(8):1499-1506.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.12.017.

[6] 6.Petrie J., Sassoon A., Haidukewych G.J. Pelvic discontinuity: current solutions. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B(11 Suppl A):109-113. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.32764.

[7] 7.Hughes A.J., Debuitleir C., Soden P., O’Donnchadha B., Tansey A., Abdulkarim A. Et al. 3D Printing AIDS acetabular reconstruction in complex revision hip arthroplasty. Adv Orthop. 2017;2017:8925050. DOI: 10.1155/2017/8925050