USING RECTANGULAR FEMORAL COMPONENT IN REVISION SURGERY AFTER THA FAILURE RESULTING FROM ASEPTIC LOOSENING

Abstract

The authors analyzed the treatment outcomes in 34 patients who underwent femoral revision surgery with cementless rectangular femoral components. In all cases the indication for the surgery was THA failure resulting from aseptic loosening. Average follow-up time was 23,8 months. There were no cases of aseptic loosening after the revision surgery. The treatment results were evaluated as excellent or good in (85%) 29 patients.

Keywords

revision hip replacement / aseptic loosening / cementless stem

References

[1] 1. Медицинские и социальные проблемы эндопротезирования суставов конечностей/В.П. Москалев [и др.]. -СПб.: Морсар АВ, 2001. -157 с.

[2] 2. Каграманов С.В. Первичная артропластика тазобедренного сустава эндопротезом Цваймюлера/С.В. Каграманов/Эндопротезирование в России. -Казань; СПб., 2010. -Вып. 5. -С. 28-41.

[3] 3. Неверов В.А. Ревизионное эндопротезирование тазобедренного сустава/В.А. Неверов, С.М. Закари. -СПб.: Образование, 1997. -112 с.

[4] 4. Тихилов P.M. Руководство по эндопротезированию тазобедренного сустава/P.M. Тихилов. В.М. Шаповалов. -СПб.: РНИИТО им. P.P. Вредена, 2008. -301 с.

[5] 5. Amstutz H.C. Revision of aseptic loose total hip arthroplasties/H.C Amstutz, SM. Ma, R.H. Jmnah, L. Mai//Clin. Orthop. -2004. -N420. -P. 2-9.

[6] 6. Bohm P. The use of tapered stems for femoral revision surgery/P. Bohm, O. Bischel//Clin. Orthop. -2004. -N420. -P. 148-159.

[7] 7. Delia Valle C.J. The femur in revision total hip arthroplasty evaluation and classification/C.J. Delia Valle, W.G. Paprosky//Clin. Orthop. -2004. -N420. -P. 55-62.

[8] 8. Delia Valle C.J. Classification and an algorithmic approach to the reconstruction of femoral deficiency in revision total hip arthroplasty/C.J. Delia Valle, W.G. Paprosky//J. Bone Joint Surg. -2003. -Vol. 85-A, Suppl. 4. -P. 1-6.

[9] 9. Engh C.A. Porous-coated hip replacement: the factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results/C.A. Engh, J.D. Bobyn, A.H. Glassman//J. Bone Joint Surg. -1987. -Vol. 69-B. -P. 45-55.

[10] 10. Engh С.A. Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components/CA. Engh, P. Massin, K.E. Suthers//Clin. Orthop. -1990. -N257. -P. 107-128.

[11] 11. Estok D.M. Long-term results of cemented femoral revision surgery using second-generation technigues: an average 11.7-year follow-up evaluation D.M. Estok, W.H. Harris//Clin. Orthop. -1994. -N 299. -P. 190-202.

[12] 12. Gruen T.A. "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening/T.A. Gruen, G.M. McNeice, H.C. Amstutz//Clin. Orthop. -1979. -N 141. -P. 17-27.

[13] 13. Grunig R. Three-to 7-year results with the uncemented SL femoral revision prosthesis/R. Grunig, E. Morscher, P.E. Ochsner//Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. -1997. -Vol. 116. -P. 187-197.

[14] 14. Katz R.P. Long-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty with improved cementing technique/R.P. Katz, J.J. Callaghan, P.M. Sullivan, R.C. Johnston//J. Bone Joint Surg. -1997. -Vol. 79-B. -P. 322-326. 15.

[15] 15. Kim Y.H. Revision hip arthroplasty using strut allograft and fully porous-coated stems/Y.H. Kim, J.S. Kim//J. Arthroplasty. -2005. -Vol. 20. -P. 4.

[16] 16. Kolstad K. The Wagner revision stem for severe osteolysis: 31 hips followed for 1.5 -5 years/K. Kolstad [et al.]//Acta Orthop Scand. -1996. -Vol. 67. -P. 541-544.

[17] 17. Korovessis P. High medium -term survival of Zweymuller SLR-Plus stem used in femoral revision/P. Korovessis, T. Repantis//Clin. Orthop. -2009. -N467. -P. 2032-2040.

[18] 18. Maurer S.G. Reconstruction of the failed femoral component and proximal femoral bone loss in revision hip surgery/S.G. Maurer, A.C. Baitner, P.E. Di Cesare//J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. -2000. -Vol. 8. -P. 354-363.

[19] 19. Paprosky W.G. Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty/W.G. Paprosky, N.V. Greidanus, J. Antoniou//Clin. Orthop. -1999. -N369. -P. 230-242.