Total Knee Arthroplasty in Hemodialysis Patients: Routine or Complex Surgery?

Aleksander N. Tsed , Nikita E. Mushtin , Aleksander K. Dulaev , Anton V. Schmeljew

Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia ›› 2023, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4) : 101 -112.

PDF (820KB)
Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia ›› 2023, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4) : 101 -112. DOI: 10.17816/2311-2905-16495
Discussions
research-article

Total Knee Arthroplasty in Hemodialysis Patients: Routine or Complex Surgery?

Author information +
History +
PDF (820KB)

Abstract

Background. Chronic hemodialysis significantly increases the risks associated with knee replacement. Among the late complications of knee arthroplasty in hemodialysis patients, deep periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and aseptic loosening are more frequent. The frequency of revision interventions in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) is substantially higher compared to patients with normal kidney function.

The aim of the study — based on the perioperative parameters and midterm outcomes to justify the primary knee replacement in chronic hemodialysis patients as complex case of arthroplasty.

Methods. A retrospective randomized single-center cohort study was conducted, including 62 patients with various forms of knee osteoarthritis. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 — 29 (46.8%) patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing dialysis, Group 2 — 33 (53.2%) patients without kidney pathology. The average follow-up period in both groups was 3.7 years (min — 1, max — 6). The following parameters were assessed: patient age, length of hospital stay, morphocortical index, body mass index (BMI), duration of hemodialysis, functional assessment of the knee joint using the KSS Function Score and Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12), radiological results on the KRESS, and the frequency of various complications.

Results. In Group 1, patients had significantly lower BMI compared to Group 2. Length of hospital stay in Group 1 were 1.7 times longer. According to the KSS Function Score, no significant differences were observed between the groups in the first 36 months after the operation. However, by the 4th year of follow-up, average KSS Function Score in Group 1 decreased to 77.3 points, which was due to infectious complications. The FJS-12 showed worse scores in Group 2, averaging 68.7 points. After more than three years post-operation, no statistically significant differences were observed between the groups, which was associated with an increase in the number of complications in Group 1. Results on the KRESS after 43 months did not differ between the groups and averaged 4.8 points. Group 1 had more orthopedic complications and cases of PJI, accounting for 7 out of 37.

Conclusion. Age and constitutional characteristics of patients undergoing hemodialysis significantly differ from the normal population. The frequency of complications in Group 1 was 23.5%. These patients require the implantation of more constrained implant components and modular systems. Therefore, primary knee replacement in hemodialysis patients can be classified as a complex case of arthroplasty.

Keywords

knee arthroplasty / chronic hemodialysis / chronic kidney disease

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Aleksander N. Tsed, Nikita E. Mushtin, Aleksander K. Dulaev, Anton V. Schmeljew. Total Knee Arthroplasty in Hemodialysis Patients: Routine or Complex Surgery?. Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia, 2023, 29(4): 101-112 DOI:10.17816/2311-2905-16495

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Преображенский П.М., Филь А.С., Корнилов Н.Н., Пантелеев А.Н., Гуацаев М.С., Каземирский А.В. и др. Эндопротезирование коленного сустава в клинической практике: анализ 36 350 наблюдений из регистра НМИЦ ТО имени Р.Р. Вредена. Травматология и ортопедия России. 2023;29(3):73-85. doi: 10.17816/2311-2905-9349. Preobrazhensky P.M., Fil A.S., Kornilov N.N., Panteleev A.N., Guatsaev M.S., Kazemirsky A.V. et al. Current State of Knee Arthroplasty in Russia: Analysis of 36,350 Сases from the Register of the Vreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics. Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2023;29(3): 73-85. (In Russian). doi: 10.17816/2311-2905-9349.

[2]

1.Андреева Т.М., Огрызко Е.В., Попова М.М. Травматизм, ортопедическая заболеваемость, состояние травматолого-ортопедической помощи населению России в 2018 году. М.: НМИЦ ТО им. Н. Н Приорова; 2019.

[3]

Середа А.П., Кочиш А.А., Черный А.А., Антипов А.П., Алиев А.Г., Вебер Е.В. и др. Эпидемиология эндопротезирования тазобедренного и коленного суставов и перипротезной инфекции в Российской Федерации. Травматология и ортопедия России. 2021;27(3):84-93. doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2021-27-3-84-93. Sereda A.P., Kochish A.A., Cherny A.A., Antipov A.P., Aliev A.G., Veber E.V., et al. Epidemiology of Hip And Knee Arthroplasty and Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Russian Federation. Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2021;27(3):84-93. (In Russian). doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2021-27-3-84-93.

[4]

2.Прохоренко, В.М. 25-летний опыт эндопротезирования крупных суставов конечностей в ФГБУ "ННИИТО им. Я.Л. Цивьяна" Минздрава России / В.М. Прохоренко, И.А. Пахомов, Т.И. Александров [и др.] // Травматология жəне ортопедия. – 2019. – № 3-4. – С. 189-193.

[5]

Singh J.A. Epidemiology of knee and hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. Open Orthop J. 2011;5:80-85. doi: 10.2174/1874325001105010080.

[6]

3.Singh JA. Epidemiology of knee and hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. Open Orthop J. 2011;5:80–85.

[7]

Evans J.T., Walker R.W., Evans J.P., Blom A.W., Sayers A., Whitehouse M.R. How long does a knee replacement last? A systematic review and meta-analysis of case series and national registry reports with more than 15 years of follow-up. Lancet. 2019;393(10172): 655-663. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32531-5.

[8]

4.Evans, J. T. How long does a knee replacement last? A systematic review and meta-analysis of case series and national registry reports with more than 15 years of follow-up / R. W. Walker, J. P. Evans, A. W. Blom, A. Sayers, M. R. Whitehouse // The Lancet. – 2019. - P. 655–663.

[9]

Pollock M., Somerville L., Firth A., Lanting B. Outpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty, Total Knee Arthroplasty, and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of the Literature. JBJS Rev. 2016;4(12):e4. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.16.00002.

[10]

5.Pollock M, Somerville L, Firth A, Lanting B. Outpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty, Total Knee Arthroplasty, and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of the Literature. JBJS Rev. 2016 Dec 27;4(12):e4.

[11]

Муштин Н.Е., Цед А.Н., Дулаев А.К., Леонтьева Н.В., Румянцев А.Ш. Возможности использования фракционированных и нефракционированных гепаринов после первичного эндопротезирования тазобедренного и коленного суставов у пациентов, получающих программный гемодиализ. Нефрология. 2020;24(6): 55-64. doi: 10.36485/1561-6274-2020-24-6-55-64. Mushtin N.E., Tsed A.N., Dulaev A.K., Leontyeva N.V., Rumyantsev A.Sh. Comparison of using fractionated and unfractionated heparins after primary hip and knee arthroplasty in patients receiving programmed hemodialysis. Nephrology (Saint-Petersburg). 2020;24(6):55-64. (In Russian). doi: 10.36485/1561-6274-2020-24-6-55-64.

[12]

6.Муштин, Н. Е., Цед, А. Н., Дулаев, А. К., Леонтьева, Н. В., Румянцев, А. Ш. (2020). Возможности использования фракционированных и нефракционированных гепаринов после первичного эндопротезирования тазобедренного и коленного суставов у пациентов, получающих программный гемодиализ. Нефрология, 24(6), 55-64.

[13]

Петрова Е.Н., Полушин Ю.С., Шлык И.В., Цед А.Н. Особенности периоперационного ведения пациентов с терминальной стадией хронической болезни почек при эндопротезировании тазобедренного и коленного суставов. Альманах клинической медицины. 2019;47(3):251-265. doi: 10.18786/2072-0505-2019-47-033. Petrova E.N., Polushin Yu.S., Shlyk I.V., Tsed A.N. Particulars of the perioperative management of patients with end stage renal disease during hip and knee replacement arthroplasty. Almanac of Clinical Medicine. 2019;47(3):251-265. (In Russian). doi: 10.18786/2072-0505-2019-47-033.

[14]

7.Петрова, Е. Н., Полушин, Ю. С., Шлык, И. В., Цед, А. Н. (2019). Особенности периоперационного ведения пациентов с терминальной стадией хронической болезни почек при эндопротезировании тазобедренного и коленного суставов. Альманах клинической медицины, 47(3), 251-265.

[15]

Цед А.Н., Дулаев А.К., Муштин Н.Е., Ильющенко К.Г., Шмелев А.В. Среднесрочные результаты первичного эндопротезирования тазобедренного сустава у пациентов с терминальной стадией хронической болезни почек. Травматология и ортопедия России. 2019;25(2):44-54. doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2019-25-2-44-54. Tsed A.N., Dulaev A.K., Mushtin N.E., Iliushchenko K.G., Shmelev A.V. Mid-Term Outcomes of Primary Hip Replacement in Patients with End-Stage Chronic Renal Disease. Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2019;25(2):44-54. (In Russian). doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2019-25-2-44-54

[16]

8.Цед, А. Н., Дулаев, А. К., Муштин, Н. Е., Ильющенко, К. Г., Шмелев, А. В. (2019). Среднесрочные результаты первичного эндопротезирования тазобедренного сустава у пациентов с терминальной стадией хронической болезни почек. Травматология и ортопедия России, 25(2), 44-54.

[17]

Inoue D., Yazdi H., Goswami K., Tan T.L., Parvizi J. Comparison of Postoperative Complications and Survivorship of Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Dialysis and Renal Transplantation Patients. J Arthroplasty. 2020;35(4):971-975. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.10.038.

[18]

9.Inoue, D., Yazdi, H., Goswami, K., Tan, T. L., Parvizi, J. (2020). Comparison of postoperative complications and survivorship of total hip and knee arthroplasty in dialysis and renal transplantation patients. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 35(4), 971-975.

[19]

Gkiatas I., Xiang W., Karasavvidis T., Windsor E.N., Sharma A.K., Sculco P.K. Total knee arthroplasty in dialysis patients: Is it safe? A systematic review of the literature. J Orthop. 2021;25:199-206. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.05.025.

[20]

10.Gkiatas, I., Xiang, W., Karasavvidis, T., Windsor, E. N., Sharma, A. K., Sculco, P. K. (2021). Total knee arthroplasty in dialysis patients: Is it safe? A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Orthopaedics, 25, 199-206.

[21]

Мурылев В.Ю., Цыгин Н.А., Шутов Е.В., Жучков А.Г., Рукин Я.А., Сорокина Г.Л. и др. Эндопротезирование крупных суставов у больных, получающих лечение программным диализом. Результаты лечения в одном центре и обзор литературы. Нефрология и диализ. 2019;21(2):221-233. doi: 10.28996/2618-9801-2019-2-221-233. Murylev V.Yu., Tsygin N.A., Shutov E.V., Zhuchkov A.G., Rukin Ya.A., Sorokina G.L. et al. Joint arthroplasty in patients treated with chronic dialysis. Results of a single center study and review. Nephrology and Dialysis. 2019;21(2):221-233. (In Russian). doi: 10.28996/2618-9801-2019-2-221-233.

[22]

11.Stavrakis, A. I., Li, A. K., Uquillas, C., & Photopoulos, C. (2022). Comparison of total knee arthroplasty outcomes between renal transplant and end stage renal disease patients. JAAOS Global Research & Reviews, 6(3).

[23]

Stavrakis A.I., Li A.K., Uquillas C., Photopoulos C. Comparison of Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes Between Renal Transplant and End Stage Renal Disease Patients. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2022; 6(3):e21.00288. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00288.

[24]

12.Цед, А. Н., Смирнов, А. В., Дулаев, А. К., Румянцев, А. Ш., Ананьев, А. Н. (2019). Патологические повреждения костей и суставов у больных на программном гемодиализе в Санкт-Петербурге. Нефрология, 23(6), 73-82.

[25]

Мурылев В.Ю., Цыгин Н.А., Шутов Е.В., Жучков А.Г., Рукин Я.А. Тотальное эндопротезирование тазобедренных и коленных суставов у пациентов с хронической болезнью почек (обзор литературы). Травматология и ортопедия России. 2018;24(2):138-145. doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2018-24-2-138-145. Murylev V.Y., Tsygin N.A., Shutov E.V., Zhuchkov A.G., Rukin Y.A. Total hip and knee arthroplasty in patients with chronic kidney disease (review). Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2018;24(2):138-145. (In Russian). doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2018-24-2-138-145.

[26]

13.Косинская Н.С. «Дегенеративно-дистрофические поражения костно-суставного аппарата». Г. Ленинград. – 1961. – С.98.

[27]

Цед А.Н., Смирнов А.В., Дулаев А.К., Румянцев А.Ш., Ананьев А.Н. Патологические повреждения костей и суставов у больных на программном гемодиализе в Санкт-Петербурге. Нефрология.2019;23(6):73-82. doi: 10.36485/1561-6274-2019-236-73-82. Tsed A.N., Smirnov A.V., Dulaev A.К., Rumyantsev A.S., Ananyev A.N. Pathological damage of bones and joints in patients on hemodialysis in Saint Petersburg. Nephrology (Saint-Petersburg). 2019;23(6):73-82. (In Russian). doi: 10.36485/1561-6274-2019-236-73-82.

[28]

14.Engh G. A., Ammeen D. J. Classification and preoperative radiographic evaluation: knee //Orthopedic Clinics of North America. – 1998. – Т. 29. – №. 2. – С. 205-217.

[29]

Косинская Н.С. Дегенеративно-дистрофические поражения костно-суставного аппарата. Медгиз: Ленинград; 1961. с. 98. Kosinskaya N.S. Degenerative-dystrophic lesions of the osteoarticular apparatus. Medgiz: Leningrad; 1961. р. 98.

[30]

15.Парвизи Д., Герке Т. Материалы второй международной согласительной конференции по скелетно-мышечной инфекции //СПб.: РНИИТО им. РР Вредена. – 2019. – С.320.

[31]

Engh G.A., Ammeen D.J. Classification and preoperative radiographic evaluation: knee. Orthop Clin North Am. 1998;29(2):205-217. doi: 10.1016/s0030-5898(05)70319-9.

[32]

16.EWALD F. C. et al. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system //Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®. – 1989. – Т. 248. – С. 9-12.

[33]

Божкова С.А., Тихилов Р.М., Андрияшкин В.В., Ахтямов И.Ф., Белов М.В., Дианов С.В. и др. Профилактика, диагностика и лечение тромбоэмболических осложнений в травматологии и ортопедии: методические рекомендации. Травматология и ортопедия России. 2022;28(3):136-166. doi: 10.17816/2311-2905-1993. Bozhkova S.A., Tikhilov R.M., Andriyashkin V.V., Akhtyamov I.F., Belov M.V., Dianov S.V. et al. Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of Thromboembolic Complications in Traumatology and Orthopedics: Methodological Guidelines. Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2022;28(3):136-166. (In Russian). doi: 10.17816/2311-2905-1993.

[34]

17.Swedish Arthroplasty Register The Swedish arthroplasty register annual report 2021. https://registercentrum.blob.core.windows.net/slr/r/SAR-Annual -Report-2021-SJ1AFmlR15.pdf

[35]

Lingard E.A., Katz J.N., Wright R.J., Wright E.A,. Sledge C.B.; Kinemax Outcomes Group. Validity and responsiveness of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System in comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83(12):1856-1864. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200112000-00014.

[36]

18.Ben-Shlomo Y., Blom A., Boulton C., et al. The National Joint Registry 19-th Annual Report 2022 [internet]. London: National Joint Registry; 2022 Oct. https://www.ncbi.nlm.gov/books/NBK587525.

[37]

Behrend H., Giesinger K., Giesinger J.M., Kuster M.S. The “forgotten joint” as the ultimate goal in joint arthroplasty: validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(3):430-436.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.06.035.

[38]

19.The Ninth Annual Report of the American Joint Replacement Registry on Hip and Knee Arthroplastyt, 2022 https://connect.registryapps.net/hubfs/PDFs%20and%20PPTs/2022%20AJRR%20Annual%20Report.pdf

[39]

Ewald F.C. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;(248):9-12.

[40]

20.Филь, А. С. Тренды в первичной артропластике коленного сустава в Национальном медицинском исследовательском центре травматологии и ортопедии им. Р.Р.Вредена и их сравнительный анализ с данными международных национальных регистров: схож ли наш путь? / А.С. Филь, В.Н. Тараканов, Т.А. Куляба, Н.Н. Корнилов // Гений ортопедии. -2020.- Т 26, № 4. - С. 476-483.

[41]

Venishetty N., Wukich D.K., Beale J., Riley Martinez J., Toutoungy M., Mounasamy V. et al. Total knee arthroplasty in dialysis patients: a national in-patient sample-based study of perioperative complications. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2023;35(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s43019-023-00196-0.

[42]

21.Li N, Tan Y, Deng Y, Chen L. Posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Mar;22(3):556-64.

[43]

Swedish Arthroplasty Register The Swedish arthroplasty register annual report 2021. Available from: https://registercentrum.blob.core.windows.net/slr/r/SAR-Annual-Report-2021-SJlAFmlRl5.pdf

[44]

22.Thuysbaert G, Luyckx T, Ryckaert A, Gunst P, Noyez J, Winnock De Grave P. Reduced joint awareness after total knee arthroplasty with a cruciate retaining design. Acta Orthop Belg. 2020 Sep;86(3):482-488. PMID: 33581033.

[45]

The National Joint Registry 19-th Annual Report 2022 [Internet]. London: National Joint Registry; 2022 Oct. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK587525/.

[46]

23.Gustke KA, Gelbke MK (2017) All-polyethylene tibial component use for elderly, low-demand total knee arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty 32:2421–2426.

[47]

The Ninth Annual Report of the American Joint Replacement Registry on Hip and Knee Arthroplasty, 2022. Available from: https://connect.registryapps.net/hubfs/PDFs%20and%20PPTs/2022%20AJRR%20Annual%20Report.pdf.

[48]

24.Apostolopoulos V, Nachtnebl L, Mahdal M, Pazourek L, Boháč P, Janíček P, Tomáš T. Clinical outcomes and survival comparison between NexGen all-poly and its metal-backed equivalent in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2023 Sep;47(9):2207-2213.

[49]

Филь А., Тараканов В., Куляба Т., Корнилов Н. Тренды в первичной артропластике коленного сустава в Национальном медицинском исследовательском центре травматологии и ортопедии им. Р.Р. Вредена и их сравнительный анализ с данными международных национальных регистров: схож ли наш путь? Гений ортопедии. 2020;26(4):476-483. doi: 10.18019/1028-4427-2020-26-4-476-483. Fil A., Tarakanov V., Kulyaba T., Kornilov N. Primary knee joint arthroplasty trends at the Vreden National Medical Research Centre for Traumatology and Orthopedics compared with other national joint replacement registries. Is our way similar? Genij Ortopedii. 2020;26(4):476-483. (In Russian). doi: 10.18019/1028-4427-2020-26-4-476-483.

[50]

25.Scheumann GF, Holch M, Nerlich ML, Brandis A, Ostertag H, Tscherne H. Pathological fractures and lytic bone lesion of the femoral neck associated with beta 2-microglobulin amyloid deposition in long-term dialysis patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1991;110(2):93-7.

[51]

Li N., Tan Y., Deng Y., Chen L. Posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(3):556-564. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2275-0.

[52]

Thuysbaert G., Luyckx T., Ryckaert A., Gunst P., Noyez J., Winnock De Grave P. Reduced joint awareness after total knee arthroplasty with a cruciate retaining design. Acta Orthop Belg. 2020;86(3):482-488.

[53]

Gustke K.A., Gelbke M.K. All-polyethylene tibial component use for elderly, low-demand total knee arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(8):2421-2426. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.077.

[54]

Apostolopoulos V., Nachtnebl L., Mahdal M., Pazourek L., Boháč P., Janíček P. et al. Clinical outcomes and survival comparison between NexGen all-poly and its metal-backed equivalent in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2023;47(9):2207-2213. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05772-3.

[55]

Scheumann G.F., Holch M., Nerlich M.L., Brandis A., Ostertag H., Tscherne H. Pathological fractures and lytic bone lesion of the femoral neck associated with beta 2-microglobulin amyloid deposition in long-term dialysis patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1991;110(2):93-97. doi: 10.1007/BF00393881.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Eco-Vector

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (820KB)

144

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/