Comparison of the results of partial monopolar transfer of the pectoralis major for restoring active elbow flexion in children with arthrogryposis

Olga E. Agranovich , Ekaterina V. Petrova , Sergey F. Batkin , Vladimir M. Kenis , Andrey V. Sapogovskiy , Evgeniy V. Melchenko , Evgeniy D. Blagoveschenskiy

Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery ›› 2022, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (1) : 13 -22.

PDF (465KB)
Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery ›› 2022, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (1) : 13 -22. DOI: 10.17816/PTORS99901
Clinical studies
research-article

Comparison of the results of partial monopolar transfer of the pectoralis major for restoring active elbow flexion in children with arthrogryposis

Author information +
History +
PDF (465KB)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The absence of active forearm flexion in children with amyoplasia leads to severe functional disorders. Muscle transfer can potentially restore active elbow flexion and the patient’s daily living.

AIM: This study compares the results of the transposition of the latissimus dorsi and pectoralis major to the biceps brachii and identifies the optimal donor area for restoring active elbow flexion in children with amyoplasia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The retrospective study involved 61 patients with amyoplasia (30 (49%) girls and 31 (51%) boys) who were examined and treated from 2011 to 2020. Restoration of elbow flexion was performed in 90 cases. In 46 cases (51.1%), we used the pectoralis major, and in 44 (48.9%), the latissimus dorsi as donor muscles. In both groups, we performed monopolar muscle transfers. The clinical examination of the patients was conducted before and after the operation. Statistical data processing was performed using Statistica 10 and SAS JMP 11.

RESULTS: The age of patients at the time of surgery was from 1.5 to 15.5 years (6.24 ± 4.24 years), the follow-up period after surgery was from 6 to 99 months (41.25 ± 30.19 months). After surgery, all patients had elbow flexion contractures. However, when the latissimus dorsi was used as a donor muscle, the degree of contracture was less than after pectoralis major transfer (15.19° ± 13.04° and 23.24° ± 15.37°, respectively, p = 0.0483). In addition, after the latissimus dorsi transfer, the strength of the forearm flexors was on average 1 point greater than after the pectoralis major transfer (2.85 ± 1.08 and 4.00 ± 0.62 points, respectively, p < 0.0001). After the latissimus dorsi transfer, the active elbow amplitude flexion was bigger than that of the pectoralis major transfer (75.37° ± 17.86° and 55.88° ± 24.60°, respectively, p = 0.0022).

CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated the effectiveness of using the latissimus dorsi and the pectoralis major to restore elbow flexion in children with amyoplasia. However, if it is possible to choose a donor muscle, it should be the latissimus dorsi.

Keywords

arthrogryposis / amyoplasia / elbow / flexion / contractures / movement disorders / muscles transfers / latissimus dorsi muscle / pectoralis major muscle

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Olga E. Agranovich, Ekaterina V. Petrova, Sergey F. Batkin, Vladimir M. Kenis, Andrey V. Sapogovskiy, Evgeniy V. Melchenko, Evgeniy D. Blagoveschenskiy. Comparison of the results of partial monopolar transfer of the pectoralis major for restoring active elbow flexion in children with arthrogryposis. Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery, 2022, 10(1): 13-22 DOI:10.17816/PTORS99901

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Sochol KM, Edwards G 3rd, Stevanovic M. Restoration of elbow flexion with a free functional gracilis muscle transfer in an arthrogrypotic patient using a motor nerve to pectoralis major. Hand (NY). 2020;15(5):739−743. DOI: 10.1177/1558944720923412

[2]

Sochol K.M., Edwards G. 3rd, Stevanovic M. Restoration of elbow flexion with a free functional gracilis muscle transfer in an arthrogrypotic patient using a motor nerve to pectoralis major // Hand (NY). 2020. Vol. 15. No. 5. P. 739−743. DOI: 10.1177/1558944720923412

[3]

Atkins RM, Bell MJ, Sharrard WJ. Pectoralis major transfer for paralysis of elbow flexion in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985;67:640−644.

[4]

Atkins R.M., Bell M.J., Sharrard W.J. Pectoralis major transfer for paralysis of elbow flexion in children // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 1985. Vol. 67. P. 640−644.

[5]

Agranovich OE, Kochenova EA, Oreshkov AB, et al. Evaluation of unipolar transfer of the latissimus dorsi to flexor antebrachii in patients with arthrogryposis. Orthopaedic Genius. 2019;25(1):42−48. DOI: 10.18019/1028-4427-2019-25-1-42-48

[6]

Agranovich O.E., Kochenova E.A., Oreshkov A.B. et al. Evaluation of unipolar transfer of the latissimus dorsi to flexor antebrachii in patients with arthrogryposis // Orthop. Genius. 2019. Vol. 25. No. 1. P. 42−48. DOI: 10.18019/1028-4427-2019-25-1-42-48

[7]

Agranovich OE, Kochenova EA, Trofimova SI, et al. Restoration of elbow active flexion via latissimus dorsii transfer in patients with arthrogryposis. Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery. 2018;6(3):5−11. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17816/PTORS6273-75

[8]

Агранович О.Е., Коченова Е.А., Трофимова С.И. и др. Использование широчайшей мышцы спины для восстановления активного сгибания в локтевом суставе у больных с артрогрипозом // Ортопедия, травматология и восстановительная хирургия детского возраста. 2018. Т. 6. № 3. С. 5−11. DOI: 10.17816/PTORS6273-75

[9]

Carroll RE, Hill NA. Triceps transfer to restore elbow flexion. A study of fifteen patients with paralytic lesions and arthrogryposis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52:239−244.

[10]

Carroll R.E., Hill N.A. Triceps transfer to restore elbow flexion. A study of fifteen patients with paralytic lesions and arthrogryposis // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1970. Vol. 52. P. 239−244.

[11]

Chomiak J, Dungl P, Včelák J. Reconstruction of elbow flexion in arthrogryposis multiplex congenita type I. J Pediatr Orthop. 2014;34(8):799–807. DOI: 10.1097/bpo.0000000000000204

[12]

Chomiak J., Dungl P., Včelák J. Reconstruction of elbow flexion in arthrogryposis multiplex congenita type I // J. Pediatr. Orthop. 2014. Vol. 34. No. 8. P. 799–807. DOI: 10.1097/bpo.0000000000000204

[13]

Carroll RE, Kleinman WB. Pectoralis major transplantation to restore elbow flexion to the paralytic limb. J Hand Surg Am. 1979;4:501−507.

[14]

Carroll R.E., Kleinman W.B. Pectoralis major transplantation to restore elbow flexion to the paralytic limb // J. Hand Surg. Am. 1979. Vol. 4. P. 501−507.

[15]

Doyle JR, James PM, Larsen LJ, Ashley RK. Restoration of elbow flexion in arthrogryposis multiplex congenita. J Hand Surg. 1980;5A:149–152

[16]

Doyle J.R., James P.M., Larsen L.J., Ashley R.K. Restoration of elbow flexion in arthrogryposis multiplex congenita // J. Hand Surg. 1980. Vol. 5A. P. 149–152.

[17]

Gagnon E, Fogelson N, Seyfer AE. Use of the latissimus dorsi muscle to restore elbow flexion in arthrogryposis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106:1582−1585.

[18]

Gagnon E., Fogelson N., Seyfer A.E. Use of the latissimus dorsi muscle to restore elbow flexion in arthrogryposis // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2000. Vol. 106. No. 7. P. 1582–1585. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200012000-00022

[19]

Ezaki M. Treatment of the upper limb in the child with arthrogryposis. Hand Clinics. 2000;16(4):703–711. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-0712(21)00228-6

[20]

Ezaki M. Treatment of the upper limb in the child with arthrogryposis // Hand Clinics. 2000. Vol. 16. No. 4. P. 703–711. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-0712(21)00228-6

[21]

Goldfarb CA, Burke MS, Strecker WB, Manske PR. The Steindler flexorplasty for the arthrogrypotic elbow. J Hand Surg Am. 2004;29(3):462−469. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2003.12.011

[22]

Goldfarb C.A., Burke M.S., Strecker W.B., Manske P.R. The Steindler flexorplasty for the arthrogrypotic elbow // J. Hand Surg. Am. 2004. Vol. 29. No. 3. P. 462–469. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2003.12.011

[23]

Lahoti O, Bell MJ. Transfer of pectoralis major in arthrogryposis to restore elbow flexion. Deteriorating results in the long term. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(6):858–860. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B6.15506

[24]

Lahoti O., Bell M.J. Transfer of pectoralis major in arthrogryposis to restore elbow flexion. Deteriorating results in the long term // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2005. Vol. 87. No. 6. P. 858–860. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B6.15506

[25]

Zargarbashi R, Nabian MH, Werthel J-D, Valenti P. Is bipolar latissimus dorsi transfer a reliable option to restore elbow flexion in children with arthrogryposis? A review of 13 tendon transfers. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017;26(11):2004–2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.04.002

[26]

Zargarbashi R., Nabian M.H., Werthel J.-D., Valenti P. Is bipolar latissimus dorsi transfer a reliable option to restore elbow flexion in children with arthrogryposis? A review of 13 tendon transfers // J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017. Vol. 26. No. 11. P. 2004–2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.04.002

[27]

Van Heest A, Waters PM, Simmons BP. Surgical treatment of arthrogryposis of the elbow. J Hand Surg Am. 1998;23:1063–1070. DOI: 10.1016/S0363-5023(98)80017-8

[28]

Van Heest A., Waters P.M., Simmons B.P. Surgical treatment of arthrogryposis of the elbow // J. Hand Surg. Am. 1998. Vol. 23. P. 1063–1070. DOI: 10.1016/S0363-5023(98)80017-8

[29]

Oishi S, Agranovich O, Zlotolow D, et al. Treatment and outcomes of arthrogryposis in the upper extremity. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2019;181(3):363–371. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31722

[30]

Oishi S., Agranovich O., Zlotolow D. et al. Treatment and outcomes of arthrogryposis in the upper extremity // Am. J. Med. Genet. C. Semin. Med. Genet. 2019. Vol. 181. No. 3. P. 363–371. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31722

[31]

Takagi T, Seki A, Kobayashi Y, et al. Isolated muscle transfer to restore elbow flexion in children with arthrogryposis. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2016;21(1):44–48. DOI: 10.1142/S2424835516500053

[32]

Takagi T., Seki A., Kobayashi Y. et al. Isolated muscle transfer to restore elbow flexion in children with arthrogryposis // J. Hand Surg. Asian Pac. Vol. 2016. Vol. 21. No. 1. P. 44–48. DOI: 10.1142/S2424835516500053

[33]

Doi K, Arakawa Y, Hattori Y, Baliarsing AS. Restoration of elbow flexion with functioning free muscle transfer in arthrogryposis: a report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(18):e105. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01846

[34]

Doi K., Arakawa Y., Hattori Y., Baliarsing A.S. Restoration of elbow flexion with functioning free muscle transfer in arthrogryposis: a report of two cases // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2011. Vol. 93. No. 18. P. e105. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01846

[35]

Kay S, Pinder R, Wiper J, et al. Microvascular free functioning gracilis transfer with nerve transfer to establish elbow flexion. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63(7):1142–1149. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.05.021

[36]

Kay S., Pinder R., Wiper J. et al. Microvascular free functioning gracilis transfer with nerve transfer to establish elbow flexion // J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 2010. Vol. 63. No. 7. P. 1142–1149. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.05.021

[37]

Bennett JB, Hansen PE, Granberry WM, Cain TE. Surgical management of arthrogryposis in the upper extremity. J Pediatr Orthop. 1985;5:281–286.

[38]

Bennett J.B., Hansen P.E., Granberry W.M., Cain T.E. Surgical management of arthrogryposis in the upper extremity // J. Pediatr. Orthop. 1985. Vol. 5. P. 281–286.

[39]

Wall LB, Calhoun V, Roberts S, Goldfarb CA. Distal humerus external rotation osteotomy for hand position in arthrogryposis. J Hand Surg Am. 2017;42(6):473.e1–473.e7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.03.002

[40]

Wall L.B., Calhoun V., Roberts S., Goldfarb C.A. Distal humerus external rotation osteotomy for hand position in arthrogryposis // J. Hand Surg. Am. 2017. Vol. 42. No. 6. P. 473.e1–473.e7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.03.002

Funding

Государственное задание Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации(НИР № 121031700125-7)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Agranovich O.E., Petrova E.V., Batkin S.F., Kenis V.M., Sapogovskiy A.V., Melchenko E.V., Blagoveschenskiy E.D.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (465KB)

151

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/