Selected aspects of proximal femoral epiphysis fixation in children with early stages of slipped capital femoral epiphysis
Dmitriy B. Barsukov , Pavel I. Bortulev , Vladimir E. Baskov , Ivan Yu. Pozdnikin , Tatyana V. Murashko , Tamila V. Baskaeva
Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery ›› 2021, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (3) : 277 -286.
Selected aspects of proximal femoral epiphysis fixation in children with early stages of slipped capital femoral epiphysis
BACKGROUND: Epiphyseodesis of the femoral head in the early stages of slipped capital femoral epiphysis using auto-, allografts, and synthetic implant may result in deformities of the femur leading cam-type femoroacetabular impingement and dysfunction of the gluteal muscles. Most surgeons refused this intervention and favor in situ fixation of the epiphysis with modern metal instrumentation and, in particular, cannulated screws with proximal threading. However, the number of screws that provide stable fixation and how to reduce their negative effect on the enchondral growth of the femur remain controversial.
AIM: To improve the results of surgical treatment in children with early stages of slipped capital femoral epiphysis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The radiological results of surgical treatment of 40 patients (80 affected joints) aged from 11 to 14 years with slipped capital femoral epiphysis of stage 1 in one joint and stage 2 in the other joint were analyzed. 20 children were divided into two groups. In each group, the epiphysis was fixed with a 7.0 mm cannulated screw. In the first group, the screw head was held on the cortical layer. In the second group, the screw head was held 5–10 millimeters away from the cortical layer. Long-term results were evaluated at the age of 17–18 years when no signs of enchondral and ecchondral growth of the proximal femur were noted. The obtained data were subjected to statistical analysis.
RESULTS: The fixation of the epiphysis was stable in all 80 joints. The shape of epimetaphysis in the joints of stage 2 did not change in most patients by the end of femoral growth. However, the correction recorded in 32.5% of cases was more often observed in children of the second group. The shape of epimetaphysis in all 40 joints with stage 1 of the disease remained normal. The mean length of the epimetaphysis was greater in the second group than in the first group by the end of growth regardless of the stage of the pathologic process during surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: The considered method of proximal femoral epiphysis fixation, which excludes the compressive effect of a cannulated screw with proximal threading on the epiphyseal growth cartilage, provides reliable epiphysis retention in the early stages of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. It has a less negative effect on the enchondral growth of the femoral component of the joint.
slipped capital femoral epiphysis / hip joint / femoroacetabular impingement / epiphyseodesis of the femoral head / fixation of the proximal femoral epiphysis / cannulated screw
| [1] |
Tihonenkov ES, Krasnov AI. Diagnosis, surgical and rehabilitation treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis in adolescents. Saint Petersburg; 1994. (In Russ.) |
| [2] |
Тихоненков Е.С., Краснов А.И. Диагностика, хирургическое и восстановительное лечение юношеского эпифизеолиза головки бедренной кости у подростков: методические рекомендации. Санкт-Петербург, 1994. |
| [3] |
Wensaas A, Svenningsen S, Terjesen T. Long-term outcome of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a 38-year follow-up of 66 patients. J Child Orthop. 2011;5(2):75−82. |
| [4] |
Wensaas A., Svenningsen S., Terjesen T. Long-term outcome of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a 38-year follow-up of 66 patients // J. Child. Orthop. 2011. Vol. 5. No. 2. P. 75−82. |
| [5] |
Shkatula JuV. Etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (the analytical review of the literature). Vestnik SumGU. 2007;2:122−135. (In Russ.) |
| [6] |
Шкатула Ю.В. Этиология, патогенез, диагностика и принципы лечения юношеского эпифизеолиза головки бедренной кости (аналитический обзор литературы) // Вестник СумГУ. 2007. Т. 2. С. 122−135. |
| [7] |
Krechmar AN. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (clinic-experimental study). Leningrad; 1982. (In Russ.) |
| [8] |
Кречмар А.Н. Юношеский эпифизеолиз головки бедра (клинико-экспериментальное исследование): дис. … д-р мед. наук. Ленинград, 1982. |
| [9] |
Green DW, Reynolds RA, Khan SN, Tolo V. The delay in diagnosis of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a review of 102 patients. HSS Journal: the Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery. 2005;1(1):103−106. DOI: 10.1007/s11420-005-0118-y |
| [10] |
Green D.W., Reynolds R.A., Khan S.N., Tolo V. The delay in diagnosis of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a review of 102 patients // HSS Journal: the Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery. 2005. Vol. 1. No. 1. P. 103−106. DOI: 10.1007/s11420-005-0118-y |
| [11] |
Falciglia F, Aulisa A, Giordano M, et al. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: an ultrastructural study before and after osteosynthesis. Acta Orthopaedica. 2010;81(3):331−336. DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2010.483987 |
| [12] |
Falciglia F., Aulisa A., Giordano M. et al. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: an ultrastructural study before and after osteosynthesis // Acta Orthopaedica. 2010. Vol. 81. No. 3. P. 331−336. DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2010.483987 |
| [13] |
Abraham E, Gonzalez MH, Pratap S, et al. Clinical implications of anatomical wear characteristics in slipped capital femoral epiphysis and primary osteoarthritis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2007;27(7):788−795. DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181558c94 |
| [14] |
Abraham E., Gonzalez M.H., Pratap S. et al. Clinical implications of anatomical wear characteristics in slipped capital femoral epiphysis and primary osteoarthritis // J. Pediatr. Orthop. 2007. Vol. 27. No. 7. P. 788−795. DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181558c94 |
| [15] |
Al-Nammari SS, Tibrewal S, Britton EM, Farrar NG. Management outcome and the role of manipulation in slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2008;16(1):131. DOI: 10.1177/230949900801600134 |
| [16] |
Al-Nammari S.S., Tibrewal S., Britton E.M., Farrar N.G. Management outcome and the role of manipulation in slipped capital femoral epiphysis // J. Orthop. Surg. (Hong Kong). 2008. Vol. 16. No. 1. P. 131. DOI: 10.1177/230949900801600134 |
| [17] |
Arora S, Dutt V, Palocaren T, Madhuri V. Slipped upper femoral epiphysis: Outcome after in situ fixation and capital realignment technique. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. 2013;47(3):264–271. DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.125538 |
| [18] |
Arora S., Dutt V., Palocaren T., Madhuri V. Slipped upper femoral epiphysis: Outcome after in situ fixation and capital realignment technique // Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. 2013. Vol. 47. No. 3. P. 264–271. DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.125538 |
| [19] |
Ziebarth K, Leunig M, Slongo T, et al. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: relevant pathophysiological findings with open surgery. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2013;471(7):2156−2162. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-2818-9 |
| [20] |
Ziebarth K., Leunig M., Slongo T. et al. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: relevant pathophysiological findings with open surgery // Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2013. Vol. 471. No. 7. P. 2156−2162. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-2818-9 |
| [21] |
Barsukov DB, Baindurashvili AG, Bortuljov PI, et al. Vybor metoda hirurgicheskogo lechenija pri junosheskom jepifizeolize golovki bedrennoj kosti s hronicheskim smeshheniem jepifiza tjazheloj stepeni. Ortopedija, travmatologija i vosstanovitel’naja hirurgija detskogo vozrasta. 2020;8(4):383−394. DOI: 10.17816/PTORS42298 |
| [22] |
Барсуков Д.Б., Баиндурашвили А.Г., Бортулев П.И. и др. Выбор метода хирургического лечения при юношеском эпифизеолизе головки бедренной кости с хроническим смещением эпифиза тяжелой степени // Ортопедия, травматология и восстановительная хирургия детского возраста. 2020. Т. 8. № 4. C. 383−394. DOI: 10.17816/PTORS42298 |
| [23] |
Ganz R, Leunig M, Leunig-Ganz K, Harris WH. The etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip: an integrated mechanical concept. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2008;466(2):264−272. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-007-0060-z |
| [24] |
Ganz R., Leunig M., Leunig-Ganz K., Harris W.H. The etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip: an integrated mechanical concept // Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2008. Vol. 466. No. 2. P. 264−272. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-007-0060-z |
| [25] |
Wylie JD, McClincy MP, Uppal N, et al. Surgical treatment of symptomatic post-slipped capital femoral epiphysis deformity: a comparative study between hip arthroscopy and surgical hip dislocation with or without intertrochanteric osteotomy. J Child Orthop. 2020;14:98−105. DOI: 10.1302/1863-2548.14.190194 |
| [26] |
Wylie J.D., McClincy M.P., Uppal N. et al. Surgical treatment of symptomatic post-slipped capital femoral epiphysis deformity: a comparative study between hip arthroscopy and surgical hip dislocation with or without intertrochanteric osteotomy // J. Child. Orthop. 2020. Vol. 14. P. 98−105. DOI: 10.1302/1863-2548.14.190194 |
| [27] |
Accadbled F, Murgier J, Delannes B, et al. In situ pinning in slipped capital femoral epiphysis: long-term follow-up studies. J Child Orthop. 2017;11:107−109. DOI: 10.1302/1863-2548.11.160282 |
| [28] |
Accadbled F., Murgier J., Delannes B. et al. In situ pinning in slipped capital femoral epiphysis: long-term follow-up studies // J. Child. Orthop. 2017. Vol. 11. P. 107−109. DOI: 10.1302/1863-2548.11.160282 |
| [29] |
Hägglund G. Pinning the slipped and contralateral hips in the treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Child Orthop. 2017;11:110−113. DOI: 10.1302/1863- 2548.11.170022 |
| [30] |
Hägglund G. Pinning the slipped and contralateral hips in the treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis // J. Child. Orthop. 2017. Vol. 11. P. 110−113. DOI: 10.1302/1863- 2548.11.170022 |
| [31] |
Sonnega RJ, van der Sluijs JA, Wainwright AM, et al. Management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: results of a survey of the members of the European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society. Journal of Children’s Orthopaedics. 2011;5(6):433−438. DOI: 10.1007/s11832-011-0375-x |
| [32] |
Sonnega R.J., van der Sluijs J.A., Wainwright A.M. et al. Management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: results of a survey of the members of the European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society // J. Child. Orthop. 2011. Vol. 5. No. 6. P. 433−438. DOI: 10.1007/s11832-011-0375-x |
| [33] |
Billing L, Severin E. Slipping epiphysis of the hip. A roentgenological and clinical study based om a new roentgen technique. Acta Radiol. 1959;174:1−76. |
| [34] |
Billing L., Severin E. Slipping epiphysis of the hip. A roentgenological and clinical study based om a new roentgen technique // Acta Radiol. 1959. Vol. 174. P. 1−76. |
| [35] |
Bellemans J, Fabry G, Molenaers G, et al. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a long-term follow-up, with special emphasis on the capacities for remodeling. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1996;5:151−157. |
| [36] |
Bellemans J., Fabry G., Molenaers G. et al. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a long-term follow-up, with special emphasis on the capacities for remodeling // J. Pediatr. Orthop. B. 1996. Vol. 5. P. 151−157. |
| [37] |
O’Brien ET, Fahey JJ. Remodeling of the femoral neck after in situ pinning for slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am). 1977;59-A:62−68. |
| [38] |
O’Brien E.T., Fahey J.J. Remodeling of the femoral neck after in situ pinning for slipped capital femoral epiphysis // J. Bone Joint Surg. (Am). 1977. Vol. 59-A. P. 62−68. |
| [39] |
Örtegren J, Björklund-Sand L, Engbom M, Tiderius CJ. Continued growth of the femoral neck leads to improved remodeling after in situ fixation of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2018. Vol. 38. No. 3. P. 170−75. DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000797 |
| [40] |
Örtegren J., Björklund-Sand L., Engbom M, Tiderius C.J. Continued growth of the femoral neck leads to improved remodeling after in situ fixation of slipped capital femoral epiphysis // J. Pediatr. Orthop. 2018. Vol. 38. No. 3. P. 170−175. DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000797 |
| [41] |
Hägglund G, Bylander B, Hansson LI, Selvik G. Bone growth after fixing slipped capital femoral epiphyses. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1988;70-B:845−846. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.70B5.3192598 |
| [42] |
Hägglund G., Bylander B., Hansson L.I., Selvik G. Bone growth after fixing slipped capital femoral epiphyses // J. Bone Joint Surg. (Br). 1988. Vol. 70-B. P. 845−846. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.70B5.3192598 |
| [43] |
Örtegren J, Björklund-Sand L, Engbom M, et al. Unthreaded fixation of slipped capital femoral epiphysis leads to continuous growth of the femoral neck. J Pediatr Orthop. 2016;36:494−498. DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000684 |
| [44] |
Örtegren J., Björklund-Sand L., Engbom M. et al. Unthreaded fixation of slipped capital femoral epiphysis leads to continuous growth of the femoral neck // J. Pediatr. Orthop. 2016. Vol. 36. P. 494-498. DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000684 |
| [45] |
Siebenrock KA, Ferner F, Noble PC, et al. The cam-type deformity of the proximal femur arises in childhood in response to vigorous sporting activity. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2011;469(11):3229−3240. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-1945-4 |
| [46] |
Siebenrock K.A., Ferner F., Noble P.C. et al. The cam-type deformity of the proximal femur arises in childhood in response to vigorous sporting activity // Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2011. Vol. 469. P. 11. P. 3229−3240. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-1945-4 |
| [47] |
Uglow MG, Clarke NM. The management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86(5):631−635. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b5.15058 |
| [48] |
Uglow M.G., Clarke N.M. The management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2004. Vol. 86. No. 5. P. 631−635. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b5.15058 |
| [49] |
Lim YJ, Lam KS, Lee EH. Review of the management outcome of slipped capital femoral epiphysis and the role of prophylactic contra-lateral pinning re-examined. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore. 2008;37(3):184−187. |
| [50] |
Lim Y.J., Lam K.S., Lee E.H. Review of the management outcome of slipped capital femoral epiphysis and the role of prophylactic contra-lateral pinning re-examined // Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore. 2008. Vol. 37. No. 3. P. 184−187. |
| [51] |
Jones JR, Paterson DC, Hillier ТM, Foster BK. Remodelling after pinning for slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72-B:568−573. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.72B4.2380205 |
| [52] |
Jones J.R., Paterson D.C., Hillier Т.M., Foster B.K. Remodelling after pinning for slipped capital femoral epiphysis // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 1990. Vol. 72-B. P. 568−573. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.72B4.2380205 |
| [53] |
Barsukov DB, Krasnov AI, Kamosko MM. Hirurgicheskoe lechenie detej s rannimi stadijami junosheskogo jepifizeoliza golovki bedrennoj kosti. Vestnik travmatologii i ortopedii im. N.N. Priorova. 2016;(1):40−47. DOI: 10.17816/PTORS6378-86 |
| [54] |
Барсуков Д.Б., Краснов А.И., Камоско М.М. Хирургическое лечение детей с ранними стадиями юношеского эпифизеолиза головки бедренной кости // Вестник травматологии и ортопедии им. Н.Н. Приорова. 2016. № 1. С. 40−47. DOI: 10.17816/PTORS6378-86 |
| [55] |
Sailhan F, Courvoisier A, Brunet O, et al. Continued growth of the hip after fixation of slipped capital femoral epiphysis using a single cannulated screw with a proximal threading. J Child Orthop. 2011;5(2):83−88. DOI: 10.1007/s11832-010-0324-0 |
| [56] |
Sailhan F., Courvoisier A., Brunet O. et al. Continued growth of the hip after fixation of slipped capital femoral epiphysis using a single cannulated screw with a proximal threading // J. Child. Orthop. 2011. Vol. 5. No. 2. P. 83−88. DOI: 10.1007/s11832-010-0324-0 |
| [57] |
Burke JG, Sher JL. Intra-operative arthrography facilitates accurate screw fixation of a slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86(8):1197−1198. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b8.14889 |
| [58] |
Burke J.G., Sher J.L. Intra-operative arthrography facilitates accurate screw fixation of a slipped capital femoral epiphysis // J Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2004. Vol. 86. No. 8. P. 1197−1198. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b8.14889 |
| [59] |
Swarup I, Shah R, Gohel S, et al. Predicting subsequent contralateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis: an evidence-based approach. J Child Orthop. 2020;14:91−97. DOI: 10.1302/1863-2548.14.200012 |
| [60] |
Swarup I., Shah R., Gohel S. et al. Predicting subsequent contralateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis: an evidence-based approach // J. Child. Orthop. 2020. Vol. 14. P. 91−97. DOI: 10.1302/1863-2548.14.200012 |
Barsukov D.B., Bortulev P.I., Baskov V.E., Pozdnikin I.Y., Murashko T.V., Baskaeva T.V.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |