Analysis of vertebrotomy treatment in children with congenital scoliosis with unsegmented rod and rib synostosis

Marat S. Asadulaev , Sergei V. Vissarionov , Anton S. Shabunin , Kristina N. Rodionova , Yury A. Novosad , Vakhtang G. Toriya , Dmitry N. Kokushin , Nikita O. Khusainov , Aleksandra N. Filippova , Dmitry V. Ryzhikov

Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery ›› 2024, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (3) : 293 -306.

PDF (1277KB)
Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery ›› 2024, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (3) : 293 -306. DOI: 10.17816/PTORS626814
Clinical studies
research-article

Analysis of vertebrotomy treatment in children with congenital scoliosis with unsegmented rod and rib synostosis

Author information +
History +
PDF (1277KB)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Congenital anomalies of vertebral development account for 2%–11% of cases in the general structure of nosologies that cause spinal deformity. An unsegmented rod (unilateral violation of vertebral segmentation) is attributed to a prognostically unfavorable malformation. Rib synostosis causes the development of thoracic insufficiency syndrome.

AIM: To analyze the results of treatment of children with congenital scoliosis caused by an unsegmented rod and rib synostosis by vertebrotomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cohort, retrospective, monocenter study evaluated the treatment results of 55 patients. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1, children aged 2–8 years, the scope of intervention was wedge-shaped osteotomy of a non-segmented rod at the apex of the deformity, and group 2, children aged 8–18 years, the scope of intervention was wedge-shaped osteotomy at the apex of the deformity and two linear osteotomies of a non-segmented rod in the cranial and caudal directions. Clinical, radiological, and statistical research methods were used.

RESULTS: Significant correction of scoliosis was achieved in 65.5% of patients aged 2–7 years (group 1) and 56.3% in children aged 8–18 years (group 2). Hypokyphosis of the thoracic spine was observed in the patients. The percentage of correction of kyphosis was 21.1% in group 1 and 19.1% in group 2. Lung volume increased by 27.9% (p = 0.01776) in group 1, and lung volume on the concave side increased by 23.5% (p = 0.04975) and on the convex side by 29.6% (p = 0.01073). Improvement in the overall respiratory impedance reached 47.3% (p < 0.05). In group 2, a insignificant increase was found in VVC by 12.6% (p = 0.3509) and FEV1 by 8.7% of the initial (p = 0.1534), as well as an increase in total lung volume of 13.3% (p = 0.1527) and the contribution of the lung along the concave side of 18.8% (p = 0.1535), and the lung along the convex side was 8.4% (p = 0.169), indicating no significant impact on lung development and function.

CONCLUSIONS: In children with spinal deformity caused by a non-segmented rod with normal respiratory function, vertebrotomy at the apex of the deformity with subsequent correction and stabilization of the spinal deformity is recommended. Performing simultaneous multilevel osteotomies of a non-segmented rod allows for significant correction of rigid spinal deformity.

Keywords

congenital scoliosis / orthopedics / vertebrotomy / correction of scoliosis / children / spine / congenital malformation / surgery

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Marat S. Asadulaev, Sergei V. Vissarionov, Anton S. Shabunin, Kristina N. Rodionova, Yury A. Novosad, Vakhtang G. Toriya, Dmitry N. Kokushin, Nikita O. Khusainov, Aleksandra N. Filippova, Dmitry V. Ryzhikov. Analysis of vertebrotomy treatment in children with congenital scoliosis with unsegmented rod and rib synostosis. Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery, 2024, 12(3): 293-306 DOI:10.17816/PTORS626814

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Zhang YB, Zhang JG. Treatment of early-onset scoliosis: techniques, indications, and complications. Chin Med J (Engl). 2020;133(3):351–357. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000614

[2]

Zhang Y.B., Zhang J.G. Treatment of early-onset scoliosis: techniques, indications, and complications // Chin Med J (Engl). 2020. Vol. 133, N 3. P. 351–357. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000614

[3]

Lu D, Wu X, Zhao Y, et al. Orthopedic mechanism analysis of growing rod distraction for early-onset scoliosis based on 3D morphological parameters. J Orthop Res. 2024;42(3):685–699. doi: 10.1002/jor.25697

[4]

Lu D., Wu X., Zhao Y., et al. Orthopedic mechanism analysis of growing rod distraction for early-onset scoliosis based on 3D morphological parameters // J Orthop Res. 2024. Vol. 42, N 3. P. 685–699. doi: 10.1002/jor.25697

[5]

Stücker R, Mladenov K, Stücker S. Growth-preserving instrumentation for early onset scoliosis. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2023; 36(1):12–20. (In Ger.). doi: 10.1007/s00064-023-00832-8

[6]

Stücker R., Mladenov K., Stücker S. Growth-preserving instrumentation for early onset scoliosis // Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2023. Vol. 36, N 1. P. 12–20. doi: 10.1007/s00064-023-00832-8

[7]

Vissarionov SV, Asadulaev MS, Khardikov MA, et al. Spinal osteotomy for children with congenital scoliosis with unilateral unsegmented bar: preliminary results. Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery. 2021;9(4):417–426. EDN: MXUSQH doi: 10.17816/PTORS77239

[8]

Виссарионов С.В., Асадулаев М.С., Хардиков М.А., и др. Остеотомия позвоночника в лечении детей с врожденным сколиозом при нарушении сегментации боковых поверхностей тел позвонков (предварительные результаты) // Ортопедия, травматология и восстановительная хирургия детского возраста. 2021. Т. 9, № 4. С. 417–426. EDN: MXUSQH doi: 10.17816/PTORS77239

[9]

Zhang HQ, Xiao LG, Guo CF, et al. Deformed complex vertebral osteotomy technique for management of severe congenital spinal angular kyphotic deformity. Orthop Surg. 2021;13(3):1016–1025. doi: 10.1111/os.13016

[10]

Zhang H.Q., Xiao L.G., Guo C.F., et al. Deformed complex vertebral osteotomy technique for management of severe congenital spinal angular kyphotic deformity // Orthop Surg. 2021. Vol. 13, N 3. P. 1016–1025. doi: 10.1111/os.13016

[11]

Ha AS, Cerpa M, Lenke LG. State of the art review: vertebral osteotomies for the management of spinal deformity. Spine Deform. 2020;8(5):829–843. doi: 10.1007/s43390-020-00144-y

[12]

Ha A.S., Cerpa M., Lenke L.G. State of the art review: vertebral osteotomies for the management of spinal deformity // Spine Deform. 2020. Vol. 8, N 5. P. 829–843. doi: 10.1007/s43390-020-00144-y

[13]

Zhao S, Xue X, Li K, et al. Two-staged posterior osteotomy surgery in complex and rigid congenital scoliosis in younger than 10 years old children. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):788. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04682-y

[14]

Zhao S., Xue X., Li K., et al. Two-staged posterior osteotomy surgery in complex and rigid congenital scoliosis in younger than 10 years old children // BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021. Vol. 22, N 1. P. 788. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04682-y

[15]

Karol LA. The natural history of early-onset scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2019;39(6):S38–S43. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001351

[16]

Karol L.A. The natural history of early-onset scoliosis // J Pediatr Orthop. 2019. Vol. 39, N 6. P. S38–S43. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001351

[17]

Xia T, Sun Y, Wang S, et al. Vertebral artery variation in patients with congenital cervical scoliosis: an anatomical study based on radiological findings. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021;46(4):E216–E221. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003834

[18]

Xia T., Sun Y., Wang S., et al. Vertebral artery variation in patients with congenital cervical scoliosis: an anatomical study based on radiological findings // Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021. Vol. 46, N 4. P. E216–E221. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003834

[19]

McMaster MJ, McMaster ME. Prognosis for congenital scoliosis due to a unilateral failure of vertebral segmentation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(11):972–979. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01096

[20]

McMaster M.J., McMaster M.E. Prognosis for congenital scoliosis due to a unilateral failure of vertebral segmentation // J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013. Vol. 95, N 11. P. 972–979. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01096

[21]

Li S, Ou Y, Liu B, et al. Comparison of osteotomy versus non-osteotomy approach for congenital scoliosis: a retrospective study of three surgical techniques. ANZ J Surg. 2015;85(4):249–254. doi: 10.1111/ans.12886

[22]

Li Shenghua, Ou Y., Liu B., Zhu Y., et al. Comparison of osteotomy versus non-osteotomy approach for congenital scoliosis: a retrospective study of three surgical techniques // ANZ J Surg. 2015. Vol. 85, N 4. P. 249–254. doi: 10.1111/ans.12886

[23]

Mikhailovsky MV, Suzdalov VA. Thoracic insufficiency syndromein infantile congenital scoliosis. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery. 2010;(3):20–28. EDN: MUPPHZ doi: 10.14531/ss2010.3.20-28

[24]

Михайловский М.В., Суздалов В.А. Синдром торакальной недостаточности при инфантильном врожденном сколиозе // Хирургия позвоночника. 2010. № 3. C. 20–28. EDN: MUPPHZ doi: 10.14531/ss2010.3.20-28

[25]

Mayer O, Campbell R, Cahill P, et al. Thoracic insufficiency syndrome. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2016;46(3):72–97. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2015.11.001

[26]

Mayer O., Campbell R., Cahill P., et al. Thoracic insufficiency syndrome // Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2016. Vol. 46, N 3. P. 72–97. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2015.11.001

[27]

Campbell RM Jr, Smith MD, Mayes TC, et al. The characteristics of thoracic insufficiency syndrome associated with fused ribs and congenital scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(3):399–408. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200303000-00001

[28]

Campbell R.M. Jr., Smith M.D., Mayes T.C., et al. The characteristics of thoracic insufficiency syndrome associated with fused ribs and congenital scoliosis // J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003. Vol. 85, N 3. P. 399–408. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200303000-00001

[29]

Romberg K, Fagevik Olsén M, Kjellby-Wendt G, et al. Thoracic mobility and its relation to pulmonary function and rib-cage deformity in patients with early onset idiopathic scoliosis: a long-term follow-up. Spine Deform. 2020;8(2):257–268. doi: 10.1007/s43390-019-00018-y

[30]

Romberg K., Fagevik Olsén M., Kjellby-Wendt G., et al. Thoracic mobility and its relation to pulmonary function and rib-cage deformity in patients with early onset idiopathic scoliosis: a long-term follow-up // Spine Deform. 2020. Vol. 8, N 2. P. 257–268. doi: 10.1007/s43390-019-00018-y

[31]

Hedequist DJ. Surgical treatment of congenital scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am. 2007;38(4):497–vi. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2007.05.002

[32]

Hedequist D.J. Surgical treatment of congenital scoliosis // Orthop Clin North Am. 2007. Vol. 38, N 4. P. 497-vi. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2007.05.002

[33]

Lattig F, Taurman R, Hell AK. Treatment of Early-Onset Spinal Deformity (EOSD) with VEPTR. Clin Spine Surg. 2016;29(5):E246–E251. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31826eaf27

[34]

Lattig F., Taurman R., Hell A.K. Treatment of Early-Onset Spinal Deformity (EOSD) with VEPTR // Clin Spine Surg. 2016. Vol. 29, N 5. P. E246–E251. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31826eaf27

[35]

Skaggs DL, Guillaume T, El-Hawary R, et al. Early Onset Scoliosis Consensus Statement, SRS Growing Spine Committee, 2015. Spine Deformity. 2015:3(2);107. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2015.01.002

[36]

Skaggs D.L., Guillaume T., El-Hawary R., et al. Early onset scoliosis consensus statement, SRS Growing Spine Committee // Spine Deformity. 2015. Vol. 3, N 2. P. 107. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2015.01.002

[37]

Liu Z, Cheng Y, Hai Y, et al. Developments in congenital scoliosis and related research from 1992 to 2021: a thirty-year bibliometric analysis. World Neurosurg. 2022;164:e24–e44. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.02.117

[38]

Liu Z., Cheng Y., Hai Y., et al. Developments in congenital scoliosis and related research from 1992 to 2021: a thirty-year bibliometric analysis // World Neurosurg. 2022. Vol. 164. P. e24–e44. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.02.117

[39]

Ryabyh SO, Ul’rih EV, Mushkin, et al. Treatment of congenital spinal deformities in children: yesterday, today, tomorrow. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery. 2020;17(1):15–24. doi: 10.14531/ss2020.1.15-24

[40]

Рябых С.О., Ульрих Э.В., Мушкин А.Ю., и др. Лечение врожденных деформаций позвоночника у детей: вчера, сегодня, завтра // Хирургия позвоночника. 2020. Т. 17, № 1. С. 15–24. doi: 10.14531/ss2020.1.15-24

[41]

Winter RB. Congenital thoracic scoliosis with unilateral unsegmented bar, convex hemivertebrae, and fused concave ribs with severe progression after posterior fusion at age 2: 40-year follow-up after revision anterior and posterior surgery at age 8. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(8):E507–E510. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824ac401

[42]

Winter R.B. Congenital thoracic scoliosis with unilateral unsegmented bar, convex hemivertebrae, and fused concave ribs with severe progression after posterior fusion at age 2: 40-year follow-up after revision anterior and posterior surgery at age 8 // Spine. 2012. Vol. 37, N 8. P. E507–E510. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824ac401

[43]

Abdelaal A, Munigangaiah S, Davidson N, et al. Early-onset scoliosis: challenges and current management options. Orthopaedics and Trauma. 2020;34(6):390–396. doi: 10.1016/j.mporth.2020.09.009

[44]

Abdelaal A., Munigangaiah S., Davidson N., et al. Early-onset scoliosis: challenges and current management options // Orthop Trauma. 2020. Vol. 34, N 6. P. 390–396. doi: 10.1016/j.mporth.2020.09.009

[45]

Cheung JPY, Yiu K, Kwan K, et al. Mean 6-year follow-up of magnetically controlled growing rod patients with early onset scoliosis: a glimpse of what happens to graduates. Neurosurgery. 2019;84(5):1112–1123. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy270

[46]

Cheung J.P.Y., Yiu K., Kwan K., et al. Mean 6-year follow-up of magnetically controlled growing rod patients with early onset scoliosis: a glimpse of what happens to graduates // Neurosurgery. 2019. Vol. 84. P. 1112–1123. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy270

[47]

Sun X, Xu L, Chen ZH, et al. Comparison of hybrid and traditional growing rod techniques in the treatment of early-onset congenital scoliosis. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019;57(5):342–347. (In Chi.) doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2019.05.005

[48]

Sun X., Xu L., Chen Z.H., et al. Comparison of hybrid and traditional growing rod techniques in the treatment of early-onset congenital scoliosis // Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019. Vol. 57, N 5. P. 342–347. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2019.05.005

[49]

Dayer R, Ceroni D, Lascombes P. Treatment of congenital thoracic scoliosis with associated rib fusions using VEPTR expansion thoracostomy: a surgical technique. Eur Spine J. 2014;23(4):424–431. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3338-3

[50]

Dayer R., Ceroni D., Lascombes P. Treatment of congenital thoracic scoliosis with associated rib fusions using VEPTR expansion thoracostomy: a surgical technique // Eur Spine J. 2014. Vol. 23, N 4. P. S424–S431. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3338-3

[51]

Campbell RM Jr, Smith MD, Mayes TC, et al. The effect of opening wedge thoracostomy on thoracic insufficiency syndrome associated with fused ribs and congenital scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(8):1659–1674. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200408000-00009

[52]

Campbell R.M. Jr., Smith M.D., Mayes T.C., et al. The effect of opening wedge thoracostomy on thoracic insufficiency syndrome associated with fused ribs and congenital scoliosis // J Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2004. Vol. 86, N 8. P. 1659–1674. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200408000-00009

[53]

Diméglio A, Canavese F. The growing spine: how spinal deformities influence normal spine and thoracic cage growth. Eur Spine J Springer-Verlag. 2012;21(1):64–70. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1983-3

[54]

Diméglio A., Canavese F. The growing spine: how spinal deformities influence normal spine and thoracic cage growth // Eur Spine J. Springer-Verlag. 2012. Vol. 21, N 1. P. 64–70. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1983-3

[55]

Sankar WN, Acevedo DC, Skaggs DL. Comparison of complications among growing spinal implants. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(23):2091–2096. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c6edd7

[56]

Sankar W.N., Axevedo D.C., Skaggs D.L. Comparison of complications among growing spinal implants // Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010. Vol. 35, N 23. P. 2091–2096. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c6edd7

[57]

Schlösser TPC, Kruyt MC, Tsirikos AI. Surgical management of early-onset scoliosis: indications and currently available techniques. Orthopaedics and Trauma. 2021;35(6):1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.mporth.2021.09.004

[58]

Schlösser T.P.C., Kruyt M.C., Tsirikos A.I. Surgical management of early-onset scoliosis: indications and currently available techniques // Orthopaedics and Trauma. 2021. Vol. 35, N 6. P. 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.mporth.2021.09.004

[59]

Caliskan E, Ozturk M. Determination of normal lung volume using computed tomography in children and adolescents. Original Article. 2019;26(4):588–592. doi: 10.5455/annalsmedres.2018.12.308

[60]

Caliskan E., Ozturk M. Determination of normal lung volume using computed tomography in children and adolescents // Original Article. 2019. Vol. 26, N 4. P. 588–592. doi: 10.5455/annalsmedres.2018.12.308

[61]

Patent RUS N 196831 / 21.04.2023. Vissarionov SV, Asadulaev MS, Kokushin DN. Method of correction of congenital spinal deformity with segmentation disorder of lateral surfaces of vertebral bodies in school-age children. EDN: LEBRZL (In Russ.)

[62]

Патент РФ на изобретение № 2794588 / 21.04.2023. Виссарионов С.В., Асадулаев М.С., Кокушин Д.Н. Способ коррекции врожденной деформации позвоночника при нарушении сегментации боковых поверхностей тел позвонков у детей школьного возраста. EDN: LEBRZL

[63]

Tong Y, Udupa JK, McDonough JM, et al. Quantitative dynamic thoracic MRI: application to thoracic insufficiency syndrome in pediatric patients. J Radiology. 2019;292(1):206–213. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019181731

[64]

Tong Y., Udupa J.K., McDonough J.M., et al Quantitative dynamic thoracic MRI: application to thoracic insufficiency syndrome in pediatric patients // J Radiology. 2019. Vol. 292, N 1. P. 206–213. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019181731

[65]

Cunin V. Early-onset scoliosis: current treatment. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015;101(1 Suppl):S109–S118. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.06.032

[66]

Cunin V. Early-onset scoliosis: current treatment // Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015. Vol. 101, N 1. P. S109–S118. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.06.032

[67]

Zhang YB, Zhang JG. Treatment of early-onset scoliosis: techniques, indications, and complications. Chin Med J (Engl). 2020;133(3):351–357. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000614

[68]

Zhang Y.B., Zhang J.G. Treatment of early-onset scoliosis: techniques, indications, and complications // Chin Med J (Engl). 2020. Vol. 133, N 3. P. 351–357. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000614

[69]

Mackel CE, Jada A, Samdani AF, et al. A comprehensive review of the diagnosis and management of congenital scoliosis. Childs Nerv Syst. 2018;34(11):2155–2171. doi: 10.1007/s00381-018-3915-6

[70]

Mackel C.E., Jada A., Samdani A.F., et al. A comprehensive review of the diagnosis and management of congenital scoliosis // Childs Nerv Syst. 2018. Vol. 34, N 11. P. 2155–2171. doi: 10.1007/s00381-018-3915-6

[71]

Yang S, Andras LM, Redding GJ, et al. Early-onset scoliosis: a review of history, current treatment, and future direction. Pediatrics. 2016;137(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0709

[72]

Yang S., Andras G.J., Redding G.J. Early-onset scoliosis: a review of history, current treatment, and future direction // Pediatrics. 2016. Vol. 137, N 1. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0709

[73]

Chao Li C, Fu Q, Zhou Y, et al. Surgical treatment of severe congenital scoliosis with unilateral unsegmented bar by concave costovertebral joint release and both-ends wedge osteotomy via posterior approach. Eur Spine J. 2012;21(3):498–505. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1972-6

[74]

Li C., Fu Q., Zhou Y., et al. Surgical treatment of severe congenital scoliosis with unilateral unsegmented bar by concave costovertebral joint release and both-ends wedge osteotomy via posterior approach // Eur Spine J. 2012. Vol. 21, N 3. P. 498–505. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1972-6

[75]

Suk SI, Chung ER, Kim JH, et al. Posterior vertebral column resection for severe rigid scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(14):1682–1687. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000170590.21071.c1

[76]

Suk S.I., Chung E.R., Kim J.H., et al. Posterior vertebral column resection for severe rigid scoliosis // Spine. 2005. Vol. 30, N 14. P. 1682–1687. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000170590.21071.c1

Funding

Government of the Russian FederationПравительство РФ(1023021600029-8-3.2.10)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1277KB)

69

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/