Reducing radiation exposure in newborns with birth head trauma

Irina A. Kriukova , Evgeniy Y. Kriukov , Danil A. Kozyrev , Semen A. Sotniкov , Dmitriy A. Iova , Ivan N. Usenko , Аlexandеr S. Iova

Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery ›› 2017, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (4) : 24 -30.

PDF (1033KB)
Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery ›› 2017, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (4) : 24 -30. DOI: 10.17816/PTORS5424-30
Articles
research-article

Reducing radiation exposure in newborns with birth head trauma

Author information +
History +
PDF (1033KB)

Abstract

Background. Birth head trauma causing intracranial injury is one of the most common causes of neonatal mortality and morbidity. In case of suspected cranial fractures and intracranial hematomas, diagnostic methods involving radiation, such as x-ray radiography and computed tomography, are recommended. Recently, an increasing number of studies have highlighted the risk of cancer complications associated with computed tomography in infants. Therefore, diagnostic methods that reduce radiation exposure in neonates are important. One such method is ultrasonography (US).

Aim. We evaluated US as a non-ionizing radiation method for diagnosis of cranial bone fractures and epidural hematomas in newborns with cephalohematomas or other birth head traumas.

Material and methods. The study group included 449 newborns with the most common variant of birth head trauma: cephalohematomas. All newborns underwent transcranial-transfontanelle US for detection of intracranial changes and cranial US for visualization of bone structure in the cephalohematoma region. Children with ultrasonic signs of cranial fractures and epidural hematomas were further examined at a children’s hospital by x-ray radiography and/or computed tomography.

Results and discussion. We found that cranial US for diagnosis of cranial fractures and transcranial-transfontanelle US for diagnosis of epidural hematomas in newborns were highly effective. In newborns with parietal cephalohematomas (444 children), 17 (3.8%) had US signs of linear fracture of the parietal bone, and 5 (1.1%) had signs of ipsilateral epidural hematoma. Epidural hematomas were visualized only when US was performed through the temporal bone and not by using the transfontanelle approach. Sixteen cases of linear fractures and all epidural hematomas were confirmed by computed tomography.

Conclusion. The use of US diagnostic methods reduced radiation exposure in newborns with birth head trauma. US methods (transcranial-transfontanelle and cranial) can be used in screening for diagnosis and personalized monitoring of changes in birth head trauma as well as to reduce radiation exposure.

Keywords

newborns / birth injury / radiation exposure / cephalohematoma / linear skull fracture / epidural hematoma / transcranial-transfontanelle ultrasonography

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Irina A. Kriukova, Evgeniy Y. Kriukov, Danil A. Kozyrev, Semen A. Sotniкov, Dmitriy A. Iova, Ivan N. Usenko, Аlexandеr S. Iova. Reducing radiation exposure in newborns with birth head trauma. Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery, 2017, 5(4): 24-30 DOI:10.17816/PTORS5424-30

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

1.Лучевые исследования головного мозга плода и новорожденного / под ред. Т.Н. Трофимовой. – СПб.: Балт. медиц. образоват. центр, 2011. – 200 с. [Luchevye issledovaniya golovnogo mozga ploda i novorozhdennogo. Ed by T.N. Trofimovoy. Saint Petersburg: Balt. medits. obrazovat. tsentr; 2011. 200 p. (In Russ.)]

[2]

2.Краснов А.С., Терещенко Г.В. Клиническое значение лучевой нагрузки при исследовании детей с онкологическими заболеваниями // Вопросы гематологии/онкологии и иммунопатологии в педиатрии. – 2017. – № 2. – С. 75–79. [Krasnov AS, Tereshchenko GV. Klinicheskoe znachenie luchevoy nagruzki pri issledovanii detey s onkologicheskimi zabolevaniyami. Voprosy gematologii/onkologii i immunopatologii v pediatrii. 2017;(2):75-79. (In Russ.)]

[3]

3.Лучевая диагностика в педиатрии: национальное руководство / А.Ю. Васильев, М.В. Выклюк, Е.А. Зубарева и др.; под ред. А.Ю. Васильева, С.К. Тернового. – М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2010. – 368 с. [Vasil’ev AYu, Vyklyuk MV, Zubareva EA, et al.; Luchevaya diagnostika v pediatrii: nacional’noe rukovodstvo. Ed by A.Yu. Vasil’eva, S.K. Ternovogo. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2010. 368 p. (In Russ.)]

[4]

4.Труфанов Г.Е., Фокин В.А., Иванов Д.О., и др. Особенности применения методов лучевой диагностики в педиатрической практике // Вестник современной клинической медицины. – 2013. – № 6. – С. 48–54. [Trufanov GE, Fokin VA, Ivanov DO, et al. Osobennosti primeneniya metodov luchevoy diagnostiki v pediatricheskoy praktike. Vestnik sovremennoy klinicheskoy meditsiny. 2013;(6):48-54. (In Russ.)]

[5]

5.Детская нейрохирургия: клинические рекомендации / под ред. С.К. Горелышева. – М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2016. – 256 с. [Detskaya neyrokhirurgiya: klinicheskie rekomendatsii. Ed by S.K. Gorelysheva. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2016. 256 p. (In Russ.)]

[6]

6.Неонатология: национальное руководство. Краткое издание / Под ред. акад. Н.Н. Володина. – М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2013. – 896 с. [Neonatologiya: natsional’noe rukovodstvo. Kratkoe izdanie. Ed by akad. N.N. Volodina. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2013. 896 p. (In Russ.)]

[7]

7.Федеральное руководство по детской неврологии / под ред. В.И. Гузевой. – М.: Спец. изд-во мед. книг, 2016. – 668 с. [Federal’noe rukovodstvo po detskoy nevrologii. Ed by V.I. Guzevoy. Moscow: Spets. izd-vo med. knig; 2016. 668 p. (In Russ.)]

[8]

8.Kmietowicz Z. Computed tomography in childhood and adolescence is associated with small increased risk of cancer. BMJ. 2013;(346):33-48. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3348.

[9]

9.Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Cancer risks from CT scans: now we have data, what next? Radiology. 2012;(265):330-1. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12121248.

[10]

10.Cardis E, Vrijheid M, Blettner M, et al. Risk of cancer after low doses of ionising radiation: retrospective cohort study in 15 countries. BMJ. 2005;331(7508):77-80. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38499.599861.E0.

[11]

11.Einstein AJ. Beyond the bombs: cancer risks of low-dose medical radiation. Lancet. 2012;380(9840):455-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60897-6.

[12]

12.Güzel A, Hiçdönmez T, Temizöz O, et al. Indications for brain computed tomography and hospital admission in pediatric patients with minor head injury: how much can we rely upon clinical findings? Pediatric Neurosurgery. 2009;45(4):262-70. doi: 10.1159/000228984.

[13]

13.Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z, et al. Cancer risk in 680 000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ. 2013;(346). doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2360.

[14]

14.Шабалов Н.П. Неонатология: В 2 т. Т. 1. – М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2016. – 704 с. [Shabalov NP. Neonatologiya. In 2 Vol. Vol. 1. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2016. 704 p. (In Russ.)]

[15]

15.Ромоданов А.П., Бродский Ю.С. Родовая черепно-мозговая травма у новорожденных. – Киев, 1981. – 199 с. [Romodanov AP, Brodskiy YuS. Rodovaya cherepno-mozgovaya travma u novorozhdennykh. Kiev; 1981. 199 p. (In Russ.)]

[16]

16.Власюк В.В. Родовая травма и перинатальные нарушения мозгового кровообращения. – СПб.: Нестор История, 2009. – 252 с. [Vlasyuk VV. Rodovaya travma i perinatal’nye narusheniya mozgovogo krovoobrashcheniya. Saint Petersburg: Nestor Istoriya; 2009. 252 p. (In Russ.)]

[17]

17.Иова А.С., Артарян А.А., Бродский Ю.С., Гармашов Ю.А. Родовая травма головы. Черепно-мозговая травма: Клиническое руководство / Под ред. А.Н. Коновалова, Л.Б. Лихтермана, А.А. Потапова. – М., 2001. – Т. 2, Гл. 26. – С. 560–601. [Iova AS, Artaryan AA, Brodskiy YuS, Garmashov YuA. Rodovaya travma golovy. Cherepno-mozgovaya travma. Klinicheskoe rukovodstvo. Ed by A.N. Konovalova, L.B. Likhtermana, A.A. Potapova. Moscow; 2001. P. 560-601. (In Russ.)]

[18]

18.Крюкова И.А. Оптимизация скрининг-диагностики структурных внутричерепных изменений у новорожденных: Автореф. дис. … канд. мед. наук. – СПб., 2009. – 25 с. [Kryukova IA. Optimizatsiya skrining-diagnostiki strukturnykh vnutricherepnykh izmeneniy u novorozhdennykh [dissertation]. Saint Petersburg; 2009. 25 p. (In Russ.)]

[19]

19.Иова А.С. Минимально инвазивные методы диагностики и хирургического лечения заболеваний головного мозга у детей: Автореф. дис. … д-ра мед. наук. – СПб., 1996. – 44 с. [Iova AS. Minimal’no invazivnye metody diagnostiki i khirurgicheskogo lecheniya zabolevaniy golovnogo mozga u detey. [dissertation]. Saint Petersburg; 1996. 44 p. (In Russ.)].

[20]

20.Иова А.С., Гармашов Ю.А., Андрущенко Н.В., и др. Ультрасонография в нейропедиатрии (новые возможности и перспективы) // Ультрасонографический атлас. – СПб.: Петроградский и К°, 1997. – 170 с. [Iova AS, Garmashov JuA, Andrushhenko NV, et al. Ul’trasonografija v nejropediatrii (novye vozmozhnosti i perspektivy). Ul’trasonograficheskij atlas. Saint Petersburg: Petrogradskij i Ko; 1997. 170 р. (In Russ.)]

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Kriukova I.A., Kriukov E.Y., Kozyrev D.A., Sotniкov S.A., Iova D.A., Usenko I.N., Iova А.S.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1033KB)

142

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/