Stage results of the use of orthoses in children after surgical treatment of congenital spine deformity (Preliminary report)

Ignatiy А. Redchenko , Sergei V. Vissarionov , Maxim G. Gusev , Grigoriy A. Lein , Ivan V. Pavlov

Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery ›› 2021, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (1) : 41 -50.

PDF (751KB)
Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery ›› 2021, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (1) : 41 -50. DOI: 10.17816/PTORS46088
Original Study Article
research-article

Stage results of the use of orthoses in children after surgical treatment of congenital spine deformity (Preliminary report)

Author information +
History +
PDF (751KB)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: After surgical treatment of congenital spinal deformities, we can see the progression of deformities of the spinal column segments free from metal structures, which leads to the need for reoperation. Without sufficient scientific evidence, several specialists after surgical treatment use various orthoses on the body to prevent scoliotic compensatory changes.

AIM: This study aims to assess the results of body orthosis after surgical treatment of children with congenital spinal deformity with the impaired formation of the vertebrae, using orthoses, compensatory deformity after one year of treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients aged 2 to 12 years (10 boys and 15 girls) after surgical treatment of congenital deformity of the spine in the thoracic regions (13) and lumbar regions (12), wearing body orthoses. The results were assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months using thermal sensors for the orthosis wearing time by X-ray and statistical methods.

RESULTS: After three months of wearing the brace, we saw a correction of about 50% of the value of the initial compensatory deformity. After six months, both thoracic and lumbar, the correction was 60%. After one year, when performing an X-ray image without an orthosis, in thoracic deformities without a brace, the correction stabilized and remained at the level of 40%. In lumbar deformities without a brace, the original deformity returned, i.e., the correction occurred but was not fixed without the orthosis. Only one of 25 patients (4%) required a second operation to increase the fixation’s duration.

CONCLUSION: The results of observing a group of patients (25 children) for one year after surgical treatment of congenital spine deformity showed a positive effect of a functionally corrective orthosis on the body to correct secondary deformities.

Keywords

children / congenital malformation of the spine / surgical treatment / orthotics

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ignatiy А. Redchenko, Sergei V. Vissarionov, Maxim G. Gusev, Grigoriy A. Lein, Ivan V. Pavlov. Stage results of the use of orthoses in children after surgical treatment of congenital spine deformity (Preliminary report). Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery, 2021, 9(1): 41-50 DOI:10.17816/PTORS46088

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Ulrikh EV, Mushkin AY, Gubin AV. Congenital spine deformities in children: epidemiological prognosis and management. Spine Surgery. 2009;(2):55–61. (In Russ.). doi: 10.14531/ss2009.2.55-61

[2]

Ульрих Э.В., Мушкин А.Ю., Губин А.В. Врожденные деформации позвоночника у детей: прогноз эпидемиологии и тактика ведения // Хирургия позвоночника. 2009. № 2. С. 55–61. doi: 10.14531/ss2009.2.55-61

[3]

Vissarionov SV, Kokushin DN, Belyanchikov SM, Murashko VV, Kartavenko KA. Surgical treatment of congenital deformation of the thoracic lumbar spine in children. Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery. 2013;(1):10–15. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17816/PTORS1110-15

[4]

Виссарионов С.В., Кокушин Д.Н., Белянчиков С.М., Мурашко В.В., Картавенко К.А. Оперативное лечение врожденной деформации грудопоясничного отдела позвоночника у детей // Ортопедия, травматология и восстановительная хирургия детского возраста. 2013. Т. 1. № 1. С. 10–15. doi: 10.17816/PTORS1110-15

[5]

Gubin AV, Ulrich EV, Riabykh SO. Prospects of rendering care for the children of young and juvenile age with surgical pathology of the spine. Genij Orthopedii. 2011;(2):112–116. (In Russ.)

[6]

Губин А.В, Ульрих Э.В., Рябых С.О. Перспективы оказания помощи детям младшего и ювенильного возраста с хирургической патологией позвоночника // Гений ортопедии. 2011. № 2. C. 112–116.

[7]

Elikbaev GM, Hachatryan VA, Osipov LB, Sarychev SA. Epidemiology and early diagnosis of congenital malformations of spinal column and spinal cord. Voprosy sovremennoi pediatrii — Current Pediatrics. 2008;7(4):58–61. (In Russ.)

[8]

Еликбаев Г.М., Хачатрян В.А., Осипов И.Б., Сарычев С.А. Эпидемиология и ранняя диагностика врожденных пороков развития позвоночника и спинного мозга // Вопросы современной педиатрии. 2008. Т. 7. № 4. С. 58–61.

[9]

Andrianov VL, Bairov GA, Sadof’eva VI, Raje RE..Zabolevaniya i povrezhdeniya pozvonochnika u detej I podrostkov. Leningrad: Medicina; 1985. (In Russ.)

[10]

Андрианов В.Л., Баиров Г.А., Садофьева В.И., Райе Р.Э. Заболевания и повреждения позвоночника у детей и подростков. Ленинград: Медицина, 1985.

[11]

Nasca RJ, Stilling FH, Stell HH. Progression of congenital scoliosis due to hemivertebrae and hemivertebrae with bars. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975;57:456–466.

[12]

Nasca R.J., Stilling F.H., Stell H.H. Progression of congenital scoliosis due to hemivertebrae and hemivertebrae with bars // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1975. Vol. 57. P. 456–466.

[13]

Weiss H.R. Congenital scoliosis — presentation of three severe cases treated conservatively. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;140:310–313.

[14]

Weiss H.R. Congenital scoliosis – presentation of three severe cases treated conservatively // Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008. Vol. 140. P. 310–313.

[15]

Volkovich LG, Kibasova MV, Kosyanchuk TV. Experience of physical rehabilitation of children after surgical treatment of scoliosis. Pacific Medical Journal. 2016;61(4):81–83. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17238/PmJ1609-1175.2016.4.81-83

[16]

Волчкович Л.Г., Кибасова М.В., Косянчук Т.В. Опыт физической реабилитации детей после оперативного лечения сколиоза // Тихоокеанский медицинский журнал. 2016. № 4. С. 81–83. doi: 10.17238/PmJ1609-1175.2016.4.81-83

[17]

Fizicheskaya i reabilitatsionnaya meditsina: natsional’noe rukovodstvo. Ed by G.N. Ponomarenko. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2016. (In Russ.)

[18]

Физическая и реабилитационная медицина: национальное руководство / под ред. Г.Н. Пономаренко. Москва: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2016.

[19]

Kaspiris A, Grivas TB, Weiss HR, Turnbull D. Surgical and conservative treatment of patients with congenital scoliosis: α search for long-term results. 2011;4:6–12. doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-6-12

[20]

Kaspiris A., Grivas T.B., Weiss H.R., Turnbull D. Surgical and conservative treatment of patients with congenital scoliosis: α search for long-term results // Scoliosis. 2011. No. 4. P. 6–12. doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-6-12

[21]

Fekete TF, Haschtmann D, Heyde CE. Congenital malformations of the growing spine: When should treatment be conservative and when should it be surgical. Orthopade. 2016;45(6):518–526.

[22]

Fekete T.F., Haschtmann D., Heyde C.E. Congenital malformations of the growing spine: When should treatment be conservative and when should it be surgical // Orthopade. 2016. Vol. 45. No. 6. P. 518–526.

[23]

Weiss HR, Moramarco M. Congenital Scoliosis (Mini-review). Curr Pediatr Rev. 2016;12(1):43–47. doi: 10.2174/1573396312666151117121011

[24]

Weiss H.R. Moramarco M. Congenital Scoliosis (Mini-review) // Curr. Pediatr. Rev. 2016. Vol. 12. No. 1. P. 43–47. doi: 10.2174/1573396312666151117121011

[25]

Yazici M, Yilmaz G, Kawakami N. Congenital scoliosis in the Growing Spine. Spinal Disorders in young children. Springer, 2016. P. 167–190.

[26]

Yazici M., Yilmaz G., Kawakami N. Congenital scoliosis in the Growing Spine. Spinal Disorders in young children. Springer, 2016. P. 167–190.

[27]

Pahys JM, Guille JT. What’s New in Congenital Scoliosis? Pediatr Orthop. 2018;38(3):172–179. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000922

[28]

Pahys J.M., Guille J.T. What’s New in Congenital Scoliosis? // Pediatr Orthop. 2018. Vol. 38. No. 3. P. 172–179. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000922

[29]

Mikhailovsky MV, Sergunin AY. Proximal transient kyphoses – an actual problem of modern vertebrology. Hirurgia pozvonočnika. 2014;1:11–23. (In Russ.). doi: 10.14531/ss2014.1.11-23

[30]

Михайловский М.В., Сергунин А.Ю. Проксимальные переходные кифозы – актуальная проблема современной вертебрологии // Хирургия позвоночника. 2014. № 1. С. 11–23. doi: 10.14531/ss2014.1.11-23

[31]

Sergunin AY, Mikhailovsky MV, Sorokin AN. Risk Factors of proximal transient kyphosis development in idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Hirurgiapozvonočnika. 2015;12(3):28–32. (In Russ.). doi: 10.14531/ss2015.3.28-32

[32]

Сергунин А.Ю., Михайловский М.В., Сорокин А.Н. Факторы риска развития проксимальных переходных кифозов в хирургии идиопатического сколиоза // Хирургия позвоночника. 2015. Т. 12. № 3. С. 28–32. doi: 10.14531/ss2015.3.28-32

[33]

Rigo M, Jelacic M. Brace technology thematic series: the 3D Rigo Cheneau-type brace. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2017;12:10. doi: 10.1186/s13013-017-0114-2. eCollection 2017

[34]

Rigo M., Jelacic M. Brace technology thematic series: the 3D Rigo Cheneau-type brace // Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2017. Vol. 12. P. 10. doi: 10.1186/s13013-017-0114-2. eCollection 2017

[35]

Yang X, Song Y, Liu L, Zhou Z, Wang L. Emerging S-shaped curves in congenital scoliosis after hemivertebra resection and short segmental fusion. Spine J. 2016;10:1214–1220. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.06.006

[36]

Yang X., Song Y., Liu L., Zhou Z., Wang L. Emerging S-shaped curves in congenital scoliosis after hemivertebra resection and short segmental fusion // Spine J. 2016. Vol. 10. P. 1214–1220. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.06.006

[37]

King JD, Lowery GL. Results of lumbar hemivertebral excision for congenital scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991;16(7):778–782.

[38]

King J.D., Lowery G.L. Results of lumbar hemivertebral excision for congenital scoliosis // Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991. Vol. 16. No. 7. P. 778–782.

[39]

Murashko VV, Kokushin DN, Vissarionov SV, et al. The use of orthotics in a patient with congenital backbone deformation after surgical treatment Pediatric. Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery. 2018;6(4):103–109. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17816/PTORS64103-109

[40]

Мурашко В.В., Кокушин Д.Н., Виссарионов С.В. и др. Ортезирование пациента с врожденной деформацией позвоночника после хирургического лечения // Ортопедия, травматология и восстановительная хирургия детского возраста. 2018. Т. 6. Вып. 4. С. 103–109. doi: 10.17816/PTORS64103-109

[41]

Dubousset J. 3D analysis of the development of scoliotic deformity and 3D balance chain of a patient with scoliosis. Hirurgia Pozvonochnika. 2016;13(3):108–113. (In Russ.). doi: 10.14531/ss2016.3.108-113

[42]

Дюбуссе Ж. 3D-анализ развития сколиотической деформации и 3D-цепь баланса пациента со сколиозом // Хирургия позвоночника. 2016. Т. 13. № 3. С. 108–113. doi: 10.14531/ss2016.3.108-113

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Redchenko I.А., Vissarionov S.V., Gusev M.G., Lein G.A., Pavlov I.V.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (751KB)

139

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/