Cervical hemivertebrae: A literature review on the evolution of surgical management and its results

Nikita O. Khusainov , Dmitriy N. Kokushin , Alexandra N. Filippova , Sergei V. Vissarionov

Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery ›› 2023, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (2) : 219 -226.

PDF (233KB)
Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery ›› 2023, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (2) : 219 -226. DOI: 10.17816/PTORS321403
Scientific reviews
review-article

Cervical hemivertebrae: A literature review on the evolution of surgical management and its results

Author information +
History +
PDF (233KB)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Congenital cervical spinal deformities due to hemivertebrae are rare and serious entities that are difficult to solve because of anatomical obstacles in the cervical region and the lack of treatment experience of such patients.

AIM: To analyze current literature dedicated to the surgical treatment of patients with congenital scoliotic deformities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched for studies evaluating the results and surgical management of patients with cervical hemivertebrae. The literature search was performed using keywords and similar articles in PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar. The depth of the search was 50 years.

RESULTS: No studies have explored the issue of the surgical management of patients with congenital cervical scoliotic deformities because of the rarity and complexity of treatment. Still, data are sufficient to develop an efficient and safe algorithm.

CONCLUSIONS: Despite the complexity and lack of treatment experience in such patients, modern technologies for perioperative planning and surgical management allow for remarkable improvement of patients’ quality of life without serious complications.

Keywords

hemivertebrae / cervical scoliosis / osseous torticollis / children

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Nikita O. Khusainov, Dmitriy N. Kokushin, Alexandra N. Filippova, Sergei V. Vissarionov. Cervical hemivertebrae: A literature review on the evolution of surgical management and its results. Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery, 2023, 11(2): 219-226 DOI:10.17816/PTORS321403

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Samartzis D, Kalluri P, Herman J, et al. Cervical scoliosis in the Klippel-Feil patient. Spine. 2011;36(23):E1501–E1508. DOI: 10.1097/brs.0b013e3182 3145e4

[2]

Samartzis D., Kalluri P., Herman J., et al. Cervical scoliosis in the Klippel-Feil patient // Spine. 2011. Vol. 36. No. 23. P. E1501–E1508. DOI: 10.1097/brs.0b013e3182 3145e4

[3]

Samartzis D, Kalluri P, Herman J, et al. Cervical scoliosis in the Klippel-Feil patient. Spine. 2011;36(23):E1501–E1508. DOI: 10.1097/brs.0b013e3182 3145e4

[4]

Xue X, Shen J, Zhang J, et al. Klippel-Feil syndrome in congenital scoliosis. Spine. 2014;39(23):E1353–E1358. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000587

[5]

Xue X., Shen J., Zhang J., et al. Klippel-Feil syndrome in congenital scoliosis // Spine. 2014. Vol. 39. No. 23. P. E1353–E1358. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000587

[6]

Xue X, Shen J, Zhang J, et al. Klippel-Feil syndrome in congenital scoliosis. Spine. 2014;39(23):E1353–E1358. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000587

[7]

Mesfin A, Bakhsh WR, Chuntarapas T, et al. Cervical scoliosis: clinical and radiographic outcomes. Glob Spine J. 2016;6(1):7–13. DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1554776

[8]

Mesfin A., Bakhsh W.R., Chuntarapas T., et al. Cervical scoliosis: clinical and radiographic outcomes // Glob. Spine J. 2016. Vol. 6. No. 1. P. 7–13. DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1554776

[9]

Mesfin A, Bakhsh WR, Chuntarapas T, et al. Cervical scoliosis: clinical and radiographic outcomes. Glob Spine J. 2016;6(1):7–13. DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1554776

[10]

Tsirikos AI, McMaster MJ. Goldenhar-associated conditions (hemifacial microsomia) and congenital deformities of the spine. Spine. 2006;31(13):E400–E407. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000219876.45640.2a

[11]

Tsirikos A.I., McMaster M.J. Goldenhar-associated conditions (hemifacial microsomia) and congenital deformities of the spine // Spine. 2006. Vol. 31. No. 13. P. E400–E407. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000219876.45640.2a

[12]

Tsirikos AI, McMaster MJ. Goldenhar-associated conditions (hemifacial microsomia) and congenital deformities of the spine. Spine. 2006;31(13):E400–E407. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000219876.45640.2a

[13]

Basu PS, Elsebaie H, Noordeen MH. Congenital spinal deformity: a comprehensive assessment at presentation. Spine. 2002;27(20):2255–2259. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200210150-00014

[14]

Basu P.S., Elsebaie H., Noordeen M.H. Congenital spinal deformity: a comprehensive assessment at presentation // Spine. 2002. Vol. 27. No. 20. P. 2255–2259. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200210150-00014

[15]

Basu PS, Elsebaie H, Noordeen MH. Congenital spinal deformity: a comprehensive assessment at presentation. Spine. 2002;27(20):2255–2259. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200210150-00014

[16]

Ballock RT, Song KM. The prevalence of nonmuscular causes of torticollis in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 1996;16(4):500–504. DOI: 10.1097/00004694-199607000-00016

[17]

Ballock R.T., Song K.M. The prevalence of nonmuscular causes of torticollis in children // J. Pediatr. Orthop. 1996. Vol. 16. No. 4. P. 500–504. DOI: 10.1097/00004694-199607000-00016

[18]

Ballock RT, Song KM. The prevalence of nonmuscular causes of torticollis in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 1996;16(4):500–504. DOI: 10.1097/00004694-199607000-00016

[19]

Pizzutillo PD, Woods M, Nicholson L, et al. Risk factors in Klippel-Feil syndrome. Spine. 1994;19(8):2110–2116. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199409150-00020

[20]

Pizzutillo P.D., Woods M., Nicholson L., et al. Risk factors in Klippel-Feil syndrome // Spine. 1994. Vol. 19. No. 8. P. 2110–2116. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199409150-00020

[21]

Pizzutillo PD, Woods M, Nicholson L, et al. Risk factors in Klippel-Feil syndrome. Spine. 1994;19(8):2110–2116. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199409150-00020

[22]

Marks DS, Qaimkhani SA. The natural history of congenital scoliosis and kyphosis. Spine. 2009;34:1751–1755. DOI: 10.1097/brs.0b013e3181af1caf

[23]

Marks D.S., Qaimkhani S.A. The natural history of congenital scoliosis and kyphosis // Spine. 2009. Vol. 34. P. 1751–1755. DOI: 10.1097/brs.0b013e3181af1caf

[24]

Marks DS, Qaimkhani SA. The natural history of congenital scoliosis and kyphosis. Spine. 2009;34:1751–1755. DOI: 10.1097/brs.0b013e3181af1caf

[25]

Canale ST, Griffin DW, Hubbard CN. Congenital muscular torticollis. A long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64(6):810–816. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-198264060-00002

[26]

Canale S.T., Griffin D.W., Hubbard C.N. Congenital muscular torticollis. A long-term follow-up // J. Bone Joint. Surg. Am. 1982. Vol. 64. No. 6. P. 810–816 DOI: 10.2106/00004623-198264060-00002

[27]

Canale ST, Griffin DW, Hubbard CN. Congenital muscular torticollis. A long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64(6):810–816. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-198264060-00002

[28]

Deburge A, Briard JL. Cervical hemivertebra excision. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1981;63(8):1335–1338. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-198163080-00020

[29]

Deburge A., Briard J.L. Cervical hemivertebra excision // J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 1981. Vol. 63. No. 8. P. 1335–1338. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-198163080-00020

[30]

Deburge A, Briard JL. Cervical hemivertebra excision. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1981;63(8):1335–1338. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-198163080-00020

[31]

Winter RB, House JH. Congenital cervical scoliosis with unilateral congenital nerve deficit in the upper extremity. Report of two cases. Spine. 1981;6(4):341–346. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198107000-00003

[32]

Winter R.B., House J.H. Congenital cervical scoliosis with unilateral congenital nerve deficit in the upper extremity. Report of two cases // Spine. 1981. Vol. 6. No. 4. P. 341–346. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198107000-00003

[33]

Winter RB, House JH. Congenital cervical scoliosis with unilateral congenital nerve deficit in the upper extremity. Report of two cases. Spine. 1981;6(4):341–346. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198107000-00003

[34]

Smith MD. Congenital scoliosis of the cervical or cervicothoracic spine. Orthop Clin N Am. 1994;25(2):301–310. DOI: 10.1016/s0030-5898(20)31911-8

[35]

Smith M.D. Congenital scoliosis of the cervical or cervicothoracic spine // Orthop. Clin. N. Am. 1994. Vol. 25. No. 2. P. 301–310. DOI: 10.1016/s0030-5898(20)31911-8

[36]

Smith MD. Congenital scoliosis of the cervical or cervicothoracic spine. Orthop Clin N Am. 1994;25(2):301–310. DOI: 10.1016/s0030-5898(20)31911-8

[37]

Ruf M, Jensen R, Harms J. Hemivertebra resection in the cervical spine. Spine. 2005;30(4):380–385. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000153398.78661.2b

[38]

Ruf M., Jensen R., Harms J. Hemivertebra resection in the cervical spine // Spine. 2005. Vol. 30. No. 4. P. 380–385. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000153398.78661.2b

[39]

Ruf M, Jensen R, Harms J. Hemivertebra resection in the cervical spine. Spine. 2005;30(4):380–385. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000153398.78661.2b

[40]

Ruf M, Welk T, Merk HR, et. al. Resection of a hemivertebra within the craniocervical junction. Spine. 2015;40:E1191–E1194. DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000001030

[41]

Ruf M., Welk T., Merk H.R., et. al. Resection of a hemivertebra within the craniocervical junction // Spine. 2015. Vol. 40. P. E1191–E1194. DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000001030

[42]

Ruf M, Welk T, Merk HR, et. al. Resection of a hemivertebra within the craniocervical junction. Spine. 2015;40:E1191–E1194. DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000001030

[43]

Kapetanakis S, Gkasdaris G, Nastoulis E., et al. Hemivertebra of the cervical spine: an uncommon background for neck pain, cervical scoliosis, and torticollis. Clinical Case Reports. 2017;5(10):1718–1719. DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.1144

[44]

Kapetanakis S., Gkasdaris G., Nastoulis E., et al. Hemivertebra of the cervical spine: an uncommon background for neck pain, cervical scoliosis, and torticollis // Clinical Case Reports. 2017. Vol. 5. No. 10. P. 1718–1719. DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.1144

[45]

Kapetanakis S, Gkasdaris G, Nastoulis E., et al. Hemivertebra of the cervical spine: an uncommon background for neck pain, cervical scoliosis, and torticollis. Clinical Case Reports. 2017;5(10):1718–1719. DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.1144

[46]

Aranha A., Choudhary A. C2 semisegmented hemivertebra – a rare anomaly presenting with torticollis. Br J Neurosurg. 2021:1–3. DOI: 10.1080/02688697.2021.1876211

[47]

Aranha A., Choudhary A. C2 semisegmented hemivertebra – a rare anomaly presenting with torticollis // Br. J. Neurosurg. 2021. P. 1–3. DOI: 10.1080/02688697.2021.1876211

[48]

Aranha A., Choudhary A. C2 semisegmented hemivertebra – a rare anomaly presenting with torticollis. Br J Neurosurg. 2021:1–3. DOI: 10.1080/02688697.2021.1876211

[49]

Zhuang Q, Zhang J, Wang S, et al. Multiple cervical hemivertebra resection and staged thoracic pedicle subtraction osteotomy in the treatment of complicated congenital scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(1):188–193. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-4352-9

[50]

Zhuang Q., Zhang J., Wang S., et al. Multiple cervical hemivertebra resection and staged thoracic pedicle subtraction osteotomy in the treatment of complicated congenital scoliosis // Eur. Spine J. 2016. Vol. 25. Suppl. 1. P. 188–193. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-4352-9

[51]

Zhuang Q, Zhang J, Wang S, et al. Multiple cervical hemivertebra resection and staged thoracic pedicle subtraction osteotomy in the treatment of complicated congenital scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(1):188–193. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-4352-9

[52]

Wang S, Li J, Lü G, et al. Cervical hemivertebra resection and torticollis correction: report on two cases and literature review. Eur Spine J. 2018;27(3):501–509. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5534-z

[53]

Wang S., Li J., Lü G., et al. Cervical hemivertebra resection and torticollis correction: report on two cases and literature review // Eur. Spine J. 2018. Vol. 27. Suppl. 3. P. 501–509. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5534-z

[54]

Wang S, Li J, Lü G, et al. Cervical hemivertebra resection and torticollis correction: report on two cases and literature review. Eur Spine J. 2018;27(3):501–509. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5534-z

[55]

Yu M, Diao Y, Sun Y, et al. Evaluation of a combined approach to the correction of congenital cervical or cervicothoracic scoliosis. Spine J. 2019;19:803–815. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.11.006

[56]

Yu M., Diao Y., Sun Y., et al. Evaluation of a combined approach to the correction of congenital cervical or cervicothoracic scoliosis // Spine J. 2019. Vol. 19. P. 803–815. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.11.006

[57]

Yu M, Diao Y, Sun Y, et al. Evaluation of a combined approach to the correction of congenital cervical or cervicothoracic scoliosis. Spine J. 2019;19:803–815. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.11.006

[58]

Cao S, Chen X, Pan S, et al. Evaluation and comparation of a novel surgical technique and hemivertebra resection to the correction of congenital cervical scoliosis in lower cervical and cervicothoracic spine. Neurospine. 2022;19(4):1071–1083. DOI: 10.14245/ns.2244554.277

[59]

Cao S., Chen X., Pan S., et al. Evaluation and comparation of a novel surgical technique and hemivertebra resection to the correction of congenital cervical scoliosis in lower cervical and cervicothoracic spine // Neurospine. 2022. Vol. 19. No. 4 P. 1071–1083. DOI: 10.14245/ns.2244554.277

[60]

Cao S, Chen X, Pan S, et al. Evaluation and comparation of a novel surgical technique and hemivertebra resection to the correction of congenital cervical scoliosis in lower cervical and cervicothoracic spine. Neurospine. 2022;19(4):1071–1083. DOI: 10.14245/ns.2244554.277

[61]

Liew SM, Simmons ED Jr. Cervical deformity: rationale for selecting the appropriate fusion technique (anterior, posterior, and 360 degree). Orthop Clin North Am. 1998;29:779–786.

[62]

Liew S.M., Simmons E.D. Jr. Cervical deformity: rationale for selecting the appropriate fusion technique (anterior, posterior, and 360 degree) // Orthop. Clin. North. Am. 1998. Vol. 29. P. 779–786.

[63]

Liew SM, Simmons ED Jr. Cervical deformity: rationale for selecting the appropriate fusion technique (anterior, posterior, and 360 degree). Orthop Clin North Am. 1998;29:779–786.

[64]

Vissarionov SV, Syundyukov AR, Kokushin DN, et al. A comparative analysis of the surgical treatment of preschool children with congenital spinal deformation and isolated hemivertebra from the combined and dorsal approaches. Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery. 2019;7(4):5–14. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17816/PTORS745-14

[65]

Виссарионов С.В., Сюндюков А.Р., Кокушин Д.Н., и др. Сравнительный анализ хирургического лечения детей дошкольного возраста с врожденной деформацией позвоночника при изолированных полупозвонках из комбинированного и дорсального доступов // Ортопедия, травматология и восстановительная хирургия детского возраста. 2019. Т. 7. № 4. C. 5–14. DOI: 10.17816/PTORS745-14

[66]

Vissarionov SV, Syundyukov AR, Kokushin DN, et al. A comparative analysis of the surgical treatment of preschool children with congenital spinal deformation and isolated hemivertebra from the combined and dorsal approaches. Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery. 2019;7(4):5–14. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17816/PTORS745-14

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Khusainov N.O., Kokushin D.N., Filippova A.N., Vissarionov S.V.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (233KB)

71

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/