Minimally invasive treatment of complications after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in solitary kidney

Abstract

Clinical observations were made regarding the effectiveness of minimally invasive interventions in the treatment of complications after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in solitary kidney, due to the presence of a tumor. On the first day after the operation, abundant bleeding from the stump of the superior segmental renal artery was noted; this was stopped by selective embolization. On the 7^th day after the operation, a urinary fistula was revealed, which developed because of violation of the integrity of the pyelocaliceal kidney system. After stenting of the kidney was performed, urine excretion in the retroperitoneal drainage was stopped.

Keywords

selective renal artery embolization / partial nephrectomy / solitary kidney / tumor kidney

References

[1] Cohen H, McGovern F. Renal cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(23):3477-3490. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra043172.

[2] Атдуев В.А., Шейыхов Г.И., Данилов А.А., и др. Структура 90-дневных осложнений после резекции единственной почки при опухолях ее паренхимы // Онкоурология. – 2017. – Т. 13. – № 2. – С. 20–26. [Atduev VA, Sheiykhov GI, Danilov AA, et al. Structure of 90 days complications after solitary kidney resection due to parenchyma tumors. Onkourologiya = Onkouro-logy. 2017;13(2):20-26. (In Russ.)]. doi: 10.17650/1726-9776-2017-13-2-20-26.

[3] Матвеев В.Б., Волкова М.И., Алборов С.В., и др. Резекция единственной функционирующей почки при опухолях почечной паренхимы // Онкоурология. – 2017. – Т. 13. – № 2. – С. 27–35. [Matveev VB, Volkova MI, Alborov SV, et al. Partial nephrectomy for patients with a solitary kidney. Onkourologiya = Onkourology. 2017;13(2):27-35. (In Russ.)]. doi: 10.17650/1726-9776-2017-13-2-27-35.

[4] Волкова М.И., Алборов С.В., Черняев В.А., и др. Функциональные результаты резекции единственной функционирующей почки при опухолях почечной паренхимы // Онкоурология. – 2017. – Т. 13. – № 3. – С. 46–53. [Volkova MI, Alborov SV, Chernyaev VF et al. Functional results of partial nephrectomy in solitary functioning kidney tumors. Onkourologiya = Onkouro-logy. 2017;13(3):46-53. (In Russ.)]. doi: 10.17650/1726-9776-2017-13-3-46-53.

[5] Алексеев Б.Я., Калпинский А.С. Чрескожная радиочастотная абляция в лечении опухолей почек // Онкохирургия. – 2012. – Т. 4. – № 4. – С. 20–24. [Alekseev BYa, Kalpinskiy AS. Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation in kidney tumor treatment. Oncochirurgiya = Oncosurgery. 2012;4(4):20-24. (In Russ.)]

[6] Klatte T, Ficarra V, Gratzke C, et al. A literature review of renal surgical anatomy and surgical strategies for partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol. 2015;6(68):980-92. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.010.

[7] Buffi N, Lista G, Larcher A, et al. Margin, ischemia, and complications (MIC) score in partial nephrectomy: a new system for evaluating achievement of optimal outcomes in nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol. 2012;62(4):618-619. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.06.031.

[8] Матвеев В.Б., Волкова М.И., Скворцов И.Я., и др. Целесообразность и безопасность трансперитонеальной лапароскопической резекции почки при опухолях почечной паренхимы // Онкоурология. – 2014. – Т. 10. – № 1. – С. 25–34. [Matveev VB, Volkova MI, Skvortsov IYa, et al. The advisability and safety of transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal parenchymal tumors. Onkourologiya = Onkourology. 2014;10(1):25-34. (In Russ.)]. doi: 10.17650/1726-9776-2014-10-1-25-34.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Emirgaev Z.K., Bogomolov O.A., Shkolnik M.I., Prokhorov D.G., Polehin A.S.