Micropercutaneous nephrolithotripsy in the treatment of patients with nephrolithiasis: medical and organizational aspects

Abstract

The article is devoted to modern methods of treating nephrolithiasis. A review of the results of studies on the effectiveness and safety of micro- and minipercutaneous nephrolithotripsy and the advantages of different treatment methods is presented. A trend towards miniaturization of surgical methods for the treatment of nephrolithiasis has been shown, accompanied by an improvement in their results and economic feasibility. The issues of organizing surgical treatment of patients with kidney stones are considered.

Keywords

urolithiasis / nephrolithiasis / micropercutaneous nephrolithotripsy / minipercutaneous nephrolithotripsy

References

[1] Protoshchak VV, Paronnikov MV, Sivakov AA, Kiselev AO. Quality of life of patients with kidney stones. Urology reports (St. Petersburg). 2020;10(2):115–124. EDN: ZHHFDJ doi: 10.17816/uroved102115-124

[2] Протощак В.В., Паронников М.В., Сиваков А.А., Киселев А.О. Качество жизни больных нефролитиазом // Урологические ведомости. 2020. Т. 10, № 2. C. 115–124. EDN: ZHHFDJ doi: 10.17816/uroved102115-124

[3] Mohebbi N. Risk factors for urolithiasis. Ther Umsch. 2021;78(5):223–227. doi: 10.1024/0040-5930/a001264

[4] Mohebbi N. Risk factors for urolithiasis // Ther Umsch. 2021. Vol. 78, N. 5. P. 223–227. doi: 10.1024/0040-5930/a001264

[5] Khan SR, Pearle MS, Robertson WG, et al. Kidney stones. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16008. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.8

[6] Khan S.R., Pearle M.S., Robertson W.G., et al. Kidney stones // Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016. Vol. 2. ID 16008. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.8

[7] Bultitude M. Urolithiasis around the world. BJU Int. 2017;120(5):601–601. doi: 10.1111/bju.14033

[8] Bultitude M. Urolithiasis around the world // BJU Int. 2017. Vol. 120, N. 5. P. 601–601. doi: 10.1111/bju.14033

[9] Sorokin I, Mamoulakis C, Miyazawa K, et al. Epidemiology of stone disease across the world. World J Urol. 2017;35(9):1301–1320. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2008-6

[10] Sorokin I., Mamoulakis C., Miyazawa K., et al. Epidemiology of stone disease across the world // World J Urol. 2017. Vol. 35, N. 9. P. 1301–1320. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2008-6

[11] Kaprin AD, Apolihin OI, Sivkov AV, et al. The incidence of urolithiasis in the Russian Federation from 2005 to 2020. Experimental and Clinical Urology. 2022;15(2)10–17. EDN: EATILC doi: 10.29188/2222-8543-2022-15-2-10-17

[12] Каприн А.Д., Аполихин О.И., Сивков А.В., и др. Заболеваемость мочекаменной болезнью в Российской Федерации с 2005 по 2020 гг. // Экспериментальная и клиническая урология. 2022. Т. 15, № 2. С. 10–17. EDN: EATILC doi: 10.29188/2222-8543-2022-15-2-10-17

[13] Orel VI, Zavrazhnov AA, Yemelyanov OV, et al. Peculiar features of the organization of surgical care in a multidisciplinary hospital repurposed to provide care to COVID-19 patients: the structure of the incoming flow and the methodology of surgical work in pandemic. Medicine and health care. 2022;7(4):40–56. EDN: FPUUTM doi: 10.56871/MHCO.2022.91.85.005

[14] Орел В.И., Завражнов А.А., Емельянов О.В., и др. Особенности организации хирургической помощи в многопрофильном стационаре, перепрофилированном для оказания помощи больным COVID-19: структура входящего потока и методология хирургической работы в условиях пандемии // Медицина и организация здравоохранения. 2022. Т. 7, № 4. С. 40–56. EDN: FPUUTM doi: 10.56871/MHCO.2022.91.85.005

[15] Buzin VN, Son IM. Organization of medical care in inpatient settings during the pandemic: public opinion. Current problems of health care and medical statistics. 2021;(2):322–336. EDN: CZBZPR doi: 10.24412/2312-2935-2021-2-322-336

[16] Бузин В.Н., Сон И.М. Организация медицинской помощи в стационарных условиях в период пандемии: мнение населения // Современные проблемы здравоохранения и медицинской статистики. 2021. № 2. С. 322–336. EDN: CZBZPR doi: 10.24412/2312-2935-2021-2-322-336

[17] Safdar OY, Alzahrani WA, Kurdi MA, et al. The prevalence of renal stones among local residents in Saudi Arabia. J Family Med Prim Care. 2021;10(2):974–977. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_262_20

[18] Safdar O.Y., Alzahrani W.A., Kurdi M.A., et al. The prevalence of renal stones among local residents in Saudi Arabia // J Family Med Prim Care. 2021. Vol. 10, N. 2. P. 974–977. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_262_20

[19] Moe OW. Kidney stones: pathophysiology and medical management. Lancet. 2006;367(9507):333–344. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68071-9

[20] Moe O.W. Kidney stones: pathophysiology and medical management // Lancet. 2006. Vol. 367, N. 9507. P. 333–344. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68071-9

[21] Zingerenko MB, Gazaryan MA, Sapizhuk ER. Minimally invasive surgical treatment of kidney stones in elderly patients. Clinical gerontology. 2018;24(9-10):23–26. EDN: XWBNJR

[22] Зингеренко М.Б., Газарян М.А., Сапижук Е.Р. Малоинвазивное хирургическое лечение камней почек у пациентов пожилого возраста // Клиническая геронтология. 2018. Т. 24, № 9-10. С. 23–26. EDN: XWBNJR

[23] Tursunov AI, Nazarov TK, Rychkov IV. Retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients with high-density stones. Urology reports (St. Petersburg). 2022;12(2):117–126. EDN: SOWLXM doi: 10.17816/uroved106878

[24] Турсунов А.И., Назаров Т.Х., Рычков И.В. Ретроградная интраренальная хирургия у пациентов с конкрементами высокой плотности в почках // Урологические ведомости. 2022. Т. 12, № 2. C. 117–126. EDN: SOWLXM doi: 10.17816/uroved106878

[25] Gudkov AV, Boshchenko VS, Lozovskiy MS, Shikunova YaV. Integrated retrograde and antegrade contact electro-impulse lithotripsy in the treatment of kidneys and ureteropelvic junction stones. Urology Herald. 2021;9(1):39–46. EDN: NZJKHY doi: 10.21886/2308-6424-2021-9-1-39-46

[26] Гудков А.В., Бощенко В.С., Лозовский М.С., Шикунова Я.В. Комбинация ретроградной и антеградной контактной электроимпульсной литотрипсии при камнях почки и лоханочномочеточникового сегмента // Вестник урологии. 2021. Т. 9, № 1. С. 39–46. EDN: NZJKHY doi: 10.21886/2308-6424-2021-9-1-39-46

[27] Medvedev VL, Budanov AA, Dmitrenko GD, et al. Comparative efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis. Innovative Medicine of Kuban. 2021;(1):39–46. EDN: XUVECC doi: 10.35401/2500-0268-2021-21-1-39-46

[28] Медведев В.Л., Буданов А.А., Дмитренко Г.Д., и др. Сравнительная эффективность дистанционной ударно-волновой литотрипсии и ретроградной внутрипочечной хирургии при кальций-оксалатном нефролитиазе // Инновационная медицина Кубани. 2021. № 1. С. 39–46. EDN: XUVECC doi: 10.35401/2500-0268-2021-21-1-39-46

[29] Seregin IV, Seregin AA, Filimonov EV, et al. Ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in treatment of less than 2 cm kidney stones: Comparative efficacy and safety. Creative surgery and oncology. 2022;12(2):98–105. EDN: AOGGTI doi: 10.24060/2076-3093-2022-12-2-98-105

[30] Серегин И.В., Серегин А.А., Филимонов Е.В., и др. Ультрамини-перкутанная нефролитотрипсия и ретроградная интраренальная хирургия при лечении камней почек менее 2 см: сравнительные результаты эффективности и безопасности // Креативная хирургия и онкология. 2022. Т. 12, № 2. С. 98–105. EDN: AOGGTI doi: 10.24060/2076-3093-2022-12-2-98-105

[31] Tepeler A, Armagan A, Sancaktutar AA, et al. The role of microperc in the treatment of symptomatic lower pole renal calculi. J Endourol. 2013;27(1):13–18. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0422

[32] Tepeler A., Armagan A., Sancaktutar A.A., et al. The role of microperc in the treatment of symptomatic lower pole renal calculi // J Endourol. 2013. Vol. 27, N. 1. P. 13–18. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0422

[33] Hatipoglu NK, Sancaktutar AA, Tepeler A, et al. Comparison of shockwave lithotripsy and microperc for treatment of kidney stones in children. J Endourol. 2013;27(9):1141–1146. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0066

[34] Hatipoglu N.K., Sancaktutar A.A., Tepeler A., et al. Comparison of shockwave lithotripsy and microperc for treatment of kidney stones in children // J Endourol. 2013. Vol. 27, N. 9. P. 1141–1146. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0066

[35] Sabnis RB, Ganesamoni R, Doshi A, et al. Microper-cutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc) vs retrograde intrarenal surgery for the management of small renal calculi: a randomized controlled trial. BJU Int. 2013;112(3):355–361. doi: 10.1111/bju.12164

[36] Sabnis R.B., Ganesamoni R., Doshi A., et al. Microper-cutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc) vs retrograde intrarenal surgery for the management of small renal calculi: a randomized controlled trial // BJU Int. 2013. Vol. 112, N. 3. P. 355–361. doi: 10.1111/bju.12164

[37] Traxer O, Thomas A. Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Urol. 2013;189(2):580–584. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.197

[38] Traxer O., Thomas A. Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery // J Urol. 2013. Vol. 189, N. 2. P. 580–584. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.197

[39] Zhang B, Hu Y, Gao J, Zhuo D. Micropercutaneous versus Retrograde intrarenal surgery for the management of moderately sized kidney stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Int. 2020;104(1-2):94–105. doi: 10.1159/000503796

[40] Zhang B., Hu Y., Gao J., Zhuo D. Micropercutaneous versus Retrograde intrarenal surgery for the management of moderately sized kidney stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Urol Int. 2020. Vol. 104, N. 1-2. P. 94–105. doi: 10.1159/000503796

[41] Fernstrom I, Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1976;10(3):257–259. doi: 10.1080/21681805.1976.11882084

[42] Fernstrom I., Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique // Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1976. Vol. 10, N. 3. P. 257–259. doi: 10.1080/21681805.1976.11882084

[43] Torricelli FCM, Carvalho RS, Marchini GS, et al. Bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus staged approach: a critical analysis of complications and renal function. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2020;66(12):1696–1701. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.66.12.1696

[44] Torricelli F.C.M., Carvalho R.S., Marchini G.S., et al. Bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus staged approach: a critical analysis of complications and renal function // Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2020. Vol. 66, N. 12. P. 1696–1701. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.66.12.1696

[45] Suleymanov SI, Kadyrov ZA, Aguzarov AM, et al. Advantages and disadvantages of percutaneous surgery of urolithiasis in the patient’s supine position. Urology reports (St. Petersburg). 2023;13(4):369–376. EDN: RXFRVP doi: 10.17816/uroved568970

[46] Сулейманов С.И., Кадыров З.А., Агузаров А.М., и др. Преимущества и недостатки перкутанной хирургии мочекаменной болезни в положении пациента на спине // Урологические ведомости. 2023. Т. 13, № 4. C. 369–376. EDN: RXFRVP doi: 10.17816/uroved568970

[47] Khadgi S, Darrad M, El-Nahas AR, Al-Terki A. Tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones larger than 20 mm. Indian J Urol. 2021;37(1):54–58. doi: 10.4103/iju.IJU_271_20

[48] Khadgi S., Darrad M., El-Nahas A.R., Al-Terki A. Tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones larger than 20 mm // Indian J Urol. 2021. Vol. 37, N. 1. P. 54–58. doi: 10.4103/iju.IJU_271_20

[49] Bhatia VP, Aro T, Smith SM, et al. Frailty as predictor of complications in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). World J Urol. 2021;39(10):3971–3977. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03681-x

[50] Bhatia V.P., Aro T., Smith S.M., et al. Frailty as predictor of complications in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) // World J Urol. 2021. Vol. 39, N. 10. P. 3971–3977. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03681-x

[51] Arora AM, Pawar PW, Tamhankar AS, et al. Predictors for severe hemorrhage requiring angioem-bolization post percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A single-center experience over 3 years. Urol Ann. 2019;11(2):180–186. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_75_18

[52] Arora A.M., Pawar P.W., Tamhankar A.S., et al. Predictors for severe hemorrhage requiring angioem-bolization post percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A single-center experience over 3 years // Urol Ann. 2019. Vol. 11, N. 2. P. 180–186. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_75_18

[53] Mao Q, Wang C, Chen G, Tan FSB. Failure of initial superselective renal arterial embolization in the treatment of renal hemorrhage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A retrospective analysis of risk factors. Exp Ther Med. 2019;18(5):4151–4156. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.8033

[54] Mao Q., Wang C., Chen G., Tan F.S.B. Failure of initial superselective renal arterial embolization in the treatment of renal hemorrhage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A retrospective analysis of risk factors // Exp Ther Med. 2019. Vol. 18, N. 5. P. 4151–4156. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.8033

[55] Degirmenci T, Bozkurt IH, Celik S, et al. Does leaving residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with positive stone culture and/or renal pelvic urine culture increase the risk of infectious complications. Urolithiasis. 2019;47:371–375. doi: 10.1007/ s00240-018-1063-9

[56] Degirmenci T., Bozkurt I.H., Celik S., et al. Does leaving residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with positive stone culture and/or renal pelvic urine culture increase the risk of infectious complications // Urolithiasis. 2019. Vol. 47. P. 371–375. doi: 10.1007/ s00240-018-1063-9

[57] Popov SV, Orlov IN, Martov AG, et al. Our experience of micropercutaneous nephrolithotripsy application in the treatment large kidney stones. Experimental and Clinical Urology. 2018;(4):48–53. EDN: YUHIFF

[58] Попов С.В., Орлов И.Н., Мартов А.Г., и др. Наш опыт применения микроперкутанной нефролитотрипсии в лечении крупных камней // Экспериментальная и клиническая урология. 2018. № 4. С. 48–53. EDN: YUHIFF

[59] Desai MR, Sharma R, Mishra S, et al. Single-step percutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc): the initial clinical report. J Urol. 2011;186(1):140–145. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.029

[60] Desai M.R., Sharma R., Mishra S., et al. Single-step percutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc): the initial clinical report // J Urol. 2011. Vol. 186, N. 1. P. 140–145. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.029

[61] Bader MJ, Gratzke C, Seitz M, et al. The “all-seeing needle”: initial results of an optical puncture system confirming access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol. 2011;59(6):1054–1059. doi: 10.1016/ j.eururo.2011.03.026

[62] Bader M.J., Gratzke C., Seitz M., et al. The «all-seeing needle»: initial results of an optical puncture system confirming access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy // Eur Urol. 2011. Vol. 59, N. 6. P. 1054–1059. doi: 10.1016/ j.eururo.2011.03.026

[63] Popov SV, Orlov IN, Pazin IS, et al. 10 years of micropercutaneus nephrolithotripsy: evolution of method. Experimental and Clinical Urology. 2021;14(2):64–69. EDN: KTKCMU doi: 10.29188/2222-8543-2021-14-2-64-69

[64] Попов С.В., Орлов И.Н., Пазин И.С., и др. 10 лет микроперкутанной нефролитотрипсии: эволюция метода литературный обзор // Экспериментальная и клиническая урология. 2021. Т. 14, № 2. С. 64–69. EDN: KTKCMU doi: 10.29188/2222-8543-2021-14-2-64-69

[65] Kim SC, Kuo RL, Lingeman JE. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an update. Curr Opin Urol. 2003;13(3):235–241. doi: 10.1097/00042307-200305000-00012

[66] Kim S.C., Kuo R.L., Lingeman J.E. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an update // Curr Opin Urol. 2003. Vol. 13, N. 3. P. 235–241. doi: 10.1097/00042307-200305000-00012

[67] Zhu W, Liu Y, Liu L, et al. Minimally invasive versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2015;43:563–570. doi: 10.1007/s00240-015-0808-y

[68] Zhu W., Liu Y., Liu L., et al. Minimally invasive versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis // Urolithiasis. 2015. Vol. 43. P. 563–570. doi: 10.1007/s00240-015-0808-y

[69] Druskin SC, Ziemba JB. Minimally invasive (“Mini”) percutaneous nephrolithotomy: classification, indications, and outcomes. Curr Urol Rep. 2016;17:30. doi: 10.1007/s11934-016-0591-5

[70] Druskin S.C., Ziemba J.B. Minimally invasive (“Mini”) percutaneous nephrolithotomy: classification, indications, and outcomes // Curr Urol Rep. 2016. Vol. 17. ID 30. doi: 10.1007/s11934-016-0591-5

[71] Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1006–1012. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005

[72] Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D.G. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement // J Clin Epidemiol. 2009. Vol. 62, N. 10. P. 1006–1012. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005

[73] Dundar G, Gokce G, Gokcen K, et al. Microperc versus Miniperc for treatment of renal stones smaller than 2 cm in pediatric patients. Urol J. 2016;13(5):2829–2832. doi: 10.22037/uj.v13i5.3510

[74] Dundar G., Gokce G., Gokcen K., et al. Microperc versus Miniperc for treatment of renal stones smaller than 2 cm in pediatric patients // Urol J. 2016. Vol. 13, N. 5. P. 2829–2832. doi: 10.22037/uj.v13i5.3510

[75] Karatag T, Tepeler A, Silay MS, et al. A comparison of 2 percutaneous nephrolithotomy techniques for the treatment of pediatric kidney stones of sizes 10–20 mm: Microperc vs Miniperc. Urology. 2015;85(5):1015–1018. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.02.010

[76] Karatag T., Tepeler A., Silay M.S., et al. A comparison of 2 percutaneous nephrolithotomy techniques for the treatment of pediatric kidney stones of sizes 10-20 mm: Microperc vs Miniperc // Urology. 2015. Vol. 85, N. 5. P. 1015–1018. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.02.010

[77] Zhang Y, Li J, Zhang D, et al. Nomograms predicting the outcomes of endoscopic treatments for pediatric upper urinary tract calculi. Int J Urol. 2021;28(3):295–301. doi: 10.1111/iju.14451

[78] Zhang Y., Li J., Zhang D., et al. Nomograms predicting the outcomes of endoscopic treatments for pediatric upper urinary tract calculi // Int J Urol. 2021. Vol. 28, N. 3. P. 295–301. doi: 10.1111/iju.14451

[79] Tok A, Akbulut F, Buldu I, et al. Comparison of microperc and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for medium-sized lower calyx stones. Urolithiasis. 2016;44:155–159. doi: 10.1007/s00240-015-0804-2

[80] Tok A., Akbulut F., Buldu I., et al. Comparison of microperc and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for medium-sized lower calyx stones // Urolithiasis. 2016. Vol. 44. P. 155–159. doi: 10.1007/s00240-015-0804-2

[81] Kiremit MC, Guven S, Sarica K, et al. Contemporary management of medium-sized (10–20 mm) renal stones: a retrospective multicenter observational study. J Endourol. 2015;29(7):838–843. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0698

[82] Kiremit M.C., Guven S., Sarica K., et al. Contemporary management of medium-sized (10-20 mm) renal stones: a retrospective multicenter observational study // J Endourol. 2015. Vol. 29, N. 7. P. 838–843. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0698

[83] Knoll T, Wezel F, Michel MS, et al. Do patients benefit from miniaturized tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? A comparative prospective study. J Endourol. 2010;24(7):1075–1079. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0111

[84] Knoll T., Wezel F., Michel M.S., et al. Do patients benefit from miniaturized tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? A comparative prospective study // J Endourol. 2010. Vol. 24, N. 7. P. 1075–1079. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0111

[85] Ganpule AP, Bhattu AS, Desai M. PCNL in the twenty-first century: role of microperc, miniperc, and ultraminiperc. World J Urol. 2015;33:235–240. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1415-1

[86] Ganpule A.P., Bhattu A.S., Desai M. PCNL in the twenty-first century: role of microperc, miniperc, and ultraminiperc // World J Urol. 2015. Vol. 33. P. 235–240. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1415-1

[87] Mishra S, Sharma R, Garg C, et al. Prospective comparative study of miniperc and standard PNL for treatment of 1 to 2 cm size renal stone. BJU Int. 2011;108(6):896–899. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09936.x

[88] Mishra S., Sharma R., Garg C., et al. Prospective comparative study of miniperc and standard PNL for treatment of 1 to 2 cm size renal stone // BJU Int. 2011. Vol. 108, N. 6. P. 896–899. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09936.x

[89] Helal M, Black T, Lockhart J, Figueroa TE. The Hickman peel-away sheath: alternative for pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 1997;11(3):171–172. doi: 10.1089/end.1997.11.171

[90] Helal M., Black T., Lockhart J., Figueroa T.E. The Hickman peel-away sheath: alternative for pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy // J Endourol. 1997. Vol. 11, N. 3. P. 171–172. doi: 10.1089/end.1997.11.171

[91] Kukreja R, Desai M, Patel S, et al. Factors affecting blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prospective study. J Endourol. 2004;18(8):715–722. doi: 10.1089/0892779042360599

[92] Kukreja R., Desai M., Patel S., et al. Factors affecting blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prospective study // J Endourol. 2004. Vol. 18, N. 8. P. 715–722. doi: 10.1089/0892779042360599

[93] Jiang H, Yu Z, Chen L, et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for upper urinary stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:2035851. doi: 10.1155/2017/2035851

[94] Jiang H., Yu Z., Chen L., et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for upper urinary stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Biomed Res Int. 2017. Vol. 2017. ID 2035851. doi: 10.1155/2017/2035851

[95] Armagan A, Tepeler A, Silay MS, et al. Micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of moderate-size renal calculi. J Endourol. 2013;27(2):177–181. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0517

[96] Armagan A., Tepeler A., Silay M.S., et al. Micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of moderate-size renal calculi // J Endourol. 2013. Vol. 27, N. 2. P. 177–181. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0517

[97] Stern KL. Percutaneous management of upper tract stones: from mini to maxi percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Curr Opin Urol. 2023;33(4):339–344. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001087

[98] Stern K.L. Percutaneous management of upper tract stones: from mini to maxi percutaneous nephrolithotomy // Curr Opin Urol. 2023. Vol. 33, N. 4. P. 339–344. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001087

[99] Wright A, Rukin N, Smith D, et al. 'Mini, ultra, micro' – nomenclature and cost of these new minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) techniques. Ther Adv Urol. 2016;8(2):142–146. doi: 10.1177/1756287215617674

[100] Wright A., Rukin N., Smith D., et al. 'Mini, ultra, micro' – nomenclature and cost of these new minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) techniques // Ther Adv Urol. 2016. Vol. 8, N. 2. P. 142–146. doi: 10.1177/1756287215617674

[101] Hudnall M, Usawachintachit M, Metzler I, et al. Ultrasound guidance reduces percutaneous nephrolithotomy cost compared to fluoroscopy. Urology. 2017;103:52–58. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.12.030

[102] Hudnall M., Usawachintachit M., Metzler I., et al. Ultrasound guidance reduces percutaneous nephrolithotomy cost compared to fluoroscopy // Urology. 2017. Vol. 103. P. 52–58. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.12.030

[103] Ozok HU, Sagnak L, Senturk AB, et al. A comparison of metal telescopic dilators and Amplatz dilators for nephrostomy tract dilation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2012;26(6): 630–634. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0291

[104] Ozok H.U., Sagnak L., Senturk A.B., et al. A comparison of metal telescopic dilators and Amplatz dilators for nephrostomy tract dilation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy // J Endourol. 2012. Vol. 26, N. 6. P. 630–634. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0291

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Eco-Vector