Dynamics of sperm DNA fragmentation in patients with clinically significant varicocele after Marmar operation and laparoscopic varicocelectomy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Infertility is detected in 15% of sexually active couples who engage in unprotected sexual intercourse. At the same time, the male factor of infertility accounts from 30 to 50%. It is known that in 15–25% the cause of frozen pregnancy and miscarriage is the male factor of infertility associated with violations of the integrity of sexual chromatin – pathological fragmentation of sperm DNA (FDNAS). One of the main pathophysiological mechanisms of the occurrence of pathozoospermia and FDNAS in secretory male infertility is oxidative stress, which occurs in patients with varicocele. It has been proven that varicocelectomy increases the frequency of spontaneous pregnancy and improves the results of IVF-procedures. However, there are currently insufficient studies devoted to the comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of various methods of varicocelectomy in patients with pathological FDNAS.

AIM: To conduct a comparative assessment of the dynamics of sperm DNA fragmentation after subinguinal and laparoscopic varicocelectomy in male infertility.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included the results of examination and treatment of 87 men who complained of infertility in marriage for 1–9 years (on average, 3.8 ± 2.7 years). The age of the patients was 24–42 years (the average, 28.6 ± 11.3 years). All patients were diagnosed with grade II left-sided varicocele. Other pathological conditions potentially affecting ejaculate parameters were excluded. All patients underwent ejaculate analysis — sperm analysis, determined the degree of FDNAS by TUNEL method and the level of IgG class antisperm antibodies in the ejaculate by direct Mar-test. The patients were divided into 2 groups by randomization. The group 1 included 41 patients who underwent subinguinal varicocelectomy (Marmar operation), the group 2 included 46 patients who underwent laparoscopic varicocelectomy. Studies of the ejaculate — a sperm-analysis (according to WHO criteria, 2010), a MAR test and FDNAS — were carried out before, 3 and 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS: In all patients of both groups in six months after surgical correction of varicocele the concentration of spermatozoa, the number of progressively mobile and normal forms of spermatozoa (according to the strict Kruger criteria) were significantly increased. The MAR test value in all patients of both groups before surgery did not exceed 10%. There were no statistically significant changes in this indicator in the postoperative period. FDNAS values in patients of group 1 before and 3 months after surgical treatment no statistically significant differences were found (27.6 ± 6.7% and 22.4 ± 8.3%, respectively, p > 0.1). In patients in group 2, 3 months after surgical treatment a statistically significant decrease in the FDNAS value was noted compared with that before treatment (from 26.1 ± 8.9% to 13.3 ± 7.7%, p < 0.001). 6 months after surgery, patients in both groups showed a significant (p < 0.001) decrease in FDNAS values compared to the value before treatment: up to 14.6 ± 7.8% in patients of group 1 and up to 12.1 ± 8.0% — in patients of group 2.

CONCLUSIONS: 1. Performing subinguinal and laparoscopic varicocelectomy contributes to the significant improvement of the main parameters of sperm in six months after the surgical operation. 2. The DNA fragmentation level significantly decrease already in 3 months after laparoscopic varicocelectomy, and just in 6 months after Marmar operation.

Keywords

laparoscopic varicocelectomy / Marmar operation / male infertility / fertility / sperm analysis / DNA sperm fragmentation

References

[1] Jungwirth A, Giwercman A, Tournaye H, et al. European Association of Urology guidelines on Male Infertility: the 2012 up-date. Eur Urol. 2012;62(2):324–332. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.04.048

[2] Jungwirth A., Giwercman A., Tournaye H., et al. European Association of Urology guidelines on Male Infertility: the 2012 up-date // Eur Urol. 2012. Vol. 62, No. 2. P. 324–332. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.04.048

[3] Lebedev GS, Golubev NA, Shaderkin IA, et al. Male infertility in the Russian Federation: statistical data for 2000–2018. Experimental and clinical urology. 2019;(4):4–12. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.29188/2222-8543-2019-11-4-4-12.2. 2.

[4] Лебедев Г.С., Голубев Н.А., Шадеркин И.А., и др. Мужское бесплодие в Российской Федерации: статистические данные за 2000–2018 годы // Экспериментальная и клиническая урология. 2019. № 4. С. 4–13. DOI: 10.29188/2222-8543-2019-11-4-4-12.2. 2.

[5] Inhorn MC, Patrizio P. Infertility around the globe: new thinking on gender, reproductive technologies and global movements in the 21st Century. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21(4):411–426. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmv016

[6] Inhorn M.C., Patrizio P. Infertility around the globe: new thinking on gender, reproductive technologies and global movements in the 21st Сentury // Hum Reprod Update. 2015. Vol. 21, No. 4. P. 411–426. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmv016

[7] Rudneva SA, Bragina EE, Arifulin EA, et al. DNA fragmentation in spermatozoa and its relationship with impaired spermatogenesis. Andrology and Genital Surgery. 2014;15(4):26–33. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17650/2070-9781-2014-4-26-33

[8] Руднева С.А., Брагина Е.Е., Арифулин Е.А., и др. Фрагментация ДНК в сперматозоидах и ее взаимосвязь с нарушением сперматогенеза // Андрология и генитальная хирургия. 2014. Т. 15, № 4. С. 26–33. DOI: 10.17650/2070-9781-2014-4-26-33

[9] Agarwal A, Mulgund A, Hamada A, Chyatte MR. A unique view on male infertility around the globe. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015;13:37. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-015-0032-1

[10] Agarwal A., Mulgund A., Hamada A., Chyatte M.R. A unique view on male infertility around the globe // Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015. Vol. 13. ID37. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-015-0032-1

[11] Al-Shukri SH, Borovets SY, Toropov VA. Violation of spermatogenesis and outcomesof assisted reproductive technologies in various forms of hypogonadism. Urology reports (St. Petersburg). 2016;6(1):21–28. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17816/uroved621-28

[12] Аль-Шукри С.Х., Боровец С.Ю., Торопов В.А. Нарушение сперматогенеза и исходы вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий при различных формах гипогонадизма // Урологические ведомости. 2016. Т. 6, № 1. С. 21–28. DOI: 10.17816/uroved621-28

[13] Ovchinnikov RI, Popova AYu, Gamidov SI, Kvasov AV. Antioxidant therapy is the key to the treatment of idiopathic male infertility. Medical Council. 2017;(20):177–181. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.21518/2079-701X-2017-20-177-181.

[14] Овчинников Р.И., Попова А.Ю., Гамидов С.И., Квасов А.В. Антиоксидантная терапия — ключ к лечению идиопатического мужского бесплодия // Медицинский Совет. 2017. № 20. С. 177–181. DOI: 10.21518/2079-701X-2017-20-177-181

[15] Tetruashvili NK. Rannie poteri beremennosti (immunologicheskie aspekty, puti profilaktiki i terapii) [dissertation abstract]. Moscow, 2008. 48 p. (In Russ.)

[16] Тетруашвили Н.К. Ранние потери беременности (иммунологические аспекты, пути профилактики и терапии): автореф. дис. … д-ра мед. наук. Москва, 2008. 48 с.

[17] Tihomirov AL, Lubnin DM. Privychnoe nevynashivanie beremennosti: prichiny, diagnostika i sovremennye podkhody k terapii. Farmateka. 2004;(1):5–6. (In Russ.)

[18] Тихомиров А.Л., Лубнин Д.М. Привычное невынашивание беременности: причины, диагностика и современные подходы к терапии // Фарматека. 2004. № 1. С. 5–6.

[19] Agadzhanova AA. Sovremennye podkhody k diagnostike i lecheniyu antifosfolipidnogo sindroma v klinike nevynashivaniya beremennosti. Vestnik Rossiiskoi assotsiatsii akusherov-ginekologov. 1999;(2):40–45. (In Russ.)

[20] Агаджанова А.А. Современные подходы к диагностике и лечению антифосфолипидного синдрома в клинике невынашивания беременности // Вестник Российской ассоциации акушеров-гинекологов. 1999. № 2. С. 40–45.

[21] Belloc S, Hazout A, Zini A, et al. How to overcome male infertility after 40: Influence of paternal age on fertility. Maturitas. 2014;78(1):22–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.02.011

[22] Belloc S., Hazout A., Zini A., et al. How to overcome male infertility after 40: Influence of paternal age on fertility // Maturitas. 2014. Vol. 78, No. 1. P. 22–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.02.011

[23] Cho C–L, Esteves SC, Agarwal A. Novel insights into the pathophysiology of varicocele and its association with reactive oxygen species and sperm DNA fragmentation. Asian J Androl. 2016;18(2): 186–193. DOI: 10.4103/1008-682X.170441

[24] Cho C.-L., Esteves S.C., Agarwal A. Novel insights into the pathophysiology of varicocele and its association with reactive oxygen species and sperm DNA fragmentation // Asian J Androl. 2016. Vol. 18, No. 2. P. 186–193. DOI: 10.4103/1008-682X.170441

[25] Wang K, Gao Y, Wang C, et al. Role of oxidative stress in varicocele. Front Genet. 2022;13:850114. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.850114

[26] Wang K., Gao Y., Wang C., et al. Role of oxidative stress in varicocele // Front Genet. 2022. Vol. 13. ID 850114. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.850114

[27] Lira Neto FT, Roque M, Esteves SC. Effect of varicocelectomy on sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation rates in infertile men with clinical varicocele: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2021;116(3):696–712. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.04.003

[28] Lira Neto F.T., Roque M., Esteves S.C. Effect of varicocelectomy on sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation rates in infertile men with clinical varicocele: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Fertil Steril. 2021. Vol. 116, No. 3. P. 696–712. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.04.003

[29] Krawetz SA. Paternal contribution: New insights and future challenges. Nat Rev Genet. 2005;6:633–642. DOI: 10.1038/nrg1654

[30] Krawetz S.A. Paternal contribution: New insights and future challenges // Nat Rev Genet. 2005. Vol. 6. P. 633–642. DOI: 10.1038/nrg1654

[31] Tahamtan S, Tavalaee M, Izadi T, et al. Reduced sperm telomere length in individuals with varicocele is associated with reduced genomic integrity. Sci Rep. 2019;9:4336. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-40707-2

[32] Tahamtan S., Tavalaee M., Izadi T., et al. Reduced sperm telomere length in individuals with varicocele is associated with reduced genomic integrity // Sci Rep. 2019. Vol. 9. ID 4336. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-40707-2

[33] Jeremias JT, Belardin LB, Okada FK, et al. Oxidative origin of sperm DNA fragmentation in the adult varicocele. Int Braz J Urol. 2021;47(2):275–283. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0827

[34] Jeremias J.T., Belardin L.B., Okada F.K., et al. Oxidative origin of sperm DNA fragmentation in the adult varicocele // Int Braz J Urol. 2021. Vol. 47, No. 2. P. 275–283. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0827

[35] Borovets SY, Egorova VA, Gzgzian AM, Al-Shukri SK. Fragmentation of sperm DNA: clinical significance, reasons, methods of evaluation and correction. Urology reports (St. Petersburg). 2020;10(2): 173–180. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17816/uroved102173-180

[36] Боровец С.Ю., Егорова В.А., Гзгзян А.М., Аль-Шукри С.Х. Фрагментация ДНК сперматозоидов: клиническая значимость, причины, методы оценки и коррекции // Урологические ведомости. 2020. Т. 10, № 2. C. 173–180. DOI: 10.17816/uroved102173-180

[37] Roque M, Esteves SC. Effect of varicocele repair on sperm DNA fragmentation: a review. Int Urol Nephrol. 2018;50(4):583–603. DOI: 10.1007/s11255-018-1839-4

[38] Roque M., Esteves S.C. Effect of varicocele repair on sperm DNA fragmentation: a review // Int Urol Nephrol. 2018. Vol. 50, No. 4. P. 583–603. DOI: 10.1007/s11255-018-1839-4

[39] Li Z, Hu S, Zhou R, Wang J. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of microscopic and laparoscopic surgery for varicocele. World J Urol. 2022;40(1):299–300. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03516-1

[40] Li Z., Hu S., Zhou R., Wang J. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of microscopic and laparoscopic surgery for varicocele // World J Urol. 2022. Vol. 40, No. 1. P. 299–300. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03516-1

[41] Evers JLH, Collins JA, Vandekerckhove P. Surgery or embolisation for varicocele in subfertile men. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;1:CD000479. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000479

[42] Evers J.L.H., Collins J.A., Vandekerckhove P. Surgery or embolisation for varicocele in subfertile men // Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001. Vol. 1. ID CD000479. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000479

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Eco-Vector