Modern techniques for recurrent prostate cancer imaging and perspective of their development

Salman Hasunovich Al-Shukri; Sergey Yurievich Borovets; Maxim Alexandrovich Rybalov

doi:10.17816/uroved517-10

Urology reports (St. - Petersburg) ›› 2015, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) : 7 -10. DOI: 10.17816/uroved517-10

Articles

research-article

Modern techniques for recurrent prostate cancer imaging and perspective of their development

Author information +

History +

PDF

Abstract

This review deals with modern techniques for recurrent prostate cancer imaging and recommendations for their use. Perspective of development of these technologies and ways to improve the efficiency of diagnostics are shown.

Keywords

imaging techniques / recurrent prostate cancer / diagnostics

Cite this article

Download citation ▾

Salman Hasunovich Al-Shukri, Sergey Yurievich Borovets, Maxim Alexandrovich Rybalov. Modern techniques for recurrent prostate cancer imaging and perspective of their development. Urology reports (St. - Petersburg), 2015, 5(1): 7-10 DOI:10.17816/uroved517-10

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户忘记密码

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within

[1]	Picchio M., Briganti A., Fanti S. et al. The role of choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the management of patients with prostate-specific antigen progression after radical treatment of prostate cancer // Eur. Urol. 2011. Vol. 59, N 1. P. 51-60.

[2]	von Eyben F. E., Kairemo K. Meta-analysis of (11)C-choline and (18)F-choline PET/CT for management of patients with prostate cancer // Nucl. Med. Commun. 2014. Vol. 35, N 3. P. 221-230.

[3]	Ceci F., Herrmann K., Castellucci P. et al. Impact of 11C-choline PET/CT on clinical decision making in recurrent prostate cancer: results from a retrospective two-centre trial // Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2014. Vol. 41, N 12. P. 2222-2231.

[4]	Bouchelouche K., Choyke P. L., Capala J. Prostate specific membrane antigen-A target for imaging and therapy with radionuclides // Discov. Med. 2010. Vol. 9, P. 55-61.

[5]	Afshar-Oromieh A., Zechmann C. M., Malcher A. et al. Comparison of PET imaging with a (68)Ga-labelled PSMA ligand and (18)F-choline-based PET/CT for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer//Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2014. Vol. 41, N 1. P. 11-20.

[6]	Hegde J. V., Mulkern R. V., Panych L. P. et al. Multiparametric MRI of prostate cancer: an update on state-of-the-art techniques and their performance in detecting and localizing prostate cancer // J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2013. Vol. 37, N 5. P. 1035-1054.

[7]	Akin O., Gultekin D. H., Vargas H. A. et al. Incremental value of diffusion weighted and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in the detection of locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiation treatment: preliminary results // Eur. Radiol. 2011. Vol. 21, N 9. P. 1970-1978.

[8]

Donati O. F., Jung S. I., Vargas H. A. et al. Multiparametric prostate MR imaging with T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences: are all pulse sequences necessary to detect locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiation therapy? // Radiology. 2013. Vol. 268, N 2 P. 440-450.

[9]	Kitajima K., Murphy R. C., Nathan M. A. et al. Detection of recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: comparison of 11C-choline PET/CT with pelvic multiparametric MR imaging with endorectal coil // J. Nucl. Med. 2014. Vol. 55, N 2. P. 223-232.

[10]	Afshar-Oromieh A., Haberkorn U., Schlemmer H. P. et al. Comparison of PET/CT and PET/MRI hybrid systems using a 68Ga-labelled PSMA ligand for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer: initial experience // Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2014. Vol. 41, N 5. P. 887-897.