History of urine diversion techniques

Abstract

The review article is devoted to the history of the development of urine diversion methods, starting from the very first operations for the imposition of skin fistulas and ending with modern high-tech surgical interventions. The advantages and disadvantages of various methods of urine diversion are described. It is shown that the gold standard today is orthotopic bladder plastic surgery, which allows to achieve good functional results and a high quality of life for patients.

Keywords

urinary diversion / orthotopic neobladder / ureterosigmoid anastomosis / neocystis

References

[1] Sonnenburg E. Eine neue Methode der operativen Behandlung der Ektopia vesicae mittels Exstirpation der Harnblase. Berl Klin Wschr. 1881;30:429. (In Germ.)

[2] Sonnenburg E. Eine neue Methode der operativen Behandlung der Ektopia vesicae mittels Exstirpation der Harnblase // Berl Klin Wschr. 1881. No. 30. S. 429.

[3] Bovee JW. II. A critical survey of ureteral implantations. Ann Surg. 1900. Vol. 32. P. 165–193. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-190007000-00011

[4] Bovee JW. II. A critical survey of ureteral implantations // Ann Surg. 1900. Vol. 32. P. 165–193. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-190007000-00011

[5] Pawlick K. Ueber Blasenextirpation: Vorstellung der operirten Frau. Wien Med Wschr. 1891;14:1814. (In Germ.)

[6] Pawlick K. Ueber Blasenextirpation: Vorstellung der operirten Frau // Wien Med Wschr 1891. Vol. 14. S. 1814.

[7] Murphy LJT. Ureteric repair and replacement, urinary diversion, artificial bladders and allied subjects: Ureterourethral anastomosis. In: Murphy LJT, editor. The history of urology. Illinois: Charles C Thomas; 1972. 301 p.

[8] Murphy L.J.T. Ureteric repair and replacement, urinary diversion, artificial bladders and allied subjects: Ureterourethral anastomosis. In: Murphy L.J.T., editor. The history of urology. Illinois: Charles C Thomas, 1972. P. 301.

[9] Simon J. Ectropia vesicae (absence of the anterior walls of the bladder and pubis abdominal parietis); operation for directing the orifices of the ureters into the rectum; temporary success; subsequent death; autopsy. Lancet. 1852;2:568–570.

[10] Simon J. Ectropia vesicae (absence of the anterior walls of the bladder and pubis abdominal parietis); operation for directing the orifices of the ureters into the rectum; temporary success; subsequent death; autopsy // Lancet. 1852. No. 2. P. 568–570.

[11] Lloyd EA. Ectrophia vesicae. (Absence of anterior walls of bladder.) Operation, subsequent death. Lancet. 1851;2:370–372.

[12] Lloyd EA. Ectrophia vesicae. (Absence of anterior walls of bladder.) Operation, subsequent death // Lancet. 1851. No. 2. P. 370–372.

[13] Smith Th. An account of an unsuccessful attempt to threat extroversion of the bladder by a new operation. St Bart Hosp Rep. 1879;15: 29–35.

[14] Smith Th. An account of an unsuccessful attempt to threat extroversion of the bladder by a new operation // St Bart Hosp Rep. 1879. Vol. 15. P. 29–35.

[15] Maydl K. Über die radikaltherapie der Ektopia vesicae urinariae. Wien Med Wochenschr. 1894;44:1256–1258. (In Germ.)

[16] Maydl K. Über die radikaltherapie der Ektopia vesicae urinariae // Wien Med Wochenschr. 1894. Vol. 44. S. 1256–1258.

[17] Küster E. Totalextirpation der prostata und blase. Arch Klin Chir. 1891;42:858–878. (In Germ.)

[18] Küster E. Totalextirpation der prostata und blasé // Arch Klin Chir. 1891. Vol. 42. S. 858–878.

[19] Bladder: Diversion of the urine. In: Murphy LJT, editor. The history of urology. Illinois: Charles C Thomas; 1972;340–343.

[20] Bladder: Diversion of the urine. In: Murphy L.J.T., ed. The history of urology. Illinois: Charles C Thomas, 1972. P. 340–343.

[21] Fowler GR. Implantation of the ureters into the rectum in exstrophy of the bladder, with a description of a new method of operation. Am J Med Sci. 1898;115:270–276.

[22] Fowler G.R. Implantation of the ureters into the rectum in exstrophy of the bladder, with a description of a new method of operation // Am J Med Sci. 1898. Vol. 115. P. 270–276.

[23] Chalot V. La transplantation systematique des deux ureteres et la ligature preventive des deux arteres iliaques pour extirpation large du cancer diffuse de l’uterus par l’abdomen. Indipenense Med. 1896;38:297–299. (In French)

[24] Chalot V. La transplantation systematique des deux ureteres et la ligature preventive des deux arteres iliaques pour extirpation large du cancer diffuse de l’uterus par l’abdomen // Indipenense Med. 1896. Vol. 38. P. 297–299.

[25] Krause F. Totale extirpation der Harnblase mit Einpflanzung der Ureteren die Flexura iliaca. Münch Med Wochenschr. 1899;46:1443–1444. (In Germ.)

[26] Krause F. Totale extirpation der harnblase mit einpflanzung der ureteren die flexura iliaca // Münch Med Wochenschr. 1899. Vol. 46. S. 1443–1444.

[27] Lotheisen G. Über Uretertransplantationen. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1899;12:883–888. (In Germ.)

[28] Lotheisen G. Über Uretertransplantationen // Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1899. Vol. 12. S. 883–888.

[29] Nekrylov SA. Ordinarnyi professor po kafedre akusherstva i ginekologii Tomskogo Imperatorskogo universiteta Ivan Nikolaevich Grammatikati i akushersko-ginekologicheskoe obshchestvo pri Imperatorskom Tomskom Universitete. Sibirskii Meditsinskii Zhurnal. 2008;(4):86–88. (In Russ.)

[30] Некрылов С.А. Ординарный профессор по кафедре акушерства и гинекологии Томского Императорского университета Иван Николаевич Грамматикати и акушерско-гинекологическое общество при Императорском Томском Университете // Сибирский медицинский журнал. 2008. № 4. С. 86–88.

[31] Nesterov PV, Ukharskii AV, Gurin EV, Metel’kova EA. Uretero-intestinal anastomoses: which method to choose? History, current state of the issue and own experience. Experimental & Clinical Urology. 2021;14(1):108–113. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.29188/2222-8543-2021-14-1-108-113

[32] Нестеров П.В., Ухарский А.В., Гурин Э.В., Метелькова Е.А. Мочеточнико-кишечные анастомозы: какой метод выбрать? История, современное состояние вопроса и собственный опыт // Экспериментальная и клиническая урология. 2021. Т. 14, № 1. P. 108–113. DOI: 10.29188/2222-8543-2021-14-1-108-113

[33] Coffey RC. Physiologic implantattion of the severed ureter or common bile duct into the intestine. JAMA. 1911;56(6):397–403. DOI: 10.1001/jama.1911.02560060007002

[34] Coffey RC. Physiologic implantattion of the severed ureter or common bile duct into the intestine // JAMA 1911. Vol. 56, No. 6. P. 397–403. DOI: 10.1001/jama.1911.02560060007002

[35] Robert C, Coffey RC. Transplantation of the ureters into large intestine: Submucous implantation method. Br J Urol. 1931;3(4): 353–358. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1931.tb11117.x

[36] Robert C., Coffey R.C. Transplantation of the ureters into large intestine: Submucous implantation method // Br J Urol. 1931. Vol. 3, No. 4. P. 353–358. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1931.tb11117.x

[37] Hinman F, Weyrauch HM. A critical study of the different principles of surgery which have been used in uretero-intestinal implantation. Trans Am Assoc Gen Urin Surg. 1936;29:15–156.

[38] Hinman F., Weyrauch H.M. A critical study of the different principles of surgery which have been used in uretero-intestinal implantation // Trans Am Assoc Gen Urin Surg. 1936. Vol. 29. P. 15–156.

[39] Nesbit RM. Ureterosigmoid anastomosis by direct elliptical anastomosis. A preliminary report. J Urol. 1949;61(4):728–734. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)69133-X

[40] Nesbit R.M. Ureterosigmoid anastomosis by direct elliptical anastomosis. A preliminary report // J Urol. 1949. Vol. 61, No. 4. P. 728–734. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)69133-X

[41] Leadbetter WF. Consideration of problems incident to the performance of ureteroenterostomy; report of a technique. J Urol. 1951;65(5):818–830. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)68556-2

[42] Leadbetter W.F. Consideration of problems incident to the performance of ureteroenterostomy; report of a technique // J Urol. 1951. Vol. 65, No. 5. P. 818–830. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)68556-2

[43] Gigon C. Memoire sur l’ischurie ureterique et sur l’ureterotomie ou taille de l’uretere. Union Med Paris. 1856;10:81. (In French)

[44] Gigon C. Memoire sur l’ischurie ureterique et sur l’ureterotomie ou taille de l’uretere // Union Med Paris. 1856. Vol. 10. P. 81.

[45] De Vries JK. Permanent diversion of the urinary stream. J Urol. 1955;73(2):217–225. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)67388-9

[46] De Vries J.K. Permanent diversion of the urinary stream // J Urol. 1955. Vol. 73, No. 2. P. 217–225. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)67388-9

[47] Zaayer FJ. Discussion: Intra-abdominale Plastieken. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1911;65:836.

[48] Zaayer FJ. Discussion: Intra-abdominale Plastieken // Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1911. Vol. 65. P. 836.

[49] Seiffert L. Die “Darm-Siphon-Blase”. Arch Klin Chir. 1935; 183:569–574. (In Germ.)

[50] Seiffert L. Die «Darm-Siphon-Blase» // Arch Klin Chir. 1935. Vol. 183. S. 569–574.

[51] Bricke EM. Bladder substitution after pelvic evisceration. Surg Clin North Am. 1950;30(5):1511–1521. DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)33147-4

[52] Bricke EM. Bladder substitution after pelvic evisceration // Surg Clin North Am. 1950. Vol. 30, No. 5. P. 1511–1521. DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)33147-4

[53] Elmajian DA, Stein JP, Skinner DG. Orthotopic urinary diversion: the Kock ileal neobladder. World J Urol. 1996;14(1):40–46. DOI: 10.1007/BF01836343

[54] Elmajian D.A., Stein J.P., Skinner D.G. Orthotopic urinary diversion: the Kock ileal neobladder // World J Urol. 1996. Vol. 14, No. 1. P. 40–46. DOI: 10.1007/BF01836343

[55] Studer UE, Spiegel T, Casanova GA, et al. Ileal bladder substitute: Antireflux nipple or afferent tubular segment? Eur Urol. 1991;20(4):315–326. DOI: 10.1159/000471724

[56] Studer U.E., Spiegel T., Casanova G.A., et al. Ileal bladder substitute: Antireflux nipple or afferent tubular segment? // Eur Urol. 1991. Vol. 20, No. 4. P. 315–326. DOI: 10.1159/000471724

[57] Parra RO, Andrus CH, Jones JP, Boullier JA. Laparoscopic cystectomy. Initial report on a new treatment for the retained bladder. J Urol. 1992;148(4):1140–1144. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36843-x

[58] Parra R.O., Andrus C.H., Jones J.P., Boullier J.A. Laparoscopic cystectomy. Initial report on a new treatment for the retained bladder // J Urol. 1992. Vol. 148, No. 4. P. 1140–1144. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36843-x

[59] Sanchez de Badajoz E, Gallego Perales JL, Reche Rosado A, et al. Laparoscopic cystectomy and ileal conduit: case report. J Endourol. 1995:9(1):59–62. DOI: 10.1089/end.1995.9.59

[60] Sanchez de Badajoz E., Gallego Perales J.L, Reche Rosado A., et al. Laparoscopic cystectomy and ileal conduit: case report // J Endourol. 1995. Vol. 9, No. 1. P. 59–62. DOI: 10.1089/end.1995.9.59

[61] Menon M, Hemal AK, Tewari A, et al. Nervesparing robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy and urinary diversion. BJU Int. 2003;92(3):232–236. DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2003.04329.x

[62] Menon M., Hemal A.K., Tewari A., et al. Nervesparing robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy and urinary diversion // BJU Int. 2003. Vol. 92, No. 3. P. 232–236. DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2003.04329.x

[63] Collins JW, Tyritzis S, Nyberg T, et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: description of an evolved approach to radical cystectomy. Eur Urol. 2013;64(4):654–663. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.020

[64] Collins J.W., Tyritzis S., Nyberg T., et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: description of an evolved approach to radical cystectomy // Eur Urol. 2013. Vol. 64, No. 4. P. 654–663. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.020

[65] Komyakov BK, Fadeev VA, Novikov AI, et al. Urodinamika artifitsial’nogo mochevogo puzyrya. Urologiya. 2006;(4):13–16. (In Russ.)

[66] Комяков Б.К., Фадеев В.А., Новиков А.И., и др. Уродинамика артифициального мочевого пузыря // Урология. 2006. № 4. С. 13–16.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Eco-Vector