COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF COMBINATION CONTACT AND TRANSURETHRAL PERCUTANEOUS LITHOTRIPSY WITH REMOTE LITHOTRIPSY IN CORALLOID NEPHROLITHIASIS TREATMENT

V A Perepechai; A V Zozulya; I I Skorikov; S N Dimitriadi; V N Gornostaev

doi:10.17816/clinpract2131-34

Journal of Clinical Practice ›› 2011, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (1) : 31 -34. DOI: 10.17816/clinpract2131-34

Articles

research-article

COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF COMBINATION CONTACT AND TRANSURETHRAL PERCUTANEOUS LITHOTRIPSY WITH REMOTE LITHOTRIPSY IN CORALLOID NEPHROLITHIASIS TREATMENT

Author information +

History +

PDF

Abstract

A retrospective analysis of results of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PNLT) for corallike nephrolithiasis in lithotripter "Swiss LithoClast ® Master" and transurethral nephrolithotripsy (TUNLT). In the period 20072010 167 PNLT and 11 TUNLT were performed. Complete elimination at PNLL was achieved in 83.2% of patients, residual concretions – in 16,8% of cases, with complete elimination TUNLT – 36,4%, residual concretions – 63,6%. In 3% of patients needed for the complete elimination of the implementation of additional percutaneous accesses, while 12.6% of the patients was necessary to repeat PNLT. Complications from PNLT + DLT developed in 30,2% of cases, and when the TUNLT + DLT – in 18,2%. Percutaneous technology in comparison to open surgery with corallike nephrolithiasis can significantly shorten the postoperative rehabilitation period and be choice method of the treatment due to its high efficiency and less traumatic.

Keywords

transurethral nephrolithotripsy / percutaneous nephrolithotripsy

Cite this article

Download citation ▾

V A Perepechai, A V Zozulya, I I Skorikov, S N Dimitriadi, V N Gornostaev. COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF COMBINATION CONTACT AND TRANSURETHRAL PERCUTANEOUS LITHOTRIPSY WITH REMOTE LITHOTRIPSY IN CORALLOID NEPHROLITHIASIS TREATMENT. Journal of Clinical Practice, 2011, 2(1): 31-34 DOI:10.17816/clinpract2131-34

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户忘记密码

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within

[1]	Guidelines on Urolithiasis. C. Törk, T. Knoll, A. Petrik, K. Sarica, C. Seitz, M. Straub, O. Traxer, 2010

[2]	Дзеранов Н.К. Дистанционная ударноволновая литотрипсия в лечении мочекаменной болезни: автореф. дис…. докт. мед. наук. М., 1994. 30 с.

[3]	Дзеранов Н.К., Лопаткин Н. А. Мочекаменная болезнь. Клинические рекомендации. М.: Оверлей, 2007.

[4]	Дзеранов Н.К., Лыков А.В., Разумов С.В., Морозов А.А. Амбулаторная дистанционная литотрипсия – за и против // Материалы пленума правления Российского общества урологов (Сочи, 28-30 апреля 2003). М., 2003. 130-131.

[5]	Дзеранов Н.К., Яненко Э.К. Оперативное лечение коралловидного нефролитиаза // Урология. 2004. № 1. С. 34-38.

[6]	Дзеранов Н.К., Бешлиев Д.А. Лечение мочекаменной болезни комплексная медицинская проблема // Качество жизни. Медицина. 2005. № 2. С. 46-51.

[7]	Мартов А.Г., Максимов В.А., Ергаков Д.В. и соавт. Гольмиевая контактная литотрипсия в трансуретральном лечении камней верхних мочевыводящих путей // Урология. 2008. № 5. С. 24-28.

[8]	Яненко Э.К., Константинова О.В. Современный взгляд на лечение больных мочекаменной болезнью // Урология. 2009. № 5. С. 61-66.