CHANGING APPROACH TO THE PROSTATE AS THE WAY OF NERVE-SPARING EFFECT IMPROVEMENT IN PATIENTS WITH LAPAROSCOPIC PROSTATECTOMY

V A Perepechay; V L Medvedev; S N Dmitriady; A V Zozulya; I I Skorikov; I N Kelina; V N Gornostaev

doi:10.17816/clinpract2126-30

Journal of Clinical Practice ›› 2011, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (1) : 26 -30. DOI: 10.17816/clinpract2126-30

Articles

research-article

CHANGING APPROACH TO THE PROSTATE AS THE WAY OF NERVE-SPARING EFFECT IMPROVEMENT IN PATIENTS WITH LAPAROSCOPIC PROSTATECTOMY

Author information +

History +

PDF

Abstract

The use of prostatespecific antigen screening made it possible to detect an earlystage prostate cancer in young men in which nervesparing radical prostatectomy with preservation of erectile function could be performed. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRPE) is preferred as a nervesparing technique in the treatment of prostate cancer. During the last 2 years 19 patients underwent the modified Brussels technique transperitoneal LRPE, (extrafascial prostatectomy – 17, interfascial – 2). The average period of observation was 10.3 months. 13 of 14 patients were observated more than 6 months. In this group all patients achieved a complete continence, one of the patients remained urine leak with no more than 1 strip a day. Brussels technique provides better control of neurovascular fibers in the seminal vesicles during radical prostatectomy. Posterior approach to the prostate gland should be avoided in the nervesparing LRPE.

Keywords

laparoscopic radical prostatectomy / the Brussels technique

Cite this article

Download citation ▾

V A Perepechay,V L Medvedev,S N Dmitriady,A V Zozulya,I I Skorikov,I N Kelina,V N Gornostaev. CHANGING APPROACH TO THE PROSTATE AS THE WAY OF NERVE-SPARING EFFECT IMPROVEMENT IN PATIENTS WITH LAPAROSCOPIC PROSTATECTOMY. Journal of Clinical Practice, 2011, 2(1): 26-30 DOI:10.17816/clinpract2126-30

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户忘记密码

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within

[1]	Guillonneau B., Cathelineau X., Barret E. et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technical and early oncological assessment of 40 operations // Eur. Urol. 1999. Vol. 36 (1). P. 14- 20.

[2]	Guillonneau B., Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radi cal prostatectomy: the Montsouris experience // J.Urol. 2000. Vol. 163 (2). P. 418 -422.

[3]	Textbook of laparoscopic urology / Ed. by Inderbir S.Gill © 2006 Informa Healthcare USA, Inc.

[4]	Коган М.И., Лоран О.Б., Петров С.Б. Ради кальная хирургия рака предстательной железы. М.:ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2006. 352 с.

[5]	Пушкарь Д.Ю., Раснер П.И. Диагностика и лечение локализованного рака предстательной железы. М.: МЕДпресс- информ, 2008. 320 с.

[6]	Хатьков И.Е., Волков Т.В., Биктимиров Р.Г. Лапароскопическая радикальная простатэктомия. М.: ООО "Медицинское информационное агентство", 2007. 96 с.

[7]	Endoscopic Extraperitoneal Radical Prostatecto my Laparoscopic and Robot Assisted Surgery. Stolzen burg J.U., Matthew T. Gettman, Evangelos N. Liatsikos (Eds.) Springer Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2007.

[8]	Guillonneau B., Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique // J.Urol. 2000. Vol. 163 (6). P. 1643 -1649.

[9]	Guillonneau B., Rozet F., Cathelineau X. et al. Perioperative complications of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris 3 year experience // J.Urol. 2002. Vol. 167 (1). P. 51- 56.