The possibilities of adapting the re-processing protocol in the practice of the ThinPrep Pap test usage

Abstract

The method of liquid cytology is a newer diagnostic test compared to the traditional cytological examination of scrapings from the cervix and allows one to standardize the morphological examination and reduce the number of unsatisfactory samples. One of the factors determining the adequacy of the Pap test is the number of squamous epithelial cells in a sample. The abundance of blood elements, mucus, lubricant, or inflammatory elements may affect the informativeness of the sample. In the practice of the ThinPrep Pap test usage, when receiving an inadequate sample, a protocol for re-processing the contents of the vial is used, in order to neutralize the possible influence of such impurities on the final result. Here, we present a review on the methods of the re-processing protocol application and our own experience of adapting the protocol in the practice of a clinical diagnostic laboratory.

Keywords

Pap-test / liquid-based cytology / ThinPrep

References

[1] Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2020 году (заболеваемость и смертность) / под ред. А.Д. Каприна, В.В. Старинского, А.О. Шахзадовой. Москва: МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена, 2021. 252 р. [Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2020 (morbidity and mortality). Ed. by A.D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinsky, A.O. Shakhzadova. Moscow: P.A. Herzen Moscow State Research Institute; 2021. 252 p. (In Russ).]

[2] Клинические рекомендации. Цервикальная интраэпителиальная неоплазия, эрозия и эктропион шейки матки. 2020. [Clinical recommendations. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, erosion and ectropion of the cervix. 2020. (In Russ).]

[3] Rozemeijer K, Penning C, Siebers AG, et al. Comparing SurePath, ThinPrep, and conventional cytology as primary test method: SurePath is associated with increased CIN II+ detection rates. Cancer Causes Control. 2016;27(1):15–25. doi: 10.1007/s10552-015-0678-1

[4] De Oliveira AC, Domingues MF, Neufeld PM, et al. Comparison between conventional cytology and liquid-based cytology in the Tertiary Brazilian Navy Hospital in Rio de Janeiro. Acta Cytol. 2020;64(6):539–546. doi: 10.1159/000508018

[5] Taylor S, Kuhn L, Dupree W, et al. Direct comparison of liquid-based and conventional cytology in a South African screening trial. Int J Cancer. 2006;118(4):957–962. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21434

[6] Цервикальная цитология по системе Бетесда: терминология, критерии и пояснения / под ред. Р. Найяр, Д. Уилбура; пер. с англ. под ред. Н.Ю. Полонской. Москва: Практическая медицина, 2017. 304 с. [Cervical cytology according to the Bethesda system: Terminology, criteria and explanations. Ed. by R. Nayyar, D. Wilbur; translated from English ed. by N.Y. Polonskaya. Moscow: Prakticheskaya meditsina; 2017. 304 p. (In Russ).]

[7] Risley C, Geisinger KR, Robinson JC, et al. Precancerous cervical lesions and HPV genotypes identified in previously unsatisfactory cervical smear tests after inexpensive glacial acetic acid processing. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;144(1): 85–89. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12699

[8] Kalinicheva T, Frisch N, Giorgadze T, et al. Etiologic factors related to unsatisfactory ThinPrep cervical cytology: Evaluation and potential solutions to improve. Cytojournal. 2015;12:21. doi: 10.4103/1742-6413.165955

[9] Rosa M, Pragasam P, Saremian J, et al. The unsatisfactory ThinPrep Pap Test: Analysis of technical aspects, most common causes, and recommendations for improvement. Diagn Cytopathol. 2013;41(7):588–594. doi: 10.1002/dc.22904

[10] Jeong H, Hong SR, Chae SW, et al. Comparison of unsatisfactory samples from conventional smear versus liquid-based cytology in uterine cervical cancer screening test. J Pathol Transl Med. 2017;51(3):314–319. doi: 10.4132/jptm.2017.03.17

[11] Cohen D, Shorie J, Biscotti C. Glacial acetic acid treatment and atypical endocervical glandular cells: An analysis of 92 cases. Am J Clin Pathol. 2010;133(5):799–801. doi: 10.1309/AJCP8N9ZJQDHFYTC

[12] Dalton P, MacDonald S, Boerner S. Acetic acid recovery of gynecologic liquid-based samples of apparent low squamous cellularity. Acta Cytol. 2006;50(2):136–140. doi: 10.1159/000325921

[13] Kitchener HC, Gittins M, Desai M, et al. A study of cellular counting to determine minimum thresholds for adequacy for liquid-based cervical cytology using a survey and counting protocol. Health Technol Assess. 2015;19(22):1–64. doi: 10.3310/hta19220

[14] Gupta N, John D, Dudding N, et al. Factors contributing to false-negative and potential false-negative cytology reports in SurePath liquid-based cervical cytology. Cytopathology. 2013; 24(1):39–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2012.00992.x

[15] Munson E, Chateau KD, Nelson BE, et al. Effect of glacial acetic acid treatment of liquid-based cytology collections on performance of Cervista HPV HR for detection of high-risk human papillomavirus. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(6):2129–2131. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06719-11

[16] Munson E, Schroeder ER, Ross KC, et al. Effect of preanalytical processing of ThinPrep specimens on detection of high-risk human papillomavirus by the Aptima HPV assay. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52(5):1448–1452. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03624-13

[17] McMenamin M, McKenna M. Effect of glacial acetic acid treatment of cervical ThinPrep specimens on HPV DNA detection with the cobas 4800 HPV test. Cytopathology. 2013; 4(5):321–326. doi: 10.1111/cyt.12052

Funding

ФМБА РоссииFederal Medical and Biological Agency of Russia

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Aksamentov A.K., Melnikova N.V., Moshnina E.V., Kolyshkina N.A., Kucherova O.N., Baklaushev V.P.