Possibilities of modern neuroimaging techniques in the diagnostics and neuromonitoring of the recovery process in patients after ischemic stroke

Abstract

Ischemic stroke is still leading in terms of primary disability caused by residual neurologic de-fect in the majority of patients. Persistent motor disorders are observed even after timely and ade-quately carried out rehabilitation measures. The article discusses the possibilities of modern instru-mental technologies for diagnostics and further monitoring of the process of restoration of post-stroke deficit, which is based on the phenomenon of neuroplasticity.

Keywords

ischemic stroke / motor disorders / neuroimaging / magnetic resonance imaging / neuroplasticity

References

[1] Бархатов Ю.Д., Кадыков А.С. Прогностические факторы восстановления нарушенных в результате ишемического инсульта двигательных функций // Анналы клинической и экспериментальной неврологии. 2017. № 11(1). С. 80–89.

[2] Дамулин И.В., Екушева Е.В. Деменция вследствие поражения мелких церебральных сосудов: патогенез, клиника, лечение // Неврология, нейропсихиатрия, психосоматика. 2014. № 4. С. 94–100.

[3] Дамулин И.В., Екушева Е.В. Инсульт и нейропластичность // Журнал неврологии и психиатрии имени С.С. Корсакова. 2014. № 114(8). С. 136–142.

[4] Добрынина Л.А. Возможности функциональной и структурной нейровизуализации в изучении восстановления двигательных функций после ишемического инсульта // Анналы клинической и экспериментальной неврологии. 2011. № 5(3). С. 53–56.

[5] Екушева Е.В. Сенсомоторная интеграция при поражении центральной нервной системы: клинические и патогенетические аспекты: Автореф. дисс. ... д-ра мед. наук. М.: РНИМУ им. Н.И. Пирогова, 2016.

[6] Ишемический инсульт и транзиторная ишемическая атака у взрослых: Клинические рекомендации Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации. М., 2015.

[7] Пирадов М.А., Танашян М.М., Кротенкова М.В. и др. Передовые технологии нейровизуализации // Анналы клинической и экспериментальной неврологии. 2015. № 9(4). С. 11–17.

[8] Скворцова В.И. Реперфузионная терапия ишемического инсульта // Медицинский консилиум. 2004. № 6(8). С. 610–614.

[9] Труфанов Г.Е. Лучевая диагностика. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2011.

[10] Basser P.J., Pierpaoli C. Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI // Journal Magnetic Resonance. 1996. Vol. 111. P. 209–219.

[11] Di Pino G., Pellegrino G., Assenza G. et al. Modulation of brain plasticity in stroke: A novel model for neurorehabilitation // Nature Reviews Neurology. 2014. Vol. 10. No. 10. P. 597–608.

[12] EEG-fMRI. Physiological basis, technique, and applications / Ed. by A. Schmuel. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2010.

[13] Hara Y. Brain plasticity and rehabilitation in stroke // Journal of Nippon Medical School. 2015. Vol. 82. No. 1. P. 4–13.

[14] Jang S.H. The role of the corticospinal tract in motor recovery in patients with a stroke: A review // NeuroRehabilitation. 2009. Vol. 24. No. 3. P. 285–290.

[15] Johansson B.B. Brain plasticity in health and disease // The Keio Journal of Medicine. 2004. Vol. 53. No. 4. P. 231–246.

[16] Lee J.S., Han M.K., Kim S.H. et al. Fiber tracking by diffusion tensor imaging in corticospinal tract stroke: Topographical correlation with clinical symptoms // NeuroImage. 2005. Vol. 26. P. 771–776.

[17] Leukel C., Taube W., Beck S., Schubert M. Pathway-specific plasticity in the human spinal cord // European Journal of Neuroscience. 2012. Vol. 35. No. 10. P. 1622–1629.

[18] McDonnell M., Koblar S., Ward N.S. et al. An investigation of cortical neuroplasticity following stroke in adults: Is there evidence for a critical window for rehabilitation // BMC Neurology. 2015. Vol. 109. No. 15.

[19] Moller A.R. Neural plastisity and disorders of the nervous system. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

[20] Moser E., Meyerspeer M., Fischmeister F. et al. Windows on the human body – in vivo high-field magnetic resonance research and applications in medicine and psychology // Sensors (Basel, Switzerland). 2010. Vol. 10. No. 6. P. 5724–5757.

[21] Murphy T.H., Corbett D. Plasticity during stroke recovery: From synapse to behavior // Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2009. No. 10. P. 861–872.

[22] Rossini P.M., Burke D., Chen R. et al. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: Basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee // Clinical Neurophysiology. 2015. Vol. 126. No. 6. P. 1071–1107.

[23] Warach S., Dashe J.F., Edelman R.R. Clinical outcome in ischemic stroke predicted by early diffusion weighted and perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: A preliminary analysis // The Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism. 1996. Vol. 16. P. 53–59.

[24] Winnubst J., Cheyne J.E., Niculescu D., Lohmann C. Spontaneous activity drives local synaptic plasticity in vivo // Neuron. 2015. Vol. 87. No. 2. P. 399–410.

[25] Wissel J., Olver J., Stibrant Sunnerhagen K. Navigating the poststroke continuum of care // Journal of Stroke Cerebrovascular Disease. 2013. Vol. 22. No. 1. P. 1.

[26] Zorowitz R., Brainin M. Advances in brain recovery and rehabilitation 2010 // Stroke. 2011. Vol. 42. No. 2. P. 294–297.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Ekusheva E.V., Kiparisova E.S., Kurzanceva O.O., Smirnova O.A.