RATIONAL CHOICE OF TACTICS OF CONSERVATIVE AND SURGICAL TREATMENT OF CHEMICAL ESOPHAGEAL BURNS IN CHILDREN

K. S. Ormantaev; K. T. Tursunov; S. A. Myrzakhmet; A. A. Sagymbayeva

doi:10.17816/psaic268

Russian Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care ›› 2016, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (3) : 35 -39. DOI: 10.17816/psaic268

Original Study Articles

other

RATIONAL CHOICE OF TACTICS OF CONSERVATIVE AND SURGICAL TREATMENT OF CHEMICAL ESOPHAGEAL BURNS IN CHILDREN

Author information +

History +

PDF

Abstract

The frequency of basic chemical agents, clinical and diagnostic features and effectiveness of treatment of chemical burns of the esophagus were studied from 574 children in this article. The effectiveness of complex conservative treatment achieved in 516 (90%) cases. In 58 (10%) cases were performed probing program bougienage for string conductor, prolonged intubation of the esophagus were fitted in 15 children. Simultaneous retrosternal kolonoezofagoplastic with the creation of antireflux colonogastroanastomoz was performed in 5 children with total esophageal stenosis. Retrocolic gastroeyunoanastomoz was produced by the method after Ru in 2 cases, due to cicatricial pyloric stenosis gastric. Complications in the form of a fistula in the upper colonoezofagoanastomoz zone was observed in only one case.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾

K. S. Ormantaev, K. T. Tursunov, S. A. Myrzakhmet, A. A. Sagymbayeva. RATIONAL CHOICE OF TACTICS OF CONSERVATIVE AND SURGICAL TREATMENT OF CHEMICAL ESOPHAGEAL BURNS IN CHILDREN. Russian Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care, 2016, 6(3): 35-39 DOI:10.17816/psaic268

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户忘记密码

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within

[1]	Consequences of caustic ingestions in children / M. Nuutinen, M. Uhari, T. Karaval et al. // Acta Paediatr.,1994. Vol. 83. No. 11. P. 1200-1205.

[2]	Алиев М.А. Реконструктивно-восстановительные операции на пищеводе при послеожоговых рубцовых стриктурах // Ж. Хирургия им. Н.И. Пирогова, 2005. № 12. С. 40-43.

[3]	Stary D., Tuma J., Planka L., Gal P. Corrosive injuries of the oesophafus and the stomach in children // Department of Paediatric Surgery, Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty Hospital in Brno, SCRIPTA MEDICA (BRNO). June 2008. Czech Republic. Vol. 81. No. 2. P. 69-76.

[4]	Selçuk Otçu, Ýbrahim Karnak, Feridun Cahit Tanyel, Mehmet Emin Þenocak, Nebil Büyükpamukçu. Biochemical indicators of caustic ingestion and/or accompanying esophageal injury in children // The Turkish Journal of Pediatrics. 2003. Vol. 45. P. 21-25.

[5]	Ашкрафт К.Ч., Холдет Т.М. Детская хирургия. Том 1. Спб.: Хардфорд, 1996.

[6]	Исаков Ю.Ф., Степанов Э.А., Разумовский А.Ю., Тимощенко О.В. Лечение химических ожогов пищевода у детей // Хирургия, 1996. № 4. С. 4-8.

[7]	Аллахвердян А.С., Мазурин В.С., Исаков В.А. Роль антисекреторной терапии в профилактике рестенозов после бужирования послеожоговых стриктур пищевода // Consilium-Medicum. 2007. Том 09. № 7.

[8]	Годжелло Э.А. Лечение рубцовых стриктур пищевода и пищеводных анастомозов с использованием гибких эндоскопов // Вестн. РАМН., 1998. № 6. С. 36-39.

[9]	Черноусов А.Ф., Богопольский П.М., Курбанов Ф.С. Хирургия пищевода: Руководство для врачей. М.: Медицина, 2000.

[10]	Ормантаев К.С., Кожаканов К.К., Джаксон В.Л., Поварницина Н.В. Применение ингибиторов протеолиза в комплексном лечении химического ожога пищевода у детей // Педиатрия, 1991. № 6. 0031-403X. С. 62-65.