Artificial intelligence systems in surgery: A review of opportunities, limitations, and prospects

Boris A. Kobrinskii

doi:10.17816/psaic1547

Russian Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care ›› 2023, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (3) : 385 -404. DOI: 10.17816/psaic1547

Reviews

review-article

Artificial intelligence systems in surgery: A review of opportunities, limitations, and prospects

Boris A. Kobrinskii

Author information +

History +

PDF

Abstract

Artificial intelligence technologies are increasingly being applied in a variety of medical disciplines. After reviewing 278 publications from 1985 to 2023, 99 articles were selected from the databases elibrary, PubMed, Medline, WoS, Nature, Springer, and Wiley J Database to present the main approaches and a modern picture of the application of artificial intelligence methods and technologies in pediatric surgery and intensive care. The article examines many facets of artificial intelligence systems for medical uses, namely, computer decision support systems or supporting the surgeon throughout the surgical intervention procedure. Computer analysis of 3D visualization and 3D anatomical modeling of images obtained from computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging investigations can be used to plan operations. Because of the possibilities of sufficiently accurate 3D models and methods for organs and pathological processes, various methodologies and software tools for preoperative planning and intraoperative support of surgical intervention have been developed. Computer (technical) vision analyzes high-quality medical images and interprets them in multimodal three-dimensional images for computer diagnoses and operations under visual control, including augmented reality methods. Robotic surgery involves manipulators, including remotely controlled ones, and intellectualized complexes that independently perform specific actions of the “second assistant surgeon”. In intensive care, artificial intelligence technologies are being investigated to merge data from bedside monitors and other information about patients’ conditions to identify critical situations and control mechanical ventilation. Simultaneously, several obstacles impede the adoption of artificial intelligence in surgery. The nature and standardization of the initial data required for their integration, taking into consideration atypical cases, the possibility of bias in the sample used, and the transparency of the decision-making process in machine learning models are examples. The explanation of solutions presented in machine learning models and the transition to full-fledged validation of the systems being built define the prospects for developing and using artificial intelligence systems.

Keywords

surgery / intelligent support for medical decisions / robotic surgery / augmented reality / artificial intelligence in intensive care / computer vision / explainability of artificial intelligence

Cite this article

Download citation ▾

Boris A. Kobrinskii. Artificial intelligence systems in surgery: A review of opportunities, limitations, and prospects. Russian Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care, 2023, 13(3): 385-404 DOI:10.17816/psaic1547

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户忘记密码

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within

[1]	Gasparyan SA, Pashkina ES. Stranitsy istorii informatizatsii zdravookhraneniya Rossii. Moscow, 2002. 304 p. (In Russ.)

[2]	Гаспарян С.А., Пашкина Е.С. Страницы истории информатизации здравоохранения России. Москва, 2002. 304 с.

[3]	Gasparyan SA, Pashkina ES. Stranitsy istorii informatizatsii zdravookhraneniya Rossii. Moscow, 2002. 304 p. (In Russ.)

[4]	Nazarenko GI, Osipov GS. Meditsinskie informatsionnye sistemy i iskusstvennyi intellekt. Moscow: Meditsina XXI, 2003. 234 p. (In Russ.)

[5]	Назаренко Г.И., Осипов Г.С. Медицинские информационные системы и искусственный интеллект. Москва: Медицина XXI, 2003. 234 с.

[6]	Nazarenko GI, Osipov GS. Meditsinskie informatsionnye sistemy i iskusstvennyi intellekt. Moscow: Meditsina XXI, 2003. 234 p. (In Russ.)

[7]	Zhai H, Brady P, Li Q, et al. Developing and evaluating a machine learning based algorithm to predict the need of pediatric intensive care unit transfer for newly hospitalized children. Resuscitation. 2014;85(8):1065–1071. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.04.009

[8]	Zhai H., Brady P., Li Q., et al. Developing and evaluating a machine learning based algorithm to predict the need of pediatric intensive care unit transfer for newly hospitalized children // Resuscitation. 2014. Vol. 85, No. 8. P. 1065–1071. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.04.009

[9]	Zhai H, Brady P, Li Q, et al. Developing and evaluating a machine learning based algorithm to predict the need of pediatric intensive care unit transfer for newly hospitalized children. Resuscitation. 2014;85(8):1065–1071. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.04.009

[10]	Rusin CG, Acosta SI, Shekerdemian LS, et al. Prediction of imminent, severe deterioration of children withparallel circulations using real-time processing of physiologic data. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152(1):171–177. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.03.083

[11]	Rusin C.G., Acosta S.I., Shekerdemian L.S., et al. Prediction of imminent, severe deterioration of children withparallel circulations using real-time processing of physiologic data // J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016. Vol. 152, No. 1. P. 171–177. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.03.083

[12]	Rusin CG, Acosta SI, Shekerdemian LS, et al. Prediction of imminent, severe deterioration of children withparallel circulations using real-time processing of physiologic data. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152(1):171–177. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.03.083

[13]	Kwon J-M, Jeon K-H, Lee M, et al. Deep learning algorithm to predict need for critical care in pediatric emergency departments. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021;37(12):e988–e994. DOI: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001858

[14]	Kwon J.-M., Jeon K.-H., Lee M., et al. Deep learning algorithm to predict need for critical care in pediatric emergency departments // Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021. Vol. 37, No. 12. P. e988–e994. DOI: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001858

[15]	Kwon J-M, Jeon K-H, Lee M, et al. Deep learning algorithm to predict need for critical care in pediatric emergency departments. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021;37(12):e988–e994. DOI: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001858

[16]	Park SJ, Cho K-J, Kwon O, et al. Development and validation of a deep-learning-based pediatric early warning system: a single-center study. Biomed J. 2022;45(1):155–168. DOI: 10.1016/j.bj.2021.01.003

[17]	Park S.J., Cho K.-J., Kwon O., et al. Development and validation of a deep-learning-based pediatric early warning system: a single-center study // Biomed J. 2022. Vol. 45, No. 1. P. 155–168. DOI: 10.1016/j.bj.2021.01.003

[18]	Park SJ, Cho K-J, Kwon O, et al. Development and validation of a deep-learning-based pediatric early warning system: a single-center study. Biomed J. 2022;45(1):155–168. DOI: 10.1016/j.bj.2021.01.003

[19]	Pospelov GS. Iskusstvennyi intellekt — osnova novoi informatsionnoi tekhnologii. Moscow: Nauka, 1988. 288 p. (In Russ.)

[20]	Поспелов Г.С. Искусственный интеллект — основа новой информационной технологии. Москва: Наука, 1988. 288 с.

[21]	Pospelov GS. Iskusstvennyi intellekt — osnova novoi informatsionnoi tekhnologii. Moscow: Nauka, 1988. 288 p. (In Russ.)

[22]	Deo RC. Machine learning in medicine. Circulation. 2015;132(20):1920–1930. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.001593

[23]	Deo R.C. Machine learning in medicine // Circulation. 2015. Vol. 132, No. 20. P. 1920–1930. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.001593

[24]	Deo RC. Machine learning in medicine. Circulation. 2015;132(20):1920–1930. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.001593

[25]	Eckhardt CM, Madjarova SJ, Williams RJ, et al. Unsupervised machine learning methods and emerging applications in healthcare. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023;31:376–381. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-07233-7

[26]	Eckhardt C.M., Madjarova S.J., Williams R.J., et al. Unsupervised machine learning methods and emerging applications in healthcare // Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023. Vol. 31. P. 376–381. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-07233-7

[27]	Eckhardt CM, Madjarova SJ, Williams RJ, et al. Unsupervised machine learning methods and emerging applications in healthcare. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023;31:376–381. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-07233-7

[28]	Shah N, Arshad A, Mazer MB, et al. The use of machine learning and artificial intelligence within pediatric critical care. Pediatr Res. 2023;93(2):405–412. DOI: 10.1038/s41390-022-02380-6

[29]	Shah N., Arshad A., Mazer M.B., et al. The use of machine learning and artificial intelligence within pediatric critical care // Pediatr Res. 2023. Vol. 93, No. 2. P. 405–412. DOI: 10.1038/s41390-022-02380-6

[30]	Shah N, Arshad A, Mazer MB, et al. The use of machine learning and artificial intelligence within pediatric critical care. Pediatr Res. 2023;93(2):405–412. DOI: 10.1038/s41390-022-02380-6

[31]	Hopewell S, Loudon K, Clarke MJ, et al. Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;1:MR000006. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000006.pub3

[32]	Hopewell S., Loudon K., Clarke M.J., et al. Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results // Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009. Vol. 1. ID MR000006. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000006.pub3

[33]	Hopewell S, Loudon K, Clarke MJ, et al. Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;1:MR000006. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000006.pub3

[34]	Jüni P, Altman DG, Egger M. Systematic reviews in health care: assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ. 2001;323(7303):42–46. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.323.7303.42

[35]	Jüni P., Altman D.G., Egger M. Systematic reviews in health care: assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials // BMJ. 2001. Vol. 323, No. 7303. P. 42–46. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.323.7303.42

[36]	Jüni P, Altman DG, Egger M. Systematic reviews in health care: assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ. 2001;323(7303):42–46. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.323.7303.42

[37]	de Simone B, Chouillard E, Gumbs AA, et al. Artificial intelligence in surgery: the emergency surgeon’s perspective (the ARIES project). Discov Health Systems. 2022;1(1):9. DOI: 10.1007/s44250-022-00014-6

[38]	de Simone B., Chouillard E., Gumbs A.A., et al. Artificial intelligence in surgery: the emergency surgeon’s perspective (the ARIES project) // Discov Health Systems. 2022. Vol. 1, No. 1. ID 9. DOI: 10.1007/s44250-022-00014-6

[39]	de Simone B, Chouillard E, Gumbs AA, et al. Artificial intelligence in surgery: the emergency surgeon’s perspective (the ARIES project). Discov Health Systems. 2022;1(1):9. DOI: 10.1007/s44250-022-00014-6

[40]	Joskowicz L. Computer-aided surgery meets predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine. EPMA J. 2017;8(1):1–4. DOI: 10.1007/s13167-017-0084-8

[41]	Joskowicz L. Computer-aided surgery meets predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine // EPMA J. 2017. Vol. 8, No. 1. P. 1–4. DOI: 10.1007/s13167-017-0084-8

[42]	Joskowicz L. Computer-aided surgery meets predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine. EPMA J. 2017;8(1):1–4. DOI: 10.1007/s13167-017-0084-8

[43]	Hashimoto DA, Rosman G, Rus D, Meireles OR. Artificial intelligence in surgery: promises and perils. Ann Surg. 2018;268(1):70–76. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002693

[44]	Hashimoto D.A., Rosman G., Rus D., Meireles O.R. Artificial intelligence in surgery: promises and perils // Ann Surg. 2018. Vol. 268, No. 1. P. 70–76. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002693

[45]	Hashimoto DA, Rosman G, Rus D, Meireles OR. Artificial intelligence in surgery: promises and perils. Ann Surg. 2018;268(1):70–76. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002693

[46]	Dragun IA, Ustinov GG, Zatsepin PM. Avtomatizirovannaya sistema kolichestvennoi otsenki operatsionnogo riska. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University. Geo Assets Engineering. 2007;310(1):217–221. (In Russ.)

[47]	Драгун И.А., Устинов Г.Г., Зацепин П.М. Автоматизированная система количественной оценки операционного риска // Известия Томского политехнического университета. 2007. Т. 310, № 1. С. 217–221.

[48]	Dragun IA, Ustinov GG, Zatsepin PM. Avtomatizirovannaya sistema kolichestvennoi otsenki operatsionnogo riska. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University. Geo Assets Engineering. 2007;310(1):217–221. (In Russ.)

[49]	Bertsimas D, Dunn J, Velmahos GC, Kaafarani HMA. Surgical risk is not linear: derivation and validation of a novel, user-friendly, and machine-learning-based predictive OpTimal trees in emergency surgery risk (POTTER) calculator. Ann Surg. 2018;268(4):574–583. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002956

[50]

Bertsimas D., Dunn J., Velmahos G.C., Kaafarani H.M.A. Surgical risk is not linear: derivation and validation of a novel, user-friendly, and machine-learning-based predictive OpTimal trees in emergency surgery risk (POTTER) calculator // Ann Surg. 2018. Vol. 268, No. 4. P. 574–583. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002956

[51]	Bertsimas D, Dunn J, Velmahos GC, Kaafarani HMA. Surgical risk is not linear: derivation and validation of a novel, user-friendly, and machine-learning-based predictive OpTimal trees in emergency surgery risk (POTTER) calculator. Ann Surg. 2018;268(4):574–583. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002956

[52]	Maurer LR, Bertsimas D, Bouardi HT, et al. Trauma outcome predictor: an artificial intelligence interactive smartphone tool to predict outcomes in trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021;91(1):93–99. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003158

[53]	Maurer L.R., Bertsimas D., Bouardi H.T., et al. Trauma outcome predictor: an artificial intelligence interactive smartphone tool to predict outcomes in trauma patients // J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021. Vol. 91, No. 1. P. 93–99. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003158

[54]	Maurer LR, Bertsimas D, Bouardi HT, et al. Trauma outcome predictor: an artificial intelligence interactive smartphone tool to predict outcomes in trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021;91(1):93–99. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003158

[55]

Thorsen-Meyer H-C, Nielsen AB, Nielsen AP, et al. Dynamic and explainable machine learning prediction of mortality in patients in the intensive care unit: a retrospective study of high-frequency data in electronic patient records. Lancet Digit Health. 2020;2(4):e179–e191. DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30018-2

[56]

Thorsen-Meyer H.-C., Nielsen A.B., Nielsen A.P., et al. Dynamic and explainable machine learning prediction of mortality in patients in the intensive care unit: a retrospective study of high-frequency data in electronic patient records // Lancet Digit Health. 2020. Vol. 2, No. 4. P. e179–e191. DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30018-2

[57]

[58]

Mountney P, Yang G-Z. Soft tissue tracking for minimally invasive surgery: learning local deformation online. Metaxas D, Axel L, Fichtinger G, Székely G, editors. Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention – MICCAI 2008. MICCAI 2008. Lecture notes in computer science. Vol 5242. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-85990-1_44.

[59]

Mountney P., Yang G.-Z. Soft tissue tracking for minimally invasive surgery: learning local deformation online. Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention — MICCAI 2008. MICCAI 2008. Lecture notes in computer science. Vol 5242 / ed. by D. Metaxas, L. Axel, G. Fichtinger, G. Székely. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-85990-1_44.

[60]

[61]	Vitiello V, Lee S-L, Cundy TP, Yang G-Z. Emerging robotic platforms for minimally invasive surgery. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2013;6:111–126. DOI: 10.1109/RBME.2012.2236311

[62]	Vitiello V., Lee S.-L., Cundy T.P., Yang G.-Z. Emerging robotic platforms for minimally invasive surgery // IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2013. Vol. 6. P. 111–126. DOI: 10.1109/RBME.2012.2236311

[63]	Vitiello V, Lee S-L, Cundy TP, Yang G-Z. Emerging robotic platforms for minimally invasive surgery. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2013;6:111–126. DOI: 10.1109/RBME.2012.2236311

[64]	Chilamkurthy S, Ghosh R, Tanamala S, et al. Deep learning algorithms for detection of critical findings in head CT scans: a retrospective study. Lancet. 2018;392(10162):2388–2396. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31645-3

[65]	Chilamkurthy S., Ghosh R., Tanamala S., et al. Deep learning algorithms for detection of critical findings in head CT scans: a retrospective study // Lancet. 2018. Vol. 392, No. 10162. P. 2388–2396. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31645-3

[66]	Chilamkurthy S, Ghosh R, Tanamala S, et al. Deep learning algorithms for detection of critical findings in head CT scans: a retrospective study. Lancet. 2018;392(10162):2388–2396. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31645-3

[67]	Daley M, Cameron S, Ganesan SL, et al. Pediatric severe traumatic brain injury mortality prediction determined with machine learning-based modeling. Injury. 2022;53(3):992–998. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.01.008

[68]	Daley M., Cameron S., Ganesan S.L., et al. Pediatric severe traumatic brain injury mortality prediction determined with machine learning-based modeling // Injury. 2022. Vol. 53, No. 3. P. 992–998. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.01.008

[69]	Daley M, Cameron S, Ganesan SL, et al. Pediatric severe traumatic brain injury mortality prediction determined with machine learning-based modeling. Injury. 2022;53(3):992–998. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.01.008

[70]	Kayhanian S, Young AMH, Mangla C, et al. Modelling outcomes after paediatric brain injury with admission laboratory values: a machine-learning approach. Pediatr Res. 2019;86(5):641–645. DOI: 10.1038/s41390-019-0510-9

[71]	Kayhanian S., Young A.M.H., Mangla C., et al. Modelling outcomes after paediatric brain injury with admission laboratory values: a machine-learning approach // Pediatr Res. 2019. Vol. 86, No. 5. P. 641–645. DOI: 10.1038/s41390-019-0510-9

[72]	Kayhanian S, Young AMH, Mangla C, et al. Modelling outcomes after paediatric brain injury with admission laboratory values: a machine-learning approach. Pediatr Res. 2019;86(5):641–645. DOI: 10.1038/s41390-019-0510-9

[73]	Tunthanathip T, Oearsakul T. Application of machine learning to predict the outcome of pediatric traumatic brain injury. Chin J Traumatol. 2021;24(6):350–355. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2021.06.003

[74]	Tunthanathip T., Oearsakul T. Application of machine learning to predict the outcome of pediatric traumatic brain injury // Chin J Traumatol. 2021. Vol. 24, No. 6. P. 350–355. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2021.06.003

[75]	Tunthanathip T, Oearsakul T. Application of machine learning to predict the outcome of pediatric traumatic brain injury. Chin J Traumatol. 2021;24(6):350–355. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2021.06.003

[76]	Meyer A, Zverinski D, Pfahringer B, et al. Machine learning for real-time prediction of complications in critical care: a retrospective study. Lancet Respir Med. 2018;6(12):905–914. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30300-X

[77]	Meyer A., Zverinski D., Pfahringer B., et al. Machine learning for real-time prediction of complications in critical care: a retrospective study // Lancet Respir Med. 2018. Vol. 6, No. 12. P. 905–914. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30300-X

[78]	Meyer A, Zverinski D, Pfahringer B, et al. Machine learning for real-time prediction of complications in critical care: a retrospective study. Lancet Respir Med. 2018;6(12):905–914. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30300-X

[79]	Esteva H, Nunez TG, Rodriguez RO. Neural networks and artificial intelligence in thoracic surgery. Thorac Surg Clin. 2007;17(3):359–367. DOI: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2007.07.012

[80]	Esteva H., Nunez T.G., Rodriguez R.O. Neural networks and artificial intelligence in thoracic surgery // Thorac Surg Clin. 2007. Vol. 17, No. 3. P. 359–367. DOI: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2007.07.012

[81]	Esteva H, Nunez TG, Rodriguez RO. Neural networks and artificial intelligence in thoracic surgery. Thorac Surg Clin. 2007;17(3):359–367. DOI: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2007.07.012

[82]	Mayer-Shönberger V, Ingellson E. Big data and medicine: a big deal? J Intern Med. 2018;283(5):418–429. DOI: 10.1111/joim.12721

[83]	Mayer-Shönberger V., Ingellson E. Big data and medicine: a big deal? // J Intern Med. 2018. Vol. 283, No. 5. P. 418–429. DOI: 10.1111/joim.12721

[84]	Mayer-Shönberger V, Ingellson E. Big data and medicine: a big deal? J Intern Med. 2018;283(5):418–429. DOI: 10.1111/joim.12721

[85]	Wong A, Otles E, Donnelly JP, et al. External validation of a widely implemented proprietary sepsis prediction model in hospitalized patients. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181(8):1065–1070. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.2626

[86]	Wong A., Otles E., Donnelly J.P., et al. External validation of a widely implemented proprietary sepsis prediction model in hospitalized patients // JAMA Intern Med. 2021. Vol. 181, No. 8. P. 1065–1070. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.2626

[87]	Wong A, Otles E, Donnelly JP, et al. External validation of a widely implemented proprietary sepsis prediction model in hospitalized patients. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181(8):1065–1070. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.2626

[88]

Hwang AB, Schuepfer G, Pietrini M, Boes S. External validation of EPIC’s risk of unplanned readmission model, the LACE+ index and SQLape as predictors of unplanned hospital readmissions: a monocentric, retrospective, diagnostic cohort study in Switzerland. PLoS One. 2021;16(11):e0258338. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258338

[89]

Hwang A.B., Schuepfer G., Pietrini M., Boes S. External validation of EPIC’s risk of unplanned readmission model, the LACE+ index and SQLape as predictors of unplanned hospital readmissions: a monocentric, retrospective, diagnostic cohort study in Switzerland // PLoS One. 2021. Vol. 16, No. 11. ID e0258338. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258338

[90]

[91]	Shchadenko SV, Gorbachyova AS, Arslanova AR, Tolmachyov IV. 3D visualization for surgical modeling and surgical planning. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2014;13(4):165–171. (In Russ.)

[92]	Щаденко С.В., Горбачёва А.С., Арсланова А.Р., Толмачёв И.В. 3D-визуализация для планирования операций и выполнения хирургического вмешательства (CAS-технологии) // Бюллетень сибирской медицины. 2014. Т. 13, № 4. С. 165–171.

[93]	Shchadenko SV, Gorbachyova AS, Arslanova AR, Tolmachyov IV. 3D visualization for surgical modeling and surgical planning. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2014;13(4):165–171. (In Russ.)

[94]	Arhipov IV, Mikhaylov EM, Dolotova DD, et al. Evaluation of accuracy of medical optical navigation system “Neuroplan” for modeling of neurosurgical interventions. Russian journal of neurosurgery. 2018;20(4):104–113. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17650/1683-3295-2018-20-4-104-113

[95]	Архипов И.В., Михайлов Е.М., Долотова Д.Д., и др. Оценка точности оптической медицинской навигационной системы «Нейроплан» при моделировании нейрохирургических вмешательств // Нейрохирургия. 2018. Т. 20, № 4. С. 104–113. DOI: 10.17650/1683-3295-2018-20-4-104-113

[96]	Arhipov IV, Mikhaylov EM, Dolotova DD, et al. Evaluation of accuracy of medical optical navigation system “Neuroplan” for modeling of neurosurgical interventions. Russian journal of neurosurgery. 2018;20(4):104–113. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17650/1683-3295-2018-20-4-104-113

[97]	Enchev Y. Neuronavigation: geneology, reality, and prospects. Neurosurg Focus. 2009;27(3):e11. DOI: 10.3171/2009.6.FOCUS09109

[98]	Enchev Y. Neuronavigation: geneology, reality, and prospects // Neurosurg Focus. 2009. Vol. 27, No. 3. P. e11. DOI: 10.3171/2009.6.FOCUS09109

[99]	Enchev Y. Neuronavigation: geneology, reality, and prospects. Neurosurg Focus. 2009;27(3):e11. DOI: 10.3171/2009.6.FOCUS09109

[100]

Monteiro M, Newcombe VFJ, Mathieu F, et al. Multiclass semantic segmentation and quantification of traumatic brain injury lesions on head CT using deep learning: an algorithm development and multicentre validation study. Lancet Digit Health. 2020;2(6):E314–E322. DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30085-6

[101]

Monteiro M., Newcombe V.F.J., Mathieu F., et al. Multiclass semantic segmentation and quantification of traumatic brain injury lesions on head CT using deep learning: an algorithm development and multicentre validation study // Lancet Digit Health. 2020. Vol. 2, No. 6. P. E314–E322. DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30085-6

[102]

[103]

Dreizin D, Zhou Y, Fu S, et al. A multiscale deep learning method for quantitative visualization of traumatic hemoperitoneum at CT: assessment of feasibility and comparison with subjective categorical estimation. Radiol Artif Intell. 2020;2(6):e190220. DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2020190220

[104]

Dreizin D., Zhou Y., Fu S., et al. A multiscale deep learning method for quantitative visualization of traumatic hemoperitoneum at CT: assessment of feasibility and comparison with subjective categorical estimation // Radiol Artif Intell. 2020. Vol. 2, No. 6. ID e190220. DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2020190220

[105]

[106]

Wang X, Peng Y, Lu L, et al. ChestX-Ray8: Hospital-Scale chest X-Ray database and benchmarks on weakly-supervised classification and localization of common thorax diseases. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Honolulu, HI, USA. 2017. P. 3462–3471. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2017.369

[107]

Wang X., Peng Y., Lu L., et al. ChestX-Ray8: Hospital-Scale chest X-Ray database and benchmarks on weakly-supervised classification and localization of common thorax diseases // IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Honolulu, HI, USA. 2017. P. 3462–3471. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2017.369

[108]

[109]

Oakden-Rayner L. Exploring the ChestXray14 Dataset: Problems. Medical AI researcher. Radiologist Blog [cited 2023 Jun 21]. Available at: https://laurenoakdenrayner.com/2017/12/18/the-chestxray14-dataset-problems/

[110]

Oakden-Rayner L. Exploring the ChestXray14 Dataset: Problems. Medical AI researcher // Radiologist Blog [дата обращения: 21.06.2023]. Режим доступа: https://laurenoakdenrayner.com/2017/12/18/the-chestxray14-dataset-problems/

[111]

[112]

Billinghurst M, Savage J, Oppenheimer P, Edmond C. The expert surgical assistant. An intelligent virtual environment with multimodal input. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1996;29:590–607.

[113]

Billinghurst M., Savage J., Oppenheimer P., Edmond C. The expert surgical assistant. An intelligent virtual environment with multimodal input // Stud Health Technol Inform. 1996. Vol. 29. P. 590–607.

[114]

Billinghurst M, Savage J, Oppenheimer P, Edmond C. The expert surgical assistant. An intelligent virtual environment with multimodal input. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1996;29:590–607.

[115]

Savage J, Rosenblueth DA, Matamoros M, et al. Semantic reasoning in service robots using expert systems. Robotics Auton Syst. 2019;114:77–92. DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2019.01.007

[116]

Savage J., Rosenblueth D.A., Matamoros M., et al. Semantic reasoning in service robots using expert systems // Robotics Auton Syst. 2019. Vol. 114. P. 77–92. DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2019.01.007

[117]

Savage J, Rosenblueth DA, Matamoros M, et al. Semantic reasoning in service robots using expert systems. Robotics Auton Syst. 2019;114:77–92. DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2019.01.007

[118]

Mascagni P, Padoy N. OR black box and surgical control tower: recording and streaming data and analytics to improve surgical care. J Visc Surg. 2021;158(3S):18–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2021.01.004

[119]

Mascagni P., Padoy N. OR black box and surgical control tower: recording and streaming data and analytics to improve surgical care // J Visc Surg. 2021. Vol. 158, No. 3S. P. 18–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2021.01.004

[120]

[121]

Kenngott HG, Wagner M, Nickel F, et al. Computer-assisted abdominal surgery: new technologies. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015;400(3):273–281. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-015-1289-8

[122]

Kenngott H.G., Wagner M., Nickel F., et al. Computer-assisted abdominal surgery: new technologies // Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015. Vol. 400, No. 3. P. 273–281. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-015-1289-8

[123]

Kenngott HG, Wagner M, Nickel F, et al. Computer-assisted abdominal surgery: new technologies. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015;400(3):273–281. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-015-1289-8

[124]

Mascagni P, Alapatt D, Urade T, et al. A computer vision platform to automatically locate critical events in surgical videos: documenting safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 2021;274(1):e93–e95. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004736

[125]

Mascagni P., Alapatt D., Urade T., et al. A computer vision platform to automatically locate critical events in surgical videos: documenting safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy // Ann Surg. 2021. Vol. 274, No. 1. P. e93–e95. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004736

[126]

[127]

Liu R, An J, Wang Z, et al. Artificial intelligence in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: does computer vision outperform human vision? Art Int Surg. 2022;2(2):80–92. DOI: 10.20517/ais.2022.04

[128]

Liu R., An J., Wang Z., et al. Artificial intelligence in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: does computer vision outperform human vision? // Art Int Surg. 2022. Vol. 2, No. 2. P. 80–92. DOI: 10.20517/ais.2022.04

[129]

Liu R, An J, Wang Z, et al. Artificial intelligence in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: does computer vision outperform human vision? Art Int Surg. 2022;2(2):80–92. DOI: 10.20517/ais.2022.04

[130]

Colleoni E, Moccia S, Du X, et al. Deep learning based robotic tool detection and articulation estimation with spatiotemporal layers. IEEE Robot Autom Lett. 2019;4(3):2714–2721. DOI: 10.1109/LRA.2019.2917163

[131]

Colleoni E., Moccia S., Du X., et al. Deep learning based robotic tool detection and articulation estimation with spatiotemporal layers // IEEE Robot Autom Lett. 2019. Vol. 4, No. 3. P. 2714–2721. DOI: 10.1109/LRA.2019.2917163

[132]

[133]

Chadebecq F, Vasconcelos F, Mazomenos E, Stoyanov D. Computer vision in the surgical operating room. Visc Med. 2020;36(6):456–462. DOI: 10.1159/000511934

[134]

Chadebecq F., Vasconcelos F., Mazomenos E., Stoyanov D. Computer vision in the surgical operating room // Visc Med. 2020. Vol. 36, No. 6. P. 456–462. DOI: 10.1159/000511934

[135]

Chadebecq F, Vasconcelos F, Mazomenos E, Stoyanov D. Computer vision in the surgical operating room. Visc Med. 2020;36(6):456–462. DOI: 10.1159/000511934

[136]

Ito K, Sugimoto M, Tsunoyama T, et al. A trauma patient care simulation using extended reality technology in the hybrid emergency room system. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021;90(5):e108–e112. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003086

[137]

Ito K., Sugimoto M., Tsunoyama T., et al. A trauma patient care simulation using extended reality technology in the hybrid emergency room system // J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021. Vol. 90, No. 5. P. e108–e112. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003086

[138]

[139]

Luo H, Hu Q, Jia F. Details preserved unsupervised depth estimation by fusing traditional stereo knowledge from laparoscopic image. Healthcare Technol Lett. 2019;6(6):154–158. DOI: 10.1049/htl.2019.0063

[140]

Luo H., Hu Q., Jia F. Details preserved unsupervised depth estimation by fusing traditional stereo knowledge from laparoscopic image // Healthcare Technol Lett. 2019. Vol. 6, No. 6. P. 154–158. DOI: 10.1049/htl.2019.0063

[141]

[142]

Chen JH, Li Y, Gong JP, Yakun W. Application of da Vinci surgical robotic system in hepatobiliary surgery. Int J Surg Med. 2017;4(1):22–27. DOI: 10.5455/ijsm.da-Vinci-surgical-robotic-system-in-hepatobiliary-surgery

[143]

Chen J.H., Li Y., Gong J.P., Yakun W. Application of da Vinci surgical robotic system in hepatobiliary surgery // Int J Surg Med. 2017. Vol. 4, No. 1. P. 22–27. DOI: 10.5455/ijsm.da-Vinci-surgical-robotic-system-in-hepatobiliary-surgery

[144]

[145]

Nishikawa A, Hosoi T, Koara K, at el. Face MOUSe: A novel human-machine interface for controlling the position of a laparoscope. IEEE Transact Robotics Automat. 2003;19(5):825–841. DOI: 10.1109/TRA.2003.81709

[146]

Nishikawa A., Hosoi T., Koara K., at el. Face MOUSe: A novel human-machine interface for controlling the position of a laparoscope // IEEE Transact Robotics Automat. 2003. Vol. 19, No. 5. P. 825–841. DOI: 10.1109/TRA.2003.81709

[147]

[148]

Saeidi H, Opfermann JD, Kam M, et al. Autonomous robotic laparoscopic surgery for intestinal anastomosis. Sci Robot. 2022;7(62):eabj2908. DOI: 10.1126/scirobotics.abj2908

[149]

Saeidi H., Opfermann J.D., Kam M., et al. Autonomous robotic laparoscopic surgery for intestinal anastomosis // Sci Robot. 2022. Vol. 7, No. 62. ID eabj2908. DOI: 10.1126/scirobotics.abj2908

[150]

Saeidi H, Opfermann JD, Kam M, et al. Autonomous robotic laparoscopic surgery for intestinal anastomosis. Sci Robot. 2022;7(62):eabj2908. DOI: 10.1126/scirobotics.abj2908

[151]

Kozlov YA, Mihan DZh, Novozhilov VA, Baradieva PZ. Robot-assisted surgery in children — state of the art and perspectives of the development. Russian Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care. 2015;5(3):63–68. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17816/psaic192

[152]

Козлов Ю.А., Михан Дж., Новожилов В.А., Барадиева П.Ж. Робот-ассистированная хирургия у детей — современное состояние проблемы и перспективы развития // Российский вестник детской хирургии, анестезиологии и реаниматологии. 2015. Т. 5, № 3. С. 63–68. DOI: 10.17816/psaic192

[153]

[154]

Mosoyan MS, Fedorov DA, Osipov IB, et al. Robot-assisted bladder diverticulectomy in a 9-year-old boy. Russian Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care. 2023;13(1):53–61. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17816/psaic1305

[155]

Мосоян М.С., Федоров Д.А., Осипов И.Б., и др. Робот-ассистированная дивертикулэктомия мочевого пузыря у мальчика 9 лет // Российский вестник детской хирургии, анестезиологии и реаниматологии. 2023. Т. 13, № 1. С. 53–61. DOI: 10.17816/psaic1305

[156]

[157]

Pelizzo G, Nakib G, Romano P, et al. Five millimetre-instruments in paediatric robotic surgery: Advantages and shortcomings. Minima Invasiv Ther Allied Technol. 2014;24(3):1–6. DOI: 10.3109/13645706.2014.975135

[158]

Pelizzo G., Nakib G., Romano P., et al. Five millimetre-instruments in paediatric robotic surgery: Advantages and shortcomings // Minima Invasiv Ther Allied Technol. 2014. Vol. 24, No. 3. P. 1–6. DOI: 10.3109/13645706.2014.975135

[159]

[160]

Matson A, Sinha CK, Haddad M. Robotic pediatric surgery. Sinha CK, Davenport M, editors. Handbook of pediatric surgery. Springer, Cham, 2022. P. 565–575. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-84467-7_68

[161]

Matson A., Sinha C.K., Haddad M. Robotic pediatric surgery. Handbook of pediatric surgery / C.K. Sinha, M. Davenport, editors. Springer, Cham, 2022. P. 565–575. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-84467-7_68

[162]

Matson A, Sinha CK, Haddad M. Robotic pediatric surgery. Sinha CK, Davenport M, editors. Handbook of pediatric surgery. Springer, Cham, 2022. P. 565–575. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-84467-7_68

[163]

Van Mulken TJM, Schols RM, Scharmga AMJ, et al. First-in-human robotic supermicrosurgery using a dedicated microsurgical robot for treating breast cancer-related lymphedema: a randomized pilot trial. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):757. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-14188-w

[164]

Van Mulken T.J.M., Schols R.M., Scharmga A.M.J., et al. First-in-human robotic supermicrosurgery using a dedicated microsurgical robot for treating breast cancer-related lymphedema: a randomized pilot trial // Nat Commun. 2020. Vol. 11, No. 1. ID 757. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-14188-w

[165]

[166]

Gumbs AA, Alexander F, Karcz K, et al. White paper: definitions of artificial intelligence and autonomous actions in clinical surgery. Art Int Surg. 2022;2(2):93–100. DOI: 10.20517/ais.2022.10

[167]

Gumbs A.A., Alexander F., Karcz K., et al. White paper: definitions of artificial intelligence and autonomous actions in clinical surgery // Art Int Surg. 2022. Vol. 2, No. 2. P. 93–100. DOI: 10.20517/ais.2022.10

[168]

Gumbs AA, Alexander F, Karcz K, et al. White paper: definitions of artificial intelligence and autonomous actions in clinical surgery. Art Int Surg. 2022;2(2):93–100. DOI: 10.20517/ais.2022.10

[169]

Gumbs AA, Frigerio I, Spolverato G, et al. Artificial intelligence surgery: how do we get to autonomous actions in surgery? Sensors. 2021;21(16):5526. DOI: 10.3390/s21165526

[170]

Gumbs A.A., Frigerio I., Spolverato G., et al. Artificial intelligence surgery: how do we get to autonomous actions in surgery? // Sensors. 2021. Vol. 21, No. 16. ID 5526. DOI: 10.3390/s21165526

[171]

Gumbs AA, Frigerio I, Spolverato G, et al. Artificial intelligence surgery: how do we get to autonomous actions in surgery? Sensors. 2021;21(16):5526. DOI: 10.3390/s21165526

[172]

Wesdorp NJ, Hellingman T, Jansma EP, et al. Advanced analytics and artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review of radiomics predicting response to treatment. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48:1785–1794. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-05142-w

[173]

Wesdorp N.J., Hellingman T., Jansma E.P., et al. Advanced analytics and artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review of radiomics predicting response to treatment // Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021. Vol. 48. P. 1785–1794. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-05142-w

[174]

[175]

Hanson CW III, Marshall BE. Artificial intelligence applications in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2001;29(2):427–435. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200102000-00038

[176]

Hanson C.W. III, Marshall B.E. Artificial intelligence applications in the intensive care unit // Crit Care Med. 2001. Vol. 29, No. 2. P. 427–435. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200102000-00038

[177]

Hanson CW III, Marshall BE. Artificial intelligence applications in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2001;29(2):427–435. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200102000-00038

[178]

Kobrinskii BA, Taperova LN. Proekt meditsinskoi intellektual’noi sistemy real’nogo vremeni dlya reanimatsii. Yazykin IM, Rybina GV, Sinitsyn SV, editors. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov: “Nauchnaya sessiya MIFI-2007”. Vol. 3. Moscow, 2007. P. 32–34. (In Russ.)

[179]

Кобринский Б.А., Таперова Л.Н. Проект медицинской интеллектуальной системы реального времени для реанимации // Сборник научных трудов: «Научная сессия МИФИ-2007». Т. 3 / под ред. И.М. Языкина, Г.В. Рыбиной, С.В. Синицына. Москва, 2007. С. 32–34.

[180]

[181]

Kobrinskiy BA. Retrospective analysis of medical expert systems. Novosti iskusstvennogo intellekta. 2005;(2):6–17. (In Russ.)

[182]

Кобринский Б.А. Ретроспективный анализ медицинских экспертных систем // Новости искусственного интеллекта. 2005. № 2. C. 6–17.

[183]

Kobrinskiy BA. Retrospective analysis of medical expert systems. Novosti iskusstvennogo intellekta. 2005;(2):6–17. (In Russ.)

[184]

Gazizova DSh, Lishchuk VA, Lobacheva GV, et al. Primenenie matematicheskikh modelei i metodov dlya lecheniya ostroi serdechnoi nedostatochnosti. Lishchuk VA, Gazizova DSh, editors. Matematicheskaya kardiologiya. Teoriya, klinicheskie rezul’taty, rekomendatsii, perspektivy. Moscow: OOO «Print PRO», 2015. P. 145–146. (In Russ.)

[185]

Газизова Д.Ш., Лищук В.А., Лобачева Г.В., и др. Применение математических моделей и методов для лечения острой сердечной недостаточности. Математическая кардиология. Теория, клинические результаты, рекомендации, перспективы / под ред. В.А. Лищука, Д.Ш. Газизовой. Москва: ООО «Принт Про», 2015. С. 145–146.

[186]

[187]

Shvyrev SL, Zarubina TV. Informatsionnye tekhnologii v intensivnoi terapii. Moscow: Izdatel’skii dom “Menedzher zdravookhraneniya”, 2016. 90 p. (In Russ.)

[188]

Швырёв С.Л., Зарубина Т.В. Информационные технологии в интенсивной терапии. Москва: Издательский дом «Менеджер здравоохранения», 2016. 90 с.

[189]

Shvyrev SL, Zarubina TV. Informatsionnye tekhnologii v intensivnoi terapii. Moscow: Izdatel’skii dom “Menedzher zdravookhraneniya”, 2016. 90 p. (In Russ.)

[190]

Vincent J-L. The continuum of critical care. Crit Care. 2019;23(S1):122. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-019-2393-x

[191]

Vincent J.-L. The continuum of critical care // Crit Care. 2019. Vol. 23, No. S1. ID 122. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-019-2393-x

[192]

Vincent J-L. The continuum of critical care. Crit Care. 2019;23(S1):122. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-019-2393-x

[193]

Chang H, Yu JY, Yoon S, Kim T, Cha WC. Machine learning-based suggestion for critical interventions in the management of potentially severe conditioned patients in emergency department triage. Sci Rep. 2022;12:10537. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-14422-4

[194]

Chang H., Yu J.Y., Yoon S., Kim T., Cha W.C. Machine learning-based suggestion for critical interventions in the management of potentially severe conditioned patients in emergency department triage // Sci Rep. 2022. Vol. 12. ID 10537. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-14422-4

[195]

[196]

Chen L, Ogundele O, Clermont G, et al. Dynamic and personalized risk forecast in step-down units. Implications for monitoring paradigms. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017;14(3):384–391. DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201611-905OC

[197]

Chen L., Ogundele O., Clermont G., et al. Dynamic and personalized risk forecast in step-down units. Implications for monitoring paradigms // Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017. Vol. 14, No. 3. P. 384–391. DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201611-905OC

[198]

[199]

Yoon JH, Mu L, Chen L, et al. Predicting tachycardia as a surrogate for instability in the intensive care unit. J Clin Monit Comput. 2019;33(6):973–985. DOI: 10.1007/s10877-019-00277-0

[200]

Yoon J.H., Mu L., Chen L., et al. Predicting tachycardia as a surrogate for instability in the intensive care unit // J Clin Monit Comput. 2019. Vol. 33, No. 6. P. 973–985. DOI: 10.1007/s10877-019-00277-0

[201]

Yoon JH, Mu L, Chen L, et al. Predicting tachycardia as a surrogate for instability in the intensive care unit. J Clin Monit Comput. 2019;33(6):973–985. DOI: 10.1007/s10877-019-00277-0

[202]

Wijnberge M, Geerts BF, Hol L, et al. Effect of a machine learning-derived early warning system for intraoperative hypotension vs standard care on depth and duration of intraoperative hypotension during elective noncardiac surgery: the HYPE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2020;323(11):1052–1060. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.0592

[203]

Wijnberge M., Geerts B.F., Hol L., et al. Effect of a machine learning-derived early warning system for intraoperative hypotension vs standard care on depth and duration of intraoperative hypotension during elective noncardiac surgery: the HYPE randomized clinical trial // JAMA. 2020. Vol. 323, No. 11. P. 1052–1060. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.0592

[204]

[205]

Yoon JH, Jeanselme V, Dubrawski A, et al. Prediction of hypotension events with physiologic vital sign signatures in the intensive care unit. Crit Care. 2020;24:661. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-03379-3

[206]

Yoon J.H., Jeanselme V., Dubrawski A., et al. Prediction of hypotension events with physiologic vital sign signatures in the intensive care unit // Crit Care. 2020. Vol. 24. ID 661. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-03379-3

[207]

Yoon JH, Jeanselme V, Dubrawski A, et al. Prediction of hypotension events with physiologic vital sign signatures in the intensive care unit. Crit Care. 2020;24:661. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-03379-3

[208]

Gutierrez G. Artificial Intelligence in the Intensive Care Unit. Crit Care. 2020;24:101. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-2785-y

[209]

Gutierrez G. Artificial Intelligence in the Intensive Care Unit // Crit Care. 2020. Vol. 24. ID 101. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-2785-y

[210]

Gutierrez G. Artificial Intelligence in the Intensive Care Unit. Crit Care. 2020;24:101. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-2785-y

[211]

Banerjee I, Sofela M, Yang J, et al. Development and performance of the pulmonary embolism result forecast model (PERFORM) for computed tomography clinical decision support. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(8):e198719. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8719

[212]

Banerjee I., Sofela M., Yang J., et al. Development and performance of the pulmonary embolism result forecast model (PERFORM) for computed tomography clinical decision support // JAMA Netw Open. 2019. Vol. 2, No. 8. ID e198719. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8719

[213]

[214]

Zeiberg D, Prahlad T, Nallamothu BK, et al. Machine learning for patient risk stratification for acute respiratory distress syndrome. PLoS One. 2019;14(3):e0214465. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214465

[215]

Zeiberg D., Prahlad T., Nallamothu B.K., et al. Machine learning for patient risk stratification for acute respiratory distress syndrome // PLoS One. 2019. Vol. 14, No. 3. ID e0214465. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214465

[216]

Zeiberg D, Prahlad T, Nallamothu BK, et al. Machine learning for patient risk stratification for acute respiratory distress syndrome. PLoS One. 2019;14(3):e0214465. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214465

[217]

Flechet M, Falini S, Bonetti C, et al. Machine learning versus physicians’ prediction of acute kidney injury in critically ill adults: a prospective evaluation of the AKIpredictor. Crit Care. 2019;23:282. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-019-2563-x

[218]

Flechet M., Falini S., Bonetti C., et al. Machine learning versus physicians’ prediction of acute kidney injury in critically ill adults: a prospective evaluation of the AKIpredictor // Crit Care. 2019. Vol. 23. ID 282. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-019-2563-x

[219]

[220]

Tran NK, Sen S, Palmieri TL, et al. Artificial intelligence and machine learning for predicting acute kidney injury in severely burned patients: a proof of concept. Burns. 2019;45(6):1350–1358. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.03.021

[221]

Tran N.K., Sen S., Palmieri T.L., et al. Artificial intelligence and machine learning for predicting acute kidney injury in severely burned patients: a proof of concept // Burns. 2019. Vol. 45, No. 6. P. 1350–1358. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.03.021

[222]

[223]

Davoudi A, Malhotra KR, Shickel B, et al. Intelligent ICU for autonomous patient monitoring using pervasive sensing and deep learning. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):8020. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-44004-w

[224]

Davoudi A., Malhotra K.R., Shickel B., et al. Intelligent ICU for autonomous patient monitoring using pervasive sensing and deep learning // Sci Rep. 2019. Vol. 9, No. 1. ID 8020. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-44004-w

[225]

Davoudi A, Malhotra KR, Shickel B, et al. Intelligent ICU for autonomous patient monitoring using pervasive sensing and deep learning. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):8020. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-44004-w

[226]

Ma P, Liu J, Shen F, et al. Individualized resuscitation strategy for septic shock formalized by finite mixture modeling and dynamic treatment regimen. Crit Care. 2021;25:243. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-021-03682-7

[227]

Ma P., Liu J., Shen F., et al. Individualized resuscitation strategy for septic shock formalized by finite mixture modeling and dynamic treatment regimen // Crit Care. 2021. Vol. 25. ID 243. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-021-03682-7

[228]

[229]

Demšar J, Zupan B. Hands-on training about overfitting. PLoS Comput Biol. 2021;17:1008671. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008671

[230]

Demšar J., Zupan B. Hands-on training about overfitting // PLoS Comput Biol. 2021. Vol. 17. ID e1008671. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008671

[231]

Demšar J, Zupan B. Hands-on training about overfitting. PLoS Comput Biol. 2021;17:1008671. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008671

[232]

Hravnak M, Pellathy T, Chen L, et al. A call to alarms: current state and future directions in the battle against alarm fatigue. J Electrocardiol. 2018;51(6S):44–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.07.024

[233]

Hravnak M., Pellathy T., Chen L., et al. A call to alarms: current state and future directions in the battle against alarm fatigue // J Electrocardiol. 2018. Vol. 51, No. 6S. P. 44–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.07.024

[234]

[235]

Morris AH. Human cognitive limitations. Broad, consistent, clinical application of physiological principles will require decision support. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018;15(S1):53–56. DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201706-449KV

[236]

Morris A.H. Human cognitive limitations. Broad, consistent, clinical application of physiological principles will require decision support // Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018. Vol. 15, No. S1. P. 53–56. DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201706-449KV

[237]

[238]

Parreco J, Hidalgo A, Parks JJ, et al. Using artificial intelligence to predict prolonged mechanical ventilation and tracheostomy placement. J Surg Res. 2018;228:179–187. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.03.028

[239]

Parreco J., Hidalgo A., Parks J.J., et al. Using artificial intelligence to predict prolonged mechanical ventilation and tracheostomy placement // J Surg Res. 2018. Vol. 228. P. 179–187. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.03.028

[240]

[241]

Hsieh M-H, Hsieh M-J, Chen C-M, et al. An artificial neural network model for predicting successful extubation in intensive care units. J Clin Med. 2018;7(9):240. DOI: 10.3390/jcm7090240

[242]

Hsieh M.-H., Hsieh M.-J., Chen C.-M., et al. An artificial neural network model for predicting successful extubation in intensive care units // J Clin Med. 2018. Vol. 7, No. 9. ID 240. DOI: 10.3390/jcm7090240

[243]

Hsieh M-H, Hsieh M-J, Chen C-M, et al. An artificial neural network model for predicting successful extubation in intensive care units. J Clin Med. 2018;7(9):240. DOI: 10.3390/jcm7090240

[244]

Thille AW, Rodriguez P, Cabello B, et al. Patient-ventilator asynchrony during assisted mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32(10):1515–1522. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-006-0301-8

[245]

Thille A.W., Rodriguez P., Cabello B., et al. Patient-ventilator asynchrony during assisted mechanical ventilation // Intensive Care Med. 2006. Vol. 32, No. 10. P. 1515–1522. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-006-0301-8

[246]

Thille AW, Rodriguez P, Cabello B, et al. Patient-ventilator asynchrony during assisted mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32(10):1515–1522. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-006-0301-8

[247]

Chen C-W, Lin W-C, Hsu C-H, et al. Detecting ineffective triggering in the expiratory phase in mechanically ventilated patients based on airway flow and pressure deflection: feasibility of using a computer algorithm. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(2):455–461. DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000299734.34469.D9

[248]

Chen C.-W., Lin W.-C., Hsu C.-H., et al. Detecting ineffective triggering in the expiratory phase in mechanically ventilated patients based on airway flow and pressure deflection: feasibility of using a computer algorithm // Crit Care Med. 2008. Vol. 36, No. 2. P. 455–461. DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000299734.34469.D9

[249]

[250]

Blanch L, Sales B, Montanya J, et al. Validation of the better care system to detect ineffective efforts during expiration in mechanically ventilated patients: a pilot study. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38(5):772–780. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-012-2493-4

[251]

Blanch L., Sales B., Montanya J., et al. Validation of the better care system to detect ineffective efforts during expiration in mechanically ventilated patients: a pilot study // Intensive Care Med. 2012. Vol. 38, No. 5. P. 772–780. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-012-2493-4

[252]

[253]

Marchuk Y, Magrans R, Sales B, et al. Predicting patient-ventilator asynchronies with hidden Markov models. Sci Rep. 2018;8:17614. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-36011-0

[254]

Marchuk Y., Magrans R., Sales B., et al. Predicting patient-ventilator asynchronies with hidden Markov models // Sci Rep. 2018. Vol. 8. ID 17614. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-36011-0

[255]

Marchuk Y, Magrans R, Sales B, et al. Predicting patient-ventilator asynchronies with hidden Markov models. Sci Rep. 2018;8:17614. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-36011-0

[256]

Yoon JH, Pinsky MR, Clermont G. Artificial intelligence in critical care medicine. Crit Care. 2022;26(1):75. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-022-03915-3

[257]

Yoon J.H., Pinsky M.R., Clermont G. Artificial intelligence in critical care medicine // Crit Care. 2022. Vol. 26, No. 1. ID 75. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-022-03915-3

[258]

Yoon JH, Pinsky MR, Clermont G. Artificial intelligence in critical care medicine. Crit Care. 2022;26(1):75. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-022-03915-3

[259]

Natarajan P. Best practices: Separating myth from reality. Natarajan P, Frenzel JC, Smaltz DH, editors. Demystifying big data and machine learning for healthcare. 1st edition. CRC Press, 2023. P. 56–68. DOI: 10.1201/9781315389325

[260]

Natarajan P. Best practices: Separating myth from reality. Demystifying big data and machine learning for healthcare. 1st edition / P. Natarajan, J.C. Frenzel, D.H. Smaltz, editors. CRC Press, 2023. P. 56–68. DOI: 10.1201/9781315389325

[261]

[262]

Petersen E, Holm S, Ganz M, Feragen A. The path toward equal performance in medical machine learning. Patterns. 2023;4(7):100790. DOI: 10.1016/j.patter.2023.100790

[263]

Petersen E., Holm S., Ganz M., Feragen A. The path toward equal performance in medical machine learning // Patterns. 2023. Vol. 4, No. 7. ID 100790. DOI: 10.1016/j.patter.2023.100790

[264]

Petersen E, Holm S, Ganz M, Feragen A. The path toward equal performance in medical machine learning. Patterns. 2023;4(7):100790. DOI: 10.1016/j.patter.2023.100790

[265]

Litvin A, Korenev S, Rumovskaya S, et al. WSES project on decision support systems based on artificial neural networks in emergency surgery. World J Emerg Surg. 2021;16(1):50. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-021-00394-9

[266]

Litvin A., Korenev S., Rumovskaya S., et al. WSES project on decision support systems based on artificial neural networks in emergency surgery // World J Emerg Surg. 2021. Vol. 16, No. 1. ID 50. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-021-00394-9

[267]

[268]

Steyerberg EW, Vergouwe Y. Towards better clinical prediction models: Seven steps for development and an ABCD for validation. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(29):1925–1931. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu207

[269]

Steyerberg E.W., Vergouwe Y. Towards better clinical prediction models: Seven steps for development and an ABCD for validation // Eur Heart J. 2014. Vol. 35, No. 29. P. 1925–1931. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu207

[270]

Steyerberg EW, Vergouwe Y. Towards better clinical prediction models: Seven steps for development and an ABCD for validation. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(29):1925–1931. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu207

[271]

Leisman DE, Harhay MO, Lederer DJ, et al. Development and reporting of prediction models: guidance for authors from editors of Respiratory, Sleep, and Critical Care journals. Crit Care Med. 2020;48(5):623–633. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004246

[272]

Leisman D.E., Harhay M.O., Lederer D.J., et al. Development and reporting of prediction models: guidance for authors from editors of Respiratory, Sleep, and Critical Care journals // Crit Care Med. 2020. Vol. 48, No. 5. P. 623–633. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004246

[273]

[274]

Duran JM, Jongsma KR. Who is afraid of black box algorithms? On the epistemological and ethical basis of trust in medical AI. J Med Ethics. 2021;47:329–335. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106820

[275]

Duran J.M., Jongsma K.R. Who is afraid of black box algorithms? On the epistemological and ethical basis of trust in medical AI // J Med Ethics. 2021. Vol. 47. P. 329–335. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106820

[276]

Duran JM, Jongsma KR. Who is afraid of black box algorithms? On the epistemological and ethical basis of trust in medical AI. J Med Ethics. 2021;47:329–335. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106820

[277]

Linardatos P, Papastefanopoulos V, Kotsiantis S. Explainable AI: a review of machine learning interpretability methods. Entropy. 2020;23(1):18. DOI: 10.3390/e23010018

[278]

Linardatos P., Papastefanopoulos V., Kotsiantis S. Explainable AI: a review of machine learning interpretability methods // Entropy. 2020. Vol. 23, No. 1. ID 18. DOI: 10.3390/e23010018

[279]

Linardatos P, Papastefanopoulos V, Kotsiantis S. Explainable AI: a review of machine learning interpretability methods. Entropy. 2020;23(1):18. DOI: 10.3390/e23010018

[280]

Finn VK, Shesternikova OP. Ehvristika obnaruzheniya ehmpiricheskikh zakonomernostei posredstvom DSM-rassuzhdenii. Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya informatsiya. Seriya 2: Informatsionnye protsessy i sistemy. 2018;(9):7–42. (In Russ.)

[281]

Финн В.К., Шестерникова О.П. Эвристика обнаружения эмпирических закономерностей посредством ДСМ-рассуждений // Научно-техническая информация. Серия 2: Информационные процессы и системы. 2018. № 9. С. 7–42.

[282]

[283]

Gavrilov AV. Gibridnye intellektual’nye sistemy: Monografiya. Novosibirsk: Izd-vo NGTU, 2002. (In Russ.)

[284]

Гаврилов А.В. Гибридные интеллектуальные системы: Монография. Новосибирск: Изд-во НГТУ, 2002.

[285]

Gavrilov AV. Gibridnye intellektual’nye sistemy: Monografiya. Novosibirsk: Izd-vo NGTU, 2002. (In Russ.)

[286]

Ignatyev VV. Adaptive hybrid intellectual control systems. Izvestiya SFEDU. Engineering sciences. 2010;(12):89–94. (In Russ.)

[287]

Игнатьев В.В. Адаптивные гибридные интеллектуальные системы управления // Известия ЮФУ. Технические науки. 2010. № 12. С. 89–94.

[288]

Ignatyev VV. Adaptive hybrid intellectual control systems. Izvestiya SFEDU. Engineering sciences. 2010;(12):89–94. (In Russ.)

[289]

Kobrinskii BA, Dolotova DD, Donitova VV, Gavrilov AV. Radiological images in the construction of hybrid intelligent system. Medical doctor and IT. 2020;(4):43–50. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.37690/1811-0193-2020-4-43-50

[290]

Кобринский Б.А., Долотова Д.Д., Донитова В.В., Гаврилов А.В. Радиологические изображения в построении гибридной интеллектуальной системы // Врач и информационные технологии. 2020. № 4. С. 43–50. DOI: 10.37690/1811-0193-2020-4-43-50

[291]

[292]

Kitaguchi D, Takeshita N, Hasegawa H, Ito M. Artificial intelligence-based computer vision in surgery: Recent advances and future perspectives. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2022;6(1):29–36. DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12513

[293]

Kitaguchi D., Takeshita N., Hasegawa H., Ito M. Artificial intelligence-based computer vision in surgery: Recent advances and future perspectives // Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2022. Vol. 6, No. 1. P. 29–36. DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12513

[294]

[295]

Camarillo DB, Krummel TM, Salisbury JK. Robotic technology in surgery: past, present, and future. Am J Surg. 2018;188(4S1):2–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.08.025

[296]

Camarillo D.B., Krummel T.M., Salisbury J.K. Robotic technology in surgery: past, present, and future // Am J Surg. 2018. Vol. 188, No. 4S1. P. 2–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.08.025

[297]

Camarillo DB, Krummel TM, Salisbury JK. Robotic technology in surgery: past, present, and future. Am J Surg. 2018;188(4S1):2–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.08.025