Double-barreled enterostomy with compression anastomosis in newborns and infants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Staged treatment of small bowel diseases involves the formation of an enterostomy. Bishop–Koop T-anastomosis and Mikulicz double-barreled enterostomy with compression clamp are widely applied. The disadvantages of Mikulicz’s can be eliminated using a clip of titanium nickelide with shape memory instead of a clamp.

AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a titanium nickelide device in double-barreled enterostomy and compare the results of treatment with a T-anastomosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included newborns and infants. The clip was applied on 9–58 days postoperatively. Differences were accepted as significant at p < 0.05.

RESULTS: Since 2000, enterostomy was performed in 79 children: 12 (15.2%) had T-anastomoses, 44 (55.7%) had double-barreled stomas, and 18 (40.9%) had a titanium nickelide clip. In the study groups, stomas were applied for ileus, atresia, and aganglionosis. In the group of double-barreled enterostomies with a clip, the stoma was closed later (p = 0.027) and the operation time was short (p = 0.013). In the T-anastomosis group, parenteral nutrition was required for a longer period (p = 0.018). Self-removal of the clip and appearance of the stool occurred on days 5 and 1–3. Compression anastomosis was obtained in 83.3% and stoma closure outside in 73.3%. With a double-barreled enterostomy, hepatic failure (p = 0.018) and anastomosis dysfunction (p = 0.046) were less common. T-anastomosis revealed an increase in the incidence of CDC II (p = 0.013) and III (p = 0.015) complications.

DISCUSSION: The results reflect the safety of the presented method in comparison with the T-anastomosis, since the operation time and duration of the parenteral nutrition are reduced, invasive treatment is less often required for complications, and anastomosis dysfunction rarely occurs.

CONCLUSIONS: Double-barreled enterostomy with a compression clip is an effective and safe alternative to T-anastomosis in children aged <1 year. The formed compression anastomosis allows closure of the stoma by suturing its outer part. The conditions for the formation of the anastomosis are the patency of the distal sections and bowel diameter ≥1 cm.

Keywords

double-barreled enterostomy / T-shape anastomosis / titanium nickelide / compression anastomosis / newborn

References

[1] Doroshevskii YuL, Nemilova TK. «T-obraznyi» anastomoz v lechenii ostroi kishechnoi neprokhodimosti u novorozhdennykh. Grekov’s bulletin of surgery. 1979;122(12):3–19. (In Russ.)

[2] Дорошевский Ю.Л., Немилова Т.К. «Т-образный» анастомоз в лечении острой кишечной непроходимости у новорожденных // Вестник хирургии им. И.И. Грекова. 1979. Т. 122, № 12. С. 3–19.

[3] Wit J, Sellin S, Degenhard P, et al. Is the Bishop – Koop anastomosis in treatment of neonatal ileus still current. Chirurg. 2000;71:307–10. DOI: 10.1007/s001040051055

[4] Wit J., Sellin S., Degenhard P., et al. Is the Bishop – Koop anastomosis in treatment of neonatal ileus still current // Chirurg. 2000. Vol. 71. P. 307–310. DOI: 10.1007/s001040051055

[5] Bell RH, Johnson FE, Lilly JR. Intestinal anastomoses in neonatal surgery. Ann Surg. 1976;183(3):276–281. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-197603000-00011

[6] Bell R.H., Johnson F.E., Lilly J.R. Intestinal anastomoses in neonatal surgery // Ann Surg. 1976. Vol. 183. No. 3. P. 276–281. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-197603000-00011

[7] Zigan’shin RV, Gyunter VEh, Gibert BK. Kompressionnye anastomozy v zheludochno-kishechnoi khirurgii, vypolnennye pri pomoshchi ustroistva iz splava s pamyat’yu formy. Pirogov Russian journal of surgery. 1990;66(8):115–120. (In Russ.)

[8] Зиганьшин Р.В., Гюнтер В.Э., Гиберт Б.К. Компрессионные анастомозы в желудочно-кишечной хирургии, выполненные при помощи устройства из сплава с памятью формы // Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова. 1990. Т. 66, № 8. С. 115–120.

[9] Gyunter VEh, Dambaev GTs, Sysolyatin PG, Zigan’shin RV. Meditsinskie materialy i implantaty s pamyat’yu formy. Tomsk: Izd-vo Tomskogo un-ta, 1998. 487 P. (In Russ.)

[10] Гюнтер В.Э., Дамбаев Г.Ц., Сысолятин П.Г., Зиганьшин Р.В. Медицинские материалы и имплантаты с памятью формы. Томск: Изд-во Томского ун-та, 1998. 487 с.

[11] Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–213. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae

[12] Dindo D., Demartines N., Clavien P.A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey // Ann Surg. 2004. Vol. 240. No. 2. P. 205–213. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae

[13] Isakov YuF, Stepanov EhA, Vasil’ev GS. Magnitnо-kompressionnye anastomozy v khirurgii trubchatykh organov u detei. Sovetskaya pediatriya. 1987;(5):44–63. (In Russ.)

[14] Исаков Ю.Ф., Степанов Э.А., Васильев Г.С. Магнитно-компрессионные анастомозы в хирургии трубчатых органов у детей // Советская педиатрия. 1987. № 5. C. 44–63.

[15] Patent RUS № RU 2410039 C1/14.07.05.2009. Byul. № 3. Petlakh VI, Gatkin EYa, Sergeev AV, et al. Sposob formirovaniya magnitnogo mezhkishechnogo anastomoza. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37465840 (In Russ.)

[16] Патент РФ на изобретение № RU 2410039 C1/ 14.07.05.2009. Бюл. № 3. Петлах В.И., Гаткин Е.Я., Сергеев А.В., и др. Способ формирования магнитного межкишечного анастомоза.

[17] Bissaliyev BN, Tsap NA, Tussupkaliev AB, et al. Magnetic Compression Inter-Intestinal Anastomosis in the Treatment of Children with Enterostomes. Novosti Khirurgii. 2020;(1):46–52. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.18484/2305-0047.2020.1.46.

[18] Бисалиев Б.Н., Цап Н.А., Тусупкалиев А.Б., и др. Применение магнитно-компрессионного межкишечного анастомоза в лечении детей с энтеростомами // Новости хирургии. 2020. № 1. С. 46–52. DOI: 10.18484/2305-0047.2020.1.46

[19] Aksel’rov MA. Pervyi opyt ispol’zovaniya kompressionnogo otsrochennogo anastomoza pri rezektsii kishki v usloviyakh peritonita u detei. Russian Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2010;(4):51–52. (In Russ.)

[20] Аксельров М.А. Первый опыт использования компрессионного отсроченного анастомоза при резекции кишки в условиях перитонита у детей // Детская хирургия. 2010. № 4. С. 51–52.

[21] Popov FB, Nemilova TK, Karavaeva SA. Ehnterostomiya v neotlozhnoi abdominal’noi khirurgii novorozhdennykh. Russian Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2004;(5):20–23. (In Russ.)

[22] Попов Ф.Б., Немилова Т.К., Караваева С.А. Энтеростомия в неотложной абдоминальной хирургии новорожденных // Детская хирургия. 2004. № 5. С. 20–23.

[23] Balaganskii DA, Karavaev AV, Osipkin VG, et al. Primenenie kompressionnykh ustroistv iz nikelida titana s pamyat’yu formy pri lechenii kishechnoi neprokhodimosti v detskom vozraste. Medicine in Kuzbass. 2007;(1):12–13. (In Russ.)

[24] Балаганский Д.А., Караваев А.В., Осипкин В.Г., и др. Применение компрессионных устройств из никелида титана с памятью формы при лечении кишечной непроходимости в детском возрасте // Медицина в Кузбассе. 2007. № 1. С. 12–13.

[25] Gassan TA, Stepanov EA, Krasovskaya TV, et al. A morphological substantiation of a tactic in closing the intestinal stomas formed during the neonatal period. Russian Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2003;(6):11–13. (In Russ.)

[26] Гассан Т.А., Степанов Э.А., Красовская Т.В., Голоденко Н.В. Морфологическое обоснование тактики при закрытии кишечных стом, сформированных в периоде новорожденности // Детская хирургия. 2003. № 6. С. 11–13.

[27] Bhat S, Cameron NR, Sharma P, et al. Chyme recycling in the management of small bowel double enterostomy in pediatric and neonatal populations: A systematic review. Clinical nutrition ESPEN. 2020;37:1–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2020.03.013

[28] Bhat S., Cameron N.R., Sharma P., et al. Chyme recycling in the management of small bowel double enterostomy in pediatric and neonatal populations: A systematic review // Clinical nutrition ESPEN. 2020. Vol. 37. P. 1–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2020.03.013

[29] Aksel’rov MA, Emel’yanova VA, Sergienko TV. Khirurgicheskaya problema neonatal’nogo perioda — progressiruyushchii nekrotiziruyushchii ehnterokolit — i puti ee preodoleniya. Medical newsletter of Vyatka. 2015;(2):17–20. (In Russ.)

[30] Аксельров М.А., Емельянова В.А., Сергиенко Т.В. Хирургическая проблема неонатального периода — прогрессирующий некротизирующий энтероколит — и пути ее преодоления // Вятский медицинский вестник. 2015. № 2. С. 17–20.

[31] Peng YF, Zheng HQ, Zhang H, et al. Comparison of outcomes following three surgical techniques for patients with severe jejunoileal atresia. Gastroenterology report. 2019;7(6):444–448. DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goz026

[32] Peng Y.F., Zheng H.Q., Zhang H., et al. Comparison of outcomes following three surgical techniques for patients with severe jejunoileal atresia // Gastroenterology report. 2019. Vol. 7. No. 6. P. 444–448. DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goz026

[33] Martynov I, Raedecke J, Klima-Frysch J, et al. The outcome of Bishop – Koop procedure compared to divided stoma in neonates with meconium ileus, congenital intestinal atresia and necrotizing enterocolitis. Medicine. 2019;98(27):e16304. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016304

[34] Martynov I., Raedecke J., Klima-Frysch J., et al. The outcome of Bishop – Koop procedure compared to divided stoma in neonates with meconium ileus, congenital intestinal atresia and necrotizing enterocolitis // Medicine. 2019. Vol. 98. No. 27. ID e16304. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016304

[35] Haithem HAA. Meconium ileus a study and comparison between common operative procedures performed in basrah. Basrah Journal of Surgery. 2016;22(2):84–90. DOI: 10.33762/bsurg.2016.116618

[36] Haithem H.A.A. Meconium ileus a study and comparison between common operative procedures performed in basrah // Basrah Journal of Surgery. 2016. Vol. 22. No. 2. P. 84–90. DOI: 10.33762/bsurg.2016.116618

[37] Eeftinck Schattenkerk LD, Backes M, de Jonge WJ, et al. Treatment of Jejunoileal Atresia by primary anastomosis or Enterostomy: Double the operations, double the risk of complications. J Pediatr Surg. 2021;28:S0022-3468(21)00530-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.07.021

[38] Eeftinck Schattenkerk L.D., Backes M., de Jonge W.J., et al. Treatment of Jejunoileal Atresia by primary anastomosis or Enterostomy: Double the operations, double the risk of complications // J Pediatr Surg. 2021. Vol. 28. ID S0022-3468(21)00530-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.07.021

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Ivanov S.D., Slizovskiy G.V., Shikunova Y.V., Pogorelko V.G., Balaganskiy D.A., Yushmanova A.B., Gunther V.E., Khodorenko V.N., Anikeev S.G.