Associations between socio-economic, demographic, and anthropometric factors and physical frailty in outpatient patients aged 65 and older: data from the Russian EVKALIPT Study

Natalya V. Sharashkina , Natalya M. Vorobyeva , Andrey D. Izyumov , Madina M.-B. Balaeva , Anastasia V. Sorokina , Nadezhda K. Runikhina , Yulia V. Kotovskaya , Olga N. Tkacheva

Russian Family Doctor ›› 2024, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (4) : 80 -90.

PDF
Russian Family Doctor ›› 2024, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (4) : 80 -90. DOI: 10.17816/RFD634503
Original study article
research-article

Associations between socio-economic, demographic, and anthropometric factors and physical frailty in outpatient patients aged 65 and older: data from the Russian EVKALIPT Study

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Background: Currently, the number of elderly and senile patients is steadily increasing. Physical frailty significantly worsens prognosis in this population, making the evaluation of its relationship with socio-economic, demographic, and anthropometric factors a pertinent area of study.

Aim: To examine the associations between socio-economic, demographic, and anthropometric factors and physical frailty in outpatient patients aged 65 and older.

Materials and methods: A sub-analysis of the EVKALIPT study included 2,553 outpatient patients aged 65 and older (mean age 76.9 years, 32.2% men). Participants were divided into three age subgroups: 65–74 years, 75–84 years, and 85 years and older. A two-stage comprehensive geriatric assessment was conducted: the first stage involved a questionnaire on socio-economic status, and the second stage involved an objective examination using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). Physical frailty was defined based on SPPB results as follows: 10–12 points indicated no frailty (“robust” patients), 8–9 points indicated pre-frailty (“pre-frail” patients), and ≤ 7 points indicated physical frailty.

Results: Total SPPB scores ranged from 0 to 12 (median 7, interquartile range 4–9), with the prevalence of physical frailty at 58%. Patients with physical frailty had poorer socio-economic status. Multivariate regression analysis identified eight independent factors associated with physical frailty: age (per year), female sex, absence of a partner, disability, educational level as an ordinal variable (1 to 6, where 1 is no education and 6 is a doctoral degree), past blood donation, continued employment, and material resources as an ordinal variable (1 to 3, where 1 is low and 3 is high).

Conclusions: In outpatient patients aged 65 and older, physical frailty is associated with socio-economic, demographic, and anthropometric factors. High levels of education, past blood donation, continued employment, and high material resources were found to have a protective effect against physical frailty.

Keywords

physical frailty / frailty / Short Physical Performance Battery / blood donation

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Natalya V. Sharashkina, Natalya M. Vorobyeva, Andrey D. Izyumov, Madina M.-B. Balaeva, Anastasia V. Sorokina, Nadezhda K. Runikhina, Yulia V. Kotovskaya, Olga N. Tkacheva. Associations between socio-economic, demographic, and anthropometric factors and physical frailty in outpatient patients aged 65 and older: data from the Russian EVKALIPT Study. Russian Family Doctor, 2024, 28(4): 80-90 DOI:10.17816/RFD634503

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Gu D, Andreev K, Dupre M.E. Major trends in population growth around the world. China CDC Wkly. 2021;3(28):604–613. doi: 10.46234/ccdcw2021.160

[2]

Gu D., Andreev K., Dupre M.E. Major trends in population growth around the world // China CDC Wkly. 2021. Vol. 3, N 28. P. 604–613. doi: 10.46234/ccdcw2021.160

[3]

Cieza A, Sabariego C, Bickenbach J, et al. Rethinking disability. BMC Medicine. 2018;1(16):14. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-1002-6

[4]

Cieza A., Sabariego C., Bickenbach J., et al. Rethinking disability // BMC Medicine. 2018. Vol. 1, N 16. P. 14. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-1002-6

[5]

Davydov EL, Tikhonova NV, Glushanko VS, et al. Asthenic syndrome in elderly people: diagnostic, treatment and rehabilitation trends. Siberian medical review. 2020;5(125):40–48. EDN: HNGCTO doi: 10.20333/2500136-2020-5-40-48

[6]

Давыдов Е.Л., Тихонова Н.В., Глушанко В.С., и др. Синдром старческой астении: особенности диагностики, лечения и реабилитации // Сибирское медицинское обозрение. 2020. Т. 5, № 125. С. 40–48. EDN: HNGCTO doi: 10.20333/2500136-2020-5-40-48

[7]

Courtwright AM, Zaleski D, Tevald M, et al. Discharge frailty following lung transplantation. Clin Transplant. 2019;33(10):e13694. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13694

[8]

Courtwright A.M., Zaleski D., Tevald M., et al. Discharge frailty following lung transplantation // Clin Transplant. 2019. Vol. 33, N 10. P. e13694. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13694

[9]

Clinical guidelines Senile asthenia. 2024. [Internet]. Available from: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/613_2?ysclid=m4k3eu547b846032772 . Accessed: 04 July 2024. (In Russ.)

[10]

Клинические рекомендации Старческая астения. 2024. [Электронный ресурс]. Режим доступа: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/613_2?ysclid=m4k3eu547b846032772 . Дата обращения: 11.12.24.

[11]

Jung HW, Baek JY, Jang IY, et al. Short physical performance battery as a crosswalk between frailty phenotype and deficit accumulation frailty index. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2021;76(12):2249–2255. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glab087

[12]

Jung H.W., Baek J.Y., Jang I.Y., et al. Short physical performance battery as a crosswalk between frailty phenotype and deficit accumulation frailty index // J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2021. Vol. 76, N 12. P. 2249–2255. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glab087

[13]

Wang X, Hu J, Wu D. Risk factors for frailty in older adults. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101(34):e30169. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030169

[14]

Wang X., Hu J., Wu D. Risk factors for frailty in older adults // Medicine (Baltimore). 2022. Vol. 101, N 34. P. e30169. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030169

[15]

Tkacheva ON, Kotovskaya YuV, Runikhina NK, et al. Clinical guidelines on frailty. Russian journal of geriatric medicine. 2020;(1):11–46. EDN: JCMOSK doi: 10.37586/2686-8636-1-2020-11-46

[16]

Ткачева О.Н., Котовская Ю.В., Рунихина Н.К., и др. Клинические рекомендации «Старческая астения» // Российский журнал гериатрической медицины. 2020. № 1. С. 11–46. EDN: JCMOSK doi: 10.37586/2686-8636-1-2020-11-46

[17]

Tkacheva ON, Kotovskaya YuV, Runikhina NK, et al. Clinical guidelines frailty. Part 2. Russian journal of geriatric medicine. 2020;(2):115–130. EDN: SLCYCK doi: 10.37586/2686-8636-2-2020-115-130

[18]

Ткачева О.Н., Котовская Ю.В., Рунихина Н.К., и др. Клинические рекомендации «Старческая астения». Часть 2 // Российский журнал гериатрической медицины. 2020. № 2. С. 115–130. EDN: SLCYCK doi: 10.37586/2686-8636-2-2020-115-130

[19]

Vorob’eva NM, Tkacheva ON, Kotovskaya YuV, et al. Russian epidemiological study evkalipt: protocol and basic characteristics of participants. Russian journal of geriatric medicine. 2021;(1):35–43. EDN: OSMVEM doi: 10.37586/2686-8636-1-2021-35-43

[20]

Воробьёва Н.М., Ткачёва О.Н., Котовская Ю.В., и др. Российское эпидемиологическое исследование эвкалипт: протокол и базовые характеристики участников // Российский журнал гериатрической медицины. 2021. № 1. С. 35–43. EDN: OSMVEM doi: 10.37586/2686-8636-1-2021-35-43

[21]

Gordon EH, Hubbard RE. Do sex differences in chronic disease underpin the sex-frailty paradox? Mech Ageing Dev. 2019;179:44–50. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2019.02.004

[22]

Gordon E.H., Hubbard R.E. Do sex differences in chronic disease underpin the sex-frailty paradox? // Mech Ageing Dev. 2019. Vol. 179. P. 44–50. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2019.02.004

[23]

Oksuzyan A, Juel K, Vaupel JW, et al. Men: good health and high mortality. Sex differences in health and aging. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2008;20(2):91–102. doi: 10.1007/BF03324754

[24]

Oksuzyan A., Juel K., Vaupel J.W., et al. Men: good health and high mortality. Sex differences in health and aging // Aging Clin Exp Res. 2008. Vol. 20, N 2. P. 91–102. doi: 10.1007/BF03324754

[25]

Park C, Ko FC. The science of frailty: sex differences. Clin Geriatr Med. 2021;37(4):625–638. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2021.05.008

[26]

Park C., Ko F.C. The science of frailty: sex differences // Clin Geriatr Med. 2021. Vol. 37, N 4. P. 625–638. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2021.05.008

[27]

Kojima G, Aoyama R, Tanabe M. Associations between social isolation and physical frailty in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022;23(11):e3–e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.06.012

[28]

Kojima G., Aoyama R., Tanabe M. Associations between social isolation and physical frailty in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis // J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022. Vol. 23, N 11. P. e3–e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.06.012

[29]

Gale CR, Westbury L, Cooper C. Social isolation and loneliness as risk factors for the progression of frailty: the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Age Ageing. 2018;47(3):392–397. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx188

[30]

Gale C.R., Westbury L., Cooper C. Social isolation and loneliness as risk factors for the progression of frailty: the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing // Age Ageing. 2018. Vol. 47, N 3. P. 392–397. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx188

[31]

Chastin S, Gardiner PA, Harvey JA, et al. Interventions for reducing sedentary behaviour in community-dwelling older adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;6(6):CD012784. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012784.pub2

[32]

Chastin S., Gardiner P.A., Harvey J.A., et al. Interventions for reducing sedentary behavior in community-dwelling older adults // Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. Vol. 6, N 6. P. CD012784. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012784.pub2

[33]

Kojima G, Walters K, Iliffe S, et al. Marital status and risk of physical frailty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020;21(3):322–330. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.09.017

[34]

Kojima G., Walters K., Iliffe S., et al. Marital status and risk of physical frailty: a systematic review and meta-analysis // J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020. Vol. 21, N 3. P. 322–330. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.09.017

[35]

Trevisan C, Grande G, Vetrano DL, et al. Gender differences in the relationship between marital status and the development of frailty: A Swedish Longitudinal Population-Based Study. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020;29(7):927–936. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2019.8095

[36]

Trevisan C., Grande G., Vetrano D.L., et al. Gender differences in the relationship between marital status and the development of frailty: A Swedish Longitudinal Population-Based Study // J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020. Vol. 29, N 7. P. 927–936. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2019.8095

[37]

Sirotko ML, Denisenko MB, Zolotovskaya IA, Komarova MV. Medical and social status of patients over 80 years old subject to single or joint residence. Advances in Gerontology. 2021;34(3):446–453. EDN: QXDBKT doi: 10.34922/AE.2021.34.3.015

[38]

Сиротко М.Л., Денисенко М.Б., Золотовская И.А., Комарова М.В. Медико-социальный статус пациентов старше 80 лет при условии одиночного или совместного проживания // Успехи геронтологии. 2021. Т. 34, № 3. С. 446–453. EDN: QXDBKT doi: 10.34922/AE.2021.34.3.015

[39]

Sampaio LS, Carneiro JAO, Coqueiro RDS, Fernandes MH. Indicadores antropométricos como preditores na determinação da fragilidade em idosos. Cien Saude Colet. 2017;22(12):4115–4124. (In Portuguese). doi: 10.1590/1413-812320172212.05522016

[40]

Sampaio L.S., Carneiro J.A.O., Coqueiro R.D.S., Fernandes M.H. Indicadores antropométricos como preditores na determinação da fragilidade em idosos // Cien Saude Colet. 2017. Vol. 22, N 12. P. 4115–4124. (In Portuguese). doi: 10.1590/1413-812320172212.05522016

[41]

Closs VE, Ziegelmann PK, Flores JHF, et al. Anthropometric measures and frailty prediction in the elderly: an easy-to-use tool. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res. 2017;2017:8703503. doi: 10.1155/2017/8703503

[42]

Closs V.E., Ziegelmann P.K., Flores J.H.F., et al. Anthropometric measures and frailty prediction in the elderly: an easy-to-use tool // Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res. 2017. Vol. 2017. P. 8703503. doi: 10.1155/2017/8703503

[43]

Bellelli F, Consorti E, Hettiarachchige TMK, et al. Relationship among age, education and frailty in older persons. J Frailty Aging. 2023;12(4):326–328. doi: 10.14283/jfa.2023.39

[44]

Bellelli F., Consorti E., Hettiarachchige T.M.K., et al. Relationship among age, education and frailty in older persons // J Frailty Aging. 2023. Vol. 12, N 4. P. 326–328. doi: 10.14283/jfa.2023.39

Funding

Правительство Российской ФедерацииGovernment of the Russian Federation

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Eco-Vector

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

124

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/