Comparative estimation of laser coagulation efficiency in macular and microphotocoagulation of high density in diabetic maculopathy treatment

Tat’yana V Kotsur; Aleksandr S Izmaylov

doi:10.17816/OV9443-45

Ophthalmology Reports ›› 2016, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (4) : 43 -45. DOI: 10.17816/OV9443-45

Articles

research-article

Comparative estimation of laser coagulation efficiency in macular and microphotocoagulation of high density in diabetic maculopathy treatment

Author information +

History +

PDF (709KB)

Abstract

Subthreshold microphotocoagulation leads to the development of barely visible or invisible retinal burns. It has also been shown to be effective in macular edema treatment without any side effects that are inherent to the ETDRS method (atrophy of retinal pigment epithelium and choroid and decreased retinal sensitivity). Microphotocoagulation efficacy may be increased by high-density laser applications; however, publications drawing attention to this matter are rare in modern literature.

Keywords

diabetic maculopathy / diabetic retinopathy / diabetes of II type / microphotocoagulation / subthreshold laser coagulation

Cite this article

Download citation ▾

Tat’yana V Kotsur, Aleksandr S Izmaylov. Comparative estimation of laser coagulation efficiency in macular and microphotocoagulation of high density in diabetic maculopathy treatment. Ophthalmology Reports, 2016, 9(4): 43-45 DOI:10.17816/OV9443-45

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户忘记密码

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within

[1]

1.ETDRS report number 19. Early treatment diabetic retinopathy study group. Focal photocoagulation treatment of diabetic macular edema. Relationship of treatment effect to fluorescent angiographic and other retinal characteristics at baseline. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113(9):1144-1155. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1995.01100090070025.

[2]	2.Roider J. Laser treatment of retinal diseases by subthreshould laser effects. Semin Ophthalmology. 1999;14:19-26. doi: 10.3109/08820539909056059.

[3]	3.Roider J, Michaud NA, Flotte TJ, et al. Response of the retinal pigment epithelium to selective photocoagulation. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992; 110(12):1786-1792. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1992.01080240126045.

[4]	4.Lavinsky D, et al. Randomized clinical trial evaluating mETDRS versus normal or high-density micropulse photocoagulation for Diabetic Macular Edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(7):4314-4323. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6828.

[5]	5.Lovestam-Adrian M. Photocoagulation of diabetic macular oedema-complications and visual outcome / M. Lovestam-Adrian, E. Agardh. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2000;78(6):667-671. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2000.078006667.x.

[6]	6.Roider J, Michaud NA, Flotte TJ, et al. Response of the retinal pigment epithelium to selective photocoagulation. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110(12):1786-1792. doi: 10.1001/archopht. 1992.01080240126045.

[7]	7.Schatz H. Progressive enlargement of laser scars following grid laser photocoagulation for diffuse diabetic macular edema / H. Schatz, D. Madeira, H.R. McDonald, et al. Arch Ophthalmol.1991;109(11): 1549-1551. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1991.01080110085041.