Secondary cataract in patients after traditional phacoemulsification in comparison with femtolaser extraction
Ilya V. Kulikov , Artur E. Spirin , Bulat A. Mullackhmetov , Irina L. Kulikova
Ophthalmology Reports ›› 2023, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (4) : 7 -13.
Secondary cataract in patients after traditional phacoemulsification in comparison with femtolaser extraction
BACKGROUND: Secondary cataract is a frequent complication of the postoperative period of cataract surgery.
AIM: To evaluate the timing of secondary cataract formation in pseudophakic eyes after cataract extraction phacoemulsification, carried out as traditional phacoemulsification in comparison with femtolaser cataract surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent YAG laser posterior capsulotomy (98 people, 108 eyes). All patients were divided into two groups. First group (54 people, 58 eyes) consisted of patients in whom secondary cataract occurred after traditional phacoemulsification. In the second group (44 people, 50 eyes) secondary cataract occurred after femtolaser-assisted cataract surgery. All patients were implanted with a monofocal intraocular lens MIOL-2.
RESULTS: The data analysis revealed that the period of secondary cataract formation in the first group was 2.83 ± 1.25 years, in the second group 3.75 ± 1.0 years.
CONCLUSIONS: The analysis showed that the secondary cataract after traditional phacoemulsification occurs earlier by an average of 1 year than after femtolaser-assisted cataract surgery.
secondary cataract / phacoemulsification / femtolaser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) / YAG-laser dissection / intraocular lens (IOL)
| [1] |
Balashevich LI, Takhtaev YuV, Molodkina NA. Chastota razvitiya vtorichnoi katarakty posle implantatsii gidrofobnykh gibkikh intraokulyarnykh linz. Novoe v oftal’mologii. 2002;(1):32–34. (In Russ.) |
| [2] |
Балашевич Л.И., Тахтаев Ю.В., Молодкина Н.А. Частота развития вторичной катаракты после имплантации гидрофобных гибких интраокулярных линз // Новое в офтальмологии. 2002. № 1. С. 32–34. |
| [3] |
Aznabaev BM, Semes’ko SG. Vtorichnaya katarakta: diagnostika, lechenie, profilaktika: uchebnoe posobie. Moscow: APO FGBU FNKTS FMBA Rossii, 2020. (In Russ.) |
| [4] |
Азнабаев Б.М., Семесько С.Г. Вторичная катаракта: диагностика, лечение, профилактика: учебное пособие. Москва: АПО ФГБУ ФНКЦ ФМБА России, 2020. |
| [5] |
Pavlyuchenko KP, Akimova OG. Vtorichnaya katarakta, sovremennye predstavleniya ob ehtiologii, patogeneze, diagnostike, profilaktike i lechenii. Oftal’mologicheskii zhurnal. 2002;(2):51–56. (In Russ.) |
| [6] |
Павлюченко К.П., Акимова О.Г. Вторичная катаракта, современные представления об этиологии, патогенезе, диагностике, профилактике и лечении // Офтальмологический журнал. 2002. № 2. С. 51–56. |
| [7] |
Fabrikantov OL, Shutova SV, Aryasov AS, Goydin AP. The probability of secondary cataract development followed phacoemulsification with IOL implantation. Fyodorov journal of ophthalmic surgery. 2015;(3):6–12. (In Russ.) |
| [8] |
Фабрикантов О.Л., Шутова С.В., Арясов А.С., Гойдин А.П. Вероятность развития вторичной катаракты после факоэмульсификации с имплантацией ИОЛ // Офтальмохирургия. 2015. № 3. С. 6–12. |
| [9] |
American Academy of Ophthalmology. Basic and clinical science course. Lens and cataract. 2018–2019. American Academy of Ophthalmology, 2019. 119 p. |
| [10] |
Awasthi N, Guo S, Wagner BJ. Posterior capsular opacification: a problem reduced but not yet eradicated. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(4):555–562. DOI: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.3 |
| [11] |
Awasthi N., Guo S., Wagner B.J. Posterior capsular opacification: a problem reduced but not yet eradicated // Arch Ophthalmol. 2009. Vol. 127, No. 4. Р. 555–562. DOI: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.3 |
| [12] |
Wormstone IM, Wormstone YM, Smith JO, Eldred JA. Posterior capsule opacification: What’s in the bag? Prog Ret Eye Res. 2021;82:100905. DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2020.100905 |
| [13] |
Wormstone I.M., Wormstone Y.M., Smith J.O., Eldred J.A. Posterior capsule opacification: What’s in the bag? // Prog Ret Eye Res. 2021. Vol. 82. ID 100905. DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2020.100905 |
| [14] |
Wormstone IM, Eldred JA. Experimental models for posterior capsule opacification research. Exp Eye Res. 2016;142:2–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2015.04.021 |
| [15] |
Wormstone I.M., Eldred J.A. Experimental models for posterior capsule opacification research // Exp Eye Res. 2016. Vol. 142. Р. 2–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2015.04.021 |
| [16] |
Bantcykina YV, Malov IV, Eroshevskaya EB, Malov VM. Frequency, causes, pathogenesis, types, classifications, and clinical manifestations of a secondary cataract. Aspirantskiy Vestnik Povolzhiya. 2018;(1–2):145–152. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17816/2075-2354.2018.18.145-152 |
| [17] |
Банцыкина Ю.В., Малов И.В., Ерошевская Е.Б., Малов В.М. Частота, причины, патогенез, форма, классификация и клинические проявления вторичной катаракты // Аспирантский вестник Поволжья. 2018. № 1–2. С. 145–152. DOI: 10.17816/2075-2354.2018.18.145-152 |
| [18] |
Kovalevskaya MA, Filina LA, Kokorev VL. Factors of the risk of developing a secondary cataract and recommendations for conducting a primary posterior capsulorhexis. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Surgery. 2018;11(3):213–217. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.18499/2070-478X-2018-11-3-213-217 |
| [19] |
Ковалевская М.А., Филина Л.А., Кокорев В.Л. Факторы риска развития вторичной катаракты и рекомендации к проведению первичного заднего капсулорексиса // Вестник экспериментальной и клинической хирургии. 2018. Т. 11, № 3. С. 213–217. DOI: 10.18499/2070-478X-2018-11-3-213-217 |
| [20] |
Apple DJ, Solomon KD, Tetz MR, et al. Posterior capsule opacification. Surv Ophthalmol. 1992;37(2):73–116. DOI: 10.1016/0039-6257(92)90073-3 |
| [21] |
Apple D.J., Solomon K.D., Tetz M.R., et al. Posterior capsule opacification // Surv Ophthalmol. 1992. Vol. 37, No. 2. Р. 73–116. DOI: 10.1016/0039-6257(92)90073-3 |
| [22] |
Vasavada AR, Trivedi RH. Posterior capsule striae. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;22(11):1527–1531. DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(99)00197-2 |
| [23] |
Vasavada A.R., Trivedi R.H. Posterior capsule striae // J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999. Vol. 22, No. 11. Р. 1527–1531. DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(99)00197-2 |
| [24] |
Wolken MA, Oetting TA. Linear posterior capsule opacification with the AcrySof intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;27(11):1889–1891. DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(01)00843-4 |
| [25] |
Wolken M.A., Oetting T.A. Linear posterior capsule opacification with the AcrySof intraocular lens // J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011. Vol. 27, No. 11. Р. 1889–1891. DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(01)00843-4 |
| [26] |
Zuev VK, Tumanyan EhR, Sorokoletov GV, et al. Chastota razvitiya vtorichnoi katarakty posle provedeniya fakoehmul’sifikatsii s implantatsiei sovremennykh modelei zadnekamernykh intraokulyarnykh linz. Modern technologies in ophthalmology. 2015;(2):47–49. (In Russ.) |
| [27] |
Зуев В.К., Туманян Э.Р., Сороколетов Г.В., и др. Частота развития вторичной катаракты после проведения факоэмульсификации с имплантацией современных моделей заднекамерных интраокулярных линз // Современные технологии в офтальмологии. 2015. № 2. С. 47–49. |
| [28] |
Kolesnikov AV, Kolesnikova MA, Mironenko LV, et al. Chastota razvitiya vtorichnoi katarakty posle implantatsii intraokulyarnykh linz iz gidrofobnogo i gidrofil’nogo akrila. Modern technologies in ophthalmology. 2017;(3):295–297. (In Russ.) |
| [29] |
Колесников А.В., Колесникова М.А., Мироненко Л.В., и др. Частота развития вторичной катаракты после имплантации интраокулярных линз из гидрофобного и гидрофильного акрила // Современные технологии в офтальмологии. 2017. № 3. С. 295–297. |
| [30] |
Bai L, Vasil’ev AV, Egorova AV. Izuchenie chastoty vstrechaemosti razlichnykh tipov vtorichnoi katarakty posle fakoehmul’sifikatsii vozrastnoi katarakty v zavisimosti ot materiala implantirovannoi IOL. Modern technologies in ophthalmology. 2018;(5):17–19. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.25276/2312-4911-2018-5-17-19 |
| [31] |
Бай Л., Васильев А.В., Егорова А.В. Изучение частоты встречаемости различных типов вторичной катаракты после факоэмульсификации возрастной катаракты в зависимости от материала имплантированной ИОЛ // Современные технологии в офтальмологии. 2018. № 5. С. 17–19. DOI: 10.25276/2312-4911-2018-5-17-19 |
| [32] |
Nishi O, Nishi K, Sakanishi K. Inhibition of migrating lens epithelial cells at the capsular bend created by the rectangular optic edge of a posterior chamber intraocular lens. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1998;29(7):587–594. DOI: 10.3928/1542-8877-19980701-10 |
| [33] |
Nishi O., Nishi K., Sakanishi K. Inhibition of migrating lens epithelial cells at the capsular bend created by the rectangular optic edge of a posterior chamber intraocular lens // Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1998. Vol. 29, No. 7. Р. 587–594. DOI: 10.3928/1542-8877-19980701-10 |
| [34] |
Verdina T, Peppoloni C, Barbieri L, et al. Long-term evaluation of capsulotomy shape and posterior capsule opacification after low-energy bimanual femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. J Ophthalmol. 2020;2020:6431314. DOI: 10.1155/2020/6431314 |
| [35] |
Verdina T., Peppoloni C., Barbieri L., et al. Long-term evaluation of capsulotomy shape and posterior capsule opacification after low-energy bimanual femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery // J Ophthalmol. 2020. Vol. 2020. ID 6431314. DOI: 10.1155/2020/6431314 |
| [36] |
Xu J, Li W, Xu Z, et al. Comparative visual outcomes of EDOF intraocular lens with FLACS vs conventional phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2023;49(1):55–61. DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001027 |
| [37] |
Xu J., Li W., Xu Z., et al. Comparative visual outcomes of EDOF intraocular lens with FLACS vs conventional phacoemulsification // J Cataract Refract Surg. 2023. Vol. 49, No. 1. P. 55–61. DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001027 |
| [38] |
Zhong Y, Zhu Y, Wang W, et al. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification: comparison of internal aberrations and visual quality. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022;260:901–911. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-021-05441-4 |
| [39] |
Zhong Y., Zhu Y., Wang W., et al. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification: comparison of internal aberrations and visual quality // Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022. Vol. 260. P. 901–911. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-021-05441-4 |
| [40] |
Auffarth GU, Friedmann E, Breyer D, et al. Stability and visual outcomes of the capsulotomy-fixated FEMTIS-IOL after automated femtosecond laser-assisted anterior capsulotomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021;225:27–37. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.12.025 |
| [41] |
Auffarth G.U., Friedmann E., Breyer D., et al. Stability and visual outcomes of the capsulotomy-fixated FEMTIS-IOL after automated femtosecond laser-assisted anterior capsulotomy // Am J Ophthalmol. 2021. Vol. 225. P. 27–37. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.12.025 |
| [42] |
Kovács I, Kránitz K, Sándor GL, et al. The effect of femtosecond laser capsulotomy on the development of posterior capsule opacification. J Refract Surg. 2014;30(3):154–158. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20140217-01 |
| [43] |
Kovács I., Kránitz K., Sándor G.L., et al. The effect of femtosecond laser capsulotomy on the development of posterior capsule opacification // J Refract Surg. 2014. Vol. 30, No. 3. Р. 154–158. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20140217-01 |
| [44] |
Zhao Y, Yang K, Li J, et al. Comparison of hydrophobic and hydrophilic intraocular lens in preventing posterior capsule opacification after cataract surgery: an updated meta-analysis. Medicine. 2017;96(44): e8301. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008301 |
| [45] |
Zhao Y., Yang K., Li J., et al. Comparison of hydrophobic and hydrophilic intraocular lens in preventing posterior capsule opacification after cataract surgery: an updated meta-analysis // Medicine. 2017. Vol. 96, No. 44. ID e8301. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008301 |
| [46] |
Shlenskaya OV, Salmina SV. Vtorichnaya katarakta posle implantatsii myagkikh intraokulyarnykh linz MIOL. X International science and practice conferences: “Sovremennye tekhnologii kataraktal’noi i refraktsionnoi khirurgii”. 2007. P. 289–292. (In Russ.) |
| [47] |
Шленская О.В., Салмина С.В. Вторичная катаракта после имплантации мягких интраокулярных линз МИОЛ // X Международная научно-практическая конференция: «Современные технологии катарактальной и рефракционной хирургии». 2007. С. 289–292. |
| [48] |
Wu S, Tong N, Pan L, et al. Retrospective analyses of potential risk factors for posterior capsule opacification after cataract surgery. J Ophthalmol. 2018;2018:9089285. DOI: 10.1155/2018/9089285 |
| [49] |
Wu S., Tong N., Pan L., et al. Retrospective analyses of potential risk factors for posterior capsule opacification after cataract surgery // J Ophthalmol. 2018. Vol. 2018. ID 9089285. DOI: 10.1155/2018/9089285 |
| [50] |
Praveen MR, Vasavada AR, Shah GD, et al. A prospective evaluation of posterior capsule opacification in eyes with diabetes mellitus: a case-control study. Eye (Lond). 2014;28(6):720–727. DOI: 10.1038/eye.2014.60 |
| [51] |
Praveen M.R., Vasavada A.R., Shah G.D., et al. A prospective evaluation of posterior capsule opacification in eyes with diabetes mellitus: a case-control study // Eye (Lond). 2014. Vol. 28, No. 6. Р. 720–727. DOI: 10.1038/eye.2014.60 |
| [52] |
Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Nakao F, Hayashi F. Posterior capsule opacification after cataract surgery in patients with diabetes mellitus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;134(1):10–16. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(02)01461-7 |
| [53] |
Hayashi K., Hayashi H., Nakao F., Hayashi F. Posterior capsule opacification after cataract surgery in patients with diabetes mellitus // Am J Ophthalmol. 2002. Vol. 134, No. 1. Р. 10–16. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(02)01461-7 |
| [54] |
Zaczek A, Zetterström C. Posterior capsule opacificationafter phacoemulsification in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25(2):233–237. DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(99)80132-1 |
| [55] |
Zaczek A., Zetterström C. Posterior capsule opacificationafter phacoemulsification in patients with diabetes mellitus // J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999. Vol. 25, No. 2. Р. 233–237. DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(99)80132-1 |
| [56] |
Küchle M, Amberg A, Martus P, et al. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome and secondary cataract. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997;81(10): 862–866. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.81.10.862 |
| [57] |
Küchle M., Amberg A., Martus P., et al. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome and secondary cataract // Br J Ophthalmol. 1997. Vol. 81, No. 10. Р. 862–866. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.81.10.862 |
| [58] |
Sorokoletov GV. Vliyanie velichiny peredne-zadnei osi glaza i materiala IOL na chastotu i dinamiku razvitiya vtorichnoi katarakty v otdalennom posleoperatsionnom periode fakoehmul’sifikatsii katarakty. Modern technologies in ophthalmology. 2015;(4): 91–94. (In Russ.) |
| [59] |
Сороколетов Г.В. Влияние величины переднезадней оси глаза и материала ИОЛ на частоту и динамику развития вторичной катаракты в отдалённом послеоперационном периоде факоэмульсификации катаракты // Современные технологии в офтальмологии. 2015. № 4. С. 91–94. |
| [60] |
Sorokoletov GV, Zuyev VK, Tumanyan ER, et al. Frequency of secondary cataract development in pseudophakic eyes with posterior chamber IOL of current designs in case of axial myopia. Fyodorov journal of ophthalmic surgery. 2013;(2):28–31. (In Russ.) |
| [61] |
Сороколетов Г.В., Зуев В.К., Туманян Э.Р., и др. Частота развития вторичной катаракты в артифакичных глазах с современными моделями заднекамерных ИОЛ при осевой миопии // Офтальмохирургия. 2013. № 2. С. 28–31. |
Eco-Vector
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |