Optimal fixation period of a combined bioconstruction with buccal epithelial cells in limbal cell deficiency in experiment

Ekaterina V. Сhentsova , Natalia V. Borovkova , Tatyana V. Tselaya , Maya V. Storozheva , Maksim S. Makarov , Aleksey A. Churilov , Ivan N. Ponomarev

Ophthalmology Reports ›› 2023, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (2) : 63 -72.

PDF
Ophthalmology Reports ›› 2023, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (2) : 63 -72. DOI: 10.17816/OV321988
Experimental trials
research-article

Optimal fixation period of a combined bioconstruction with buccal epithelial cells in limbal cell deficiency in experiment

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The search for an effective method for the treatment of limbal stem cell deficiency of various etiologies, leading to intense clouding and vascularization of the cornea, followed by a significant decrease in visual acuity, remains an important and relevant topic in ophthalmology. The results of the studies showed that transplantation of buccal epithelial cells could significantly improve the prognosis of treatment in this category of patients.

AIM: To determine the optimal fixation period of a combined bioconstruction with buccal epithelial cells for the treatment of limbal cell deficiency in experiment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: At the first stage, the corneal epithelium was removed with a scraper in the eyes of experimental animals (12 eyes), and the limb was excised along the entire circumference. Next, to isolate epithelial buccal cells and manufacture a combined bioconstruction consisting of buccal cells, a collagen carrier and a soft contact lens, a flap of the mucous membrane of 5 × 5 mm was taken from the cheeks of rabbits. At the second stage, after the formation of a fibrovascular pannus on the cornea, it was excised to transparent layers of the cornea, a combined bioconstruction was placed on top. Further, one U-shaped suture was applied at the border of the inner and outer third of the eyelids. Temporary blepharorraphia persisted for 3 days (6 eyes) and 5 days (6 eyes), after the specified time, stitches were removed from the eyelids, and bioconstructions were removed. The bioconstructions removed from the eyes were stained with a vital (lifetime) fluorochrome dye based on tripaflavin and acridine orange, followed by analysis in a fluorescent microscope. The structure of cell nuclei, the overall integrity of the cytoplasm, and the presence of secretory vesicles were evaluated. After 7 and 14 days after transplantation of the bioconstruction, the area of erosion, the extent of new vessels and the transparency of the cornea were evaluated. When the observation was completed, the rabbits were removed from the experiment, and the eyes were enucleated and subjected to histological examination.

RESULTS: On the surface of all bioconstructions removed after 5 days, only leukocytes were detected. At the same time, on collagen matrix of bioconstructions removed after 3 days, in addition to leukocytes, there were also buccal epithelial cells with normal nuclear structure and chromatin topography in its composition, as well as with secretory vesicles. On days 7–14, both groups showed a decrease in the area of erosion, while the dynamics of ocular surface recovery processes was more pronounced in the group with fixation of the bioconstruction for 5 days.

CONCLUSIONS: According to the results of in vivo staining with fluorochrome dye of combined bioconstructions removed from the cornea of experimental animals 3 and 5 days after superficial keratectomy, as well as the data of clinical and histological examination, the optimal period for bioconstruction fixation was established to be 5 days.

Keywords

cornea / deficiency of limbal epithelial stem cells / oral mucosa / buccal epithelial cells / fibrovascular pannus / combined bioconstruction / rabbits

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ekaterina V. Сhentsova, Natalia V. Borovkova, Tatyana V. Tselaya, Maya V. Storozheva, Maksim S. Makarov, Aleksey A. Churilov, Ivan N. Ponomarev. Optimal fixation period of a combined bioconstruction with buccal epithelial cells in limbal cell deficiency in experiment. Ophthalmology Reports, 2023, 16(2): 63-72 DOI:10.17816/OV321988

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Van Buskirk EM. The anatomy of the limbus. Eye (Lond). 1989;3(2):101–108. DOI: 10.1038/eye.1989.16

[2]

Van Buskirk E.M. The anatomy of the limbus // Eye (Lond). 1989. Vol. 3, No. 2. P. 101–108. DOI: 10.1038/eye.1989.16

[3]

Davanger M, Evensen A. Role of the pericorneal papillary structure in renewal of corneal epithelium. Nature. 1971;229(5286): 560–561. DOI: 10.1038/229560a0

[4]

Davanger M., Evensen A. Role of the pericorneal papillary structure in renewal of corneal epithelium // Nature. 1971. Vol. 229, No. 5286. P. 560–561. DOI: 10.1038/229560a0

[5]

Popandopulo AG, Kavelina AS, Ivanova ON, Drozhzhina GI. Rol’ limbal’nykh kletok v regeneratsii rogovitsy. Tavricheskii mediko-biologicheskii vestnik. 2013;16(1–2):158–160. (In Russ.)

[6]

Попандопуло А.Г., Кавелина А.С., Иванова О.Н., Дрожжина Г.И. Роль лимбальных клеток в регенерации роговицы // Таврический медико-биологический вестник. 2013. T. 16, № 1–2. С. 158–160.

[7]

Daniels JT, Dart JK, Tuft SJ, Khaw PT. Corneal stem cells in review. Wound Repair Regen. 2001;9(6):483–494. DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-475x.2001.00483.x

[8]

Daniels J.T., Dart J.K., Tuft S.J., Khaw P.T. Corneal stem cells in review // Wound Repair Regen. 2001. Vol. 9, No. 6. P. 483–494. DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-475x.2001.00483.x

[9]

O’Sullivan F, Clynes M. Limbal stem cells a review of their identification and culture for clinical use. Cytotechnology. 2007;53(1–3): 101–106. DOI: 10.1007/s10616-007-9063-6

[10]

O’Sullivan F., Clynes M. Limbal stem cells a review of their identification and culture for clinical use // Cytotechnology. 2007. Vol. 53, No. 1–3. P. 101–106. DOI: 10.1007/s10616-007-9063-6

[11]

Ramos T, Deborah S, Ahmad S. An update on ocular surface epithelial stem cells: cornea and conjunctiva. Stem Cells Int. 2015;2015:601731. DOI: 10.1155/2015/601731

[12]

Ramos T., Deborah S., Ahmad S. An update on ocular surface epithelial stem cells: cornea and conjunctiva // Stem Cells Int. 2015. Vol. 2015. ID601731. DOI: 10.1155/2015/601731

[13]

Dua HS, Saini JS, Azuara-Blanco A, Gupta P. Limbal stem cell deficiency: Concept, aetiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis and management. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2000;48(2):83–92.

[14]

Dua H.S., Saini J.S., Azuara-Blanco A., Gupta P. Limbal stem cell deficiency: Concept, aetiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis and management // Indian J Ophthalmol. 2000. Vol. 48, No. 2. P. 83–92.

[15]

Shapiro MS, Friend J, Thoft RA. Corneal re-epithelialization from the conjunctiva. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1981;21(1–1):135–142.

[16]

Shapiro M.S., Friend J., Thoft R.A. Corneal re-epithelialization from the conjunctiva // Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1981. Vol. 21, No. 1–1. P. 135–142.

[17]

Deng S, Sejpal K, Bakhtiari P. Presentation, diagnosis and management of limbal stem cell deficiency. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2013;20(1):5–10. DOI: 10.4103/0974-9233.106381

[18]

Deng S., Sejpal K., Bakhtiari P. Presentation, diagnosis and management of limbal stem cell deficiency // Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2013. Vol. 20, No. 1. P. 5–10. DOI: 10.4103/0974-9233.106381

[19]

Dubovikov AS, Gavrilyuk IO, Kulikov AN, et al. Limbal stem cell deficiency: etiology, pathogenesis, priniciples and prospects of surgical treatment. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2019;12(1): 103–111. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.21516/2072-0076-2019-12-1-103-111

[20]

Дубовиков А.С., Гаврилюк И.О., Куликов А.Н., и др. Лимбальная недостаточность: этиология, патогенез, принципы и перспективы хирургического лечения // Российский офтальмологический журнал. 2019. T. 12, № 1. С. 103–111. DOI: 10.21516/2072-0076-2019-12-1-103-111

[21]

Kenyon KR, Tseng SC. Limbal asutograft transplantation for ocular surface disorders. Ophthalmology. 1989;96(5):709–723. DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(89)32833-8

[22]

Kenyon K.R., Tseng S.C. Limbal asutograft transplantation for ocular surface disorders // Ophthalmology. 1989. Vol. 96, No. 5. P. 709–723. DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(89)32833-8

[23]

Tsai RJ-F, Tseng SC. Human allograft limbal transplantation for corneal surface reconstruction. Cornea. 1994;13(5):389–400. DOI: 10.1097/00003226-199409000-00003

[24]

Tsai R.J.-F., Tseng S.C. Human allograft limbal transplantation for corneal surface reconstruction // Cornea. 1994. Vol. 13, No. 5. P. 389–400. DOI: 10.1097/00003226-199409000-00003

[25]

Kwitko S, Marinho D, Barcaro S, et al. Allograft conjunctival transplantation for bilateral ocular surface disorders. Ophthalmology. 1995;102(7):1020–1025. DOI: 10.1016/S0161-(95)30918-9

[26]

Kwitko S., Marinho D., Barcaro S., et al. Allograft conjunctival transplantation for bilateral ocular surface disorders // Ophthalmology. 1995. Vol. 102, No. 7. P. 1020–1025. DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(95)30918-9

[27]

Nakamura T, Inatomi T, Sotozono C, et al. Ocular surface reconstruction using stem cell and tissue engineering. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2016;51:187–207. DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.07.003

[28]

Nakamura T., Inatomi T., Sotozono C., et al. Ocular surface reconstruction using stem cell and tissue engineering // Prog Retin Eye Res. 2016. Vol. 51. P. 187–207. DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.07.003

[29]

Nakamura T, Inatomi T, Sotozono C, et al. Successful primary culture and autologous transplantation of corneal limbal epithelial cells from minimal biopsy for unilateral severe ocular surface disease. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica. 2004;82(4):468–471. DOI: 10.1111/j.1395-3907.2004.00285.x

[30]

Nakamura T., Inatomi T., Sotozono C., et al. Successful primary culture and autologous transplantation of corneal limbal epithelial cells from minimal biopsy for unilateral severe ocular surface disease // Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica. 2004. Vol. 82, No. 4. P. 468–471. DOI: 10.1111/j.1395-3907.2004.00285.x

[31]

Makarov PV, Gundorova RA, Chernetskii IS, Oganesian OG. Limbic transplantation in the surgical rehabilitation of patients with prior severe ocular burns. The Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2007;123(3):9–12. (In Russ.)

[32]

Макаров П.В., Гундорова Р.А., Чернетский И.С, Оганесян О.Г. Лимбальная трансплантация в хирургической реабилитации пациентов, перенесших тяжёлые ожоги глаз // Вестник офтальмологии. 2007. Т. 123, № 3. С. 9–12.

[33]

Yang J, Yamato M, Nishida K, et al. Corneal epithelial stem cell delivery using cell sheet engineering: Not lost in transplantation. J Drug Target. 2006;14(7):471–482. DOI: 10.1080/10611860600847997

[34]

Yang J., Yamato M., Nishida K., et al. Corneal epithelial stem cell delivery using cell sheet engineering: Not lost in transplantation // J Drug Target. 2006. Vol. 14, No. 7. P. 471–482. DOI: 10.1080/10611860600847997

[35]

Nakamura T, Inatomi T, Cooper LJ, et al. Phenotypic investigation of human eyes with transplanted autologous cultivated oral mucosal epithelial sheets for severe ocular surface diseases. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(6):1080–1088. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.09.034

[36]

Nakamura T., Inatomi T., Cooper L.J., et al. Phenotypic investigation of human eyes with transplanted autologous cultivated oral mucosal epithelial sheets for severe ocular surface diseases // Ophthalmology. 2007. Vol. 114, No. 6. P. 1080–1088. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.09.034

[37]

Nakamura T, Inatomi T, Sotozono C, et al. Transplantation of cultivated autologous oral mucosal epithelial cells in patients with severe ocular surface disorders. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88(10): 1280–1284. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2003.038497

[38]

Nakamura T., Inatomi T., Sotozono C., et al. Transplantation of cultivated autologous oral mucosal epithelial cells in patients with severe ocular surface disorders // Br J Ophthalmol. 2004. Vol. 88, No. 10. P. 1280–1284. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2003.038497

[39]

Nishida K, Yamato M, Hayashida Y, et al. Corneal reconstruction with tissue-engineered cell sheets composed of autologous oral mucosal epithelium. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(12):1187–1196. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa040455

[40]

Nishida K., Yamato M., Hayashida Y., et al. Corneal reconstruction with tissue-engineered cell sheets composed of autologous oral mucosal epithelium // N Engl J Med. 2004. Vol. 351, No. 12. P. 1187–1196. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa040455

[41]

Satake Y, Dogru M, Yamane G-Y, et al. Barrier function and cytologic features of the ocular surface epithelium after autologous cultivated oral mucosal epithelial transplantation. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(1):23–28. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.126.1.23

[42]

Satake Y., Dogru M., Yamane G.-Y., et al. Barrier function and cytologic features of the ocular surface epithelium after autologous cultivated oral mucosal epithelial transplantation // Arch Ophthalmol. 2008. Vol. 126, No. 1. P. 23–28. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.126.1.23

[43]

Bezushko AV, Dubovikov AS, Kulikov AN, et al. Мodification of mechanical limbal stem cell deficiency model. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2018;15(1):51–57. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.18008/1816-5095-2018-1-51-57

[44]

Безушко А.В., Дубовиков А.С., Куликов А.Н., и др. Модификация механической модели лимбальной недостаточности // Офтальмология. 2018. T. 15, № 1. С. 51–57. DOI: 10.18008/1816-5095-2018-1-51-57

[45]

Inatomi T, Nakamura T, Koizumi N, et al. Midterm results on ocular surface reconstruction using cultivated autologous oral mucosal epithelial transplantation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141(2):267–275. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.09.003

[46]

Inatomi T., Nakamura T., Koizumi N., et al. Midterm results on ocular surface reconstruction using cultivated autologous oral mucosal epithelial transplantation // Am J Ophthalmol. 2006. Vol. 141, No. 2. P. 267–275. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.09.003

[47]

Voino-Yasenetskii VV. Razrastanie i izmenchivost’ tkanei glaza pri ego zabolevaniyakh i travmakh. Kyiv: Vishcha shkola, 1979. (In Russ.)

[48]

Войно-Ясенецкий В.В. Разрастание и изменчивость тканей глаза при его заболеваниях и травмах. Киев: Вища школа, 1979.

[49]

Egorova NS, Chentsova EV, Borovkova NV, et al. Experimental repair of deep corneal defects using a bio-construct comprising a collagen type i matrix loaded with buccal epithelial cells. Transplantologiya. The Russian Journal of Transplantation. 2017;9(3): 226–235. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.23873/2074-0506-2017-9-3-226-235

[50]

Егорова Н.С., Ченцова Е.В., Боровкова Н.В., и др. Репаративный эффект биоконструкции на основе коллагена I типа и клеток буккального эпителия при лечении глубоких дефектов роговицы в эксперименте // Трансплантология. 2017. Т. 9, № 3. С. 226–236. DOI: 10.23873/2074-0506-2017-9-3-226-235

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Eco-Vector

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

151

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/