Residual astigmatism calculation method in implantation of a monofocal non-toric intraocular lens

Dmitrii F. Belov , Vadim P. Nikolaenko , Angelina G. Alekseeva

Ophthalmology Reports ›› 2023, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (3) : 45 -52.

PDF
Ophthalmology Reports ›› 2023, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (3) : 45 -52. DOI: 10.17816/OV321678
Original study articles
research-article

Residual astigmatism calculation method in implantation of a monofocal non-toric intraocular lens

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nowadays, phacoemulsification with monofocal non-toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation is a most common procedure in cataract surgery. Residual astigmatism has an important impact on uncorrected visual acuity. Therefore, development of residual astigmatism assessment method is relevant and may expand indications for toric IOL implantation.

AIM: To develop a method for calculating residual astigmatism in cases when non-toric monofocal IOL is implanted.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 351 patients (391 eyes, 105 men and 246 women, mean age 75.3 ± 8.5 years) who underwent phacoemulsification with non-toric monofocal IOL implantation. Biometry was performed by IOL-Master 500, postoperative refraction was assessed by autorefractometer Topcon-8800.

RESULTS: Using regression analysis, where the depended variable was residual astigmatism, and preoperative corneal astigmatism and steep corneal meridian axis location served as covariates, we revealed a significant relation (p < 0.001) with medium strength (R2 = 0.51) between these parameters, which formed residual astigmatism calculation formula for monofocal non-toric IOL implantation: Ast = KAst · 0.71 – 0.62 · sinKax + 0.73.

CONCLUSIONS: This formula may allow to evaluate the residual astigmatism and justify a decision on the advisability of toric IOL implantation.

Keywords

phacoemulsification / astigmatism / intraocular lens (IOL) / toric IOL / IOL calculation formula / biometry / posterior corneal surface / Barrett toric calculator / Kane formula

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Dmitrii F. Belov, Vadim P. Nikolaenko, Angelina G. Alekseeva. Residual astigmatism calculation method in implantation of a monofocal non-toric intraocular lens. Ophthalmology Reports, 2023, 16(3): 45-52 DOI:10.17816/OV321678

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Libman ES. Slepota i invalidnost’ vsledstvie patologii organa zreniya v Rossii. Natsional’noe rukovodstvo. Moscow: Oftal’mologiya, 2008. (In Russ.)

[2]

Либман Е.С. Слепота и инвалидность вследствие патологии органа зрения в России. Национальное руководство. Москва: Офтальмология, 2008.

[3]

Cataract surgical rates. Community Eye Health. 2017;30(100): 88–89.

[4]

Cataract surgical rates // Community Eye Health. 2017. Vol. 30, No. 100. P. 88–89.

[5]

Belov DF, Nikolaenko VP. Alternative method of intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with short axial length. The Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2022;138(3):2428. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17116/oftalma202213803124

[6]

Белов Д.Ф., Николаенко В.П. Альтернативный способ расчёта оптической силы интраокулярных линз при короткой переднезадней оси глаза // Вестник офтальмологии. 2022. Т. 138, № 3. С. 24–28. DOI: 10.17116/oftalma202213803124

[7]

Belov DF, Potemkin VV, Nikolaenko VP. Optimization of intraocular lens power calculation in pseudoexfoliation syndrome. The Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2021;137(4):38–42. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17116/oftalma202113704138

[8]

Белов Д.Ф., Потемкин В.В., Николаенко В.П. Оптимизация расчёта интраокулярных линз при псевдоэксфолиативном синдроме // Вестник офтальмологии. 2021. Т. 137, № 4. С. 38–42. DOI: 10.17116/oftalma202113704138

[9]

Melles RB, Holladay JT, Chang WJ. Accuracy of intraocular lens calculation formulas. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(2):169–178. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.08.027

[10]

Melles R.B., Holladay J.T., Chang W.J. Accuracy of intraocular lens calculation formulas // Ophthalmology. 2018. Vol. 125, No. 2. P. 169–178. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.08.027

[11]

Kopaev SYu, Ilinskaya IA, Bessarabov AN. Corneal astigmatism in patients with various ophthalmic pathologies. The Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2021;137(2):59–65. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17116/oftalma202113702159

[12]

Копаев С.Ю., Ильинская И.А., Бессарабов А.Н. Роговичный астигматизм при различной офтальмопатологии // Вестник офтальмологии. 2021. Т. 137, № 2. С. 59–65. DOI: 10.17116/oftalma202113702159

[13]

Boiko EV, Shukhaev SV, Kudlakhmedov SS, Litvin IB. Comparative evaluation of surgical correction of corneal astigmatism by toric IOL implantation using various keratometric data and calculation methods. Fyodorov Journal of Ophthalmic Surgery. 2022;(4): 36–44. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.25276/0235-4160-2022-4-36-44

[14]

Бойко Э.В., Шухаев С.В., Кудлахмедов Ш.Ш., Литвин И.Б. Сравнительная оценка хирургической коррекции роговичного астигматизма торическими ИОЛ с использованием различных кератометрических данных и методов расчёта // Офтальмохирургия. 2022. № 4. С. 36–44. DOI: 10.25276/0235-4160-2022-4-36-44

[15]

Rakhmanov VV, Khripun KV, Astakhov SY, Ramazanova AM. Approach to cataract surgery in patients with irregular astigmatism due to pronounced corneal pathology. Ophthalmology Reports. 2014;7(4):5–9. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17816/OV201445-9

[16]

Рахманов В.В., Хрипун К.В., Астахов С.Ю., Рамазанова А.М. Тактика хирургического лечения катаракты у больных с неправильным астигматизмом на фоне выраженной патологии роговой оболочки // Офтальмологические ведомости. 2014. Т. 7, № 4. C. 5–9. DOI: 10.17816/OV201445-9

[17]

Srinivasan S. ESCRS Clinical trends survey 2017, Toric IOL decisions. Eyeworld Supplements. 2017;5–6.

[18]

Srinivasan S. ESCRS Clinical trends survey 2017, Toric IOL decisions // Eyeworld Supplements. 2017. P. 5–6.

[19]

Can İ, Takmaz T, Özdamar A, et al. Evaluation of the cataract surgery 2018 survey in terms of achieving refractive cataract surgery targets. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2021;51(1):7–18. DOI: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2020.46020

[20]

Can İ., Takmaz T., Özdamar A., et al. Evaluation of the cataract surgery 2018 survey in terms of achieving refractive cataract surgery targets // Turk J Ophthalmol. 2021. Vol. 51, No. 1. P. 7–18. DOI: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2020.46020

[21]

Simons RWP, Visser N, van den Biggelaar FJHM, et al. Trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis of toric versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract patients with bilateral corneal astigmatism in the Netherlands. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45(2):146–152. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.09.019

[22]

Simons R.W.P., Visser N., van den Biggelaar F.J.H.M., et al. Trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis of toric versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract patients with bilateral corneal astigmatism in the Netherlands // J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019. Vol. 45, No. 2. P. 146–152. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.09.019

[23]

De Bernardo M, Zeppa L, Cennamo M, et al. Prevalence of corneal astigmatism before cataract surgery in Caucasian patients. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2014;24(4):494–500. DOI: 10.5301/ejo.5000415

[24]

De Bernardo M., Zeppa L., Cennamo M., et al. Prevalence of corneal astigmatism before cataract surgery in Caucasian patients // Eur J Ophthalmol. 2014. Vol. 24, No. 4. P. 494–500. DOI: 10.5301/ejo.5000415

[25]

Yang S, Byun Y-S, Kim HS, Chung S-H. Comparative accuracy of Barrett toric calculator with and without posterior corneal astigmatism measurements and the Kane toric formula. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021;231:48–57. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.05.028

[26]

Yang S., Byun Y.-S., Kim H.S., Chung S.-H. Comparative accuracy of Barrett toric calculator with and without posterior corneal astigmatism measurements and the Kane toric formula // Am J Ophthalmol. 2021. Vol. 231. P. 48–57. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.05.028

[27]

Reitblat O, Barnir EM, Qassoom A, et al. Comparison of the Barrett toric calculator using measured and predicted posterior corneal astigmatism, the Kane and Abulafia–Koch calculators. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2023;49(7):704–710. DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001178

[28]

Reitblat O., Barnir E.M., Qassoom A., et al. Comparison of the Barrett toric calculator using measured and predicted posterior corneal astigmatism, the Kane and Abulafia–Koch calculators // J Cataract Refract Surg. 2023. Vol. 49, No. 7. P. 704–710. DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001178

[29]

Li H, Wang Y, Chen M, et al. Distribution of the anterior corneal astigmatism in over 140 000 patients with age-related cataract. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2021;57(1):56–62. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20200107-00010

[30]

Li H., Wang Y., Chen M., et al. Distribution of the anterior corneal astigmatism in over 140 000 patients with age-related cataract // Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2021. Vol. 57, No. 1. P. 56–62. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20200107-00010

[31]

Motamed-Gorji N, Jafari A, Mohammadi SF, et al. Associated factors and distribution of posterior corneal astigmatism in a middle-aged population. Clin Exp Optom. 2022;105(8):806–812. DOI: 10.1080/08164622.2021.1992249

[32]

Motamed-Gorji N., Jafari A., Mohammadi S.F., et al. Associated factors and distribution of posterior corneal astigmatism in a middle-aged population // Clin Exp Optom. 2022. Vol. 105, No. 8. P. 806–812. DOI: 10.1080/08164622.2021.1992249

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Eco-Vector

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

164

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/