Ahmed valve implantation: intraoperative and early postoperative complications
Vadim Petrovich Nikolaenko , Larisa Mikhaylovna Kontantinova , Ol'ga Gennad'yevna Pavlova
Ophthalmology Reports ›› 2014, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (4) : 10 -12.
Ahmed valve implantation: intraoperative and early postoperative complications
Purpose. To analyze the causes of intraoperative and early postoperative complications and to develop a plan to improve the surgical technique. Methods. An Ahmed valve implantation by a standard method with obligatory posterior sclerectomy was performed in 238 patients aged from 18 to 88 years. Results. There were 7 cases of corneal perforation during the preparatory stage in excessively deep bridle suture; 3 cases of conjunctival and scleral perforation; 4 cases of inadvertent orifice enlargement in needle perforation of limbal scar tissue with consequent excessive filtration; in 37 patients, there was a hemorrhage from new vessels situated in the anterior chamber angle and the iris; 59 cases of serous cilio-choroidal effusion; 12 cases of hemorrhagic detachment. Conclusions. It is mandatory to follow the main principles of surgical technique and to take into consideration associated diseases.
refractory glaucoma / Ahmed drainage system / complications
| [1] |
Byun Y. S., Lee N. Y., Park C. K. Risk factors of implant exposure outside the conjunctiva after Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation.JpnJ. Ophthalmol. 2009; 53 (2): 114-119. |
| [2] |
Christakis P. G., Kalenak J. W., Zurakowski D., Tsai J. C., Kammer J. A., Harasymowycz P. J., Ahmed I. I. The Ahmed Versus Baerveldt study: one-year treatment outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118 (11): 2180-2189. |
| [3] |
Christakis P. G., Tsai J. C., Zurakowski D., Kalenak J. W., Cantor L. B., Ahmed I. I. The Ahmed Versus Baerveldt study: design, baseline patient characteristics, and intraoperative complications.Ophthalmology. 2011; 118 (11): 2172-2179. |
| [4] |
Geffen N., Buys Y. M., Smith M., Anraku A., Alasbali T., Rachmiel R., Trope G. E. Conjunctival complications related to Ahmed glaucoma valve insertion. J. Glaucoma. 2014; 23 (2): 109-114. |
| [5] |
Nguyen Q. H. Primary surgical management refractory glaucoma: tubes as initial surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2009; 20 (2): 122-125. |
| [6] |
Rachmiel R., Trope G. E., Buys Y. M., Flanagan J. G., Chipman M. L. Intermediate-term outcome and success of superior versus inferior Ahmed Glaucoma Valve implantation. J. Glaucoma. 2008; 17 (7): 584-590. |
| [7] |
Rootman D. B., Trope G. E., Rootman D. S. Glaucoma aqueous drainage device erosion repair with buccal mucous membrane grafts. J. Glaucoma. 2009; 18 (8): 618-622. |
| [8] |
Schwartz K., Budenz D. Current management of glaucoma.Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2004; 15 (2): 119-126. |
| [9] |
Shen C. C., Salim S., Du H., Netland P. A. Trabeculotomy versus Ahmed Glaucoma Valve implantation in neovascularglaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol. 2011; 5: 281-286. |
| [10] |
Souza C., Tran D. H., Loman J., Law S. K., Coleman A. L., Cap rioli J. Long-term outcomes of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation in refractory glaucomas. Am J. Ophthalmol. 2007; 144 (6): 893-900. |
Nikolaenko V.P., Kontantinova L.M., Pavlova O.G.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |