Comparative analysis of vitreofoveolar traction syndrome surgical treatment

Dmitriy Olegovich Shkvorchenko; Valeriy Dmitriyevich Zakharov; Anna Vladimirovna Rusanovskaya; Yelena Vladimirovna Belousova; Svetlana Aleksandrovna Kakunina; Tamara Sergeyevna Mironova; Viktoriya Adilyevna Pismenskaya; Kirill Sergeyevich Norman

doi:10.17816/OV2014328-33

Ophthalmology Reports ›› 2014, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (3) : 28 -33. DOI: 10.17816/OV2014328-33

Articles

other

Comparative analysis of vitreofoveolar traction syndrome surgical treatment

Author information +

History +

PDF

Abstract

This article focuses on the surgical treatment of the vitreomacular traction ( VMT) syndrome comparing vitrectomy with and without internal limiting membrane (ILM) removal. Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. In the 1st group, the procedure was performed without the ILM removal. In the 2nd group, the surgery was performed with perifoveolar ILM removal. A comparative analysis revealed that an anatomical result was reached in both groups, but in the 1st group, the development of epiretinal fibrosis was observed in 35 % of the cases in the late postoperative period; and this was not observed in the 2nd group. Visual function recovery was faster in the 1st group, but at 1 year visit, data from both groups were comparable. Thus, the treatment method with surgical ILM removal is preferable, due to more stable anatomical result.

Keywords

vitreomacular traction syndrome / epiretinal fibrosis / internal limiting membrane / surgical treatment

Cite this article

Download citation ▾

Dmitriy Olegovich Shkvorchenko, Valeriy Dmitriyevich Zakharov, Anna Vladimirovna Rusanovskaya, Yelena Vladimirovna Belousova, Svetlana Aleksandrovna Kakunina, Tamara Sergeyevna Mironova, Viktoriya Adilyevna Pismenskaya, Kirill Sergeyevich Norman. Comparative analysis of vitreofoveolar traction syndrome surgical treatment. Ophthalmology Reports, 2014, 7(3): 28-33 DOI:10.17816/OV2014328-33

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户忘记密码

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within

[1]	Байбородов Я. В. 27G-хирургия первой стадии макулярных разрывов без витрэктомии. В кн.: Сборник тезисов «Федоровские чтения - 2011» IX Всероссийская научно-практическая конференция с международным участием; 2011.

[2]	Стебнев В. С., Малов В. М. Симптоматическая витреомакулярная адгезия: варианты естественного безоперационного течения. В кн.: Современные технологии лечения витреоретинальной патологии. М.; 2013: 178-180.

[3]	Bottos J., Elizalde J. Vitreomacular traction syndrome. J. Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2012; 7 (2): 148-161.

[4]	Donald M. Gass. Reappraisal of Biomicroscopic Classification of Stages of Development of a Macular Hole./ American Journal of Ophthhalmology. 1995; 119: 752-759.

[5]	Duker J. S., Kaiser P. K., Binder S., Gaudric A., Reichel E. The international vitreomacular traction study group classification of vitreomacular adhesion, traction, and macular hole. Ophthalmology. 2013; 120 (12): 2611-9.

[6]	Johnson M. W. Perifoveal vitreous detachment and its macular complications. Trans. Am. Ophthalmol Soc. 2005; 103: 537-567.

[7]	Niranjan K., Jamal K., Khalid S. Partial-thickness macular hole in traction syndrome: a case report the literature. Journal of Medical Case Reports. 2010; 4: 7-12.

[8]	Taiichi Hikichi, Akitoshi Yoshida, Jun Akiba, Clement L. Trempe. Natural outcomes of stage 1, 2, 3, and 4 idiopathic macular holes.British Journal of Ophthalmology. 1995; 79: 517-520.

[9]	Steel D., Lotery A. Idiopathic vitreomacular traction and macular hole: a comprehensive review of pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Eye. 2013; 27: 1-21.