Methods for measuring intraocular pressure: disadvantages and advantages

Abstract

This review of the literature is devoted to the comparison of tonometers based on various operating principles, their advantages and disadvantages. The principles of operation of each considered in the review tonometer are discussed. The features of the structure and mechanisms for measuring the intraocular pressure of various tonometers are highlighted, on the basis of which the anatomical features and other factors that have the greatest impact on the reliability of measurement and accounting of the data obtained in clinical practice are determined.

Keywords

tonometers / tonometry / ophthalmotonus / intraocular pressure / Goldmann tonometer / Maklakov tonometer

References

[1] Bader J, Zeppieri M, Havens SJ. Tonometry. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, 2022. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493225/

[2] Bader J., Zeppieri M., Havens S.J. Tonometry. In: StatPearls [Электронный ресурс]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, 2022. Доступ по ссылке: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493225/

[3] Brusini P, Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M. How to measure intraocular pressure: an updated review of various tonometers. J Clin Med. 2021;10(17):3860. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10173860

[4] Brusini P., Salvetat M.L., Zeppieri M. How to measure intraocular pressure: an updated review of various tonometers // J Clin Med. 2021. Vol. 10, No. 17. ID3860. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10173860

[5] Nesterov AP, Piletskiĭ GK, Piletskiĭ NG. A transpalpebral tonometer for measuring the intraocular pressure. The Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2003;119(1):3–5. (In Russ.)

[6] Нестеров А.П., Пилецкий Г.К., Пилецкий Н.Г. Транспальпебральный тонометр для измерения внутриглазного давления // Вестник офтальмологии. 2003. Т. 119, № 1. С. 3–5.

[7] Deutsch C, Christiansen N, Ossysek I, et al. Clinical calibration and in vitro evaluation of the validity of 2 microprocessor controlled tonometers. Ophthalmologe. 1996;93(5):544–548. (In German) DOI: 10.1007/s003470050035

[8] Deutsch C., Christiansen N., Ossysek I., et al. Klinische kalibration und in-vitro-validitätsprüfung 2er mikroprozessorgesteuerter tonometer // Ophthalmologe. 1996. Vol. 93, No. 5. P. 544–548. DOI: 10.1007/s003470050035

[9] Mark HH. Armand Imbert, Adolf Fick, and their tonometry law. Eye. 2012;26(1):13–16. DOI: 10.1038/eye.2011.248

[10] Mark H.H. Armand Imbert, Adolf Fick, and their tonometry law // Eye. 2012. Vol. 26, No. 1. P. 13–16. DOI: 10.1038/eye.2011.248

[11] Troost A, Yun SH, Specht K, et al. Transpalpebral tonometry: reliability and comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometry and palpation in healthy volunteers. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89(3): 80–283. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2004.050211

[12] Troost A., Yun S.H., Specht K., et al. Transpalpebral tonometry: reliability and comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometry and palpation in healthy volunteers // Br J Ophthalmol. 2005. Vol. 89, No. 3. P. 280–283. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2004.050211

[13] Rubinfeld RS, Cohen EJ, Laibson PR, et al. The accuracy of finger tension for estimating intraocular pressure after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1998;29(3):213–215. DOI: 10.3928/1542-8877-19980301-07

[14] Rubinfeld R.S., Cohen E.J., Laibson P.R., et al. The accuracy of finger tension for estimating intraocular pressure after penetrating keratoplasty // Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1998. Vol. 29, No. 3. P. 213–215. DOI: 10.3928/1542-8877-19980301-07

[15] Moshetova LK, Nesterov AP, Egorova EA, editors. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii. Oftal’mologiya. Moscow: GEHOTAR-Media, 2006. 237 p. (In Russ.)

[16] Клинические рекомендации. Офтальмология / под ред. Л.К. Мошетовой, А.П. Нестерова, Е.А. Егоровой. Москва: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2006. 237 с.

[17] Albert DM, Keeler R. The Pressure: Before and after Schiøtz. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2020;3(6):409–413. DOI: 10.1016/j.ogla.2020.04.015

[18] Albert D.M., Keeler R. The Pressure: Before and after Schiøtz // Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2020. Vol. 3, No. 6. P. 409–413. DOI: 10.1016/j.ogla.2020.04.015

[19] Cordero I. Understanding and caring for a Schiotz tonometer. Community Eye Health. 2014;27(87):57.

[20] Cordero I. Understanding and caring for a Schiotz tonometer // Community Eye Health. 2014. Vol. 27, No. 87. ID 57.

[21] Patel H, Gilmartin B, Cubbidge RP, Logan NS. In vivo measurement of regional variation in anterior scleral resistance to Schiotz indentation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011;31(5):437–443. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00840.x

[22] Patel H., Gilmartin B., Cubbidge R.P., Logan N.S. In vivo measurement of regional variation in anterior scleral resistance to Schiotz indentation // Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011. Vol. 31, No. 5. P. 437–443. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00840.x

[23] Fedotov AA, Azima VYu. Razvitie metodov izmereniya vnutriglaznogo davleniya. Uchebnoe posobie. Ryazan, 2015. 15 p. (In Russ.)

[24] Федотов А.А., Азима В.Ю. Развитие методов измерения внутриглазного давления. Учебное пособие. Рязань, 2015. 15 с.

[25] Lam DSC, Leung DYL, Chiu TYH, et al. Pressure phosphene self-tonometry: a comparison with Goldmann tonometry in glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45(9):3131–3136. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.04-0115

[26] Lam D.S.C., Leung D.Y.L., Chiu T.Y.H., et al. Pressure phosphene self-tonometry: a comparison with Goldmann tonometry in glaucoma patients // Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004. Vol. 45, No. 9. P. 3131–3136. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.04-0115

[27] Brigatti L, Maguluri S. Reproducibility of self-measured intraocular pressure with the phosphene tonometer in patients with ocular hypertension and early to advanced glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2005;14(1):36–39. DOI: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000146374.59119.42

[28] Brigatti L., Maguluri S. Reproducibility of self-measured intraocular pressure with the phosphene tonometer in patients with ocular hypertension and early to advanced glaucoma // J Glaucoma. 2005. Vol. 14, No. 1. P. 36–39. DOI: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000146374.59119.42

[29] Rai S, Moster MR, Kesen M, et al. Level of disagreement between Proview phosphene tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer intraocular pressure readings. J Glaucoma. 2005;14(2):120–123. DOI: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000151887.51541.af

[30] Rai S., Moster M.R., Kesen M., et al. Level of disagreement between Proview phosphene tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer intraocular pressure readings // J Glaucoma. 2005. Vol. 14, No. 2. P. 120–123. DOI: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000151887.51541.af

[31] Kontiola A, Päivi P. Measuring intraocular pressure with the Pulsair 3000 and Rebound tonometers in elderly patients without an anesthetic. Graefe’s archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology. 2004;242:3–7. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-003-0671-3

[32] Kontiola A., Päivi P. Measuring intraocular pressure with the Pulsair 3000 and Rebound tonometers in elderly patients without an anesthetic // Graefe’s archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology. 2004. Vol. 242. P. 3–7. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-003-0671-3

[33] Rootman DS, Insler MS, Thompson HW, et al. Accuracy and precision of the Tono-Pen in measuring intraocular pressure after keratoplasty and epikeratophakia and in scarred corneas. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106(12):1697–1700. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1988.01060140869030

[34] Rootman D.S., Insler M.S., Thompson H.W., et al. Accuracy and precision of the Tono-Pen in measuring intraocular pressure after keratoplasty and epikeratophakia and in scarred corneas // Arch Ophthalmol. 1988. Vol. 106, No. 12. P. 1697–1700. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1988.01060140869030

[35] Nakakura S. Icare® rebound tonometers: review of their characteristics and ease of use. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:1245–1253. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S163092

[36] Nakakura S. Icare® rebound tonometers: review of their characteristics and ease of use // Clin Ophthalmol. 2018. Vol. 12. P. 1245–1253. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S163092

[37] Billy A, David PE, Mahabir AK, et al. Utility of the Tono-Pen in measuring intraocular pressure in Trinidad: a cross-sectional study. West Indian Med J. 2015;64(4):367–371. DOI: 10.7727/wimj.2014.125

[38] Billy A., David P.E., Mahabir A.K., et al. Utility of the Tono-Pen in Measuring intraocular pressure in Trinidad: a cross-sectional study // West Indian Med J. 2015. Vol. 64, No. 4. P. 367–371. DOI: 10.7727/wimj.2014.125

[39] Levy Y, Zadok D, Glovinsky Y, et al. Tono-Pen versus Goldmann tonometry after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25(4):486–491. DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(99)80044-3

[40] Levy Y., Zadok D., Glovinsky Y., et al. Tono-Pen versus Goldmann tonometry after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy // J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999. Vol. 25, No. 4. P. 486–491. DOI: 10.1016/s0886–3350(99)80044–3

[41] Neuburger M, Maier P, Böhringer D, et al. The impact of corneal edema on intraocular pressure measurements using Goldmann applanation tonometry, Tono-Pen XL, iCare, and ORA: an in vitro model. J Glaucoma. 2013;22(7):584–590. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31824cef11

[42] Neuburger M., Maier P., Böhringer D., et al. The impact of corneal edema on intraocular pressure measurements using Goldmann applanation tonometry, Tono-Pen XL, iCare, and ORA: an in vitro model // J Glaucoma. 2013. Vol. 22, No. 7. P. 584–590. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31824cef11

[43] Moon CH, Choi KS, Rhee MR, Lee SJ. Intraoperative assessment of intraocular pressure in vitrectomized air-filled and fluid-filled eyes. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91(7): e524–e528. DOI: 10.1111/aos.12145

[44] Moon C.H., Choi K.S., Rhee M.R., Lee S.J. Intraoperative assessment of intraocular pressure in vitrectomized air-filled and fluid-filled eyes // Acta Ophthalmol. 2013. Vol. 91, No. 7. P. e524–e528. DOI: 10.1111/aos.12145

[45] Doering CJ, Feldman E, Bdolah-Abram T, et al. Mathematical discrepancies of the Tono-Pen applanation tonometer. J Glaucoma. 2017;26(2): e30–e36. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000524

[46] Doering C.J., Feldman E., Bdolah-Abram T., et al. Mathematical discrepancies of the Tono-Pen applanation tonometer // J Glaucoma. 2017. Vol. 26, No. 2. P. e30–e36. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000524

[47] Horowitz GS, Byles J, Lee J, D’Este C. Comparison of the Tono-Pen and Goldmann tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in patients with glaucoma. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004;32(6):584–589. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2004.00907.x

[48] Horowitz G.S., Byles J., Lee J., D’Este C. Comparison of the Tono-Pen and Goldmann tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in patients with glaucoma // Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004. Vol. 32, No. 6. P. 584–589. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2004.00907.x

[49] Bhartiya S, Bhargav S, Sethi S, Mohan S. Tonopen: A critical Appraisal. Glaucoma. 2009;14(7):73–76.

[50] Bhartiya S., Bhargav S., Sethi S., Mohan S. Tonopen: A critical Appraisal // Glaucoma. 2009. Vol. 14, No. 7. P. 73–76.

[51] Gloor BRP. Hans Goldmann (1899–1991). Eur J Ophthalmol. 2010;20(1):1–11. DOI: 10.1177/112067211002000101

[52] Gloor B.R.P. Hans Goldmann (1899–1991) // Eur J Ophthalmol. 2010. Vol. 20, No. 1. P. 1–11. DOI: 10.1177/112067211002000101

[53] Kumar N, Jivan S. Goldmann applanation tonometer calibration error checks: current practice in the UK. Eye. 2007;21(6):733–734. DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702316

[54] Kumar N., Jivan S. Goldmann applanation tonometer calibration error checks: current practice in the UK // Eye. 2007. Vol. 21, No. 6. P. 733–734. DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702316

[55] Gazzard G, Jayaram H, Roldan AM, Friedman DS. When gold standards change: time to move on from Goldmann tonometry? Br J Ophthalmol. 2021;105(1):1–2. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-317112

[56] Gazzard G., Jayaram H., Roldan A.M., Friedman D.S. When gold standards change: time to move on from Goldmann tonometry? // Br J Ophthalmol. 2021. Vol. 105, No. 1. P. 1–2. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-317112

[57] Shah MA, Bin Saleem K, Mehmood T. Intraocular pressure measurement: Goldmann applanation tonometer vs non contact airpuff tonometer. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2012;24(3–4):21–24. PMID: 24669600.

[58] Shah M.A., Bin Saleem K., Mehmood T. Intraocular pressure measurement: Goldmann Applanation Tonometer vs non contact airpuff tonometer // J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2012. Vol. 24, No. 3–4. P. 21–24.

[59] Kass MA. Standardizing the measurement of intraocular pressure for clinical research. Guidelines from the Eye Care Technology Forum. Ophthalmology. 1996;103(1):183–185. DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30741-0

[60] Kass M.A. Standardizing the measurement of intraocular pressure for clinical research. Guidelines from the Eye Care Technology Forum // Ophthalmology. 1996. Vol. 103, No. 1. P. 183–185. DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30741-0

[61] Chandra A, Barsam A, Hammond CJ. Tonometer prism sterilisation: a local and UK national survey. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2008;31(1):13–16. DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2007.07.004

[62] Chandra A., Barsam A., Hammond C.J. Tonometer prism sterilisation: a local and UK national survey // Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2008. Vol. 31, No. 1. P. 13–16. DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2007.07.004

[63] Ragan A, Cote SL, Huang JT. Disinfection of the Goldman applanation tonometer: a systematic review. Can J Ophthalmol. 2018;53(3):252–259. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2017.09.013

[64] Ragan A., Cote S.L., Huang J.T. Disinfection of the Goldman applanation tonometer: a systematic review // Can J Ophthalmol. 2018. Vol. 53, No. 3. P. 252–259. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2017.09.013

[65] Sandhu SS, Chattopadhyay S, Birch MK, Ray-Chaudhuri N. Frequency of Goldmann applanation tonometer calibration error checks. J Glaucoma. 2005;14(3):215–218. DOI: 10.1097/00061198-200506000-00009

[66] Sandhu S.S., Chattopadhyay S., Birch M.K., Ray-Chaudhuri N. Frequency of Goldmann applanation tonometer calibration error checks // J Glaucoma. 2005. Vol. 14, No. 3. P. 215–218. DOI: 10.1097/00061198-200506000-00009

[67] Choudhari NS, Moorthy PK, Tungikar VB, et al. Rectifying calibration error of Goldmann applanation tonometer is easy! Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014;62(11):1082–1085. DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.146761

[68] Choudhari N.S., Moorthy P.K., Tungikar V.B., et al. Rectifying calibration error of Goldmann applanation tonometer is easy! // Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014. Vol. 62, No. 11. P. 1082–1085. DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.146761

[69] Rüfer F. Sources of error in Goldmann applanation tonometry. Ophthalmologe. 2011;108(6):546–552. (In German) DOI: 10.1007/s00347-011-2370-5

[70] Rüfer F. Fehlerquellen bei der Goldmann-Applanationstonometrie // Ophthalmologe. 2011. Vol. 108, No. 6. P. 546–552. DOI: 10.1007/s00347-011-2370-5

[71] Jethani J, Dave P, Jethani M, et al. The applicability of correction factor for corneal thickness on non-contact tonometer measured intraocular pressure in LASIK treated eyes. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2016;30(1):25–28. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2015.11.001

[72] Jethani J., Dave P., Jethani M., et al. The applicability of correction factor for corneal thickness on non-contact tonometer measured intraocular pressure in LASIK treated eyes // Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2016. Vol. 30, No. 1. P. 25–28. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2015.11.001

[73] Kiddee W, Tanjana A. Variations of intraocular pressure measured by Goldmann applanation tonometer, Tono-Pen, iCare Rebound tonometer, and Pascal dynamic contour tonometer in patients with corneal edema after phacoemulsification. J Glaucoma. 2021;30(4):317–324. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001725

[74] Kiddee W., Tanjana A. Variations of intraocular pressure measured by Goldmann applanation tonometer, Tono-Pen, iCare rebound tonometer, and Pascal dynamic contour tonometer in patients with corneal edema after phacoemulsification // J Glaucoma. 2021. Vol. 30, No. 4. P. 317–324. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001725

[75] Blodi CF. Edward S Perkins, MD, PhD (1919–2015): In the vanguard of ophthalmic physician-scientists. J Med Biogr. 2021;6:9677720211030267. DOI: 10.1177/09677720211030267

[76] Blodi C.F. Edward S Perkins, MD, PhD (1919–2015): In the vanguard of ophthalmic physician-scientists // J Med Biogr. 2021. Vol. 6. ID9677720211030267. DOI: 10.1177/09677720211030267

[77] Aziz K, Friedman DS. Tonometers-which one should I use? Eye. 2018;32(5):931–937. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-018-0040-4

[78] Aziz K., Friedman D.S. Tonometers-which one should I use? // Eye. 2018. Vol. 32, No. 5. P. 931–937. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-018-0040-4

[79] Ohanesian R.V., Shahsuvaryan M.L. Eye Diseases. 2005. Vol. 16. P. 16.

[80] Gupta N, Aun T, Kongdon N, et al. Rukovodstvo po lecheniyu glaukomy Mezhdunarodnogo soveta po oftal’mologii. 2016. 29 p. (In Russ.)

[81] Гупта Н., Аун Т., Конгдон Н., и др. Руководство по лечению глаукомы Международного совета по офтальмологии. 2016. 29 с.

[82] Vurdaft AE. On the precision of polyak measuring scales in Maklakov tonometry. National Journal glaucoma. 2017;16(4):11–22. (In Russ.)

[83] Вурдафт А.Е. О точности измерительных линеек // Национальный журнал глаукома. 2017. Т. 16, № 4. С. 11–22.

[84] Astakhov YS, Akopov EL, Potyomkin VV. Аpplanation and dynamic contour tonometry: a comparative analysis. Ophthalmology Journal. 2008;1(1):4–10. (In Russ.)

[85] Астахов Ю.С., Акопов Е.Л., Потемкин В.В. Аппланационная и динамическая контурная тонометрия: сравнительный анализ // Офтальмологические ведомости. 2008. Т. 1, № 1. С. 4–10.

[86] Bauer SM, Venatovskaya LA, Avershina LA, Pikusova SM. Elastotonometry for evaluation of biomechanical characteristics of the eye after surgical hyperopia correction. The Russian annals of ophthalmology. 2020;136(5):32–38. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17116/oftalma202013605132

[87] Бауэр С.М., Венатовская Л.А., Авершина Л.А., Пикусова С.М. Оценка биомеханических характеристик на основе эластотонометрии после операций по коррекции гиперметропии // Вестник офтальмологии. 2020. Т. 136, № 5. С. 32–38. DOI: 10.17116/oftalma202013605132

[88] Dorofeev DA, Pozdeeva OG, Ekgardt VF, et al. Ophthalmotonometric indicators measured by Maklakov applanation tonometer and rebound tonometer. Reflection. 2018;(2):27–32. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.25276/2686-6986-2018-2-27-32

[89] Дорофеев Д.А., Поздеева О.Г., Экгардт В.Ф., и др. Результаты тонометрии аппланационной по Маклакову и точечной контактной прибором Icare в сравнительном аспекте // Отражение. 2018. № 2. С. 27–32. DOI: 10.25276/2686-6986-2018-2-27-32

[90] Rozhko YuI. Glaznoe davlenie: tonometricheskie i tonograficheskie metody issledovaniya. Uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie po oftal’mologii dlya studentov 4–6 kursov vsekh fakul’tetov, klinicheskikh ordinatorov i aspirantov meditsinskikh vuzov. Gomel: GomGMU, 2013. 36 p. (In Russ.)

[91] Рожко Ю.И. Глазное давление: тонометрические и тонографические методы исследования. Учебно-методическое пособие по офтальмологии для студентов 4–6 курсов всех факультетов, клинических ординаторов и аспирантов медицинских вузов. Гомель: ГомГМУ, 2013. 36 с.

[92] Moiseeva IN, Stein AA. The effect of spatial inhomogeneity of the cornea on the deformation properties of the eyeball and the results of Maklakoff applanation tonometry. Biophysics. 2017;62:984–993. DOI: 10.1134/S0006350917060173

[93] Moiseeva I.N., Stein A.A. The effect of spatial inhomogeneity of the cornea on the deformation properties of the eyeball and the results of Maklakoff applanation tonometry // Biophysics. 2017. Vol. 62. P. 984–993. DOI: 10.1134/S0006350917060173

[94] Astakhov YuS, Akopov YeL, Potemkin VV. Comparative characteristics of current tonometric methods. The Russian annals of ophthalmology. 2008;124(5):11–14. (In Russ.)

[95] Астахов Ю.С., Акопов Е.Л., Потемкин В.В. Сравнительная характеристика современных методов тонометрии // Вестник офтальмологии. 2008. Т. 124, № 5. С. 11–14.

[96] West CE, Capella JA, Kaufman HE. Measurement of intraocular pressure with a pneumatic applanation tonometer. Am J Ophthalmol. 1972;74(3):505–509. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9394(72)90917-8

[97] West C.E., Capella J.A., Kaufman H.E. Measurement of intraocular pressure with a pneumatic applanation tonometer // Am J Ophthalmol. 1972. Vol. 74, No. 3. P. 505–509. DOI: 10.1016/0002–9394(72)90917–8

[98] Zadok D, Tran DB, Twa M, et al. Pneumotonometry versus Goldmann tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25(10):1344–1348. DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(99)00202-3

[99] Zadok D., Tran D.B., Twa M., et al. Pneumotonometry versus Goldmann tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia // J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999. Vol. 25, No. 10. P. 1344–1348. DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(99)00202-3

[100] Abbasoglu OE, Bowman RW, Cavanagh HD, McCulley JP. Reliability of intraocular pressure measurements after myopic excimer photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmology. 1998;105(12): 2193–2196. DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)91215-5

[101] Abbasoglu O.E., Bowman R.W., Cavanagh H.D., McCulley J.P. Reliability of intraocular pressure measurements after myopic excimer photorefractive keratectomy // Ophthalmology. 1998. Vol. 105, No. 12. P. 2193–2196. DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)91215-5

[102] Silver DM, Farrell RA. Validity of pulsatile ocular blood flow measurements. Surv Ophthalmol. 1994;38(Suppl):S72–S80. DOI: 10.1016/0039-6257(94)90049-3

[103] Silver D.M., Farrell R.A. Validity of pulsatile ocular blood flow measurements // Surv Ophthalmol. 1994. Vol. 38, Suppl. S72–S80. DOI: 10.1016/0039-6257(94)90049-3

[104] Esgin H, Alimgil ML, Erda S. Clinical comparison of the ocular blood flow tonograph and the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Eur J Ophthalmol. 1998;8(3):162–166. DOI: 10.1177/112067219800800308

[105] Esgin H., Alimgil M.L., Erda S. Clinical comparison of the ocular blood flow tonograph and the Goldmann applanation tonometer // Eur J Ophthalmol. 1998. Vol. 8, No. 3. P. 162–166. DOI: 10.1177/112067219800800308

[106] Spraul CW, Lang GE, Ronzani M, et al. Reproducibility of measurements with a new slit lamp-mounted ocular blood flow tonograph. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1998;236(4):274–279. DOI: 10.1007/s004170050077

[107] Spraul C.W., Lang G.E., Ronzani M., et al. Reproducibility of measurements with a new slit lamp-mounted ocular blood flow tonograph // Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1998. Vol. 236, No. 4. P. 274–279. DOI: 10.1007/s004170050077

[108] Eklund A, Hallberg P, Lindén C, Lindahl OA. An applanation resonator sensor for measuring intraocular pressure using combined continuous force and area measurement. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44(7):3017–3024. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.02-1116

[109] Eklund A., Hallberg P., Lindén C., Lindahl O.A. An applanation resonator sensor for measuring intraocular pressure using combined continuous force and area measurement // Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003. Vol. 44, No. 7. P. 3017–3024. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.02-1116

[110] Jóhannesson G, Hallberg P, Eklund A, Lindén C. Introduction and clinical evaluation of servo-controlled applanation resonance tonometry. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012;90(7):677–682. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.02111.x

[111] Jóhannesson G., Hallberg P., Eklund A., Lindén C. Introduction and clinical evaluation of servo-controlled applanation resonance tonometry // Acta Ophthalmol. 2012. Vol. 90, No. 7. P. 677–682. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.02111.x

[112] Hallberg P, Eklund A, Bäcklund T, Lindén C. Clinical evaluation of applanation resonance tonometry: a comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma. 2007;16(1):88–93. DOI: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000243468.28590.8e

[113] Hallberg P., Eklund A., Bäcklund T., Lindén C. Clinical evaluation of applanation resonance tonometry: a comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometry // J Glaucoma. 2007. Vol. 16, No. 1. P. 88–93. DOI: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000243468.28590.8e

[114] Ottobelli L, Fogagnolo P, Frezzotti P, et al. Repeatability and reproducibility of applanation resonance tonometry: a cross-sectional study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2015;15:36. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-015-0028-9

[115] Ottobelli L., Fogagnolo P., Frezzotti P., et al. Repeatability and reproducibility of applanation resonance tonometry: a cross-sectional study // BMC Ophthalmol. 2015. Vol. 15. ID 36. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-015-0028-9

[116] Grolman B. A new tonometer system. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom. 1972;49(8):646–660. DOI: 10.1097/00006324-197208000-00005

[117] Grolman B. A new tonometer system // Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom. 1972. Vol. 49, No. 8. P. 646–660. DOI: 10.1097/00006324-197208000-00005

[118] Ing E, Zhang A, Michaelov E, Wang W. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and non-contact tonometry in older patients presenting with headache or vision loss. Open Ophthalmol J. 2018;12:104–109. DOI: 10.2174/1874364101812010104

[119] Ing E., Zhang A., Michaelov E., Wang W. Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Non-contact Tonometry in Older Patients Presenting with Headache or Vision Loss // Open Ophthalmol J. 2018. Vol. 12. P. 104–109. DOI: 10.2174/1874364101812010104

[120] Vernon SA. Non-contact tonometry in the postoperative eye. Br J Ophthalmol. 1989;73(4):247–249. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.73.4.247

[121] Vernon S.A. Non-contact tonometry in the postoperative eye // Br J Ophthalmol. 1989. Vol. 73, No. 4. P. 247–249. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.73.4.247

[122] Moseley MJ. Non-contact tonometry. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1995;15(S2): S35–S37. DOI: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.1995.0150s2S35.x

[123] Moseley M.J. Non-contact tonometry // Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1995. Vol. 15, No. S2. P. S35–S37. DOI: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.1995.0150s2S35.x

[124] Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(1):156–162. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.044

[125] Luce D.A. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer // J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005. Vol. 31, No. 1. P. 156–162. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.044

[126] Kynigopoulos M, Schlote T, Kotecha A, et al. Repeatability of intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical properties measurements by the ocular response analyser. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2008;225(5):357–360. DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1027256

[127] Kynigopoulos M., Schlote T., Kotecha A., et al. Repeatability of intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical properties measurements by the ocular response analyser // Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2008. Vol. 225, No. 5. P. 357–360. DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1027256

[128] Bao F, Huang W, Zhu R, et al. Effectiveness of the Goldmann applanation tonometer, the dynamic contour tonometer, the ocular response analyzer and the Corvis ST in measuring intraocular pressure following FS-LASIK. Curr Eye Res. 2020;45(2):144–152. DOI: 10.1080/02713683.2019.1660794

[129] Bao F., Huang W., Zhu R., et al. Effectiveness of the Goldmann applanation tonometer, the dynamic contour tonometer, the ocular response analyzer and the Corvis ST in measuring intraocular pressure following FS-LASIK // Curr Eye Res. 2020. Vol. 45, No. 2. P. 144–152. DOI: 10.1080/02713683.2019.1660794

[130] Atkinson PL, Wishart PK, James JN, et al. Deterioration in the accuracy of the pulsair non-contact tonometer with use: need for regular calibration. Eye. 1992;6(Pt 5):530–534. DOI: 10.1038/eye.1992.112

[131] Atkinson P.L., Wishart P.K., James J.N., et al. Deterioration in the accuracy of the Pulsair non-contact tonometer with use: need for regular calibration // Eye. 1992. Vol. 6, Pt 5. P. 530–534. DOI: 10.1038/eye.1992.112

[132] Britt JM, Clifton BC, Barnebey HS, Mills RP. Microaerosol formation in noncontact ‘air-puff’ tonometry. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109(2):225–228. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1991.01080020071046

[133] Britt J.M., Clifton B.C., Barnebey H.S., Mills R.P. Microaerosol formation in noncontact ‘air-puff’ tonometry // Arch Ophthalmol. 1991. Vol. 109, No. 2. P. 225–228. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1991.01080020071046

[134] Almazyad EM, Ameen S, Khan MA, Malik R. Guidelines and recommendations for tonometry use during the COVID-19 Era. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2020;27(2):73–78. DOI: 10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_237_20

[135] Almazyad E.M., Ameen S., Khan M.A., Malik R. Guidelines and recommendations for tonometry use during the COVID-19 Era // Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2020. Vol. 27, No. 2. P. 73–78. DOI: 10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_237_20

[136] Stock RA, Ströher C, Sampaio RR, et al. A Comparative study between the Goldmann applanation tonometer and the non-contact air-puff tonometer (Huvitz HNT 7000) in normal eyes. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:445–451. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S294710

[137] Stock R.A., Ströher C., Sampaio R.R., et al. A Comparative study between the Goldmann applanation tonometer and the non-contact air-puff tonometer (Huvitz HNT 7000) in normal eyes // Clin Ophthalmol. 2021. Vol. 15. P. 445–451. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S294710

[138] Demirci G, Erdur SK, Tanriverdi C, et al. Comparison of rebound tonometry and non-contact airpuff tonometry to Goldmann applanation tonometry. Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2019;11:2515841419835731. DOI: 10.1177/2515841419835731

[139] Demirci G., Erdur S.K., Tanriverdi C., et al. Comparison of rebound tonometry and non-contact airpuff tonometry to Goldmann applanation tonometry // Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2019. Vol. 11. ID 2515841419835731. DOI: 10.1177/2515841419835731

[140] Kyei S, Assiamah F, Kwarteng MA, Gboglu CP. The association of central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure measures by non-con tact tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry among glaucoma patients. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2020;30(6):999–1004. DOI: 10.4314/ejhs.v30i6.18

[141] Kyei S., Assiamah F., Kwarteng M.A., Gboglu C.P. The association of central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure measures by non-con tact tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry among glaucoma patients // Ethiop J Health Sci. 2020. Vol. 30, No. 6. P. 999–1004. DOI: 10.4314/ejhs.v30i6.18

[142] Salouti R, Alishiri AA, Gharebaghi R, et al. Comparison among Ocular Response Analyzer, Corvis ST and Goldmann applanation tonometry in healthy children. Int J Ophthalmol. 2018;11(8):1330–1336. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2018.08.13

[143] Salouti R., Alishiri A.A., Gharebaghi R., et al. Comparison among Ocular Response Analyzer, Corvis ST and Goldmann applanation tonometry in healthy children // Int J Ophthalmol. 2018. Vol. 11, No. 8. P. 1330–1336. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2018.08.13

[144] Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA. Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44(9):3790–3794. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.02-0946

[145] Kaufmann C., Bachmann L.M., Thiel M.A. Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis // Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003. Vol. 44, No. 9. P. 3790–3794. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.02-0946

[146] Kniestedt C, Kanngiesser HE. Dynamische Konturtonometrie. Ophthalmologe. 2006;103(8):713–721. DOI: 10.1007/s00347-006-1387-7

[147] Kniestedt C., Kanngiesser H.E. Dynamische Konturtonometrie // Ophthalmologe. 2006. Vol. 103, No. 8. P. 713–721. DOI: 10.1007/s00347-006-1387-7

[148] Punjabi OS, Kniestedt C, Stamper RL, Lin SC. Dynamic contour tonometry: principle and use. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;34(9): 837–840. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2006.01389.x

[149] Punjabi O.S., Kniestedt C., Stamper R.L., Lin S.C. Dynamic contour tonometry: principle and use // Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006. Vol. 34, No. 9. P. 837–840. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2006.01389.x

[150] Kamppeter BA, Jonas JB. Dynamic contour tonometry for intraocular pressure measurement. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140(2): 318–320. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.01.039

[151] Kamppeter B.A., Jonas J.B. Dynamic contour tonometry for intraocular pressure measurement // Am J Ophthalmol. 2005. Vol. 140, No. 2. P. 318–320. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.01.039

[152] Duba I, Wirthlin AC. Dynamic contour tonometry for post-LASIK intraocular pressure measurements. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2004;221(5):347–350. DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-812895

[153] Duba I., Wirthlin A.C. Dynamic contour tonometry for post-LASIK intraocular pressure measurements // Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2004. Vol. 221, No. 5. P. 347–350. DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-812895

[154] Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45(9):3118–3121. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.04-0018

[155] Kaufmann C., Bachmann L.M., Thiel M.A. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry // Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004. Vol. 45, No. 9. P. 3118–3121. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.04-0018

[156] Lam AK, Tse JS. Dynamic contour tonometry over silicone hydrogel contact lens. J Optom. 2014;7(2):91–99. DOI: 10.1016/j.optom.2013.07.005

[157] Lam A.K., Tse J.S. Dynamic contour tonometry over silicone hydrogel contact lens // J Optom. 2014. Vol. 7, No. 2. P. 91–99. DOI: 10.1016/j.optom.2013.07.005

[158] Kanngiesser HE, Nee M, Kniestedt C, et al. Simulation of dynamic contour tonometry compared to in vitro study revealing minimal influence of corneal radius and astigmatism. The theoretical foundations of dynamic contour tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:2641.

[159] Kanngiesser H.E., Nee M., Kniestedt C., et al. Simulation of dynamic contour tonometry compared to in vitro study revealing minimal influence of corneal radius and astigmatism. The theoretical foundations of dynamic contour tonometry // Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003. Vol. 44. ID 2641.

[160] Kniestedt C, Nee M, Stamper RL. Accuracy of dynamic contour tonometry compared with applanation tonometry in human cadaver eyes of different hydration states. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;243(4):359–366. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-004-1024-6

[161] Kniestedt C., Nee M., Stamper R.L. Accuracy of dynamic contour tonometry compared with applanation tonometry in human cadaver eyes of different hydration states // Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005. Vol. 243, No. 4. P. 359–366. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-004-1024-6

[162] Bäurle S, Viestenz A, Seitz B, Viestenz A. Intraocular pressure elevation after vitrectomy-Goldmann applanation tonometry measures lower intraocular pressure than dynamic contour tonometry. Ophthalmologe. 2022;119(S1):71–76. (In German) DOI: 10.1007/s00347-021-01443-z

[163] Bäurle S., Viestenz A., Seitz B., Viestenz A. Intraokularer Druckanstieg nach Vitrektomie — Applanationstonometrie nach Goldmann misst niedriger als dynamische Konturtonometrie // Ophthalmologe. 2022. Vol. 119, No. S1. P. 71–76. DOI: 10.1007/s00347-021-01443-z

[164] Bochmann F, Kaufmann C, Thiel MA. Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: challenging the gold standard. Expert Rev Ophthalmol. 2010;5(6):743–749. DOI: 10.1586/eop.10.68

[165] Bochmann F., Kaufmann C., Thiel M.A. Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: challenging the gold standard // Expert Rev Ophthalmol. 2010. Vol. 5, No. 6. P. 743–749. DOI: 10.1586/eop.10.68

[166] Twa MD, Roberts CJ, Karol HJ, et al. Evaluation of a contact lens-embedded sensor for intraocular pressure measurement. J Glaucoma. 2010;19(6):382–390. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181c4ac3d

[167] Twa M.D., Roberts C.J., Karol H.J., et al. Evaluation of a contact lens-embedded sensor for intraocular pressure measurement // J Glaucoma. 2010. Vol. 19, No. 6. P. 382–390. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181c4ac3d

[168] Mansouri K, Shaarawy T. Continuous intraocular pressure monitoring with a wireless ocular telemetry sensor: initial clinical experience in patients with open angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95(5):627–629. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2010.192922

[169] Mansouri K., Shaarawy T. Continuous intraocular pressure monitoring with a wireless ocular telemetry sensor: initial clinical experience in patients with open angle glaucoma // Br J Ophthalmol. 2011. Vol. 95, No. 5. P. 627–629. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2010.192922

[170] Mansouri K, Weinreb RN, Liu JH. Efficacy of a contact lens sensor for monitoring 24-h intraocular pressure related patterns. PLoS One. 2015;10(5): e0125530. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125530

[171] Mansouri K., Weinreb R.N., Liu J.H. Efficacy of a contact lens sensor for monitoring 24-h intraocular pressure related patterns // PLoS One. 2015. Vol. 10, No. 5. ID e0125530. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125530

[172] Kim YW, Kim JS, Lee SY, et al. Twenty-four-hour intraocular pressure-related patterns from contact lens sensors in normal-tension glaucoma and healthy eyes: the exploring nyctohemeral intraocular pressure related pattern for glaucoma management (ENIGMA) study. Ophthalmology. 2020;127(11):1487–1497. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.05.010

[173] Kim Y.W., Kim J.S., Lee S.Y., et al. Twenty-four-hour intraocular pressure-related patterns from contact lens sensors in normal-tension glaucoma and healthy eyes: the exploring nyctohemeral intraocular pressure related pattern for glaucoma management (ENIGMA) study // Ophthalmology. 2020. Vol. 127, No. 11. P. 1487–1497. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.05.010

[174] Mansouri K. The road ahead to continuous 24-hour intraocular pressure monitoring in glaucoma. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2014;9(2):260–268.

[175] Mansouri K. The road ahead to continuous 24-hour intraocular pressure monitoring in glaucoma // J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2014. Vol. 9, No. 2. P. 260–268.

[176] Lorenz K, Korb C, Herzog N, et al. Tolerability of 24-hour intraocular pressure monitoring of a pressure-sensitive contact lens. J Glaucoma. 2013;22(4):311–316. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318241b874

[177] Lorenz K., Korb C., Herzog N., et al. Tolerability of 24-hour intraocular pressure monitoring of a pressure-sensitive contact lens // J Glaucoma. 2013. Vol. 22, No. 4. P. 311–316. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318241b874

[178] Holló G, Kóthy P, Vargha P. Evaluation of continuous 24-hour intraocular pressure monitoring for assessment of prostaglandin-induced pressure reduction in glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2014;23(1): e6–e12. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31829e5635

[179] Holló G., Kóthy P., Vargha P. Evaluation of continuous 24-hour intraocular pressure monitoring for assessment of prostaglandin-induced pressure reduction in glaucoma // J Glaucoma. 2014. Vol. 23, No. 1. P. e6–e12. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31829e5635

[180] Mottet B, Aptel F, Romanet JP, et al. 24-hour intraocular pressure rhythm in young healthy subjects evaluated with continuous monitoring using a contact lens sensor. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131(12):1507–1516. DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.5297

[181] Mottet B., Aptel F., Romanet J.P., et al. 24-hour intraocular pressure rhythm in young healthy subjects evaluated with continuous monitoring using a contact lens sensor // JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013. Vol. 131, No. 12. P. 1507–1516. DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.5297

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Samoylov A.N., Samoylova P.A., Ahmetov N.R., Usov V.A., Gainutdinova R.F., Zakirova G.Z.