Medical and psychological support of women with stillbirth in the perinatal period: a national study

Abstract

In the Russian Federation, the stillbirth rate in 2018 was 5.51 per 1000 live and dead births, which is almost twice the figure in the United States and Europe. This study aimed to conduct a rating analysis separately for each factor that influences the selection of techniques for the management of labor and the postpartum period in women with stillbirth.

Material and methods. A questionnaire was developed, which consisted 23 questions in Russian. A total of 402 Russian-speaking medical workers took part in the survey.

Results. In this study, 49.7% of the respondents seldom encounter patients with stillbirth. Moreover, 59.5% of the respondents find it easy to create a supportive communication with these patients, 70% believed that contact between the mother and her stillborn child has a negative influence on her psychoemotional state both at the time of delivery and in the long term, and only 27.7% found that mothers wanted to spend time with the child. As the optimal method of analgesia, 57.2% of the respondents chose epidural analgesia for stillbirth delivery. Furthermore, 57.7% believed that patients with stillbirth were satisfied with the quality of medical care, and 74.1% gave a positive assessment of the quality of medical care provided to patients with stillbirth in their medical institutions. Moreover, medical professionals (89.3%) consider it necessary to develop clinical recommendations on this problem.

Conclusions. The results indicate that a unified technique of managing the peripartum period with stillbirth is still not established. Clinical guidelines on this problem are necessary.

Keywords

stillbirth / labor pain relief / sedation / ethical aspects

References

[1] Ageeva LI, Aleksandrova GA, Zaychenko NM, Kirillova GN, Leonov SA, Ogryzko EV, Titova IA, et al. Healthcare indicators in Russia. 2019. Statistical collection. Federal’naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoy statistiki. Moscow; 2019:170. (In Russ).

[2] Агеева Л.И., Александрова Г.А., Зайченко Н.М., Кириллова Г.Н., Леонов С.А., Огрызко Е.В., Титова И.А., и др. Здравоохранение в России. 2019. Статистический сборник. М., 2019. 170.

[3] Spiridonov VA, Latfullina RR. Medical and legal aspects of assessing the provision of medical care in cases of fetal death. Meditsinskoe pravo: teoriya i praktika. 2018;4(2):74–80. (In Russ).

[4] Спиридонов В.А., Латфуллина Р.Р. Медицинские и юридические аспекты оценки оказания медицинской помощи в случаях смерти плода // Медицинское право: теория и практика. 2018. Т. 4. № 2. С. 74–80.

[5] Reinebrant HE, Leisher SH, Coory M, Henry S, Wojcieszek AM, Gardener G, Flenady V. Making stillbirths visible: a systematic review of globally reported causes of stillbirth. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2017;125(2):212–224. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14984.

[6] Reinebrant H.E., Leisher, S.H., Coory M., Henry S., Wojcieszek, A.M., Gardener, G., Flenady V. Making stillbirths visible: a systematic review of globally reported causes of stillbirth // BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2017. Vol. 125. N 2. P. 212–224. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14984.

[7] Monostori D, Dombi E, Zelena A. Wrong communication panels for perinatal loss. Orvosi hetilap. 2018;159(25):1033–1036. DOI: 10.1556/650.2018.31006.

[8] Monostori D., Dombi E., Zelena A. Wrong communication panels for perinatal loss // Orvosi hetilap. 2018. Vol. 159. N 25. P. 1033–1036. DOI: 10.1556/650.2018.31006.

[9] Ananthram H, Apostoloff A, Becker J, Bolton E, Booker C, Bousfield A, et al. Stillbirth care. Queensland Clinical Guidelines. 2019;34.

[10] Ananthram H., Apostoloff A., Becker J., Bolton E., Booker C., Bousfield A., et al. Stillbirth care // Queensland Clinical Guidelines. 2019. 34.

[11] Bennett SM, Litz BT, Maguen S, Ehrenreich JT. An Exploratory Study of the Psychological Impact and Clinical Care of Perinatal Loss. Journal of Loss and Trauma. 2008;13(6):485–510. DOI: 10.1080/15325020802171268.

[12] Bennett S.M., Litz B.T., Maguen S., Ehrenreich J.T. An Exploratory Study of the Psychological Impact and Clinical Care of Perinatal Loss // Journal of Loss and Trauma. 2008. Vol. 13. N 6. P. 485–510. DOI: 10.1080/15325020802171268.

[13] DiMiceli-Zsigmond M, Williams AK, Richardson MG. Expecting the Unexpected. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2015;121(2): 457–464. DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000000785.

[14] DiMiceli-Zsigmond M., Williams A.K., Richardson M.G. Expecting the Unexpected // Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2015. Vol. 121. N 2. P. 457–464. DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000000785.

[15] Christiansen DM. Posttraumatic stress disorder in parents following infant death: A systematic review. Clinical Psychology Review. 2017;51:60–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.10.007.

[16] Christiansen D. M. Posttraumatic stress disorder in parents following infant death: A systematic review // Clinical Psychology Review. 2017. Vol. 51. P. 60–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.10.007.

[17] Gravensteen I, Helgadottir L, Jacobsen E, Radestad I, Sandset P, Ekeberg O. Women’s experiences in relation to stillbirth and risk factors for long-term post-traumatic stress symptoms: a retrospective study. BMJ Open. 2013;3(10). DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003323.

[18] Gravensteen I., Helgadottir L., Jacobsen E., Radestad I., Sandset P., Ekeberg O. Women’s experiences in relation to stillbirth and risk factors for long-term post-traumatic stress symptoms: a retrospective study // BMJ Open. 2013. Vol. 3. N 10. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003323.

[19] Ryninks K, Roberts-Collins C, McKenzie-McHarg K, Horsch A. Mothers’ experience of their contact with their stillborn infant: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2014;14(1). DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-203.

[20] Ryninks K., Roberts-Collins C., McKenzie-McHarg K., Horsch A. Mothers’ experience of their contact with their stillborn infant: An interpretative phenomenological analysis // BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2014. Vol. 14. N 1. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-203.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Eco-Vector