Double-space combined spinal-epidural technique for elective caesarean section: a review of 10 years’ experience in a UK teaching maternity unit

J. Sadashiviaih , R. Wilson , H. McLure , G. Lyons

Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management ›› 2011, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) : 17 -24.

PDF
Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management ›› 2011, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) : 17 -24. DOI: 10.17816/RA36083
Articles
research-article

Double-space combined spinal-epidural technique for elective caesarean section: a review of 10 years’ experience in a UK teaching maternity unit

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

It is known, that the use of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) in obstetrics is associated with less analgesia failures and conversion to general anesthesia (GA), as compared with spinal anesthesia (SA) or epidural anesthesia (EA). It is also known, that double-space combined spinal-epidural technique is associated with less failures than “needle through needle” technique. However data about the influence of these techniques on changes in anesthesia plans to the general anaesthesia has not been earlier presented. Authors presented a review of their 10-year practical experience of the double-space CSEA use for elective cesarean section. Results of this retrospective study showed, that use of the double-space CSEA is associated with less conversion to GA, as compared with “needle through needle” CSEA.

Keywords

combined spinal-epidural anesthesia / spinal anesthesia / general anesthesia / accident puncture of dura mater / post puncture headache / epidural blood patch

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
J. Sadashiviaih, R. Wilson, H. McLure, G. Lyons. Double-space combined spinal-epidural technique for elective caesarean section: a review of 10 years’ experience in a UK teaching maternity unit. Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management, 2011, 5(1): 17-24 DOI:10.17816/RA36083

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Akerman N., Saxena S., Wilson R., Columb M., Lyons G. Effect of intrathecal diamorphine on block height during spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section with bupivacaine // Br. J. Anaesth. 2005; 94: 843-847.

[2]

Backe S. K., Shiekh Z., Wilson R., Lyons G. R. Combined spinal/epidural anaesthesia: needle-through-needle or separate spaces? // Eur. J. Anaesthesial. 2004; 21: 854-857.

[3]

Chan T. M. L., Ahmed E., Yentis S. M., Holdcroft A. Post partum headaches: summary report of the National Obstetric Anaesthetic Database 1999 // Int. J. Obstet. Anesth. 2003; 12: 107-112.

[4]

Choi P T., Galinski S. E., Takeuchi L., Lucas S., Tamayo C., Jadad A. R. PDPH is a common complication of neuraxial blockade in parturients: a metaanalysis of obstetrical studies // Can. J. Anesth. 2003; 50: 460-469.

[5]

Dar A. Q., Robinson A. P., Lyons G. Postpartum neurological symptoms following regional blockade: a prospective study with case controls // Int. J. Obstet. Anesth. 2002; 11: 85-90.

[6]

Dennehy К. С., Rosaeg O. P Intrathecal catheter insertion during labour reduces the risk of post dural puncture headache // Can. J. Anesth. 1998; 45: 42-45.

[7]

Garry M., Davies S. Failure of regional blockade for caesarean section // Int. J. Obstet. Anesth. 2002; 11: 9-12.

[8]

Jenkins J. G., Khan M. M. Anaesthesia for Caesarean section: a survey in a UK region from 1992 to 2002 // Anaesthesia. 2003; 58: 1114-1118.

[9]

Kinsella S. M. A prospective audit of regional anaesthesia failure in 5080 Caesarean sections // Anaesthesia. 2008; 63: 822-832.

[10]

Lyons G., Macdonald R. Mikl B. Combined epidural-spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section. Through the needle or in separate spaces? // Anaesthesia. 1992; 47: 199-201.

[11]

Norris M. C., Leighton B. L. Continuous spinal anesthesia after unintentional dural puncture in parturients // Reg. Anesth. 1990; 15: 285-287.

[12]

Paech M., Godkin R., Webster S. Complications of epidural analgesia and anaesthesia: a prospective analysis of 10995 cases // Int. J. Obstet. Anesth. 1998; 7: 5-11.

[13]

Pan P. H., Bogard T. D., Owen M. D. Incidence and characteristics of failures in obstetric neuraxial analgesia and anesthesia: a retro spective analysis of 19259 deliveries // Int. J. Obstet. Anesth. 2004; 13: 227-233.

[14]

Ranasinghe J. S., Steadman J., Toyama T. Lai M. Combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia is better than spinal or epidural alone for Caesarean delivery // Br. J. Anuesth. 2003; 91: 299-303.

[15]

Rutter S. V., Shields F., Broadbent C. R., Popat M., Russell R. Management of accidental dural puncture in labour with intra thecal catheters: an analysis of 10 years experience // Int. J. Obstet. Anesth. 2001; 10: 177-181.

[16]

Shibili K. U., Russel I. F. A survey of anaesthetic techniques used for caesarean section in the UK in 1997 // Int. J. Obstet. Anesth. 2000; 9: 160-167.

[17]

Van de Velde M., Schepers R., Berends N., Vandermeersch E., De Buck F. Ten years of experience with accidental dural puncture and post-dural puncture headache in a tertiary obstetric anaesthesia department // Int. J. Obstet. Anesth. 2008; 17: 329-335.

[18]

Viira D. J., Courtman S., Coghill J. Technical difficulties and complication rates of combined spinal epidural anaesthesia for elective and non elective caesarean section // Int. J. Obstet. Anesth. 2008; 17: 86-87.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Eco-Vector

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

158

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/