Effect of labor analgesia on labor outcome
Stephen H. Halpern , Faraj W. Abdallah
Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management ›› 2010, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (4) : 5 -11.
Effect of labor analgesia on labor outcome
| [1] |
Halpern S. H., Carvalho B. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor // Anesth Analg. 2009; 108: 921-928. |
| [2] |
Hinova A., Fernando R. Systemic remifentanil for labor analgesia // Anesth Analg. 2009; 109: 1925-1929. |
| [3] |
Niehaus L. S., Chaska B. W., Nesse R. E. The effects of epidural anesthesia ontype of delivery // J. Am. Board Fam. Pract. 1988; 1: 238-244. |
| [4] |
Lieberman E., Lang J. M., Cohen A. et al. Association of epidural analgesia with cesarean delivery in nulliparas // Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 88: 993-1000. |
| [5] |
Hess P. E., Pratt S. D., Soni A. K. et al. An association between severe labor pain and cesarean delivery // Anesth Analg. 2000; 90: 881-886. |
| [6] |
Leighton B. L., Halpern S. H. Epidural analgesia and the progress of labor. In: Halpern S. H., Douglas M. J., editors. Evidence-based obstetric anesthesia. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing; 2005. pp. 10-22. |
| [7] |
Bofill J. A., Vincent R. D., Ross E. L. et al. Nulliparous active labor, epidural analgesia, and cesarean delivery for dystocia // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1997; 177: 1465-1470. |
| [8] |
Birnbach D. J., Ojea L. S. Combined spinal-epidural (CSE) for labor and delivery // Int. Anesthesiol. Clin. 2002; 40: 27-48. |
| [9] |
Tsen L. C., Thue B., Datta S., Segal S. Is combined spinalepidural analgesia associated with more rapid cervical dilation in nulliparous patients when compared with conventional epidural analgesia? // Anesthesiology. 1999; 91: 920-925. |
| [10] |
Gambling D. R., Sharma S. K., Ramin S. M. et al. A randomized study of combined spinal-epidural analgesia versus intravenous meperidine during labor: impact on cesarean delivery rate //Anesthesiology. 1998; 89: 1336-1344. |
| [11] |
Norris M. C., Fogel S. T., Conway-Long C. Combined spinalepidural versus epidural labor analgesia // Anesthesiology. 2001; 95: 913-920. |
| [12] |
Comparative Obstetric Mobile Epidural Trial (COMET) Study Group UK. Effect of low-dose mobile versus traditional epidural techniques on mode of delivery: a randomised controlled trial // Lancet. 2001; 358: 19-23. |
| [13] |
Comparative Obstetric Mobile Epidural Trial Study Group, UK Randomized controlled trial comparing traditional with two 'mobile' epidural techniques: anesthetic and analgesic efficacy // Anesthesiology. 2002; 97: 1567-1575. |
| [14] |
Simmons S. W., Cyna A. M., Dennis A. T., Hughes D. Combined spinal-epidural versus epidural analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 3: Art. no.: CD003401. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003401.pub2. |
| [15] |
Goetzl L. M. ACOG Committee on Practice B: ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists number 36, July 2002. Obstetric analgesia and anesthesia // Obstet. Gynecol. 2002; 100: 177-191. |
| [16] |
Ohel G., Gonen R., Vaida S. et al. Early versus late initiation of epidural analgesia in labor: does it increase the risk of cesarean section? A randomized trial // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2006; 194: 600-605. |
| [17] |
Wong C. A., Scavone B. M., Peaceman A. M. et al. The risk of cesarean delivery with neuraxial analgesia given early versus late in labor // N. Engl. J. Med. 2005; 352: 655-665. |
| [18] |
Wong C. A., McCarthy R. J., Sullivan J. T. et al. Early compared with late neuraxial analgesia in nulliparous labor induction: a randomized controlled trial // Obstet. Gynecol. 2009; 113: 1066-1074. |
| [19] |
Wang F., Shen X., Guo X. et al. Epidural analgesia in the latent phase of labor and the risk of cesarean delivery: a five-year randomized controlled trial // Anesthesiology. 2009; 111: 871-880 |
Eco-Vector
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
PDF
