Combination of peripheral blocks as a part of enhanced rehabilitation in total knee replacement: a prospective comparative open randomized study

Andrey A. Manevskiy , Sergey V. Sviridov , Tatiana V. Builova , Margarita A. Torpudzhiyan , Natalia U. Borzova , Anton A. Tarbushkin , Anton B. Serebryakov , Samir M. Askerov , Bella M. Dzeytova

Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (3) : 205 -217.

PDF
Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (3) : 205 -217. DOI: 10.17816/RA111184
Original study articles
research-article

Combination of peripheral blocks as a part of enhanced rehabilitation in total knee replacement: a prospective comparative open randomized study

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The patient’s recovery after total knee replacement (TKR) is long and is associated several potentially serious complications. The optimal solution to this problem is the introduction of regional blocks of the lower limb into anesthesiologic practice, which can contribute to enhanced rehabilitation and fewer complications.

AIM: To perform a prospective comparative analysis of the anesthesia outcomes of patients who received a combination of prolonged femoral nerve blockade (CFNB) with catheter insertion and infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (IPACK), with the results in patients receiving prolonged epidural analgesia (PEA) as postoperative analgesia for TKR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty patients were included and distributed according to the required planned surgical intervention (TKR). The duration of the inclusion period was 3 months (from March to May 2022). Patients were observed up to 48 h after surgery, with control points every 8 h. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (PEA, n=40) underwent subarachnoid anesthesia in combination with PEA, and group 2 (n=40) underwent subarachnoid anesthesia as a combination of CFNB and IPACK. To compare the groups, the following main indicators were used: severity of pain syndrome (visual analog scale [VAS], from 0 to 10 cm), muscle strength on the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale, duration of patients’ stay in the intensive care unit, duration of hospitalization, and presence of postoperative complications.

RESULTS: The highest average score for VAS was recorded at 32 h in group 1, and it was 3.6 cm. The lowest average score for VAS (1.1–1.2 cm) was noted in the first 8 h and after 48 h in group 1. In group 2, this value was 0.9–1.5 cm in the first 16 h, and at 48 h, the pain syndrome was more pronounced in group 2, making up 2 cm on VAS. Compared with the PEA group, the CFNB group had statistically higher values of the indicators of the motor strength of the leg muscles on the MRC scale at all stages of the study. The PEA group stayed in the intensive care unit statistically significantly longer than the PBN group: 210 (189–260) and 180 (154–185) min, respectively (p <0.001).

CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that the use of multimodal analgesia as a combination of CFNB and IPACK is a reliable anesthetic support for TKR, with an efficiency not inferior to classical epidural analgesia. The use of this combination of peripheral blockades contributes to the early activation and rehabilitation of patients after TKR.

Keywords

total knee replacement / ultrasound / femoral nerve block / epidural analgesia / pain / multimodal analgesia

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Andrey A. Manevskiy, Sergey V. Sviridov, Tatiana V. Builova, Margarita A. Torpudzhiyan, Natalia U. Borzova, Anton A. Tarbushkin, Anton B. Serebryakov, Samir M. Askerov, Bella M. Dzeytova. Combination of peripheral blocks as a part of enhanced rehabilitation in total knee replacement: a prospective comparative open randomized study. Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management, 2022, 16(3): 205-217 DOI:10.17816/RA111184

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Andreeva TM, Ogryzko EV, Popova MM. Travmatizm, ortopedicheskaya zabolevaemost’, sostoyanie travmatologo-ortopedicheskoi pomoshchi naseleniyu Rossii v 2017. Ezhegodnyi statisticheskii sbornik. Moscow: Teler; 2018. P. 148–149. (In Russ).

[2]

Андреева Т.М., Огрызко Е.В., Попова М.М. Травматизм, ортопедическая заболеваемость, состояние травматолого-ортопедической помощи населению России в 2017. Ежегодный статистический сборник. Москва: Телер, 2018. С. 148–149.

[3]

Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, et al. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(4):780–785. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222

[4]

Kurtz S., Ong K., Lau E., et al. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030 // J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007. Vol. 89, N 4. P. 780–785. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222

[5]

Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78(5):606–617. doi: 10.1093/bja/78.5.606

[6]

Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation // Br J Anaesth. 1997. Vol. 78, N 5. P. 606–617. doi: 10.1093/bja/78.5.606

[7]

Harris JD. Management of expected and unexpected opioid-related side effects. Clin J Pain. 2008;24(Suppl10):S8–S13. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31816b58eb

[8]

Harris J.D. Management of expected and unexpected opioid-related side effects // Clin J Pain. 2008. Vol. 24, Suppl. 10. P. S8–S13. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31816b58eb

[9]

Mörwald EE, Olson A, Cozowicz C, et al. Association of opioid prescription and perioperative complications in obstructive sleep apnea patients undergoing total joint arthroplasties. Sleep Breath. 2018;22(1):115–121. doi: 10.1007/s11325-017-1539-9

[10]

Mörwald E.E., Olson A., Cozowicz C., et al. Association of opioid prescription and perioperative complications in obstructive sleep apnea patients undergoing total joint arthroplasties // Sleep Breath. 2018. Vol. 22, N 1. P. 115–121. doi: 10.1007/s11325-017-1539-9

[11]

De Luca ML, Ciccarello M, Martorana M, et al. Pain monitoring and management in a rehabilitation setting after total joint replacement. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(40):e12484. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012484

[12]

De Luca M.L., Ciccarello M., Martorana M., et al. Pain monitoring and management in a rehabilitation setting after total joint replacement // Medicine (Baltimore). 2018. Vol. 97, N 40. P. e12484. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012484

[13]

Fowler SJ, Symons J, Sabato S, Myles PS. Epidural analgesia compared with peripheral nerve blockade after major knee surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Br J Anaesth. 2008;100(2):154–164. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem373

[14]

Fowler S.J., Symons J., Sabato S., Myles P.S. Epidural analgesia compared with peripheral nerve blockade after major knee surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials // Br J Anaesth. 2008. Vol. 100, N 2. P. 154–164. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem373

[15]

Ovechkin AM, Politov ME, Panov NV, Sokologorsky SV. Anaesthetic care of patients undergoing primary hip and knee arthroplasty: evolution of views. Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management. 2020;14(2):53–62. (In Russ). doi: 10.17816/1993-6508-2020-14-2-53-62

[16]

Овечкин А.М., Политов М.Е., Панов Н.В., Сокологорский С.В. Анестезия при первичном эндопротезировании тазобедренного и коленного суставов: эволюция взглядов // Регионарная анестезия и лечение острой боли. 2020. Т. 14, № 2. С. 53–62. doi: 10.17816/1993-6508-2020-14-2-53-62

[17]

Wainwright TW, Gill M, McDonald DA, et al. Consensus statement for perioperative care in total hip replacement and total knee replacement surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. Acta Orthop. 2020;91(1):3–19. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1683790

[18]

Wainwright T.W., Gill M., McDonald D.A., et al. Consensus statement for perioperative care in total hip replacement and total knee replacement surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations // Acta Orthop. 2020. Vol. 91, N 1. P. 3–19. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1683790

[19]

Memtsoudis SG, Cozowicz C, Bekeris J, et al. Peripheral nerve block anesthesia/analgesia for patients undergoing primary hip and knee arthroplasty: recommendations from the International Consensus on Anesthesia-Related Outcomes after Surgery (ICAROS) group based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of current literature. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021;46(11):971–985. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102750

[20]

Memtsoudis S.G., Cozowicz C., Bekeris J., et al. Peripheral nerve block anesthesia/analgesia for patients undergoing primary hip and knee arthroplasty: recommendations from the International Consensus on Anesthesia-Related Outcomes after Surgery (ICAROS) group based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of current literature // Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021. Vol. 46, N 11. P. 971–985. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102750

[21]

Chan E, Fransen M, Parker D, et al. Femoral nerve blocks for acute postoperative pain after knee replace-ment surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(5):CD009941. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009941.pub2

[22]

Chan E., Fransen M., Parker D., et al. Femoral nerve blocks for acute postoperative pain after knee replace-ment surgery // Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. Vol. 2014, N 5. P. CD009941. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009941.pub2

[23]

Fan X, Cao F, Luo A. Femoral nerve block versus fascia iliaca block for pain control in knee and hip arthroplasties: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100(14):e25450. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025450

[24]

Fan X., Cao F., Luo A. Femoral nerve block versus fascia iliaca block for pain control in knee and hip arthroplasties: A meta-analysis // Medicine (Baltimore). 2021. Vol. 100, N 14. P. e25450. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025450

[25]

Glants S. Mediko-biologicheskaya statistika. Per. s angl. Moscow: Praktika; 1998. (In Russ).

[26]

Гланц С. Медико-биологическая статистика. Пер. с англ. Москва: Практика, 1998.

[27]

Wilmore DW, Kehlet H. Management of patients in fast track surgery. BMJ. 2001;322(7284):473–476. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7284.473

[28]

Wilmore D.W., Kehlet H. Management of patients in fast track surgery // BMJ. 2001. Vol. 322, N 7284. P. 473–476. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7284.473

[29]

Gromov K, Kristensen BB, Jørgensen CC, et al. Fast-track total knee arthroplasty. Ugeskr Laeger. 2017;179(38):V04170300. (In Danish).

[30]

Gromov K., Kristensen B.B., Jørgensen C.C., et al. Fast-track total knee arthroplasty // Ugeskr Laeger. 2017. Vol. 179, N 38. P. V04170300.

[31]

O’Neill A, Lirk P. Multimodal Analgesia. Anesthesiol Clin. 2022;40(3):455–468. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2022.04.002

[32]

O’Neill A., Lirk P. Multimodal Analgesia // Anesthesiol Clin. 2022. Vol. 40, N 3. P. 455–468. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2022.04.002

[33]

Webb CA, Mariano ER. Best multimodal analgesic protocol for total knee arthroplasty. Pain Manag. 2015;5(3):185–196. doi: 10.2217/pmt.15.8

[34]

Webb C.A., Mariano E.R. Best multimodal analgesic protocol for total knee arthroplasty // Pain Manag. 2015. Vol. 5, N 3. P. 185–196. doi: 10.2217/pmt.15.8

[35]

Wang F, Ma W, Huang Z. Analgesia effects of IPACK block added to multimodal analgesia regiments after total knee replacement: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of 5 randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100(22):e25884. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025884

[36]

Wang F., Ma W., Huang Z. Analgesia effects of IPACK block added to multimodal analgesia regiments after total knee replacement: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of 5 randomized controlled trials // Medicine (Baltimore). 2021. Vol. 100, N 22. P. e25884. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025884

[37]

Rawal N. Epidural technique for postoperative pain: gold standard no more? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012;37(3):310–317.

[38]

Rawal N. Epidural technique for postoperative pain: gold standard no more? // Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012. Vol. 37, N 3. P. 310–317.

[39]

Anger M, Valovska T, Beloeil H, et al. PROSPECT Working Group and the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy. PROSPECT guideline for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations. Anaesthesia. 2021;76(8):1082–1097. doi: 10.1111/anae.15498

[40]

Anger M., Valovska T., Beloeil H., et al. PROSPECT Working Group and the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy. PROSPECT guideline for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations // Anaesthesia. 2021. Vol. 76, N 8. P. 1082–1097. doi: 10.1111/anae.15498

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Eco-Vector

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

42

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/