THE DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA FOR HABITUALLY-EXCESSIVE ACCOMMODATION STRAIN BASED ON SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF ACCOMMODATION

E. P Tarutta , N. A Tarasova

Russian Pediatric Ophthalmology ›› 2013, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1) : 34 -38.

PDF
Russian Pediatric Ophthalmology ›› 2013, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1) : 34 -38. DOI: 10.17816/rpoj37565
Articles
research-article

THE DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA FOR HABITUALLY-EXCESSIVE ACCOMMODATION STRAIN BASED ON SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF ACCOMMODATION

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The subjective and objective parameters of habitually-excessive accommodation strain (HEAS) were estimated in 130 patients at the age varying from 6 to 18 (mean 11.26 ± 0.2) years presenting with myopia of different severity. The patients were divided into 3 groups depending on the difference between subjectively assessed refraction (using the corrective glass) and objective cycloplegic refraction. It was shown that the enhancement of the subjective non-cycloplegic refraction compared with the objective cycloplegic one by more than 0.5 dioptres is accompanied by the highest rate of myopia progression, significantly higher values of accommodation strain (resting accommodation strain), habitual accommodation strain, open-field habitual accommodation strain), and accommodation deficiency (the reduction of all subjective and objective characteristics of accommodation performance). The results of the study give reason to consider habitual accommodation strain, i.e. the difference between manifest and cycloplegic refraction of more than 0.5 dioptres, as the diagnostic criterion for habitually-excessive accommodation strain (HEAS). This difference is possible to calculate from the comparison of cycloplegic refraction and the pre-cycloplegic refraction obtained by means of subjective correction or based on the readings of one and the same autorefractomer or from the data of remotometry.

Keywords

myopia / excessive accommodation strain

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
E. P Tarutta, N. A Tarasova. THE DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA FOR HABITUALLY-EXCESSIVE ACCOMMODATION STRAIN BASED ON SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF ACCOMMODATION. Russian Pediatric Ophthalmology, 2013, 8(1): 34-38 DOI:10.17816/rpoj37565

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Катаргина Л. А., Тарутта Е. П., Проскурина О. В. и др. Аккомодация: к вопросу о терминологии // Рос. офтальмол. журн. - 2011. - Т. 4, № 3. - С. 93-94.

[2]

Колотов М. Г. Объективный аккомодационный ответ при миопии и возможности его оптимизации: Автореф. дис.. канд. мед. наук. - М., 1999.

[3]

Онуфрийчук О. Н., Розенблюм Ю. З. и др. О привычном тонусе аккомодации // Офтальмология. - 2006. - Т. 3, № 3. - С. 84-87.

[4]

Сергиенко Н. М., Эмилит В. А., Мельник А. И. и др. Влияние бисферопризматических очков на орган зрения при близорукости // Вестн. офтальмол. - 1988. - № 1. - С. 45-47.

[5]

Сомов Е. Е. Введение в клиническую офтальмологию. -СПб., 1993.

[6]

Тарутта Е. П., Филинова О. Б. Способ определения привычного тонуса аккомодации. Пат. на изобр. № 2394469 (приоритет от 27.03.2009) РФ.

[7]

Тарутта Е. П., Филинова О. Б. Способ исследования запасов и устойчивости относительной аккомодации. Пат. на изобрет. № 2367385 (приоритет от 29.05.08) рФ.

[8]

Шаповалов С. Л. Методы исследования динамической рефракции глаза // Динамическая рефракция глаза в норме и при патологии: Сборник науч. работ. - М., 1981. - С. 34-51.

[9]

Benjamin W. J. Borish’s Clinical Refraction. W. J. Benjamin Second edition. St. Louis, 2006. - 1694 p.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Eco-Vector

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

138

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/