OPTIMIZATION OF THE ROUTINE WORK OF A DENTIST QUALITY CONTROL PHOTOCOMPOSITE RESTORATIONS OF ANTERIOR TEETH

O. I Lobach; Natalya V. Lapina; L. A Skorikova; T. V Gayvoronskaya; E. V Kochurova; L. V Gavryushova

doi:10.18821/1728-2802-2019-23-1-24-31

Russian Journal of Dentistry ›› 2019, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (1) : 24 -31. DOI: 10.18821/1728-2802-2019-23-1-24-31

Articles

research-article

OPTIMIZATION OF THE ROUTINE WORK OF A DENTIST QUALITY CONTROL PHOTOCOMPOSITE RESTORATIONS OF ANTERIOR TEETH

Author information +

History +

PDF

Abstract

The aim of the study is to optimize the routine work of a dentist to control the quality of photocomposite restorations of the frontal group of teeth. Materials and methods. 30 people with violation of aesthetics of hard tissues of the anterior group of vital teeth (n = 166) were examined and treated. The quality of the produced restorations was assessed according to the generally accepted Ryge criteria by the classical method and using the “Intraoral optical microscope” [1] immediately after the restoration, 6 and 12 months later. Results and discussion. There were no significant differences in the stability of restorations according to the Ryge criteria when using foreign and domestic composites (p > 0.05). After 6 months, color stability, edge fit and roughness decreased in both cases (p > 0.05). When comparing the restorations immediately after the filling, 6 and 12 months after the Ryge criteria by the classical method of quality assessment and using the “Intraoral optical microscope”, statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences were found in terms of “edge adaptation”, “secondary caries”, “surface roughness”, “change in the color of the edges of the cavity”; at the same time, such criteria as “color matching” and “preservation of anatomical shape” when using both methods had minor differences. Summary. Stability in the quality of the restorations according to the criteria Ryge both photocomposite materials (Estelux NK and Filtek Z550), no significant differences were found. Therefore, the domestic material Estelux NK, taking into account its financial availability can be recommended as a composite of choice in aesthetic dental rehabilitation. To control the results of treatment with the use of restoration photocomposites, it is possible to recommend the generally recognized Ryge criteria with the use of an “Intraoral optical microscope” due to greater objectivity and simplicity in application.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾

O. I Lobach, Natalya V. Lapina, L. A Skorikova, T. V Gayvoronskaya, E. V Kochurova, L. V Gavryushova. OPTIMIZATION OF THE ROUTINE WORK OF A DENTIST QUALITY CONTROL PHOTOCOMPOSITE RESTORATIONS OF ANTERIOR TEETH. Russian Journal of Dentistry, 2019, 23(1): 24-31 DOI:10.18821/1728-2802-2019-23-1-24-31

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户忘记密码

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within

[1]	Заявка на изобретение http://new.fips.ru/registers-doc-view/fips_servlet

[2]	Sichieri R. Pereira RARevista de SaúdePública: 50 years disseminating the knowledge in nutrition. Rev. Saude Publica. 2016; 50(72): 1-12.

[3]	Staxrud F., Tveit A. B., Rukke H. V. [et al]. Repair of defective composite restorations. A questionnaire study among dentists in the Public Dental Service in Norway. J. Dent. 2016; 52: 50-4.

[4]	Информационный бюллетень ВОЗ №318 май 2012 http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs318/ru/ ссылка доступна на 13.03.2019

[5]	Parise Gré C., Bona V., Schweigert D. Pedrollo Lise [et al] Esthetic Rehabilitation of Retained Primary Teeth-A Conservative Approach. J. Prosthodont. 2017; 11: 125-27.

[6]	Casagrande L., Laske M., Bronkhorst E. M. Huysmans MCDNJM and all. Repair may increase survival of direct posterior restorations - A practice based study J. Dent. 2017; 64:30-6.

[7]	Черкасов С. М. Анализ распространенности заболеваний зубочелюстной системы, формирующих спрос на стоматологические услуги. Фундаментальные исследования. 2014; 2: 186-9.

[8]	Лапина Н.В. Скорикова Л.А., Сеферян К.Г. и др. Опыт применения препарата грандаксин в процессе ортопедической реабилитации стоматологических больных с нарушением психоэмоциональной сферы. Российский стоматологический журнал. 2015; 19(2): 27-9.

[9]	Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Int. Dent. J. 1980; 30(4): 347-58.

[10]	Быков И.М., Ижнина Е.В., Кочурова Е.В., Лапина Н.В. Радио-индуцированные изменения в слюноотделении пациентов со злокачественными новообразованиями челюстно-лицевой области. Стоматология. 2018. 97(1):67-70.

[11]	Kochurova E.V., Nikolenko V.N. Estimation of expression of oral fluid biomarkers in the diagnosis of pretumor diseases of oral mucosa. Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine. 2017;163(1): 87-91.

[12]	Скориков В.Ю., Лапина Н.В., Скорикова Л.А. Лечение мышечно-суставной дисфункции височно-нижнечелюстного сустава при ревматоидном артрите. Российский стоматологический журнал. 2016;20(4): 205-8.

[13]	Лапина Н.В. Ортопедическое лечение больных с сопутствующими заболеваниями при смещениях нижней челюсти. Казанский медицинский журнал. 2011; 92(6): 855-7.

[14]	Скориков В.Ю., Лапина Н.В., Скорикова Л.А. Клиника и лечение ревматоидного артрита височно-нижнечелюстного сустава. Cathedra. Стоматологическое образование. 2016; 56: 28-32.