ANTIBACTERIAL PROPERTIES OF TEMPORARY FILLING MATERIALS

S. V Tarasenko , L. A Grigor’janc , Ilana Aleksandrovna Gor , I. V Medvedeva , G. R Pogosyan

Russian Journal of Dentistry ›› 2018, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (5) : 229 -232.

PDF
Russian Journal of Dentistry ›› 2018, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (5) : 229 -232. DOI: 10.18821/1728-2802-2018-22-5-229-232
Articles
research-article

ANTIBACTERIAL PROPERTIES OF TEMPORARY FILLING MATERIALS

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Object: assessment of the antibacterial effect of sealing materials based on epoxy resin, zinc-eugenol of cement and hydroxide of calcium. Materials and methods: Antibacterial activity was estimated by agaro-diffusive test (ADT) estimated the of microorganisms. Plates from filling materials were placed on Petri dish, the sowed with St. aureus, and a zone of a growth inhibition of microorganisms was estimated. Materials were used right after mixing, right after hardening, in 30 days after mixing. Results: Materials had the maximum antibacterial effect after hardening, minimum in 30 days after mixing. The greatest efficiency against St. aureus showed material based on zinc-oxide- eugenol cement.

Keywords

temporary filling materials / antibacterial properties

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
S. V Tarasenko, L. A Grigor’janc, Ilana Aleksandrovna Gor, I. V Medvedeva, G. R Pogosyan. ANTIBACTERIAL PROPERTIES OF TEMPORARY FILLING MATERIALS. Russian Journal of Dentistry, 2018, 22(5): 229-232 DOI:10.18821/1728-2802-2018-22-5-229-232

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Мозговая Л.А., Задорина И.И., Быкова Л.П., Годовалов А.П. Микрофлора корневых каналов зубов в динамике лечения хронических форм апикального периодонтита. Саратовский научно-медицинский журнал. 2013; 9(3): 447-9.

[2]

Baumann M., Beer R., Arnold M., Hassell T. Endodontology. Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme; 2010: 189-90.

[3]

Eldeniz A., Erdemir A., Kurtoglu F., Esener T. Evaluation of pH and calcium ion release of Acroseal sealer in comparison with Apexit and Sealapex sealers. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2007; 103(3): e86-e91. https://doi/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.10.018

[4]

Kapralos V., Koutroulis A., Ørstavik D., Sunde P., Rukke H. Antibacterial Activity of Endodontic Sealers against Planktonic Bacteria and Bacteria in Biofilms. J. Endod. 2018; 44(1): 149-54. https://doi/10.1016/j.joen.2017.08.023

[5]

Kayaoglu G., Erten H., Alaçam T., Ørstavik D. Short-term antibacterial activity of root canal sealers towards Enterococcus faecalis. Int. Endod. J. 2005; 38(7): 483-88. https://doi/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00981.x

[6]

Pawińska M., Szczurko G., Kierklo A., Sidun J. A laboratory study evaluating the pH of various modern root canal filling materials. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2017; 26(3): 387-92. https://doi/10.17219/acem/60440

[7]

Nirupama D., Nainan M., Ramaswamy R., et al. In VitroEvaluation of the Antimicrobial Efficacy of Four Endodontic Biomaterials againstEnterococcus faecalis,Candida albicans, and Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Biomater. 2014;2014:1-6. doi:10.1155/2014/383756

[8]

Zhou H, Shen Y, Zheng W, Li L, Zheng Y, Haapasalo M. Physical Properties of 5 Root Canal Sealers. J. Endod. 2013; 39(10): 1281-6. https://doi/10.1016/j.joen.2013.06.012

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Eco-Vector

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

148

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/