Immunobiological in immunobiological indicators in oral cavity at stages of dental rehabilitation of patients with oncology disease

Ekaterina Vladimirovna Kochurova; S. V Kozlov; V. N Nikolenko; O. S Guyter

doi:10.17816/dent.39274

Russian Journal of Dentistry ›› 2014, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (4) : 33 -35. DOI: 10.17816/dent.39274

Articles

research-article

Immunobiological in immunobiological indicators in oral cavity at stages of dental rehabilitation of patients with oncology disease

Author information +

History +

PDF

Abstract

Production of the substitutional or forming acryl obturator is the widespread and available variant of the prosthetic rehabilitation of the oncological patients after the complex and reparative treatment. Those patients who don’t use acryl dentures and don’t have burdened background have microflora which consists mainly of round bacteria and fungi Candida, but level of biomarkers does not exceed the referential rate. Mucosa of oral cavity is the place ofprimary contact not only with aggressive parts of structurial substance of acryl obturator, antigens but with microorganisms waste products which are on it. Sutural connection is a hurt force for underlying saddle areas and additional reason for the process of cancer recurrence in patients with neoplasms of maxillofacial area.

Keywords

acryl denture / sutural connection / microflora / maxillofacial area / biomarker / oral liquid

Cite this article

Download citation ▾

Ekaterina Vladimirovna Kochurova, S. V Kozlov, V. N Nikolenko, O. S Guyter. Immunobiological in immunobiological indicators in oral cavity at stages of dental rehabilitation of patients with oncology disease. Russian Journal of Dentistry, 2014, 18(4): 33-35 DOI:10.17816/dent.39274

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户忘记密码

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within

[1]	Чиссов В.И., Старинский В.В., Петрова Г.В. Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2010 г. (заболеваемость и смертность). М.; 2012.

[2]	Галонский В.Г. Зубочелюстно-лицевая ортопедия с использованием материалов с памятью формы: Дисс. д-ра мед. наук. Красноярск-Томск; 2009.

[3]	Петров Б.А. Возрастные и индивидуальные особенности костно-мышечных структур глубокой области лица и их использование в стоматологии: Дисс.. канд. мед. наук. М.; 2009.

[4]	Pravesh K., Veena J., Alok T. Speech rehabilitation of maxillectomy patients with hollow bulb obturator. Indian J. Palliat. Care. 2012; 18(3): 2007-12.

[5]	Abhilash A., Girindhar K., Pranav M., Deviprasad N. Prosthetic rehabilitation of oro-nasal defect. J. Indian Prosthodont. Soc. 2011; 11(4): 242-5.

[6]	Пачес А.И. Злокачественные опухоли носа и придаточных пазух. В кн.: Опухоли головы и шеи. М.; 1983: 283-300.

[7]	Варес Э.Я., Кнотько Г.П. Замещающие протезы верхней челюсти. Киев; Здоров’я; 1981.

[8]	Маркин П.Ю. Клинико-лабораторное обоснование применения нового материала «СтомАкрил ремонт» в ортопедической стоматологии: Дисс. канд. мед. наук. М.; 2006.

[9]	Гожая Л.Д. Аллергические заболевания в ортопедической стоматологии. М.; 1988.

[10]	Ушаков Р.В., Царев В.Н. Микрофлора полости рта и ее значение в развитии стоматологических заболеваний. Стоматология для всех. 1998; 3: 22-6.

[11]	Koblinski J.E., Ahram M., Sloane B.F. Unraveling the role of proteases in cancer. Clin. Chim. Acta. 2000; 291(2): 113-35.

[12]	Fingleton B. Matrix metalloproteinases: roles in cancer and metastasis. Front. Biosci. 2006; 11: 479-91.

[13]	Kurahara S., Shinohara M. et al. Expression of MMPS, MT-MMP, and TIMPs in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: correlations with tumor invasion and metastasis. Head and Neck. 1999; 21(7): 627-38.