MANIPULATIVE, AESTHETICS CHARACTERISTICS, BIOLOGICAL COMPATIBLE OF MODERN ADHESIV AND FILLING MATERIALS

E. M Gilmiyarov , V. M Radomskaya , F. N Gilmiyarova , A. V Babichev , K. I Kolesova , A. N Azizov

Russian Journal of Dentistry ›› 2014, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (3) : 30 -33.

PDF
Russian Journal of Dentistry ›› 2014, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (3) : 30 -33. DOI: 10.17816/dent.39234
Articles
research-article

MANIPULATIVE, AESTHETICS CHARACTERISTICS, BIOLOGICAL COMPATIBLE OF MODERN ADHESIV AND FILLING MATERIALS

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Ninety-seven patients aged from 18 to 47 with caries localization of class I-III, according to Black, were under supervision. In total there were 160 restorations. When carrying out our researches we used Single Bond Universal as adhesive system (Filtek Ultimate was used as filling material), and Filtek Bulk Fill was also used as a nanocomposite in order to prevent polymerization shrinkage. By all criteria of Ryge (marginal adaptation, anatomic shape, secondary decay, base colour match, cavity edge discoloration, surface roughness). 97% of restorations after completion and 3 months later were assessed as " perfect". It was stated that Single Bond Universal causes acidulation of pH oral liquid and redox potential increase, while Filtek Ultimate and Filtek Bilk Fill cause decrease of redox potential. The tendency to oral liquid structure change was revealed. Single Bond Universal causing strength disturbance of tranferase, oxidoreductase and hydrolase enzymes appeared to be the most aggressive. The materials used are not bionert composites, while demonstrating good strength and aesthetic characterises.

Keywords

adhesive systems and dental restoration material of new generation / biocompatibility / oral liquid

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
E. M Gilmiyarov, V. M Radomskaya, F. N Gilmiyarova, A. V Babichev, K. I Kolesova, A. N Azizov. MANIPULATIVE, AESTHETICS CHARACTERISTICS, BIOLOGICAL COMPATIBLE OF MODERN ADHESIV AND FILLING MATERIALS. Russian Journal of Dentistry, 2014, 18(3): 30-33 DOI:10.17816/dent.39234

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Елгина А. Н., Морозова С. И., Улитенко А. И., Глухова Е. А. Изучение адгезивных свойств композитных пломбировочных материалов в зависимости от коэффициента теплового расширения. Российский стоматологический журнал. 2012; 1: 4.

[2]

Каливраджиян Э. С., Чиркова Н. В., Рыжова И. П., Примачева Н. В. Изучение токсико-гигиенических свойств стоматологических материалов, модифицированных наночастицами кремния и серебра. Российский стоматологический журнал. 2012;1: 9.

[3]

Воложин А.И., Григорьян А.С. Теоретическая проблематика на страницах журнала «Стоматология». Стоматология. 2002; 1: 7-11.

[4]

Файзуллаева Н.Н., Винниченко Ю.А. Исследование биосовместимости адгезивных систем для использования их при непрямом и прямом способах покрытия пульпы. Стоматология. 2008;4:11-4.

[5]

Дубова Л.В., Воложин А.И., Бабахин А.А. Биосовместимость стоматологических материалов - оценка безопасности по способности к гистаминолиберации. Стоматология. 2006; 4: 4-8.

[6]

Chen C., Rich S.K. Biofilm basics. Dimens Dental Hyg. 2003;1: 22-5.

[7]

Леонтьев В.К., Галиулина М.В., Ганзина И.В. и др. Структурные свойства слюны при моделировании кариесогенной ситуации. Стоматология. 1996; 2: 9-11.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Eco-Vector

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

129

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/