Effect of the oil-ether complex of Siberian fir on the fungal and periodontopathogenic flora of the mouth (microbiological study)

Alexey S. Romanov , Egor E. Olesov , Viktor N. Tsarev , Valentina N. Olesova , Elena V. Glazkova

Russian Journal of Dentistry ›› 2022, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (2) : 89 -94.

PDF
Russian Journal of Dentistry ›› 2022, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (2) : 89 -94. DOI: 10.17816/1728-2802-2022-26-2-89-94
Experimental and Theoretical Investigation
research-article

Effect of the oil-ether complex of Siberian fir on the fungal and periodontopathogenic flora of the mouth (microbiological study)

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peri-implantitis is mainly caused by the activity of periodontal pathogens with insufficient oral hygiene, which causes the disintegration of intraosseous dental implants against the background of chronic inflammation in peri-implant tissues. The correct techniques in the post-prosthetic stage in patients with dental implants include medical examination with regular professional oral hygiene, which is complicated by low patient compliance. In this regard, there are high requirements for the level of individual oral hygiene and for the effectiveness of local hygiene products, among which dental rinses occupy an important place. As rinses, it is possible to use pine-containing substances, particularly a complex of oil-essential fir “Solagift” of a Siberian company (Tomsk).

AIM: To conduct a microbiological study of the sensitivity of periodontopathogens and Candida albicans to the oil-essential complex of Siberian fir of different concentrations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: A number of periodontopathogens and C. albicans were cultured in the presence of a complex of oil–essential Siberian fir in the following proportions: 1:5, 1:10, and 1:15. Incubation for up to 3 days was conducted in the Reverse Spinner RTS-1 bioreactor (BioSan, Latvia) with automatic analysis of the optical density of the culture (OD) at a wavelength of λ=850 nm. The optical density was measured in McFarland units (Mcf). The assessment of culture growth control was based on the analysis of the growth phases of periodontopathogens: adaptive (lag phase), exponential (log phase), stationary, and dying. The following clinical isolates of microorganisms were used: Streptococcus constellatus, Staphylococcus aureus, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, and C. albicans.

RESULTS: Joint cultivation of periodontopathogens with the oil–ether complex of Siberian fir reduces the OD of cultures of clinical isolates when breeding coniferous substance 1:15—1:5 by 13.7–27.1% (A. actinomycetemcomitans), 18.3–62.0% (F. nucleatum), 30.0–56.4% (S. aureus), and 19.2–74.1% (S. constellatus). The studied coniferous complex suppresses the culture of C. albicans at a concentration of 1:5, reducing the OD of the culture of fungi in the microbiological experiment by 29.8%.

CONCLUSION. Joint cultivation of periodontopathogens with the oil–ether complex of Siberian fir reduces the OD of cultures of clinical isolates when breeding coniferous substance 1:15–1:5. The studied coniferous complex suppresses the culture of C. albicans at a concentration of 1:5, reducing the OD of the culture of fungi in the microbiological experiment by 29.8%. The bacteriostatic effectiveness of the Siberian fir oil-ether complex significantly exceeds the effect of the herbal preparation “Stomatophyte”.

Keywords

periodontopathogens / fungal flora / fir oil-ether complex / cultivation / optical density / sensitivity / bacteriostatic effect

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Alexey S. Romanov, Egor E. Olesov, Viktor N. Tsarev, Valentina N. Olesova, Elena V. Glazkova. Effect of the oil-ether complex of Siberian fir on the fungal and periodontopathogenic flora of the mouth (microbiological study). Russian Journal of Dentistry, 2022, 26(2): 89-94 DOI:10.17816/1728-2802-2022-26-2-89-94

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Olesova VN, Bronstein DA, Stepanov AF, et al. The incidence of inflammatory complications in periimplant tissues according to long-term clinical analysis. Dentist. Minsk. 2017;(1):35–37. (In Russ.).

[2]

Олесова В.Н., Бронштейн Д.А., Степанов А.Ф., и др. Частота развития воспалительных осложнений в периимплантатных тканях по данным отдаленного клинического анализа // Стоматолог. Минск. 2017. № 1 (24). С. 35–37.

[3]

Nikitin VV, Olesova VN, Pashkova GS, et al. Prevention of peri-implantitis using a bacteriophage-based agent. Russian Bulletin of Dental Implantology. 2017;(2):55–59. (In Russ.).

[4]

Никитин В.В., Олесова В.Н., Пашкова Г.С., и др. Профилактика периимплантита с использованием средства на основе бактериофагов // Российский вестник дентальной имплантологии. 2017. № 2 (36). С. 55–59.

[5]

Tsarev VN, Nikolaeva EN, Ippolitov EV. Periodontopathogenic bacteria are the main factor in the occurrence and development of periodontitis. Journal of Microbiology, Epidemiology and Immunobiology. 2017;(5):101–112. (In Russ.). doi: 10.36233/0372-9311-2017-5-101-112

[6]

Царев В.Н., Николаева Е.Н., Ипполитов Е.В. Пародонтопатогенные бактерии — основной фактор возникновения и развития пародонтита // Журнал микробиологии, эпидемиологии и иммунобиологии. 2017. № 5. С. 101–112. doi: 10.36233/0372-9311-2017-5-101-112

[7]

Kulakov AA. Dental implantation: national guidelines. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2018. 400 p. (In Russ.).

[8]

Кулаков А.А. Дентальная имплантация: национальное руководство. Москва: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2018. 400 с.

[9]

Yanushevich OO, Dmitrieva LA., eds. Periodontology: a national guide. 2nd ed. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2018. 752 p. (In Russ.).

[10]

Янушевич О.О., Дмитриева Л.А., ред. Пародонтология: национальное руководство. 2-е изд. Москва: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2018. 752 с.

[11]

Ushakov RV, Tsarev VN. Antimicrobial therapy in dentistry. Principles and Algorithms. Moscow: RMANPO; 2019. 240 p. (In Russ.).

[12]

Ушаков Р.В., Царев В.Н. Антимикробная терапия в стоматологии. Принципы и алгоритмы. Москва: РМАНПО, 2019. 240 с.

[13]

Glazkova EV, Lashko IS, Popov AA, Sakaeva ZU. Possibilities of coniferous substances in the treatment of chronic generalized periodontitis (comparative clinical study). In: Dental care for employees of organizations of certain industries with particularly dangerous working conditions: Materials of the scientific and practical conference. Moscow; 2018. P:89–91. (In Russ.).

[14]

Глазкова Е.В., Лашко И.С., Попов А.А., Сакаева З.У. Возможности хвойных субстанций в лечении хронического генерализованного пародонтита (сравнительное клиническое исследование) // Стоматологическая помощь работникам организаций отдельных отраслей промышленности с особо опасными условиями труда: материалы научно-практической конференции. Москва, 2018. С. 89–91.

[15]

Kalinina AN, Lashko IS, Tsarev VN, et al. New possibilities of local drug treatment of periodontal diseases (microbiological substantiation). Russian Journal of Dentistry. 2018;22(4):180–183. (In Russ.).

[16]

Калинина А.Н., Лашко И.С., Царев В.Н., и др. Новые возможности местного медикаментозного лечения заболеваний пародонта (микробиологическое обоснование) // Российский стоматологический журнал. 2018. Т. 22, № 4. С. 180–183.

[17]

Solagift.ru [Internet]. Solagift [cited: 2022 Jan 6]. Available from: www.solagift.ru. (In Russ.).

[18]

Solagift.ru [интернет]. Солагифт [дата обращения: 06.01.2022]. Доступ по ссылке: www.solagift.ru (дата обращения: 06.01.2022).

[19]

Tsarev VN, Panin AM, Chuvilkin VI, et al. Comprehensive assessment of the content of periodontopathogenic bacteria and cytokines in peri-implantitis using PCR and enzyme immunoassay. Russian Bulletin of Dental Implantology. 2017;(3–4):86–90. (In Russ.).

[20]

Царев В.Н., Панин А.М., Чувилкин В.И., и др. Комплексная оценка содержания пародонтопатогенных бактерий и цитокинов при периимплантите с помощью ПЦР и иммуноферментного анализа // Российский вестник дентальной имплантологии. 2017. № 3–4 (37–38). С. 86–90.

[21]

Gvetadze RSh, Dmitrieva NA, Voronin AN. Comparative analysis of the degree of colonization of microorganisms on the surface of individual gum shapers. Institute of Dentistry. 2019;(3):30–31. (In Russ.).

[22]

Гветадзе Р.Ш., Дмитриева Н.А., Воронин А.Н. Сравнительный анализ степени колонизации микроорганизмов на поверхности индивидуальных формирователей десны // Институт стоматологии. 2019. № 3 (84). С. 30–31.

[23]

Tsarev VN, Atrushkevich VG, Ippolitov EV, Podporin MS. Comparative analysis of antimicrobial activity of periodontal antiseptics using an automated system for monitoring the growth of microorganisms in real time. Periodontology. 2017;22(1):4–10. (In Russ.).

[24]

Царев В.Н., Атрушкевич В.Г., Ипполитов Е.В., Подпорин М.С. Сравнительный анализ антимикробной активности пародонтальных антисептиков с использованием автоматизированной системы контроля роста микроорганизмов в режиме реального времени // Пародонтология. 2017. Т. 22, № 1. С. 4–10.

[25]

Olesov EE, Morozov DI, Volkov AG, et al. Determination of the minimum suppressive concentration to metronidazole of representatives of obligate and facultative anaerobic microflora of periodontal pockets. Russian Journal of Dentistry. 2021;25(1):54–58. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17816/1728-2802-2021-25-1-54-58

[26]

Олесов Е.Е., Морозов Д.И., Волков А.Г., и др. Определение минимальной подавляющей концентрации к метронидазолу представителей облигатно и факультативно-анаэробной микрофлоры пародонтальных карманов // Российский стоматологический журнал. 2021. Т. 25, № 1. С. 54–58. doi: 10.17816/1728-2802-2021-25-1-54-58

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Romanov A.S., Olesov E.E., Tsarev V.N., Olesova V.N., Glazkova E.V.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

45

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/