Pooling Endocervical Samples for Chlamydia Trachomatis Diagnosis by Polymerase Chain Reaction: Cost Saving Strategy for Epidemiological and Screening Studies

Abstract

The technique of pooling endocervical samples for PCR detection of C. trachomatis was developed and compared with individual testing. The efficiency of pooling strategy was evaluated for its accuracy and cost saving ability. Population prevalence based on pooled data was estimated. 1. 500 endocervical samples were tested individually and pooled by 5 (300 pools) and 10 (150 pools) specimens. The sensitivity and specificity of PCR was not affected by pooling either by 5 or by 10 samples. The estimated prevalence was 6. 1% (95% CI: 4,5-7,7) and 6,0% (95% CI: 4,3-7,) for pooling by 5 and 10, respectively. The prevalence of 6. 6% determined by individual testing (99 of 1. 500) was within 95% CI of the estimated prevalence for pooling by 5 and 10. The used pooling strategy has resulted in 53. 3 and 44. 0% cost savings, when endocervical samples were pooled by 5 and 10, respectively. Thus, pooling endocervical samples for detection of C. trachomatis is an accurate and cost saving approach for realization of large-scale studies.

Keywords

pooling of scrapings of the epithelium of the cervical canal / Chlamydia Trachomatis / PCR method / diagnostic approach to the implementation of screening and epidemiological programs / method of pooling scrapings of the epithelium of the cervical canal / cervical canal / genital infections / chlamydial infections

References

[1] Aavitsland Р. Use of laboratory testing for genital chlamidial infection in Norway//Quality helth care — Vol. 2.— P. 91-95.

[2] Addis D.G., Vaughan ML, Ludka D., Pfister J., Davis J.P. Decreased prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection associated with a selective screening program in family planning clinics in Wisconsin//Sex. Transm. Dis.- 1993.— Vol. 20.— P. 28-35.

[3] Bass C.A, Jungkind D.L, Silverman NS, Bondi J.M. Clinical evaluation of a new polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens //J. Clin. Microbiol.— 1993.— Vol. 31.- P. 2648-2653.

[4] Bawens J.E., Clark A.M., Stamm W.E. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis endocervical infection by a commercial polymerase chain reaction assay //J. Clin. Microbiol.— Vol. 31.- P. 3023-3027.

[5] Crowley T., Horner P.J., Nelki J., Caul F.O. Screening associated with reduced infection rates //BMJ —1994- Vol. 308.— P. 716-717.

[6] Domeika M., Bassiri M, Butrimiene I., Venalis A., Ranceva J., Vasjanova V. Evaluation of vaginal introital sampling as an alternative approach for the detection of genital C. trachomatis infection in women // Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.— 1999.-Vol. 78.-P. 131-136.

[7] Herrmann B., Egger M. Genital chlamydial infection in Uppsala County, Sweden,1985-1993: declining rates for How Much Longer//Sex. Transm. Dis.— 1995.— Vol. 22.— P. 253-260.

[8] Kacena K.A., Quinn S.B., Howell MR, Madico G.E., Quinn T.C., Gay dos C.A. Pooling urine samples for ligase chain reaction screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in asymptomatic women//J. Clin. Microbiol.- 1998.— Vol. 36.— P481- 485.

[9] Kellogg J.A., Seiple J.W., Keinedinst J.L., Stroll E.S., Cavanaugh S.H. Improved PCR detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by using an altered method of specimen transport and high-quality endocervical specimens//J. Clin. Microbiol.- 1995.— Vol. 33.- P. 2765-2767.

[10] Kline R.L., Brothers T.A., Brookmeyer R., Zeger S., Quinn T.C. Evaluation of human immunodeficiency virus seroprevalence surveys using pooled sera//J. Clin. Microbiol.— 1989.— Vol. 27.— P. 1449-1452.

[11] Krepel J., Patel J., Sproston A., Hopkins F., Jang D, Mahony J, etal. The impact on accuracy and cost of ligase chain reaction testing by pooling urine specimens for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections//Sex. Transm. Dis.— 1999.— Vol. 26.— P. 504-507.

[12] Loeffelholz M.J, Lewinski C.A., Silver S.R, Purohit A.P, Herman S.A, Buonagurio D.A, etal. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens by polymerase chain reaction //J. Clin. Microbiol.- 1992.— Vol. 30.-P. 2847-2851.

[13] Mahony J.B., Luinstra K.E., Sellers J.W., Pickard L., Chong S., Jang D., et al. Role of confirmatory PCRs in determining performance of Chlamydia Amplicor PCR with endocervical specimens from women with a low prevalence of infection// J. Clin. Microbiol.- 1994.— Vol. 32- P. 2490-2493.

[14] Peeling R, Toye B, Jessamine P, Gemmill I. Pooling of urine specimens for PCR testing: a cost saving strategy for Chlamydia trachomatis control programmes// Sex. Transm. Inf.— 1998.— Vol. 74.— P. 66-70.

[15] Scholes D., Stergachis A., Heidrich F.E., Andrilla H., Holmes K.K., Stamm W.E. Prevention of pelvic inflammatory disease by screening for cervical chlamidial infection// New England J. Med.— 1996.— Vol. 334.— P. 1362-1366.

[16] Stamm WE. Expanding efforts to prevent clamydial infection//New England J. Med.- 1998.- Vol. 339.- P. 768-769.

[17] Verkooyen R.P., Luijendijk A, Huisman W.M., al. e. Detection of PCR inhibitors in cervical specimens by using the Amplicor Chlamidia trachomatis assay//J. Clin. Microbiol.- 1996.— Vol. 34.- 3072- 3074.

[18] Walckiers D, Piot P, StroobantA, van der Veken J, Declercq E. Declining trends in some sexually transmitted diseases in Belgium between 1983-1989//Genitourin. Med.- 1991.— Vol. 67.- P. 374-377.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Eсо-Vector